Nursing module 3 assignment

/in /by

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpAnalysisResearchplease follow all directions2 years ago29.09.202310Report issuefiles (1)ModuleThreeShortPaperGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdfModuleThreeShortPaperGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdfIHP 604 Module Three Short Paper Guidelines and RubricOverviewDashboards are data visualizations that healthcare organizations use to measure and analyze data. The Joint Commission (E-dition) sets standards for healthcare quality and safety. One set ofstandards The Joint Commission created is the National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG), which are designed for different facilities and are critical to maintain accreditation. In this assignment,you will explore the NPSG standards related to patient identi�cation, which states facilities will use at least two patient identi�ers before procedures.This assignment will help prepare you for your course project through the analysis of data, dashboards, and industry standards.Please note: The Joint Commission standards you have access to are the standards for acute care facilities and not long-term care. In this assignment, the standards for patient identi�cationare the same for acute care and long-term care facilities.PromptExamine the dashboard for ABC Residential Center, which is a long-term care center. Analyze the facility metrics against the national benchmarks and address the following areas. Provide atleast two scholarly sources to support your claims.https://e-dition.jcrinc.com/ProxyLogin.aspx?lnk=02a12d392046https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=9568&url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.snhu.edu%2Fcontent%2Fenforced%2F1394627-IHP-604-Q1480-OL-TRAD-GR.23TW1%2FModule%2520Three%2520Short%2520Paper%2520Guidelines%2520and%2520Rubric.html&lang=en_us&readid=d2l_read_element_1A text-only version is available: Module Three Short Paper Graphic Text-Only Version Word DocumentSpeci�cally, you must address the following rubric criteria:1. Insights from dashboards: Describe how the data in the dashboard could be used by ABC Residential Center to �nd insights related to their operations or quality of care.2. Dashboard techniques: Discuss what visualization techniques (such as using charts and graphs; color coding the data red, yellow, and green; and combining multiple sets of data into onegraph) were used by the dashboard to provide a quick, visual way to understand the data presented, and if there are additional techniques you would recommend for the dashboard touse to make the data easier and quicker to understand.3. Determining benchmarks: Determine a benchmark for patient identi�cation for ABC (you should review the NPSG standards).4. Defend selection: Provide a rationale for your selection of a benchmark.If you chose a benchmark less than 100%, how would you defend that benchmark to the public?5. Meeting the benchmark: Analyze the data in the dashboard to determine if ABC is meeting the benchmark.6. Implications: Discuss the implications of not meeting the benchmark.https://learn.snhu.edu/content/enforced/1394627-IHP-604-Q1480-OL-TRAD-GR.23TW1/Course%20Documents/IHP%20604%20Module%20Three%20Short%20Paper%20Graphic%20Text-Only%20Version.docx?_&d2lSessionVal=xmMsRhrXU2ZFWpOIo4ygj9H21&ou=13946277. Justify creating a quality improvement initiative: Justify the creation of a quality improvement initiative using the dashboard and NPSG standards if ABC is not meeting the benchmark(you don’t need to create the quality improvement initiative, rather you need to justify the need for one to meet the benchmark if it is not being met).What to SubmitSubmit this assignment as a 2-to 3-page Microsoft Word document. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins.If you need writing support, you can access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.Citations2021 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals (Camh Hard Copy). (2020). [E-book]. JCR Publishing. https://e-dition.jcrinc.com/MainContent.aspxModule Three Short Paper RubricCriteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueInsights from Dashboard Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDescribes how data in thedashboard could be used byABC Residential Center to �ndinsights related to theiroperations or quality of careShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 15Dashboard Techniques Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDiscusses visualizationtechniques used by thedashboard to provide a quick,visual way to understand thedata presented and anyadditional techniquesrecommended for thedashboard to use to make thedata easier and quicker tounderstandShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Determining Benchmarks Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines benchmark forpatient identi�cation for ABCShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1394627&type=content&rcode=snhu-1412232Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueDefend Selection Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageProvides rationale for selectionof benchmarkShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Meeting Benchmark Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageAnalyzes data in the dashboardto determine if ABC is meetingbenchmarkShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Implications Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDiscusses implications of notmeeting benchmarkShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 15Justify Creating QualityImprovement InitiativeExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageJusti�es creation of qualityimprovement initiative usingdashboard and NPSG standardsif ABC is not meetingbenchmarkShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 15Articulation of Responses Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful mannerClearly conveys meaning withcorrect grammar, sentencestructure, and spelling,demonstrating anunderstanding of audience andpurposeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, negativelyimpacting readabilitySubmission has critical errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, preventingunderstanding of ideas5Scholarly Sources Incorporates more than twoscholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or useof sources is exceptionallyinsightfulIncorporates two scholarly,current (within the last �veyears) sources that supportclaimsIncorporates fewer than twoscholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or notall sources support claimsDoes not incorporate sources 5APA Style Formats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with no errorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with fewer than �veerrorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with �ve or more errorsDoes not format in-textcitations and reference listaccording to APA style5Total: 100%ModuleThreeShortPaperGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdfIHP 604 Module Three Short Paper Guidelines and RubricOverviewDashboards are data visualizations that healthcare organizations use to measure and analyze data. The Joint Commission (E-dition) sets standards for healthcare quality and safety. One set ofstandards The Joint Commission created is the National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG), which are designed for different facilities and are critical to maintain accreditation. In this assignment,you will explore the NPSG standards related to patient identi�cation, which states facilities will use at least two patient identi�ers before procedures.This assignment will help prepare you for your course project through the analysis of data, dashboards, and industry standards.Please note: The Joint Commission standards you have access to are the standards for acute care facilities and not long-term care. In this assignment, the standards for patient identi�cationare the same for acute care and long-term care facilities.PromptExamine the dashboard for ABC Residential Center, which is a long-term care center. Analyze the facility metrics against the national benchmarks and address the following areas. Provide atleast two scholarly sources to support your claims.https://e-dition.jcrinc.com/ProxyLogin.aspx?lnk=02a12d392046https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=9568&url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.snhu.edu%2Fcontent%2Fenforced%2F1394627-IHP-604-Q1480-OL-TRAD-GR.23TW1%2FModule%2520Three%2520Short%2520Paper%2520Guidelines%2520and%2520Rubric.html&lang=en_us&readid=d2l_read_element_1A text-only version is available: Module Three Short Paper Graphic Text-Only Version Word DocumentSpeci�cally, you must address the following rubric criteria:1. Insights from dashboards: Describe how the data in the dashboard could be used by ABC Residential Center to �nd insights related to their operations or quality of care.2. Dashboard techniques: Discuss what visualization techniques (such as using charts and graphs; color coding the data red, yellow, and green; and combining multiple sets of data into onegraph) were used by the dashboard to provide a quick, visual way to understand the data presented, and if there are additional techniques you would recommend for the dashboard touse to make the data easier and quicker to understand.3. Determining benchmarks: Determine a benchmark for patient identi�cation for ABC (you should review the NPSG standards).4. Defend selection: Provide a rationale for your selection of a benchmark.If you chose a benchmark less than 100%, how would you defend that benchmark to the public?5. Meeting the benchmark: Analyze the data in the dashboard to determine if ABC is meeting the benchmark.6. Implications: Discuss the implications of not meeting the benchmark.https://learn.snhu.edu/content/enforced/1394627-IHP-604-Q1480-OL-TRAD-GR.23TW1/Course%20Documents/IHP%20604%20Module%20Three%20Short%20Paper%20Graphic%20Text-Only%20Version.docx?_&d2lSessionVal=xmMsRhrXU2ZFWpOIo4ygj9H21&ou=13946277. Justify creating a quality improvement initiative: Justify the creation of a quality improvement initiative using the dashboard and NPSG standards if ABC is not meeting the benchmark(you don’t need to create the quality improvement initiative, rather you need to justify the need for one to meet the benchmark if it is not being met).What to SubmitSubmit this assignment as a 2-to 3-page Microsoft Word document. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins.If you need writing support, you can access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.Citations2021 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals (Camh Hard Copy). (2020). [E-book]. JCR Publishing. https://e-dition.jcrinc.com/MainContent.aspxModule Three Short Paper RubricCriteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueInsights from Dashboard Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDescribes how data in thedashboard could be used byABC Residential Center to �ndinsights related to theiroperations or quality of careShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 15Dashboard Techniques Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDiscusses visualizationtechniques used by thedashboard to provide a quick,visual way to understand thedata presented and anyadditional techniquesrecommended for thedashboard to use to make thedata easier and quicker tounderstandShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Determining Benchmarks Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines benchmark forpatient identi�cation for ABCShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1394627&type=content&rcode=snhu-1412232Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueDefend Selection Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageProvides rationale for selectionof benchmarkShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Meeting Benchmark Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageAnalyzes data in the dashboardto determine if ABC is meetingbenchmarkShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Implications Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDiscusses implications of notmeeting benchmarkShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 15Justify Creating QualityImprovement InitiativeExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageJusti�es creation of qualityimprovement initiative usingdashboard and NPSG standardsif ABC is not meetingbenchmarkShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 15Articulation of Responses Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful mannerClearly conveys meaning withcorrect grammar, sentencestructure, and spelling,demonstrating anunderstanding of audience andpurposeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, negativelyimpacting readabilitySubmission has critical errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, preventingunderstanding of ideas5Scholarly Sources Incorporates more than twoscholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or useof sources is exceptionallyinsightfulIncorporates two scholarly,current (within the last �veyears) sources that supportclaimsIncorporates fewer than twoscholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or notall sources support claimsDoes not incorporate sources 5APA Style Formats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with no errorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with fewer than �veerrorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with �ve or more errorsDoes not format in-textcitations and reference listaccording to APA style5Total: 100%Bids(68)PROF_ALISTERDr. Sarah BlakeSheryl HoganDr. Freya Walkerfirstclass tutorProf Double RFiona Davasherry proffMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverIsabella HarvardDiscount AssignJudithTutorProf. Kimpacesetters2121Jahky BTop MalaikaProWritingGuruColeen AndersonDr. Everleigh_JKShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Algebra HomeworkComplete Customer Service Representative for Licensing (4-40)Human Resource Management discussionCan any one do a Mini-Case 3 pages long apa on quantitative easing in the great recessionprof timetestChoose two people who have influenced my ethics and integrity and write each of them a letter in which you explain how they have influenced you. Each of your letters should be 1-2 pagesBRM/256asap…Discussion question

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now