NIH

/in /by

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework help2 years ago04.09.20231Report issuefiles (1)Week1NIHProtecting.pdfWeek1NIHProtecting.pdfWeek 1: NIH Protecting Human Research Participants ReflectionProtecting human research participants is of utmost importance. Even though yourchange project will not be implemented in the field, and you will not be engaging withhuman subjects in this context, it is still critical that all healthcare professionals have asolid foundation in patient rights and protections within the realm of research.It is essential that all healthcare professionals, whether or not they are currentlyinvolved in research studies, remain aware of regulatory policies and updates such asthe Federal Policy for the Protection of Human SubjectsLinks to an external site.https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/19/2017-01058/federal-policy-for-the-protection-of-human-subjects, or Common Rule, that will take effect January 2019.Review the Frequently Asked Questions on Requirements for Education at the NationalInstitutes of Health (NIH) link here: https://humansubjects.nih.gov/requirement-educationLinks to an external site.Download the PDF documents listed below. Read the detailed document by the NIHand then take the self-check quiz to check your understanding before completing thisweek’s assignment.Protecting Human Research ParticipantsNIH Office of Extramural ResearchIntroductionResearch with human subjects can occasionally result in a dilemma for investigators. When thegoals of the research are designed to make major contributions to a field, such as improving theunderstanding of a disease process or determining the efficacy of an intervention, investigatorsmay perceive the outcomes of their studies to be more important than providing protectionsfor individual participants in the research.
Although it is understandable to focus on goals, our society values the rights and welfare ofindividuals. It is not considered ethical behavior to use individuals solely as means to an end.
The importance of demonstrating respect for research participants is reflected in the principlesused to define ethical research and the regulations, policies, and guidance that describe theimplementation of those principles.
Who?This course is intended for use by individuals involved in the design and/or conduct of National
Institutes of Health (NIH) funded human subjects research.
What?https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/19/2017-01058/federal-policy-for-the-protection-of-human-subjectshttps://humansubjects.nih.gov/requirement-educationhttps://humansubjects.nih.gov/requirement-educationThis course is designed to prepare investigators involved in the design and/or conduct ofresearch involving human subjects to understand their obligations to protect the rights andwelfare of subjects in research. The course material presents basic concepts, principles, andissues related to the protection of research participants.
Why?As a part of NIH’s commitment to the protection of human subjects and its response to Federal
mandates for increased emphasis on protection for human subjects in research, the NIH Officeof Extramural Research released a policy on Required Education in the Protection of HumanResearch Participants in June 2000. This course is specifically designed for extramural
investigators and is one (of many) possibilities for meeting the policy requirement.
Because this course is intended to allow investigators to fulfill the Required Education in theProtection of Human Research Subjects, it assumes that the investigators’ research will befunded by NIH and is therefore subject to all U.S. Department of Health and Human Services(HHS) regulatory and NIH policy requirements.
Archived Content: Last maintained 9/26/2018AssignmentThis week, reflect on what you learned from the NIH materials about protecting therights of human research participants.Discuss at least two of the following in your paper:• Describe the circumstances that influenced the need for a policy to protecthuman research subjects. Give examples of specific ways human researchsubjects can be harmed by researchers.• Identify three vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated withhuman research among these groups. Evaluate the requirements andrestrictions. Do you think they are adequate? Why or why not?• The Belmont Report summarizes the ethical principles and guidelines forresearch involving human subjects. Three core principles are identified: respectfor persons, beneficence, and justice. Even though these principles areconsidered equal, prioritize them in order of importance to you. Explain your decisions.• Although you are not implementing a change project at this time, and you maynot be directly involved in research as part of your professional responsibilities,explain the reasons why it is important for you to know about these rights andprotections.Your reflective paper should be two pages and written in current APA Style. Refer to therubric for more information.NURS_691A_DE – NIH assignment rubricNURS_691A_DE – NIH assignment rubricCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to aLearning Outcome Content21 to >19.32 ptsAccomplishedThe responses fully address all elements of at leasttwo writing prompts. The responses provide detailand/or quality examples for each prompt. Theresponses present insightful, clear, and accurateconnections to NIH policies, procedures, andhistory. The responses present personal reflectionand/or a willingness to consider multiplepossibilities.21 ptsThis criterion is linked to aLearning OutcomeOrganization and Writing10.5 to >9.66 ptsAccomplishedThere is a well-written, clear introduction, body,and conclusion. The introduction provides anoverview of the topic. The information in the bodyis relevant and presented in a logical order. Theconclusion summarizes the topic and includes thewriter’s thoughts on the subject. The writing is fluidand concise, and the word choice is excellent.10.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to aLearning Outcome Mechanicsand APA Format3.5 to >3.22 ptsAccomplishedThe answers are well written throughout.Information is well organized and clearlycommunicated. The assignment is mostly free ofspelling and grammatical errors. Information fromsources is paraphrased appropriately andaccurately referenced and cited in APA Style whenapplicable. The paper meets assignment lengthrequirements.3.5 ptsTotal Points: 35Week 1: NIH Protecting Human Research Participants ReflectionWeek1NIHProtecting.pdfWeek 1: NIH Protecting Human Research Participants ReflectionProtecting human research participants is of utmost importance. Even though yourchange project will not be implemented in the field, and you will not be engaging withhuman subjects in this context, it is still critical that all healthcare professionals have asolid foundation in patient rights and protections within the realm of research.It is essential that all healthcare professionals, whether or not they are currentlyinvolved in research studies, remain aware of regulatory policies and updates such asthe Federal Policy for the Protection of Human SubjectsLinks to an external site.https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/19/2017-01058/federal-policy-for-the-protection-of-human-subjects, or Common Rule, that will take effect January 2019.Review the Frequently Asked Questions on Requirements for Education at the NationalInstitutes of Health (NIH) link here: https://humansubjects.nih.gov/requirement-educationLinks to an external site.Download the PDF documents listed below. Read the detailed document by the NIHand then take the self-check quiz to check your understanding before completing thisweek’s assignment.Protecting Human Research ParticipantsNIH Office of Extramural ResearchIntroductionResearch with human subjects can occasionally result in a dilemma for investigators. When thegoals of the research are designed to make major contributions to a field, such as improving theunderstanding of a disease process or determining the efficacy of an intervention, investigatorsmay perceive the outcomes of their studies to be more important than providing protectionsfor individual participants in the research.
Although it is understandable to focus on goals, our society values the rights and welfare ofindividuals. It is not considered ethical behavior to use individuals solely as means to an end.
The importance of demonstrating respect for research participants is reflected in the principlesused to define ethical research and the regulations, policies, and guidance that describe theimplementation of those principles.
Who?This course is intended for use by individuals involved in the design and/or conduct of National
Institutes of Health (NIH) funded human subjects research.
What?https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/19/2017-01058/federal-policy-for-the-protection-of-human-subjectshttps://humansubjects.nih.gov/requirement-educationhttps://humansubjects.nih.gov/requirement-educationThis course is designed to prepare investigators involved in the design and/or conduct ofresearch involving human subjects to understand their obligations to protect the rights andwelfare of subjects in research. The course material presents basic concepts, principles, andissues related to the protection of research participants.
Why?As a part of NIH’s commitment to the protection of human subjects and its response to Federal
mandates for increased emphasis on protection for human subjects in research, the NIH Officeof Extramural Research released a policy on Required Education in the Protection of HumanResearch Participants in June 2000. This course is specifically designed for extramural
investigators and is one (of many) possibilities for meeting the policy requirement.
Because this course is intended to allow investigators to fulfill the Required Education in theProtection of Human Research Subjects, it assumes that the investigators’ research will befunded by NIH and is therefore subject to all U.S. Department of Health and Human Services(HHS) regulatory and NIH policy requirements.
Archived Content: Last maintained 9/26/2018AssignmentThis week, reflect on what you learned from the NIH materials about protecting therights of human research participants.Discuss at least two of the following in your paper:• Describe the circumstances that influenced the need for a policy to protecthuman research subjects. Give examples of specific ways human researchsubjects can be harmed by researchers.• Identify three vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated withhuman research among these groups. Evaluate the requirements andrestrictions. Do you think they are adequate? Why or why not?• The Belmont Report summarizes the ethical principles and guidelines forresearch involving human subjects. Three core principles are identified: respectfor persons, beneficence, and justice. Even though these principles areconsidered equal, prioritize them in order of importance to you. Explain your decisions.• Although you are not implementing a change project at this time, and you maynot be directly involved in research as part of your professional responsibilities,explain the reasons why it is important for you to know about these rights andprotections.Your reflective paper should be two pages and written in current APA Style. Refer to therubric for more information.NURS_691A_DE – NIH assignment rubricNURS_691A_DE – NIH assignment rubricCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to aLearning Outcome Content21 to >19.32 ptsAccomplishedThe responses fully address all elements of at leasttwo writing prompts. The responses provide detailand/or quality examples for each prompt. Theresponses present insightful, clear, and accurateconnections to NIH policies, procedures, andhistory. The responses present personal reflectionand/or a willingness to consider multiplepossibilities.21 ptsThis criterion is linked to aLearning OutcomeOrganization and Writing10.5 to >9.66 ptsAccomplishedThere is a well-written, clear introduction, body,and conclusion. The introduction provides anoverview of the topic. The information in the bodyis relevant and presented in a logical order. Theconclusion summarizes the topic and includes thewriter’s thoughts on the subject. The writing is fluidand concise, and the word choice is excellent.10.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to aLearning Outcome Mechanicsand APA Format3.5 to >3.22 ptsAccomplishedThe answers are well written throughout.Information is well organized and clearlycommunicated. The assignment is mostly free ofspelling and grammatical errors. Information fromsources is paraphrased appropriately andaccurately referenced and cited in APA Style whenapplicable. The paper meets assignment lengthrequirements.3.5 ptsTotal Points: 35Week 1: NIH Protecting Human Research Participants ReflectionBids(38)Miss DeannaPROF_ALISTERDr. Freya WalkerMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverSheryl HoganBrilliant GeekAshley EllieProf Double RJudithTutorDr. BeneveDr. Adeline ZoeLarry KellyMaria the tutorMEERAB NAEEMbrilliant answersAmanda SmithBrainy BrianMadam MichelleUrgent TutorShow All Bidsother Questions(10)New Assignment.Discipline Areas (Bodies of Knowledge)DeWitt Company uses flexible budgets to control its selling expenses.05/14/2016 Police StructureUrgent 2600 wordsQuestion 1 This question provides you with an opportunity to analyze the advantages of an organization that offers quality customer service. First, describe what it means to you to provide quality customer service for both internal customers and also exteASAPWeek 3: Assignment: Think Global, Act LocalSocial Psychology Homework Unit 1Children’s books in children’s hands

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now