Burnout in Mental Health Nurses, How to protect this vital workforce

NURS2098 Complex Mental Health & Recovery

Semester 1 of 2020

RMIT University Alistair Ross 19/03/2020 Page 1

Complex Mental Health & Recovery TUTORIAL PRESENTATION INFORMATION:

 You are required to deliver a presentation to the class on One of the following:

o [i] A discussion on the relevance of your topic for Mental Health Nursing.

o [ii] A short critique of the most useful 1‐2 pieces of literature used in your research [this again must relate to contemporary Mental Health Nursing].

 Presentation Topics will be chosen in your Week 1 tutorial class; there will be no

class in Week 2 and then presentations will commence in Week 3 of semester. If you do not attend the Week 1 class a topic will be chosen for you by the Course Coordinator (students on clinical will be allowed to select a proxy to choose their topic in Week 1).

 Please note that you need to develop and present your information in a manner that is engaging and interesting to the class.

 Simply reading out large sections of pre‐written notes without regular adlib commentary or discussion is not acceptable and will result in a lower grade being awarded as you have not fulfilled the core requirements of the assessment.

 Your presentation will need to run for 10 minutes plus an additional 5 minutes allocated for question and answer time [total 15 minutes].

 You will need to have a plan to lead the question time section of the presentation

as this will be included as part of your grade.

 Utilise a clear presentation plan / dot points.

 Utilise signposts & information provided by Presentation Marking Guide / Rubric.

 Research tips for effective presenting skills online (there are a lot!).

NURS2098 Complex Mental Health & Recovery

Semester 1 of 2020

RMIT University Alistair Ross 19/03/2020 Page 2

 PowerPoint / Computer Projector will not be available to use in your presentation.

 Be creative; if unsure about the suitability of an idea for your presentation please

email your tutor regarding your ideas to discuss this further.

 You must provide a Bibliography (in APA 6th edition format) to your Tutor before commencing your presentation.

o This is a bibliography so you can include anything you read in preparing your presentation (which is more than what you might expect to see cited in a reference list).

o Do not include reference to the NURS2098 lecture notes or to Wikipedia: these will NOT be considered.

o You need to use contemporary literature (last 5‐7 years) from journals, books and Government web pages that is relevant and trustworthy.

o If you do not present the list to your Tutor before commencing your presentation you will receive 0/4 for this section and the rest of your presentation will be marked down as you have not supported your work with an evidence base.

o Any list that is not in APA 6th edition format will score a maximum of 1/4.

NURS2098 Complex Mental Health & Recovery

Semester 1 of 2020

RMIT University Alistair Ross 19/03/2020 Page 3

TUTORIAL PRESENTATION Feedback Sheet Criteria Possible

Mark Actual

Mark

Introduction to topic including objectives/purpose of the presentation. 1. 1. Discusses relevance of topic to contemporary mental health nursing.

OR 2. Discusses 1‐2 pieces of literature related to the topic and to contemporary mental health nursing. Consider:

‐ Relevance to clinical interventions in practice. ‐ Relevance to professional practice. ‐ Relevance to reflectiveness in practice. ‐ Relevance to broader education in practice. ‐ Relevance to mental health promotion in practice.

8.

Utilises clear strategies to engage the tutorial group during the Presentation.

2.

Makes effective use of handouts to support the Presentation. 1. Makes effective of time in your Presentation. 1. Questions and answer section of the Presentation effectively lead / managed.

2.

Use of creativity in the Presentation. 1. Bibliography provided in APA format. 4 Total 20 marks Total Marks Total / 20

Assessors Comments:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

NURS2098 Complex Mental Health & Recovery

Semester 1 of 2020

RMIT University Alistair Ross 19/03/2020 Page 4

TUTORIAL PRESENTATION MARKING RUBRIC. Assessment Criteria

Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction

Introduction [1]

Your Introduction was illogical and disorganised. It did not reflect the topic at all, nor did it provided adequate detail about the presenter or the objectives or purpose of the presentation [0]

Your Introduction was reasonably well organised. It reflected the topic however it did not provide adequate detail about the objectives or purpose of the presentation [0.5]

Your Introduction was very welll organised. It included the presenter details and reflected the topic as well as provide excellent detail regarding the objectives or purpose of the presentation [1]

OPTION 1: Discusses relevance of topic to contemporary mental health nursing (8)

Your presentation is unrealistic, unrelated and ambiguous and does not focus adequately on the topic. The exploration of the topic itself is superficial and lacks the necessary depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is unclear, vague and generally lacks relevance to practice. [0‐3]

Your presentation is barely realistic, poorly related and ambiguous and only focuses to a basic standard on the topic. The exploration of the topic itself is superficial and contains the minimum necessary depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is unclear, vague and generally has only limited relevance to practice. [4]

Your presentation is reasonably realistic, relating well to the topic and focuses to a good standard of detail on the topic. The exploration of the topic itself is sound and contains a good level of depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is well considered and has reasonable relevance to practice. [5]

Your presentation is highly realistic, relating very well to the topic and focuses to a very good standard of detail on the topic. The exploration of the topic itself is well constructed and contains a very good level of depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is very well done with a high level of relevance to practice. [6]

Your presentation is exceptionally realistic and accurate, relating very well to the topic and provides an excellent standard of detail. The exploration of the topic itself is extremely well constructed and contains an outstanding level of depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is outstanding with a high level of relevance to practice. [7‐8]

OR Your presentation is unrealistic, unrelated and ambiguous and does not focus adequately on your chosen 1‐2 pieces of literature as they relate to the topic. The exploration of the literature itself is superficial and lacks the necessary depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is unclear, vague and generally lacks relevance to practice. [0‐3]

Your presentation is barely realistic, poorly related and ambiguous and only focuses to a basic standard on your chosen 1‐2 pieces of literature as they relate to the topic. The exploration of the literature itself is superficial and contains the minimum necessary depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is unclear, vague and generally has only limited relevance to practice. [4]

Your presentation is reasonably realistic, relating well to the topic and focuses to a good standard of detail on your chosen 1‐2 pieces of literature as they relate to the topic. The exploration of the literature itself is sound and contains a good level of depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is well considered and has reasonable relevance to practice. [5]

Your presentation is highly realistic, relating very well to the topic and focuses to a very good standard of detail on your chosen 1‐2 pieces of literature as they relate to the topic.. The exploration of the literature itself is well constructed and contains a very good level of depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is very well done with a high level of relevance to practice. [6]

Your presentation is exceptionally realistic and accurate, relating very well to the topic and focuses to an excellent standard of detail your chosen 1‐2 pieces of literature as they relate to the topic. The exploration of the literature itself is extremely well constructed and contains an outstanding level of depth and detail whilst your discussion linking it to contemporary MH Nursing practice is outstanding with a high level of relevance to practice. [7‐8]

OPTION 2: Discusses relevance of 1‐2 pieces of literature to contemporary mental health nursing (8)

Utilises clear strategies to

Presentation mostly read out verbatim from notes with little or no attempt to engage the tutorial group

Large sections of the Presentation read out verbatim from notes with minimal attempt to engage the

Large sections of the Presentation deliverd in the form of short sections read out from cue cards with

Overwhelming majority of the Presentation deliverd in the form of short sections read out from cue cards

NURS2098 Complex Mental Health & Recovery

Semester 1 of 2020

RMIT University Alistair Ross 19/03/2020 Page 5

engage the tutorial group [2]

evident during the presentation. No significant interactivity evident between the Presenter and the Tutorial group members. [0‐0.5]

tutorial group (i.e. examples of this may include asking the group questions / facilitating group discussion / using visual or or proprs / using clinical exelplars etc) evident during the presentation. Limited interactivity evident between the Presenter and the Tutorial group. [1]

significant adlib verbal expansion and discussion supported by strong attempts to engage the tutorial group (i.e. examples of this may include asking the group questions / facilitating group discussion / using visual or or proprs / using clinical exelplars etc) evident during the presentation. Very good interactivity evident between the Presenter and the Tutorial group. [1.5]

with significant adlib verbal expansion and discussion supported by extensive attempts to engage the tutorial group (i.e. examples of this may include asking the group questions / facilitating group discussion / using visual or or proprs / using clinical exelplars etc) evident during the presentation. Excellent interactivity evident between the Presenter and the Tutorial group. [2]

Makes effective use of handouts to support the Presentation: [2]

No handouts provided in support of the Presentation. [0]

Basic quality handouts provided in support of the presentation. This may include generic information relevant to the topic obtained from external sources (i.e. information flyers). Limited use of the handouts during your presentation to support your discussion. [1]

Very good quality handouts provided in support of the presentation. This will include information relevant to the topic obtained from external sources and combined into a handout specific to your presentation topic. Consistent use of the handouts during your presentation to support your discussion. [1.5]

Excellent quality handouts provided in support of the presentation. This will include information relevant to the topic obtained from external sources and combined into a handout specific to your presentation topic. Extensive use of the handouts during your presentation to support your discussion. [2]

Makes effective of time in your Presentation. [2]

Presentation section less than 5 minutes duration / Q&A section less than 2.5 minutes duration. [0.5]

Presentation section 5‐7 minutes duration / Q&A section 2.5‐3 minutes duration. [1]

Presentation section 7‐9 minutes duration / Q&A section 3‐4 minutes duration. [1.5]

Presentation section 9+ minutes duration / Q&A section 4+ minutes duration. [2]

Questions and answer section of the Presentation effectively lead / managed [2]

No plan / structure utilised for the Q&A section resulting in no meaningful discussion relating to the topic. [0]

Poorly prepared plan / structure utilised for the Q&A section (simply asking the Tute group if they have any questions would be an example of this) resulting in very little meaningful discussion relating to the topic. [1]

Reasonably well prepared plan / structure utilised for the Q&A section (such as asking the Tute group specific, well considered questions to facilitate discussion) resulting in robust meaningful discussion relating to the topic. [1.5]

Very well prepared plan / structure utilised for the Q&A section (such as asking the Tute group specific, well considered questions / running quizzes etc. to facilitate discussion) resulting in robust meaningful discussion relating to the topic. [2]

Use of creativity in the Presentation [1]:

Presentation delivered in a didactic type style with no evidence of creativity (beyond basic strategies to engage the tutorial group as listed above) noted during the presentation. [0]

Presentation primarily delivered in a didactic type style with some evidence of creativity (beyond basic strategies to engage the tutorial group as listed above) noted during the presentation. [0.5]

Presentation primarily delivered in a creative and imaginative style (well beyond basic strategies to engage the tutorial group as listed above). [1]

Bibliography provided in APA format [4]:

Very poor standard of referencing. Consistent errors in APA referencing style / format. Inadequate use of literature to support your presentation.

You have provided the minimum level of literature required to support your presentation. Some errors in APA referencing style / format.

You have provided a sound level of literature required to support your presentation. Good poor standard of referencing overall.

You have provided a good level of literature required to support your presentation. Very good poor standard of referencing overall.

You have provided an excellent of literature beyond what was required to support your presentation. Excellent standard of referencing overall.

NURS2098 Complex Mental Health & Recovery