Effective Practitioner prominences on person-centered, safe, evidence-based care.

/in /by
Description

Introduction

 

Effective Practitioner prominences on person-centered, safe, evidence-based care. The information, resources and actions are considered to support building a strong relationship with patients that result in a positive experience and outcomes. The knowledge, skills, and practices of early childhood educators are important factors in responsible how much a young child learns and how ready that child is for entry into school. Early childhood educators are being asked to have deeper understandings of child development and early education issues; to provide richer educational knowledges for all children, excluding those who are helpless and lacking; to engage children of changing abilities and backgrounds; to connect with a diverse array of families; and to do so with greater strains for responsibility and, in some cases, fewer resources, than ever before.

 

Kangaroo kids billabong high MM international school providing sustainable education for children aged between 2 to 8 years .begins  a sub-franchise of islander’s  education  limited (KKEL), this is the first school  to follow an international curriculum from per to primary  in Gdh. Thinadhoo. KKEL  is an  innovative, vibrant, creative energetic organization where 13 staffs and 100 students are enrolled in this organization  and each one of us strives through  our practice to whole heartedly serve children and make every learning  moment a joyful , effective and meaningful  one . highlighting  the KKEL curriculum it is learner- centric, research based and continuously improve, to offer a superior quality standard to  abreast with the newer dimensions in 21st  century education .

 

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

The process of gaining knowledge is more valuable than reaching an end result.” Discuss this claim with reference to two areas of knowledge”.

/in /by
Description

Theory Of Knowledge (TOK) essay.

Prescribed Title- “The process of gaining knowledge is more valuable than reaching an end result.” Discuss this claim with reference to two areas of knowledge”.

Must Include-

  1. formulate a knowledge question with in the essay itself and also answer it by giving some personal examples.
  2. at least 2 real life situation employing relevant Areas of Knowledge (AoK) and Ways of Knowing (Wok)
  3. claims and counter claims

Notes-

  1. Please use references only from the websites. Please don’t take any references from books, journals, etc.
  2. Bibliography only in MLA format.

Here are some websites that will guide you-

  1. For TOK Essay Format- https://www.ibmastery.com/blog/how-to-structure-a-theory-of-knowledge-essay

  1. For Knowledge Question- https://peda.net/jao/lyseo/isac/core/tokt/tlml/tok1/tlm/tffkq:file/download/815ef8dd2c8b9817f93760013b52e72046776a17/TOKKQTemplate.pdf

  1. AOK and WOK- https://sites.google.com/a/seisen.com/tok/aoks-and-wok

  1. TOK Essay Examples- http://www.ishweb.nl/Resources/50%20Excellent%20Theory%20of%20Knowledge%20Essays/html/essays.html

If you have any questions then please feel free to ask me

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

The headline of the Russian state media outlet RIA Novosti read, “Russia Created the Treatment for Coronavirus.”

/in /by
Description

The headline of the Russian state media outlet RIA Novosti read, “Russia Created the Treatment for Coronavirus.” The article went on to boast about the remedy based on the drug mefloquine, an antimalarial drug created in fact at the U.S. Army’s Walter Reed Medical Center shortly after the Vietnam War and widely known as Lariam. Mefloquine was created to replace chloroquine, another anti-malarial, which was President Donald Trump’s recent drug of choice in his dubious battle against COVID-19. It is still prescribed in many countries to prevent and treat malaria, but it is known to have severe and sometimes shocking side effects. A study conducted from 2001-2003 “confirmed mefloquine’s potential for causing psychological illness.” Facing a wave of ridicule in social media, Russian state media changed the headline, which now reads: “Russia Offered a Drug for Treating the Coronavirus.” It should be noted that there is no known cure or approved treatment for the coronavirus. Multiple clinical trials for potential medical treatments are still underway. The purpose of all this is less pharmacological than propagandistic. While Kremlin-controlled media outlets propagate conspiracy theories blaming the United States (and even Ukraine) for creating and spreading the coronavirus, Russia is presented as the potential savior of all of humanity. At a time when the Kremlin’s cynical effort to hide the extent of the pandemic in Russia is becoming ever more apparent, state media are criticizing American and European tactics for containing the pandemic. Virologist Mikhail Shchelkanov, head of the Laboratory of Ecology of Microorganisms, FEFU School of Biomedicine, described the Western approach as “18th-century tactics.” In contrast, he claimed that, “Russia, since the days of the Soviet Union, has had the world’s best biological safety system.”Russian coronavirus measures recommended by the government agency to the general public indeed seem more stringent than those offered in the United States. For example, everyday use of face masks in public is recommended for all individuals. Single-use masks are to be replaced every 2-3 hours. The risk to younger individuals is not being downplayed.

To the contrary, parents are being advised to keep their children at home or in the yard of their own home. When in public, children are to be prevented from touching any surfaces or interacting with others. There is public guidance with respect to the disinfection of store-bought food and merchandise. During his state TV show, The Evening with Vladimir Soloviev, the host described Russia’s approach to the pandemic as superior to that of Europe and the United States. “They’re behaving in an uncivilized manner,” Soloviev said, “They are being amoral. Our people unite and want to help others. Americans are just buying up guns.” Speaking to RIA Novosti, Shchelkanov praised China’s response to the pandemic and condemned the United States and Western Europe for their lack of coordinated actions, predicting that coronavirus “can easily spread like fire—and is spreading to neighboring countries.” He claimed that “the Russian Federation continues to be a bulwark of European stability.” In reality, the true numbers of coronavirus infections in Russia are grossly understated due to the lack of testing and creative approach to recording the number of deaths. Some quarantined Russians report receiving negative test results, in spite of not being tested.

The cause of death for coronavirus patients in Russia is being determined posthumously through an autopsy, and sometimes attributed to other causes, such as pulmonary thromboembolism—therefore being excluded from the official statistics. The aid supplied to Western countries by China and Russia has been criticized as largely defective and mainly useless. But Russian state media claim such support as the manifestation of “soft power.” Appearing on Soloviev’s show, political scientist Dmitry Evstafiev noted, “Every country is using the coronavirus pandemic as cover, trying to achieve their own goals. One of the Kremlin’s most pressing aims is the removal of U.S. and European sanctions against Russia and its informal allies: Iran, Venezuela, and North Korea. Experts on Russian state television repeatedly suggest that the Kremlin should bring up the removal of sanctions at every opportunity, especially while offering coronavirus aid to Western countries. During his state TV show, Soloviev expressed frustration that Trump “didn’t understand anything” and ignored President Vladimir Putin’s proposal at the recent G-20 summit calling for the immediate removal of all sanctions. Soloviev opined that the first country that is able to create the coronavirus vaccine would acquire an instrument of enormous political pressure. Russia is actively seeking to develop such a lever of global influence, but the unproven panacea it is currently touting was made in the USA.

 

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Definitions matter. Arguments of definition aren’t abstract exercises. Dictionaries are biased to their authors and to the times, so it’s possible to disagree with dictionary definitions or to regard them merely as starting points for arguments.

/in /by
Description

Instructions:

Essay #1 Argument of Definition

Definitions matter. Arguments of definition aren’t abstract exercises. Dictionaries are biased to their authors and to the times, so it’s possible to disagree with dictionary definitions or to regard them merely as starting points for arguments. An author may place a definition on their topic and make their claim from that starting point.

Read the article “Reading Literature Makes Us Smarter and Nicer” (Annie Murphy Paul, Time.com). Arguments arise from operational definitions whenever people disagree about what the conditions define or whether these conditions have been fulfilled. Operational definitions identify an object or idea by what it does or by what conditions create it. Take note of her opening quote.

Your paper will meet the following criteria:

  • At least two typed pages that is double-spaced for MLA format.
  • MLA formatting (in-text citations).
  • Introductory paragraph with hook. (Quote or interesting fact, cited if needed.)
  • Thesis statement with sub-points. (Includes the claim you are making.)
  • Appropriate transitions within and between paragraphs. (Change topic = change paragraph.)
  • Counterargument and refutation or concession (give the opposing argument from yours at least a bit of consent!)
  • Concluding paragraph that emphasizes the importance of knowing the facts presented. (Avoid simply repeating the thesis and key points.) Make it thought-provoking.
  • Avoidance of first and second person.
  • Effective sentencing and vocabulary usage.
  • Effective mechanics. (Spelling, grammar, punctuation).

 

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Essay over the book the Underground Railroad by Colson Whitehead

/in /by
Description

Double spaced , 12 point type , times new Roman font , standard margins

 

Essay over the book the Underground Railroad by Colson Whitehead

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Deterring sustainability in higher education institutions: An appraisal of the factors which influence sustainability in higher education institutions

/in /by
Description

Format —

Article reviewed-

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher education institutions: An appraisal of the factors which influence sustainability in higher education institutions

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242336083_Deterring_sustainability_in_higher_education_institutions_An_appraisal_of_the_factors_which_influence_sustainability_in_higher_education_institutions

Introduction to Paper

Summary

   Summaries paper, mythology, secondary report (secondary Survey experience), their main according to me

METHODOLOGY

Economic effect, environmental effect, social effect, institutional effect

Review/ Analysis

Prism of sustainability

Conclusion

Key point, thesis statement and my opininion

Refrences – 5 minimum

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242336083_Deterring_sustainability_in_higher_education_institutions_An_appraisal_of_the_factors_which_influence_sustainability_in_higher_education_institutions

notes

line and half spacing

12 font size, times

Other info-

Assessment Assignment 1: Essay: Review and critical commentary

 
   
Learning Outcomes Learning outcomes1-8 are assessed in these assignments.
   
Graduate Profile Outcomes[1] 1. Are confident, independent, resilient and able to set their own goals

2. Contribute positively to the global and local community

4. Are able to apply what has been learned in a range of vocational settings

5. Are curious and excited about learning

6. Know how to access and evaluate information in a range of ways

7. Think critically to solve problems collaboratively

10. Value creative and sustainable solutions
   
Assessment Assignment 1 will give the student the opportunity to select a paper, to learn about a specific topic that the student has decided to research and to write about it. The topic for the assignment is chosen by the student following discussion in class and with the lecturer.

 
Pre-Moderation These assignments have been pre-moderated.
   
Due Date See the assessment schedule below:

All assessments must be handed in on the due date and time. Late assessments will have 5% of the total grade deducted for each day the assessment is late. Once the assessment is five days overdue, it will receive zero marks.

From the course prescription:   This paper explores the inter-relatedness of culture, commerce, politics and science in understanding and managing opportunities of sustainability.

Resource Management 95.806 Assignment 1 (20%). Essay: Review and Critical Commentary.

In this assignment you will select one research paper that describes research you think will be useful in writing  your report and you will prepare a review and critical commentary of the paper. Your task is to write an essay to introduce your selected paper, to summerize it, and to critically review the paper. The term critically commentary means that you will examine the paper and evaluate the ideas from the author. The term “critical” does not mean “find faults” but to explore the ideas and to write to understand and to put the ideas into prespective with other writing on thetopic.

Before you begin writing select an academic paper that you can use as a case study in your final report. Please discuss this selection with your lecturer. I suggest you follow the marking rubric as an essay map.

Marking Schedule:  Review and Critical Essay
Criteria Fail Fair (Descriptive) Good (Analytical) Excellent (Evaluative) Max. Mark
Introduction of selected paper and objective of this essay There is no clear introduction and no clear aim of the research is given. (0-4) The introduction states the main topic but no clear aim of the research is given. (5-6) The introduction states the main topic and briefly discusses the aim of the research. (7-8) The introduction is engaging and briefly discusses the aim of the research. (9-10) 10  
Review/summary of the paper: Introduction, methodology, results, discussion and conclusion. Key points only. Summary demonstrates a lack of understanding and knowledge of the source paper (0-5) Summary demonstrates a simple (descriptive) understanding of the source paper  (6-10) Summary demonstrates a clear understanding of the source paper (11-14) Summary demonstrates an evaluative understanding of the source paper (15-20) 20  
Critical assessment: Using the Prism of Sustainability evaluate the research. The analysis is vague or not evident. Struggles to reflect and paraphrase, and to use the Prism of Sustainability accurately. (0-9) Analysis is general and shows some understanding of the use of the Prism of Sustainability. (10-18) Displays evidence of a basic analysis of a topic and recognition and understanding of the Prism of Sustainability. (19-25) Excellent analysis of a topic and demonstrates exceptional complex thinking and thorough understanding of the Prism of Sustainability. (26-30) 30  
Conclusion: Summerize key points, connect to objective of the essay. Incorrectly identifies main issues and does not show understanding of viewpoints surrounding the topic. The conclusion is poorly connected to the aim of the paper. (0-5) Limited understanding of main issues and viewpoints surrounding the topic. The conclusion does not adequately state an opinion. The conclusion is not clearly connected to the aim of research.(6-10)  Good understanding of main issues The conclusion states an opinion. Conclusions are clearly drawn and connected to the aim of research and show thoughtfulness. (11-14) Excellent understanding of main issues and viewpoints surrounding the topic. The conclusion is engaging and states an opinion. Conclusions are well articulated and show thoughtfulness and reflections in practice. (15-20) 20  
Clarity/coherence/ logical argument Poor, lacks direction and structure, many grammar and spelling mistakes.

Writing is confusing (0-4)

 Adequate presentation, and structure, few grammar and spelling mistakes. Writing makes key points but lacks focus and clarity.

(5-6)

 Good presentation, logical structure, using correct grammar and spelling. Writing is clear and focused.

(7-8)

 Outstanding, well-directed presentation, logically and coherently structured, using correct grammar and spelling. Writing contains multiple discourse markers, is structurally complex and elegant  (9-10) 10

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

motivational essay to enter a MSc in Statistics and Operational Research focused on Data Science.

/in /by
Description

I would like your help for my motivational essay to enter a MSc in Statistics and Operational Research focused on Data Science. It should include how these studies would be of benefit to my country (Panama) .

The web page of the Master´s Degree is  https://mesioupcub.masters.upc.edu/en/pathways/Data%20Science%20%28DS%29

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Both Citizen Kane and Red River are iconic genre movies within the “ Classical Hollywood Style” of film making.

/in /by
Description

Discussion Assignment

 

What do I need to do?

 

  1. Respond in minimum 300 words to the discussion question provided. (Please note: part of your mark in this section is based on posting your initial response early throughout the week so as to give time for others to respond.)
  2. Read through what other students have written in the discussion forum
  3. Respond to a minimum of 2 students (each response should be a minimum of 100 words). Your responses should add to the conversation. You are expected to add comments that continue or add new thoughts to get students reflecting on your response. You are not simply saying “great work”.
  4. Please see rubric for how you are being marked for the discussion post

 

Discussion Question

 

Both Citizen Kane and Red River are iconic genre movies within the “ Classical Hollywood Style” of film making. According to the American Film Institute, “During Hollywood’s classical period, a particular type of storytelling was favored. It championed narrative economy and a seamless style. In other words, films were constructed so that the viewer was not aware of the construction. This practice of effacing a film’s construction actually depends on a complex system of visual codes, a visual syntax still taught in film schools.” This classical Hollywood style emphasizes a linear narrative and a technical structure that allows the viewer to easily interpret that narrative.

 

For this  discussion please read the powerpoint provided titled “Classical Hollywood Style” (as well search some of the typical elements for more insight: “180 degree rule” “coverage” etc) and then address the following question in your discussion

 

PART A) Explain how story telling has been enhanced through the use of these new editing techniques. Here you are expected to compare and contrast the module 1 and module 2 films.

 

PART B) Identify two components of the “Classical Hollywood” style. Now illustrate each of your chosen (favourite) two styles with an example from Red River and another but related example from Citizen Kane (you will be identifying four examples in all). You should define each component and explain how your examples enhance the viewers understanding of the film.

 

How am I being evaluated?

CRITERIA 3 Points 2 Point 1 Point 0 Points
Quantity and Timeliness Submits one initial response early in the session and exceeds two  thoughtful peer responses

Initial Post exceeds 300 words

 Submits initial post early in the session and two peer responses

 

Initial Post is 250-300 words

 Does not submit at least one initial response early in the session and/or does not submit at least two peer responses.

Initial Post is less than 250 words

 Not submitted early in the session and no responses to peers

 

Initial post is less than 150 words
Mechanics and APA Submits posts that contain grammatically correct sentences without any spelling errors.

Cites information using correct APA

  Submits posts that contain 2-3 grammatical or spelling errors.

Cites information but with some errors in APA

 Submits posts that have more than 3 errors in spelling and grammar.

Many errors in APA

 Submits posts with more than 5 errors

Information is not cited.
Critical Analysis Discussion posts display an excellent understanding of required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology.

Post addresses all required elements in the assignment.

 Discussion posts display an understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts. Discussion posts repeat and summarize basic, correct, information, but does not provide connections between ideas.

 

Does not address all required elements in the sometime

 Discussion posts show little or no evidence that readings were completed or understood. Postings are largely personal opinions or feelings, or “I agree”, “great idea”, etc.

 

 

Does not address all required elements in the assignment.
Peer Responsiveness Demonstrates an exceptional ability to analyze and synthesize student work, asks meaningful extending questions or counterarguments. Demonstrates a good ability to analyze other student work, and ask meaningful extending questions or counterarguments. Some ability to meaningfully comment on other student work. Poor ability to comment on other student work, asks no meaningful questions or thoughts.

 

Ask This Assignment To Be Done By Our Experts

Get instant assignment help service

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Why do you believe this is the author’s purpose?

/in /by
Description

intended audience:

Evidence (Identify two (2) signs that help you to identify the audience.)

purpose:

Why do you believe this is the author’s purpose? (Answer in one complete sentence.)

diction

Evidence (Identify two (2) types of evidence with quotations and in-text citations.)

tone (the most predominant one):

Evidence (Identify specific words with quotations and in-text citations.)

mode (Identify just one.):

Evidence (Identify two (2) locations with in-text citations.)

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

In your assignment paper, identify which question you are answering by copying the relevant question into your paper.

/in /by
Description

In your assignment paper, identify which question you are answering by copying the relevant question into your paper. You are free to respond in any format you like – Use text, illustrations, charts or tables if they suit your reply. Keep your total assignment to no more than 6 pages of content, not including title page and a reference page, if you use one.

1. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is presented as a method to achieve objectives more effectively versus the traditional risk approach. ERM Standards/Frameworks > COSO II:2017 and ISO 31000:2018 are two of the most widely used standards around the world. Choose one framework you will work with throughout the course and apply it to the case study.

a. Explain how using that framework would help ART to improve their innovation approach and business practices.

b. Demonstrate how your explanation applies by choosing one example from the case study.

 

Instruction Files

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now