Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Description

Format —

Article reviewed-

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher

education institutions

An appraisal of the factors which influence

sustainability in

higher education institutions

Luis Velazquez, Nora Munguia and Margarita Sanchez

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sonora,

Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico

Deterring sustainability in higher education institutions: An appraisal of the factors which influence sustainability in higher education institutions

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242336083_Deterring_sustainability_in_higher_education_institutions_An_appraisal_of_the_factors_which_influence_sustainability_in_higher_education_institutions

Introduction to Paper

Summary

   Summaries paper, mythology, secondary report (secondary Survey experience), their main according to me

METHODOLOGY

Economic effect, environmental effect, social effect, institutional effect

Review/ Analysis

Prism of sustainability

Conclusion

Key point, thesis statement and my opininion

Refrences – 5 minimum

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242336083_Deterring_sustainability_in_higher_education_institutions_An_appraisal_of_the_factors_which_influence_sustainability_in_higher_education_institutions

notes

line and half spacing

12 font size, times

Other info-

Assessment	Assignment 1: Essay: Review and critical commentary
Learning Outcomes	Learning outcomes1-8 are assessed in these assignments.
Graduate Profile Outcomes[1]	1. Are confident, independent, resilient and able to set their own goals 2. Contribute positively to the global and local community 4. Are able to apply what has been learned in a range of vocational settings 5. Are curious and excited about learning 6. Know how to access and evaluate information in a range of ways 7. Think critically to solve problems collaboratively 10. Value creative and sustainable solutions
Assessment	Assignment 1 will give the student the opportunity to select a paper, to learn about a specific topic that the student has decided to research and to write about it. The topic for the assignment is chosen by the student following discussion in class and with the lecturer.
Pre-Moderation	These assignments have been pre-moderated.
Due Date	See the assessment schedule below: All assessments must be handed in on the due date and time. Late assessments will have 5% of the total grade deducted for each day the assessment is late. Once the assessment is five days overdue, it will receive zero marks.

From the course prescription:   This paper explores the inter-relatedness of culture, commerce, politics and science in understanding and managing opportunities of sustainability.

Resource Management 95.806 Assignment 1 (20%). Essay: Review and Critical Commentary.

In this assignment you will select one research paper that describes research you think will be useful in writing  your report and you will prepare a review and critical commentary of the paper. Your task is to write an essay to introduce your selected paper, to summerize it, and to critically review the paper. The term critically commentary means that you will examine the paper and evaluate the ideas from the author. The term “critical” does not mean “find faults” but to explore the ideas and to write to understand and to put the ideas into prespective with other writing on thetopic.

Before you begin writing select an academic paper that you can use as a case study in your final report. Please discuss this selection with your lecturer. I suggest you follow the marking rubric as an essay map.

Marking Schedule:  Review and Critical Essay
Criteria	Fail	Fair (Descriptive)	Good (Analytical)	Excellent (Evaluative)	Max.	Mark
Introduction of selected paper and objective of this essay	There is no clear introduction and no clear aim of the research is given. (0-4)	The introduction states the main topic but no clear aim of the research is given. (5-6)	The introduction states the main topic and briefly discusses the aim of the research. (7-8)	The introduction is engaging and briefly discusses the aim of the research. (9-10)	10
Review/summary of the paper: Introduction, methodology, results, discussion and conclusion. Key points only.	Summary demonstrates a lack of understanding and knowledge of the source paper (0-5)	Summary demonstrates a simple (descriptive) understanding of the source paper  (6-10)	Summary demonstrates a clear understanding of the source paper (11-14)	Summary demonstrates an evaluative understanding of the source paper (15-20)	20
Critical assessment: Using the Prism of Sustainability evaluate the research.	The analysis is vague or not evident. Struggles to reflect and paraphrase, and to use the Prism of Sustainability accurately. (0-9)	Analysis is general and shows some understanding of the use of the Prism of Sustainability. (10-18)	Displays evidence of a basic analysis of a topic and recognition and understanding of the Prism of Sustainability. (19-25)	Excellent analysis of a topic and demonstrates exceptional complex thinking and thorough understanding of the Prism of Sustainability. (26-30)	30
Conclusion: Summerize key points, connect to objective of the essay.	Incorrectly identifies main issues and does not show understanding of viewpoints surrounding the topic. The conclusion is poorly connected to the aim of the paper. (0-5)	Limited understanding of main issues and viewpoints surrounding the topic. The conclusion does not adequately state an opinion. The conclusion is not clearly connected to the aim of research.(6-10)	Good understanding of main issues The conclusion states an opinion. Conclusions are clearly drawn and connected to the aim of research and show thoughtfulness. (11-14)	Excellent understanding of main issues and viewpoints surrounding the topic. The conclusion is engaging and states an opinion. Conclusions are well articulated and show thoughtfulness and reflections in practice. (15-20)	20
Clarity/coherence/ logical argument	Poor, lacks direction and structure, many grammar and spelling mistakes. Writing is confusing (0-4)	Adequate presentation, and structure, few grammar and spelling mistakes. Writing makes key points but lacks focus and clarity. (5-6)	Good presentation, logical structure, using correct grammar and spelling. Writing is clear and focused. (7-8)	Outstanding, well-directed presentation, logically and coherently structured, using correct grammar and spelling. Writing contains multiple discourse markers, is structurally complex and elegant  (9-10)	10

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Description

Discussion Assignment

 

What do I need to do?

 

1. Respond in minimum 300 words to the discussion question provided. (Please note: part of your mark in this section is based on posting your initial response early throughout the week so as to give time for others to respond.)
2. Read through what other students have written in the discussion forum
3. Respond to a minimum of 2 students (each response should be a minimum of 100 words). Your responses should add to the conversation. You are expected to add comments that continue or add new thoughts to get students reflecting on your response. You are not simply saying “great work”.
4. Please see rubric for how you are being marked for the discussion post

 

Discussion Question

 

Both Citizen Kane and Red River are iconic genre movies within the “ Classical Hollywood Style” of film making. According to the American Film Institute, “During Hollywood’s classical period, a particular type of storytelling was favored. It championed narrative economy and a seamless style. In other words, films were constructed so that the viewer was not aware of the construction. This practice of effacing a film’s construction actually depends on a complex system of visual codes, a visual syntax still taught in film schools.” This classical Hollywood style emphasizes a linear narrative and a technical structure that allows the viewer to easily interpret that narrative.

 

For this  discussion please read the powerpoint provided titled “Classical Hollywood Style” (as well search some of the typical elements for more insight: “180 degree rule” “coverage” etc) and then address the following question in your discussion

 

PART A) Explain how story telling has been enhanced through the use of these new editing techniques. Here you are expected to compare and contrast the module 1 and module 2 films.

 

PART B) Identify two components of the “Classical Hollywood” style. Now illustrate each of your chosen (favourite) two styles with an example from Red River and another but related example from Citizen Kane (you will be identifying four examples in all). You should define each component and explain how your examples enhance the viewers understanding of the film.

 

How am I being evaluated?

CRITERIA	3 Points	2 Point	1 Point	0 Points
Quantity and Timeliness	Submits one initial response early in the session and exceeds two  thoughtful peer responses Initial Post exceeds 300 words	Submits initial post early in the session and two peer responses   Initial Post is 250-300 words	Does not submit at least one initial response early in the session and/or does not submit at least two peer responses. Initial Post is less than 250 words	Not submitted early in the session and no responses to peers   Initial post is less than 150 words
Mechanics and APA	Submits posts that contain grammatically correct sentences without any spelling errors. Cites information using correct APA	Submits posts that contain 2-3 grammatical or spelling errors. Cites information but with some errors in APA	Submits posts that have more than 3 errors in spelling and grammar. Many errors in APA	Submits posts with more than 5 errors Information is not cited.
Critical Analysis	Discussion posts display an excellent understanding of required readings and underlying concepts including correct use of terminology. Post addresses all required elements in the assignment.	Discussion posts display an understanding of the required readings and underlying concepts.	Discussion posts repeat and summarize basic, correct, information, but does not provide connections between ideas.   Does not address all required elements in the sometime	Discussion posts show little or no evidence that readings were completed or understood. Postings are largely personal opinions or feelings, or “I agree”, “great idea”, etc.     Does not address all required elements in the assignment.
Peer Responsiveness	Demonstrates an exceptional ability to analyze and synthesize student work, asks meaningful extending questions or counterarguments.	Demonstrates a good ability to analyze other student work, and ask meaningful extending questions or counterarguments.	Some ability to meaningfully comment on other student work.	Poor ability to comment on other student work, asks no meaningful questions or thoughts.

 

Ask This Assignment To Be Done By Our Experts

Get instant assignment help service

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Description

In your assignment paper, identify which question you are answering by copying the relevant question into your paper. You are free to respond in any format you like – Use text, illustrations, charts or tables if they suit your reply. Keep your total assignment to no more than 6 pages of content, not including title page and a reference page, if you use one.

1. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is presented as a method to achieve objectives more effectively versus the traditional risk approach. ERM Standards/Frameworks > COSO II:2017 and ISO 31000:2018 are two of the most widely used standards around the world. Choose one framework you will work with throughout the course and apply it to the case study.

a. Explain how using that framework would help ART to improve their innovation approach and business practices.

b. Demonstrate how your explanation applies by choosing one example from the case study.

 

Instruction Files

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Description

Annotate article

1. Speaker/Rhetor – What do we know about them? Are they trustworthy? Views? Values? Beliefs? What is her purpose? What does she hope to convey about herself?

2. Audience – What do we know about them? Who are they? Are they inclined to be skeptical of the speaker? Do they share values, interests, beliefs with the speaker? Who isn’t included in the audience?

3. Subject – What information does the speaker choose to address? What does she leave out? What does she hope to accomplish?

4. Context – When and where was the message delivered? Why did the speaker need to share the message? What outside forces may affect how the message is received?

 

Instruction Files

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now