Read the Study Questions “Modern Art Midterm” to get an idea of the homework. this folder will give you an explanation of how to answer the quiestions. read the articles attached. then, answer the five questions below:

1. Describe how the concept of the sublime in Charles Baudelaire’s “The Painter of Modern Life” relates to realism/impressionism in early modern painting. What role does the metaphor of “the child” play in his theories on realism?

2. Explain what Hermann Bahr means when he writes about the concept of “seeing” in his essay “Expressionism.” How does he use Impressionism to strengthen his argument for expressionistic painting?

3. Describe how simultaneity is conveyed in both Cubist and Futurist painting. How does the depiction of time differ between the two art movements?

4. Using the theories of composition by Piet Mondrian, explain why painting must purify itself into a purely abstract form.

5. What does Clement Greenberg mean when he writes “the imitation of imitating,” and how does this phrase relate to abstract paintings of the avant-garde?

Each question should be answered individualy in a short Comprehensive Essay format. that includes:

(I.) references to the readings (quotations or comprehensive use of paraphrasing are best), (II.) explanations of any reading references, and (III.) examples of artworks used in discussion. In reference to this third category, you should provide the titles of artworks and describe details in these examples that bear out the theory in the readings.

Analyze and evaluate the major points of your case study for research to write your persuasive essay. Use your time to develop a deep understanding of your topic to fully explain your stance on the topic. You are required to give an in depth introduction of your topic. Provide transitional sentences from one topic to the next. Then develop the body of the paper fully using no less than 3 full pages and no more than 5 pages, this does not include the APA format title and references page. Finally, provide a summative conclusion. Provide a total of two references for your references page. Ensure you use arial 12 point font and the current APA Writing Style.

Grading is as follows:  RATING UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY SUPERIOR RANGE 0 – 69.9 70 – 89.9 90 – 100 GRADE COGNITIVE LEVEL ATTAINED: Higher levels include characteristics of lower levels. ANALYZING: Breaking material into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to each other and to an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing, and attributing. APPLYING: Carrying out or using a procedure through executing, or implementing. UNDERSTANDING: Constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining. REMEMBERING: Retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge from long-term memory.

Analyze and evaluate the major points of your case study for research to write your persuasive essay. Use your time to develop a deep understanding of your topic to fully explain your stance on the topic. You are required to give an in depth introduction of your topic. Provide transitional sentences from one topic to the next. Then develop the body of the paper fully using no less than 3 full pages and no more than 5 pages, this does not include the APA format title and references page. Finally, provide a summative conclusion. Provide a minimum of two references for your references page. In-text citations are required for all cited resources and references Ensure you use Times New Roman 12 point font and the current APA Writing Style. Be sure to proofread your essay for spelling and grammatical errors. Apply everything you learned in class towards the writing of your persuasive essay. Essays must be submitted at the end of the allotted timeframe so that they can be graded. Choose one of these two sides to persuade your reader:

(1) “President Obama had the legal authority to order Operation Geronimo and to execute the plan”; or,

(2) “President Obama did not have the legal authority to order Operation Geronimo and to execute the plan”.

H-32

US ARMY SERGEANTS MAJOR ACADEMY Advanced Leader Course

Leader Core Competencies

Lesson Plan for A210 Persuasive Essay

“Presidential Authority: Operation Geronimo Case Study” Scenario

When a nation contemplates the use of force, that force must be done with legal authority and within the strictures of the laws of armed conflict. If there is both legal authority and that force follows the principles laid down by The Hague Rules of 1907 and the Geneva Conventions of 1949 then there can be a justified result. After September 11, 2001, Congress authorized the Commander-in-Chief at the time to use force against those individuals who had perpetrated the attack on the United States that fateful day. Under our constitutional scheme, the President could direct the National Command Authority to use armed force against Al Qaeda, including Bin Laden and others. Additional international authorizations via the United Nations and NATO followed. Overlaid in this authorization to use force was the basic international principle of the inherent right of a nation to self-defense, found in Art. 51 of the UN Charter. Domestically, the authorized use of force was most certainly supported by a Presidential finding to kill Bin Laden as a hostile. By law the President must inform the leadership in Congress about these findings. This was done years prior to the operation itself. The operation was months in the making. Intelligence officials discovered the compound in August while monitoring an al Qaeda courier. The CIA had been hunting that courier for years. CIA interrogators in secret overseas prison developed the first strands of information on him. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the September. 11, 2001 attacks, provided his name. The CIA got similar information from Mohammed’s successor, Abu Faraj al-Libi. The detainees told interrogators that the courier was so trusted by bin Laden that he might very well be living with the al Qaeda leader. By mid-February, intelligence from multiple sources was clear enough that President Obama wanted to “pursue an aggressive course of action,” a senior administration official said. Over the next two and a half months, President Obama led five meetings of the National Security Council focused solely on whether bin Laden was in that compound and, if so, how to get him. President Obama met with his national security advisers on March 14, 2011 to create an action plan. President Obama personally discussed the plan with Vice Admiral William McRaven, the commander of the U.S. Joint Special Operations Command. The commander first approach considered was to bomb the house using B- 2 Spirit stealth bombers, which could drop 2,000-pound Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs). Obama rejected this option, however, opting for a raid instead. This would provide definitive proof that bin Laden was inside, and limit collateral damage. On April 29, 2011, President Obama approved an operation to kill bin Laden. It was a mission that required surgical accuracy, even more precision than could be delivered by the government’s sophisticated Predator drones. To execute it, President Obama tapped a small contingent of the Navy’s elite SEAL Team Six and put them under the command of CIA Director Leon Panetta, whose analysts monitored the compound from afar. Operation Geronimo is the code name given to the raid conducted by the United States Special Forces against Osama bin Laden’s safe house in the city of Abbottābad, Pakistan on May 1, 2011. Osama Bin Laden was killed during this operation. The operation was conducted by members of the United States Navy SEAL Team Six, under the command of the Joint Special Operations Command, in conjunction with U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) operatives. The team had to go across the border of Afghanistan to launch the attack. During the month leading up to the raid, members of the Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU) trained on a one-acre replica of the “Waziristan Mansion” compound in a special operations sector of Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, practicing rappelling down into it from helicopters, among other tactical approaches. DEVGRU was a 24-man platoon. Bin Laden was in a highly fortified compound in the Pakistani town of Abbottābad. Nestled in a neighborhood that also was near Pakistani military academy and favored by retired military leaders, the

H-33

compound was surrounded by walls as high as 18 feet, topped with barbed wire. Two security gates guarded the only way in. A third-floor terrace was shielded by a seven-foot privacy wall. No phone lines or Internet cables ran to the property. The residents burned their garbage rather than put it out for collection. Intelligence officials believed the million-dollar compound was built five years ago to protect a major terrorist figure. The raid of the compound was less than 40 minutes.