Implementation, critical reflection and evaluation of an educational event
Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpnursingeducationImplementation, critical reflection and evaluation of an educational event2 years ago09.10.202320Report issuefiles (2)EVENT.docxHOMEWORK.pdfEVENT.docxAssessment titleEducational event plan templet“Enterprise Risk Management session”Student nameStudent numberUnit code11.Analysis1.1.Target audienceThe educational session will be given to the Risk managers at the hospital level.1.2.Learning needsTwenty participants in this educational session will be involved from 10 hospitals. The primary purpose of this educational session is to show that Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is a new concept that needs to be applied perfectly among Risk managers in hospitals.2.Design and Develop2.1.Learning outcomes2.1.1.Being aligned with the strategic goals of the healthcare facility by reducing the clinical and non-clinical potential risks.2.1.2.Identify the clinical and non-clinical potential risks in the early phase by applying the risk management process.2.1.3.Utilize the mitigation strategy or activate the response and treatment plan to control risks.2.1.4.Monitor and review the effectiveness of the treatment plan.2.2.The sequence of instructor and studentThe risk managers will attend the educational session daily over two weeks for four hours from 9:00 a.m. till 1:00 p.m. except on weekends. The educational session will be held in the lecture room in one of the hospitals. The learning type that would be applied is active learning.2.3.Learning resourcesOverhead projector to present the related videos and PowerPoint presentations in order to make the educational session more accessible.2.4.Formative and summative assessmentsThree assessments will be applied to the educational session. First, before beginning the educational session, assess the learners’ understanding by asking them to recall questions such as “What is the definition of the risk”? Second, give them a case scenario to assess their ability and understanding and ensure that the primary educational session objectives are achieved. Ultimately, the final exam would be run to assess the comprehensive knowledge taken from the educational session.1Student nameStudent numberUnit codeHOMEWORK.pdfSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
1NSN720ASSESSMENT TASK 2Assessment name: Implementation, critical reflection and evaluation of an educational
eventTask description:
Your assessment requires you to complete three aspects of curricula
development. You will:1. Describe the changes that you made to your educational
event (developed in Assessment 1). based on academic
feedback provided in Assessment 1. Implement your
educational event (250 words).2. Critically reflect on implementation of your educational event
and use educational evidence to support your points (1000
words).3. Drawing on your analysis of implementation of educational
event, your reflections and evaluations (from peer/participant
feedback); discuss recommendations for improvement of
your educational event, draw on evidence (1500 words).School of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
2What you need to do:
Refer and familiarise yourself with the NSN720 unit framework – the
ADDIE MODEL (a five-phase approach to building effective learning
solutions). You will need to draw on the last two phases (implement and
evaluate) of the ADDIE model to complete this assessment task.PART 1:Incorporate feedback from assessment 1 to improve analysis, design
and developments phases (ADDIE model). Briefly describe how you did
this in 250 words. Implement your education event – ensure you
provide evidence of event implementation.PART 2:Critically reflect on implementation of the event referring to your
education event plan and use educational evidence to support your
points. This may be written in first person. 1000 words.PART 3:Draw on your experience of the implementation and evaluation of
event feedback to generate recommendations for improvement of the
educational event. Incorporate evidence to support your points. 1500
words.APPENDIX (no limit, no specific mark allocated): Evidence of
implementation of educational event. You will need to provide
evidence to demonstrate that you have completed the implementation
of this event. This might be a copy of education resources used or an
email from appropriate staff or line manager stating you have
completed the event.You will have the opportunity if required, to present at the Week 11
final workshop presentations (on campus), feedback will be provided by
academic staff and other students who are present. Include this
evidence as an Appendix.Length: Academic essay 2750 words +/-10% (word length includes in-text
referencing and excludes your reference list and appendices)Estimated time to
complete task:30 hoursWeighting: 60%How will I be assessed: +/- 7 point grading scale using a rubric>Due date: 27th October, 2023 23:59hrsSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
3Presentation
requirements:This assessment task requires you to develop an academic essay addressing
the task. Use formal essay style of introduction, body and conclusion.Your assignment should be written in CiteWrite APA style and prepared as
follows:• It is a requirement that page numbers for all in-text references are
provided• Include a ‘footer’ on each page with your name, student number, unit
code and page number• 2cm margins on all sides, 1.5 spaced text• Use font, such as Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman; font size 12• CiteWrite APA style referencing• Headings can be used to structure your assignment logically (if
applicable).Be submitted in electronic format through your Canvas site.What you need to
submit:PART 1, PART 2, PART 3 and the APPENDIX are to be collated as onedocument and submitted together.Tip – CRITICAL REFLECTIONYou may like to use a reflective framework to structure Part 2. The GibbsReflective Cycle is a simple and adaptable option.http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/https://www.ed.ac.uk/reflection/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/gibbs-reflective-cyclehttps://www.ed.ac.uk/reflection/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/gibbs-reflective-cycleSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
4NSN720 ASSESSMENT TASK Assessment 2 RUBRICLearning Outcomes Assessed: 1, 3, & 4 Weighting: 60%Criteria +/- 7 +/- 6 +/- 5 +/- 4 +/- 3 +/- 2 – 1Advanced
KnowledgeDemonstrates
theoretical
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate
evaluation
feedback to
improve
implementation of
an educational
plan +Discusses
evaluation
feedback and
provides
recommendations
for improvement
of event,
supported by
relevant
educational
literatureWeighting 25%Demonstrates
advanced
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate a
range of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback
comprehensively
to develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by an extensive
range of credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates well
developed
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate a
range of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback strongly
to develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by a wide range of
credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
focused
developed
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate many
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback well to
develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate most
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventSome areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryMajority of points
supported by
credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
some educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate some
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventMany areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
which are lacking,
to improve future
event deliveryMajority of points
not supported by
credible
educational
literatureMinimal
demonstration of
educational
knowledge and
skills, limited
incorporation of
feedback to
improve
implementation of
an educational
eventMany areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
which are lacking,
to improve future
event deliveryLarge amounts of
writing not
supported by
credible
educational
literatureSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
5Critical
Reflection and
AnalysisCritically reflects
on implementation
of educational
event, supports
outcomes with an
extensive range of
literatureWeighting 25%Persuasive critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by an
extensive range of
credible literatureStrong critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by a
wide range of
credible literatureFocused critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by
credible literatureCritical reflection
is evident in the
majority of
assessment, the
majority of points
supported by
credible literature.
Several points
would benefit from
use of further
credible literatureLimited valid
critical reflection
evident. Limited
use of relevant
literatureLimited/Lack of
critical reflection.
Large amounts
not supported by
relevant literatureProfessional
writing /
communicationDemonstrates ability
to use high level
professional writing
skills to articulate
informationWeighting 10%Writing met all 5
criteria listed below.
Well structured,
concise, analytical,
and logical flow of
concepts
Consistent application
of English conventions
throughout –
grammar/ spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and
accurate use of
language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non-
discriminatory and
culturally safe languageWriting met 4 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured,
concise, analytical,
and logical flow of
concepts
Consistent application
of English conventions
throughout –
grammar/ spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and
accurate use of
language of the
discipline
Consistent and
accurate use of non-
discriminatory and
culturally safe
languageWriting met 3 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical flow
of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 2 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical
flow of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 1 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical flow
of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 0 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical
flow of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
discipline
Consistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
6Satisfactorily complied with the Academic Integrity standards outlined in the MOPP C/5.3 Academic Integrity.https://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/C/C_05_03.jspHOMEWORK.pdfSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
1NSN720ASSESSMENT TASK 2Assessment name: Implementation, critical reflection and evaluation of an educational
eventTask description:
Your assessment requires you to complete three aspects of curricula
development. You will:1. Describe the changes that you made to your educational
event (developed in Assessment 1). based on academic
feedback provided in Assessment 1. Implement your
educational event (250 words).2. Critically reflect on implementation of your educational event
and use educational evidence to support your points (1000
words).3. Drawing on your analysis of implementation of educational
event, your reflections and evaluations (from peer/participant
feedback); discuss recommendations for improvement of
your educational event, draw on evidence (1500 words).School of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
2What you need to do:
Refer and familiarise yourself with the NSN720 unit framework – the
ADDIE MODEL (a five-phase approach to building effective learning
solutions). You will need to draw on the last two phases (implement and
evaluate) of the ADDIE model to complete this assessment task.PART 1:Incorporate feedback from assessment 1 to improve analysis, design
and developments phases (ADDIE model). Briefly describe how you did
this in 250 words. Implement your education event – ensure you
provide evidence of event implementation.PART 2:Critically reflect on implementation of the event referring to your
education event plan and use educational evidence to support your
points. This may be written in first person. 1000 words.PART 3:Draw on your experience of the implementation and evaluation of
event feedback to generate recommendations for improvement of the
educational event. Incorporate evidence to support your points. 1500
words.APPENDIX (no limit, no specific mark allocated): Evidence of
implementation of educational event. You will need to provide
evidence to demonstrate that you have completed the implementation
of this event. This might be a copy of education resources used or an
email from appropriate staff or line manager stating you have
completed the event.You will have the opportunity if required, to present at the Week 11
final workshop presentations (on campus), feedback will be provided by
academic staff and other students who are present. Include this
evidence as an Appendix.Length: Academic essay 2750 words +/-10% (word length includes in-text
referencing and excludes your reference list and appendices)Estimated time to
complete task:30 hoursWeighting: 60%How will I be assessed: +/- 7 point grading scale using a rubric>Due date: 27th October, 2023 23:59hrsSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
3Presentation
requirements:This assessment task requires you to develop an academic essay addressing
the task. Use formal essay style of introduction, body and conclusion.Your assignment should be written in CiteWrite APA style and prepared as
follows:• It is a requirement that page numbers for all in-text references are
provided• Include a ‘footer’ on each page with your name, student number, unit
code and page number• 2cm margins on all sides, 1.5 spaced text• Use font, such as Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman; font size 12• CiteWrite APA style referencing• Headings can be used to structure your assignment logically (if
applicable).Be submitted in electronic format through your Canvas site.What you need to
submit:PART 1, PART 2, PART 3 and the APPENDIX are to be collated as onedocument and submitted together.Tip – CRITICAL REFLECTIONYou may like to use a reflective framework to structure Part 2. The GibbsReflective Cycle is a simple and adaptable option.http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/https://www.ed.ac.uk/reflection/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/gibbs-reflective-cyclehttps://www.ed.ac.uk/reflection/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/gibbs-reflective-cycleSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
4NSN720 ASSESSMENT TASK Assessment 2 RUBRICLearning Outcomes Assessed: 1, 3, & 4 Weighting: 60%Criteria +/- 7 +/- 6 +/- 5 +/- 4 +/- 3 +/- 2 – 1Advanced
KnowledgeDemonstrates
theoretical
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate
evaluation
feedback to
improve
implementation of
an educational
plan +Discusses
evaluation
feedback and
provides
recommendations
for improvement
of event,
supported by
relevant
educational
literatureWeighting 25%Demonstrates
advanced
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate a
range of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback
comprehensively
to develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by an extensive
range of credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates well
developed
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate a
range of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback strongly
to develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by a wide range of
credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
focused
developed
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate many
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback well to
develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate most
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventSome areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryMajority of points
supported by
credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
some educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate some
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventMany areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
which are lacking,
to improve future
event deliveryMajority of points
not supported by
credible
educational
literatureMinimal
demonstration of
educational
knowledge and
skills, limited
incorporation of
feedback to
improve
implementation of
an educational
eventMany areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
which are lacking,
to improve future
event deliveryLarge amounts of
writing not
supported by
credible
educational
literatureSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
5Critical
Reflection and
AnalysisCritically reflects
on implementation
of educational
event, supports
outcomes with an
extensive range of
literatureWeighting 25%Persuasive critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by an
extensive range of
credible literatureStrong critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by a
wide range of
credible literatureFocused critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by
credible literatureCritical reflection
is evident in the
majority of
assessment, the
majority of points
supported by
credible literature.
Several points
would benefit from
use of further
credible literatureLimited valid
critical reflection
evident. Limited
use of relevant
literatureLimited/Lack of
critical reflection.
Large amounts
not supported by
relevant literatureProfessional
writing /
communicationDemonstrates ability
to use high level
professional writing
skills to articulate
informationWeighting 10%Writing met all 5
criteria listed below.
Well structured,
concise, analytical,
and logical flow of
concepts
Consistent application
of English conventions
throughout –
grammar/ spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and
accurate use of
language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non-
discriminatory and
culturally safe languageWriting met 4 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured,
concise, analytical,
and logical flow of
concepts
Consistent application
of English conventions
throughout –
grammar/ spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and
accurate use of
language of the
discipline
Consistent and
accurate use of non-
discriminatory and
culturally safe
languageWriting met 3 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical flow
of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 2 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical
flow of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 1 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical flow
of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 0 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical
flow of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
discipline
Consistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
6Satisfactorily complied with the Academic Integrity standards outlined in the MOPP C/5.3 Academic Integrity.https://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/C/C_05_03.jspEVENT.docxAssessment titleEducational event plan templet“Enterprise Risk Management session”Student nameStudent numberUnit code11.Analysis1.1.Target audienceThe educational session will be given to the Risk managers at the hospital level.1.2.Learning needsTwenty participants in this educational session will be involved from 10 hospitals. The primary purpose of this educational session is to show that Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is a new concept that needs to be applied perfectly among Risk managers in hospitals.2.Design and Develop2.1.Learning outcomes2.1.1.Being aligned with the strategic goals of the healthcare facility by reducing the clinical and non-clinical potential risks.2.1.2.Identify the clinical and non-clinical potential risks in the early phase by applying the risk management process.2.1.3.Utilize the mitigation strategy or activate the response and treatment plan to control risks.2.1.4.Monitor and review the effectiveness of the treatment plan.2.2.The sequence of instructor and studentThe risk managers will attend the educational session daily over two weeks for four hours from 9:00 a.m. till 1:00 p.m. except on weekends. The educational session will be held in the lecture room in one of the hospitals. The learning type that would be applied is active learning.2.3.Learning resourcesOverhead projector to present the related videos and PowerPoint presentations in order to make the educational session more accessible.2.4.Formative and summative assessmentsThree assessments will be applied to the educational session. First, before beginning the educational session, assess the learners’ understanding by asking them to recall questions such as “What is the definition of the risk”? Second, give them a case scenario to assess their ability and understanding and ensure that the primary educational session objectives are achieved. Ultimately, the final exam would be run to assess the comprehensive knowledge taken from the educational session.1Student nameStudent numberUnit codeHOMEWORK.pdfSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
1NSN720ASSESSMENT TASK 2Assessment name: Implementation, critical reflection and evaluation of an educational
eventTask description:
Your assessment requires you to complete three aspects of curricula
development. You will:1. Describe the changes that you made to your educational
event (developed in Assessment 1). based on academic
feedback provided in Assessment 1. Implement your
educational event (250 words).2. Critically reflect on implementation of your educational event
and use educational evidence to support your points (1000
words).3. Drawing on your analysis of implementation of educational
event, your reflections and evaluations (from peer/participant
feedback); discuss recommendations for improvement of
your educational event, draw on evidence (1500 words).School of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
2What you need to do:
Refer and familiarise yourself with the NSN720 unit framework – the
ADDIE MODEL (a five-phase approach to building effective learning
solutions). You will need to draw on the last two phases (implement and
evaluate) of the ADDIE model to complete this assessment task.PART 1:Incorporate feedback from assessment 1 to improve analysis, design
and developments phases (ADDIE model). Briefly describe how you did
this in 250 words. Implement your education event – ensure you
provide evidence of event implementation.PART 2:Critically reflect on implementation of the event referring to your
education event plan and use educational evidence to support your
points. This may be written in first person. 1000 words.PART 3:Draw on your experience of the implementation and evaluation of
event feedback to generate recommendations for improvement of the
educational event. Incorporate evidence to support your points. 1500
words.APPENDIX (no limit, no specific mark allocated): Evidence of
implementation of educational event. You will need to provide
evidence to demonstrate that you have completed the implementation
of this event. This might be a copy of education resources used or an
email from appropriate staff or line manager stating you have
completed the event.You will have the opportunity if required, to present at the Week 11
final workshop presentations (on campus), feedback will be provided by
academic staff and other students who are present. Include this
evidence as an Appendix.Length: Academic essay 2750 words +/-10% (word length includes in-text
referencing and excludes your reference list and appendices)Estimated time to
complete task:30 hoursWeighting: 60%How will I be assessed: +/- 7 point grading scale using a rubric>Due date: 27th October, 2023 23:59hrsSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
3Presentation
requirements:This assessment task requires you to develop an academic essay addressing
the task. Use formal essay style of introduction, body and conclusion.Your assignment should be written in CiteWrite APA style and prepared as
follows:• It is a requirement that page numbers for all in-text references are
provided• Include a ‘footer’ on each page with your name, student number, unit
code and page number• 2cm margins on all sides, 1.5 spaced text• Use font, such as Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman; font size 12• CiteWrite APA style referencing• Headings can be used to structure your assignment logically (if
applicable).Be submitted in electronic format through your Canvas site.What you need to
submit:PART 1, PART 2, PART 3 and the APPENDIX are to be collated as onedocument and submitted together.Tip – CRITICAL REFLECTIONYou may like to use a reflective framework to structure Part 2. The GibbsReflective Cycle is a simple and adaptable option.http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/https://www.ed.ac.uk/reflection/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/gibbs-reflective-cyclehttps://www.ed.ac.uk/reflection/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/gibbs-reflective-cycleSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
4NSN720 ASSESSMENT TASK Assessment 2 RUBRICLearning Outcomes Assessed: 1, 3, & 4 Weighting: 60%Criteria +/- 7 +/- 6 +/- 5 +/- 4 +/- 3 +/- 2 – 1Advanced
KnowledgeDemonstrates
theoretical
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate
evaluation
feedback to
improve
implementation of
an educational
plan +Discusses
evaluation
feedback and
provides
recommendations
for improvement
of event,
supported by
relevant
educational
literatureWeighting 25%Demonstrates
advanced
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate a
range of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback
comprehensively
to develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by an extensive
range of credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates well
developed
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate a
range of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback strongly
to develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by a wide range of
credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
focused
developed
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate many
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback well to
develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate most
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventSome areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryMajority of points
supported by
credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
some educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate some
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventMany areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
which are lacking,
to improve future
event deliveryMajority of points
not supported by
credible
educational
literatureMinimal
demonstration of
educational
knowledge and
skills, limited
incorporation of
feedback to
improve
implementation of
an educational
eventMany areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
which are lacking,
to improve future
event deliveryLarge amounts of
writing not
supported by
credible
educational
literatureSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
5Critical
Reflection and
AnalysisCritically reflects
on implementation
of educational
event, supports
outcomes with an
extensive range of
literatureWeighting 25%Persuasive critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by an
extensive range of
credible literatureStrong critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by a
wide range of
credible literatureFocused critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by
credible literatureCritical reflection
is evident in the
majority of
assessment, the
majority of points
supported by
credible literature.
Several points
would benefit from
use of further
credible literatureLimited valid
critical reflection
evident. Limited
use of relevant
literatureLimited/Lack of
critical reflection.
Large amounts
not supported by
relevant literatureProfessional
writing /
communicationDemonstrates ability
to use high level
professional writing
skills to articulate
informationWeighting 10%Writing met all 5
criteria listed below.
Well structured,
concise, analytical,
and logical flow of
concepts
Consistent application
of English conventions
throughout –
grammar/ spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and
accurate use of
language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non-
discriminatory and
culturally safe languageWriting met 4 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured,
concise, analytical,
and logical flow of
concepts
Consistent application
of English conventions
throughout –
grammar/ spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and
accurate use of
language of the
discipline
Consistent and
accurate use of non-
discriminatory and
culturally safe
languageWriting met 3 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical flow
of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 2 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical
flow of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 1 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical flow
of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 0 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical
flow of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
discipline
Consistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
6Satisfactorily complied with the Academic Integrity standards outlined in the MOPP C/5.3 Academic Integrity.https://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/C/C_05_03.jspEVENT.docxAssessment titleEducational event plan templet“Enterprise Risk Management session”Student nameStudent numberUnit code11.Analysis1.1.Target audienceThe educational session will be given to the Risk managers at the hospital level.1.2.Learning needsTwenty participants in this educational session will be involved from 10 hospitals. The primary purpose of this educational session is to show that Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is a new concept that needs to be applied perfectly among Risk managers in hospitals.2.Design and Develop2.1.Learning outcomes2.1.1.Being aligned with the strategic goals of the healthcare facility by reducing the clinical and non-clinical potential risks.2.1.2.Identify the clinical and non-clinical potential risks in the early phase by applying the risk management process.2.1.3.Utilize the mitigation strategy or activate the response and treatment plan to control risks.2.1.4.Monitor and review the effectiveness of the treatment plan.2.2.The sequence of instructor and studentThe risk managers will attend the educational session daily over two weeks for four hours from 9:00 a.m. till 1:00 p.m. except on weekends. The educational session will be held in the lecture room in one of the hospitals. The learning type that would be applied is active learning.2.3.Learning resourcesOverhead projector to present the related videos and PowerPoint presentations in order to make the educational session more accessible.2.4.Formative and summative assessmentsThree assessments will be applied to the educational session. First, before beginning the educational session, assess the learners’ understanding by asking them to recall questions such as “What is the definition of the risk”? Second, give them a case scenario to assess their ability and understanding and ensure that the primary educational session objectives are achieved. Ultimately, the final exam would be run to assess the comprehensive knowledge taken from the educational session.1Student nameStudent numberUnit codeHOMEWORK.pdfSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
1NSN720ASSESSMENT TASK 2Assessment name: Implementation, critical reflection and evaluation of an educational
eventTask description:
Your assessment requires you to complete three aspects of curricula
development. You will:1. Describe the changes that you made to your educational
event (developed in Assessment 1). based on academic
feedback provided in Assessment 1. Implement your
educational event (250 words).2. Critically reflect on implementation of your educational event
and use educational evidence to support your points (1000
words).3. Drawing on your analysis of implementation of educational
event, your reflections and evaluations (from peer/participant
feedback); discuss recommendations for improvement of
your educational event, draw on evidence (1500 words).School of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
2What you need to do:
Refer and familiarise yourself with the NSN720 unit framework – the
ADDIE MODEL (a five-phase approach to building effective learning
solutions). You will need to draw on the last two phases (implement and
evaluate) of the ADDIE model to complete this assessment task.PART 1:Incorporate feedback from assessment 1 to improve analysis, design
and developments phases (ADDIE model). Briefly describe how you did
this in 250 words. Implement your education event – ensure you
provide evidence of event implementation.PART 2:Critically reflect on implementation of the event referring to your
education event plan and use educational evidence to support your
points. This may be written in first person. 1000 words.PART 3:Draw on your experience of the implementation and evaluation of
event feedback to generate recommendations for improvement of the
educational event. Incorporate evidence to support your points. 1500
words.APPENDIX (no limit, no specific mark allocated): Evidence of
implementation of educational event. You will need to provide
evidence to demonstrate that you have completed the implementation
of this event. This might be a copy of education resources used or an
email from appropriate staff or line manager stating you have
completed the event.You will have the opportunity if required, to present at the Week 11
final workshop presentations (on campus), feedback will be provided by
academic staff and other students who are present. Include this
evidence as an Appendix.Length: Academic essay 2750 words +/-10% (word length includes in-text
referencing and excludes your reference list and appendices)Estimated time to
complete task:30 hoursWeighting: 60%How will I be assessed: +/- 7 point grading scale using a rubric>Due date: 27th October, 2023 23:59hrsSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
3Presentation
requirements:This assessment task requires you to develop an academic essay addressing
the task. Use formal essay style of introduction, body and conclusion.Your assignment should be written in CiteWrite APA style and prepared as
follows:• It is a requirement that page numbers for all in-text references are
provided• Include a ‘footer’ on each page with your name, student number, unit
code and page number• 2cm margins on all sides, 1.5 spaced text• Use font, such as Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman; font size 12• CiteWrite APA style referencing• Headings can be used to structure your assignment logically (if
applicable).Be submitted in electronic format through your Canvas site.What you need to
submit:PART 1, PART 2, PART 3 and the APPENDIX are to be collated as onedocument and submitted together.Tip – CRITICAL REFLECTIONYou may like to use a reflective framework to structure Part 2. The GibbsReflective Cycle is a simple and adaptable option.http://www.citewrite.qut.edu.au/https://www.ed.ac.uk/reflection/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/gibbs-reflective-cyclehttps://www.ed.ac.uk/reflection/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/gibbs-reflective-cycleSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
4NSN720 ASSESSMENT TASK Assessment 2 RUBRICLearning Outcomes Assessed: 1, 3, & 4 Weighting: 60%Criteria +/- 7 +/- 6 +/- 5 +/- 4 +/- 3 +/- 2 – 1Advanced
KnowledgeDemonstrates
theoretical
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate
evaluation
feedback to
improve
implementation of
an educational
plan +Discusses
evaluation
feedback and
provides
recommendations
for improvement
of event,
supported by
relevant
educational
literatureWeighting 25%Demonstrates
advanced
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate a
range of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback
comprehensively
to develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by an extensive
range of credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates well
developed
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate a
range of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback strongly
to develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by a wide range of
credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
focused
developed
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate many
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventDiscusses
evaluation
feedback well to
develop a
persuasive case
for
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryPoints supported
by credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate most
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventSome areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
to improve future
event deliveryMajority of points
supported by
credible
educational
literatureDemonstrates
some educational
knowledge and
skills to
incorporate some
areas of feedback
to improve
implementation of
an educational
eventMany areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
which are lacking,
to improve future
event deliveryMajority of points
not supported by
credible
educational
literatureMinimal
demonstration of
educational
knowledge and
skills, limited
incorporation of
feedback to
improve
implementation of
an educational
eventMany areas of
evaluation
feedback need
further
development to
support
recommendations
which are lacking,
to improve future
event deliveryLarge amounts of
writing not
supported by
credible
educational
literatureSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
5Critical
Reflection and
AnalysisCritically reflects
on implementation
of educational
event, supports
outcomes with an
extensive range of
literatureWeighting 25%Persuasive critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by an
extensive range of
credible literatureStrong critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by a
wide range of
credible literatureFocused critical
reflection on the
implementation of
event, points
supported by
credible literatureCritical reflection
is evident in the
majority of
assessment, the
majority of points
supported by
credible literature.
Several points
would benefit from
use of further
credible literatureLimited valid
critical reflection
evident. Limited
use of relevant
literatureLimited/Lack of
critical reflection.
Large amounts
not supported by
relevant literatureProfessional
writing /
communicationDemonstrates ability
to use high level
professional writing
skills to articulate
informationWeighting 10%Writing met all 5
criteria listed below.
Well structured,
concise, analytical,
and logical flow of
concepts
Consistent application
of English conventions
throughout –
grammar/ spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and
accurate use of
language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non-
discriminatory and
culturally safe languageWriting met 4 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured,
concise, analytical,
and logical flow of
concepts
Consistent application
of English conventions
throughout –
grammar/ spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and
accurate use of
language of the
discipline
Consistent and
accurate use of non-
discriminatory and
culturally safe
languageWriting met 3 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical flow
of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 2 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical
flow of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 1 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical flow
of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
disciplineConsistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageWriting met 0 of the
criteria listed below.
Well structured, concise,
analytical, and logical
flow of concepts
Consistent application of
English conventions
throughout – grammar/
spelling
Used CiteWrite APA
referencing standards
without errors
Consistent and accurate
use of language of the
discipline
Consistent and accurate
use of non- discriminatory
and culturally safe
languageSchool of Nursing | Version Final NSN720
6Satisfactorily complied with the Academic Integrity standards outlined in the MOPP C/5.3 Academic Integrity.https://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/C/C_05_03.jsp12Bids(66)MISS HILLARY A+abdul_rehman_Emily ClareSTELLAR GEEK A+Sheryl HoganProf Double RDoctor.NamiraFortifiedProWritingGuruYoung NyanyaProf. TOPGRADEDr. Adeline ZoeDr M. MichelleAshley Elliesherry proffWIZARD_KIMnicohwilliamIsabella HarvardColeen AndersonBrainy BrianShow All Bidsother Questions(10)BUS 250 wk 4 Disc. 1 replies (DO NOT CHANGE THE PRICE) IF YOU DO I WILL NOT SEND A HANDSHAKE.Cognitive Development Tablemodule 4 case-computers_smProduct and Technology ManagementNursing leadership paperI need someone to do a discussion response. (only 2 paragraphs )”A” WORK DISCUSSION BOARD IN 12 HOURS (NO EXCEPTIONS)psychologyLAN Architecture & Infrastructure – Ethernet, Switches & Virtual LANsfinancial practices
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

