STUDY GUIDE FOR MEDICATION

/in /by

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Determining the credibility of evidence and sources

/in /by

Determining the credibility of evidence and resources

Develop a 2-4-page scholarly paper in which you describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, and then identify and analyze credible evidence that could be used as the basis for applying EBP to the issue.

Link for selecting a model to use in the paper:

https://connect.springerpub.com/content/book/978-0-8261-2759-4/back-matter/bmatter1

Introduction

The goal of using evidence-based research findings is to enhance safety and quality of patient care and ensure optimal outcomes are achieved. It is not uncommon to hear a nurse say, “why change it as we’ve always done it this way.” However, this is no longer acceptable in today’s practice environment. The profession of nursing has evolved, and the expectation is that the professional nurse has a scientific foundation to support the care that is provided. As the profession of nursing continues to evolve and engage in health care transformation, baccalaureate-prepared nurses are expanding taking on leadership roles that include incorporating EBPs. To be able to do this, the nurse needs to understand the criteria and makes a resource credible, as this is crucial when deciding if the research is valid and reliable for implementation into health care settings. The nurse will need to incorporate the use of evidence-based practice models. EBP models are designed to assist the nurse in developing a plan to gather evidence to answer a practice problem or question. It is a systematic approach to direct the user to incorporate scholarly findings into current practice. These EBP models lead the nurse through the decision-making process of evaluating the literature to determine the best practice evidence for the practice issue or question.

Scenario

For this assessment, you may choose from the following options as the context for the quality or safety issue or chosen diagnosis/health issue for researching and completing this assessment:

· The specific diagnosis/health issue you identified in your previous assessment. (Septicemia)

 

· The simulation Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of Evidence.

 

· A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred.

 

Instructions

The purpose of this analysis is to better understand what constitutes credibility of journal articles as well as websites. As quality improvement (QI) measures to reduce safety risks continue to be emphasized, the need for evidence-based models and evidence-based templates is growing. This type of systematic approach to incorporating evidence-based findings allows nurses to make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence. When the most up-to-date evidence-based findings are utilized, patient-centered care improves outcomes and enhances the patient experience.

Below is a quick review table of several well-known Evidence-Based Practice Models used to guide exploration:

https://connect.springerpub.com/content/book/978-0-8261-2759-4/back-matter/bmatter1

Evidence-Based Practice Models
Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice
Stetler Model
Ottawa Model
PARiHS (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) Model
ACE (Academic Center for Evidence-Based Practice) Star Model
ARCC (Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration) Mode
John Hopkins Model
KTA (Knowledge-to-Action) Model

For this assessment:

· Explain the criteria that should be used when determining the credibility of journal articles as well as websites.

· Support your explanations with references to the literature or research articles that describe criteria that should be used to determine credibility.

. Your identification and determination of credibility should be done within the context of your chosen scenario for this assessment. For example, if you choose to use the provided Vila Health scenario, your initial identification of resources should be of resources that will best help address the presented issue. However, if you are locating resources to help provide evidence-based care for the diagnosis/health care issue you identified in the first assessment, you may want to begin your literature and evidence search from the databases that were identified. Any of the three scenario options are acceptable. So, pick the one that most interests you.

Be sure to address the following in this assessment, which correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you will know what is needed for a distinguished score.

· Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.

· Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.

· Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.

. This is where you are selecting the specific resources to help address the issue in your chosen scenario.

· Identify the Evidence-Based Practice model and explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into the EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue. Review the literature below and choose the appropriate model for your diagnosis/health care issue.

. Selecting a model for evidence-based practice changes. [PDF]  and  Evidence-Based Practice Models  help explain the various evidence-based nursing models.

· Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should meet the following requirements:

· Length of submission: 2–4-page scholarly paper, this does not include the APA-formatted title page and reference list.

· Number of references: Cite 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.

· APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style.

 

D

etermi

ning the credibility of evidence and resources

 

Develop a 2

–

4

–

page scholarly paper in which you describe a quality or safety issue, or a

chosen diagnosis, and then identify and analyze credible evidence that could be used

as the basis for applying EBP to the issue.

 

Link for

selecting

a

 

model to use in the paper

:

 

https://connect.springerpub.com/content/book/978

–

0

–

8261

–

2759

–

4/back

–

matter/bm

atter

1

 

Introduction

 

The goal of using evidenc

e

–

based research findings is to enhance safety and quality of

patient care and ensure optimal outcomes are achieved. It is not uncommon to hear a

nurse say, “why change it as we’ve always done it this way.” However, this is no longer

acceptable in today’s

practice environment. The profession of nursing has evolved, and

the expectation is that the professional nurse has a scientific foundation to support the

care that is provided. As the profession of nursing continues to evolve and engage in

health care tra

nsformation, baccalaureate

–

prepared nurses are expanding taking on

leadership roles that include incorporating EBPs. To be able to do this, the nurse needs

to understand the criteria and makes a resource credible, as this is crucial when

deciding if the re

search is valid and reliable for implementation into health care

settings.

 

The nurse will need to incorporate the use of evidence

–

based practice models.

EBP models are designed to assist the nurse in developing a plan to gather evidence to

answer a practic

e problem or question. It is a systematic approach to direct the user to

incorporate scholarly findings into current practice. These EBP models lead the nurse

through the decision

–

making process of evaluating the literature to determine the best

practice e

vidence for the practice issue or question.

 

Scenario

 

For this assessment, you may choose fro

m the following options as the context for the

quality or safety issue or chosen diagnosis/health issue for researching and completing

this assessment:

 

·

 

The specific diagnosis/health issue you

 

identified in your previous a

ssessment.

 

 

(

S

epticemia)

 

 

·

 

The

 

simulation Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of

 

Evidence.

 

 

·

 

A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred.

 

 

Determining the credibility of evidence and resources

Develop a 2-4-page scholarly paper in which you describe a quality or safety issue, or a

chosen diagnosis, and then identify and analyze credible evidence that could be used

as the basis for applying EBP to the issue.

Link for selecting a model to use in the paper:

https://connect.springerpub.com/content/book/978-0-8261-2759-4/back-matter/bmatter1

Introduction

The goal of using evidence-based research findings is to enhance safety and quality of

patient care and ensure optimal outcomes are achieved. It is not uncommon to hear a

nurse say, “why change it as we’ve always done it this way.” However, this is no longer

acceptable in today’s practice environment. The profession of nursing has evolved, and

the expectation is that the professional nurse has a scientific foundation to support the

care that is provided. As the profession of nursing continues to evolve and engage in

health care transformation, baccalaureate-prepared nurses are expanding taking on

leadership roles that include incorporating EBPs. To be able to do this, the nurse needs

to understand the criteria and makes a resource credible, as this is crucial when

deciding if the research is valid and reliable for implementation into health care

settings. The nurse will need to incorporate the use of evidence-based practice models.

EBP models are designed to assist the nurse in developing a plan to gather evidence to

answer a practice problem or question. It is a systematic approach to direct the user to

incorporate scholarly findings into current practice. These EBP models lead the nurse

through the decision-making process of evaluating the literature to determine the best

practice evidence for the practice issue or question.

Scenario

For this assessment, you may choose from the following options as the context for the

quality or safety issue or chosen diagnosis/health issue for researching and completing

this assessment:

 The specific diagnosis/health issue you identified in your previous assessment.

(Septicemia)

 

 The simulation Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of Evidence.

 

 A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred.

 

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Family Analysis Project for Michael Smith

/in /by

Family Analysis Project

Submit by 2359 Saturday of Module 5.

NOTE: You will create and upload an original Word file for this assignment instead of typing directly into this document.

Overview

Select one (1) family based on personal/professional acquaintance, to complete a comprehensive, written assessment/analysis using the criteria listed below (based on class notes and readings). DO NOT use your family of orientation (family of origin) or your nuclear (conjugal) family. (For definitions, see the Glossary of Terms in Friedman et al, Family Nursing textbook.

Objectives

• Examine the impact of functional patterns and role structure on the family. • Examine family relationships and communication patterns. • Identify influences on family health promotion.

 

 

N3352 Legacy of the Family

©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 2 of 5

 

 

Grading Rubric Family Analysis Project

Target 60 points max

Acceptable At least 42 points

Unacceptable Less than 42 points

Introduction (5 points)

Introduction is present and forecasts content of the paper. (4-5 points)

Introduction is present and forecasts the content of the paper. (3-4 points)

Introduction is present. (0-1 point)

Description of Nuclear Family or Variant Family Form (8 points)

Comprehensive description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage (7-8 points)

Adequate description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage (4-6 points)

Minimal description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage. Some elements may be missing. (0-3 point)

Sociocultural Data: Cultural/Ethnic Asessment; Social Class Status (5 points)

Comprehensive description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural/ethnic and social class status (4-5 points)

Adequate description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural ethnic and social class status (2-3 points)

Minimal description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural ethnic and social class status (0-1 point)

Genogram & Ecomap (14 points)

Genogram represents a minimum of 2 generations; Uses correct symbols to demonstrate relationships; Includes symbol legend Ecomap identifies family relationships inside the middle circle; Uses external circles to include representation from multiple formal and informal support systems; Identifies the nature of relationships between family members and support systems; Includes legend (12-14 points)

Genogram represents only 1 generation; Uses mostly correct symbols to demonstrate relationships; Includes symbol legend Ecomap identifies family relationships inside the middle circle; Uses external circles to include representation from some formal and informal support systems; Identifies the nature of some of the relationships between family members and support systems; Includes legend (7-11 points)

Genogram is incomplete; Uses some correct symbols to demonstrate relationships; Includes symbol legend Ecomap identifies some family relationships inside the middle circle; Uses external circles to include some representation from formal and informal support systems; Identifies the nature of a few of the relationships between family members and support systems; Includes legend. (0-6 points)

 

 

©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 3 of 5

N3352 Legacy of the Family

 

 

Environment: Physical Setting (Home, Neighborhood, Community) (5 points)

Clearly depicts the physical environment, including the home, neighborhood, and community. (4-5 points)

Depicts some of the physical environment, including the home, neighborhood, and community. (2-3 point)

Depicts some of the physical environment, including the home, neighborhood, and community. (0-1 point)

Communication (5 points)

Carefully describes the quality and methods of communication within the family (4-5 points)

Generally describes some of the quality and/or methods of communication with the family (2-3 point)

Inadequately describes some of the quality or methods of communication with the family (0-1 points)

Power Structure: Hierarchy; Power Bases; Coalitions (5 points)

Clearly explains the power structure within the family, including the power hierarchy, power bases, and coalitions (4-5 points)

Adequately explains the power structure within the family, including the power hierarchy, power bases, and coalitions (2-3 point)

Inadequately explains the power structure within the family, including the power hierarchy, power bases, and coalitions (0-1 points)

Role Structure: Relationships (Formal & Informal) (5 points)

Clearly describes the roles within the family and how they relate to one another, both formally and informally 4-5 (2 points)

Adequately describes the roles within the family and how they relate to one another, both formally and informally (2-3 point)

Inadequately describes the roles within the family and/or how they relate to one another

(0-1 points)

Values: Norms & Rules (5 points)

Thoroughly explains the values of the family as demonstrated through its norms and rules (4-5 points)

Adequately explains the values of the family as demonstrated through its norms and rules (2-3 point)

Inadequately explains the values of the family as demonstrated through its norms and rules (0-1 points)

Spiritual Activities (5 points)

Thoroughly explains the spiritual activities of the family and their role in their lives (4-5 points)

Adequately explains the spiritual activities of the family and their role in their lives (2-3 point)

Inadequately explains the spiritual activities of the family and their role in their lives (0-1 points)

Socialization: Child Rearing Practices; Intra- family Support/Social Network; Recreational/ Leisure Activities (5 points)

Carefully explains each aspect of socialization in the family unit as outlined to the left. (4-5 points)

Explains some aspects of socialization in the family unit as outlined to the Left. (2-3. Points)

Fails to explain some aspects of socialization in the family unit as outlined to the left.

(0-1 points)

 

 

©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 4 of 5

N3352 Legacy of the Family

 

 

Adaptation: Role Conflicts/ Overload/ Changes; Coping Strategies (Functional & Dysfunctional); Problem- Solving Skills (4 points)

Effectively explains the adaptability of the family through its role conflicts, handling of overload/changes, coping strategies, both functional & dysfunctional, and problem-solving skills (3-4 points)

Attempts to explain the adaptability of the family through some of the following: handling of role conflicts, handling of overload/changes, coping strategies, both functional & dysfunctional, and problem-solving skills (1-2 point)

No attempt to explain the adaptability of the family through some of the following: handling of role conflicts, handling of overload/changes, coping strategies, both functional & dysfunctional, and problem-solving skills

(0-1 points) Health Care: a.Beliefs Regarding

Health/ Illness b.Practices Including

Promotion/ Prevention Efforts

5 points)

Comprehensively covers the healthcare beliefs regarding health and illness, as well as practices to promote health and prevent illness. (4-5 points)

Adequately covers the healthcare beliefs regarding health and illness, as well as practices to promote health and prevent illness. (2-3 points)

Minimally covers some of the healthcare beliefs regarding health and illness, as well as practices to promote health and prevent illness. (0-1 points)

Interventions: a.Recommendations for

Strengthening /Maintaining the Family’s Health

b.Discuss Interventions Based on at Least One Theoretical Framework 1) Health Belief Model

(textbook, pp. 431- 432) or

2) Health Promotion Model (pp. 432-434)

(14 points)

Completely outlines recommendations for strengthening/maintaini ng the family’s health and discusses interventions based on at least one theoretical framework from the Health Belief Model mentioned in the textbook (pp. 431-432) or from the Health Promotion Model (pp. 432-434) (12-14 points)

Outlines recommendations for strengthening/maintain the family’s health and discusses interventions based on at least one theoretical framework from the Health Belief Model mentioned in the textbook (pp. 431-432) or from the Health Promotion Model (pp. 432-434) (9-11 points)

Offers a few recommendations for strengthening/ maintaining the family’s health and discusses a few interventions. (0-8 points)

Summary/Conclusion (5 points)

Includes summary and conclusion (4-5 points)

Includes summary and conclusion (2-3 points)

Missing summary and/or conclusion (0-1 points)

Format, Length, and Quality of Writing (5 points)

Accurately follows APA format, is within the required length, and is free of errors. (4-5 points)

Mostly follows APA format, is within the required length, and has few errors. (2-3 points)

Loosely follows APA format, is within the required length, and contains many errors. (0-1 point)

 

 

©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 5 of 5

N3352 Legacy of the Family

 

Instructions

Once you have selected the family to study, begin your analysis. Use the Rubric on the previous pages to guide your work.

CONFIDENTIALITY ALERT!

DO NOT USE LAST NAMES FOR FAMILIES THAT ARE PERSONAL OR PROFESSIONAL ACQUAINTANCES. USE INITIALS or FIRST NAMES ONLY.

Address each criterion listed in the Rubric in sufficient depth to reflect the data you obtained, your analysis of the data, and your recommendations for interventions. Be sure to include specific examples to validate your analysis. You must use references (textbook, class notes, others), and these must be cited throughout your paper.

Submit your analysis in formal writing, typed using APA format. The limit is six (6) content pages. Once your paper is complete, you will follow the on-screen instructions to upload the document into the system.

 

 

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

NURS 498L

/in /by

CASE STUDY

Fall Risk and Cognition Assessments

 

Mrs. L is an 89-year-old widow who lives independently in her home. She drives, and she is an avid quilter. Her daughter lives within 2 miles and checks in daily with Mrs. L. by phone or in person.

Mrs. L has been admitted to your hospital with the diagnosis of R/O pneumonia.

Her past medical problems include the following:

· Bilateral hip replacements

· Detached retina × 2 (right eye)

· Osteoarthritis

· Depression

· Orthostatic hypotension

· Falls at home × 1

· Urinary frequency

· Insomnia (sleeps about 3 hours per night)

Mrs. L takes no medication, “not even an aspirin.”

Mrs. L uses her call button frequently to request assistance to the bathroom. Upon rounding, her nurse found Mrs. L on the floor, having crawled out of her bed with the side rails up. She was assessed and was found to have no injuries. Her gown was wet with urine. When asked to describe what happened, Mrs. L stated the following: “I called for help to the bathroom and no one came. So rather than wetting the bed, I managed to crawl over the side rails. I slipped on the floor trying to get to the bathroom.”

 

1. What are Mrs. L’s known risk factors (in the hospital) for falling?

· Environmental

 

· Medical conditions

 

· Unsafe behaviors

 

2. Using the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model (https://consultgeri.org/try-this/general-assessment/issue-8.pdf), determine Mrs. L’s fall risk score.

 

3. Mrs. L states she is “plagued by insomnia.” Using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (https://www.opapc.com/uploads/documents/PSQI.pdf), measure Mrs. L’s quality and patterns of sleep. Could Mrs. L’s sleeping pattern contribute to her risk for falls? What actions will you take based on your analysis?

 

4. Mrs. L is asked to complete the “Clock Drawing” portion of the Mini-Cog (http://mini-cog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Universal-Mini-Cog-Form-011916.pdf). She draws the clock showing 3 PM. Her drawing is missing the numbers 3, 4, and 5. One clock hand is pointing at 9 and the other is pointing at 12. For the “Three Word Recall” portion, Mrs. L remembers two words. What is her Mini-Cog score?

 

5. Having assessed Mrs. L’s fall risk and her cognitive state, develop one safety goal for each of the following:

· Environmental and equipment

 

· Gait and mobility

 

· New medications

 

· Anxiety, depression, and unsafe behavior

 

2

Copyright © 2020 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Assignment 3: Applications of the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model

/in /by

The predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling constructs in educational diagnosis and evaluation (PRECEDE), along with the policy, regulatory, and organizational constructs in educational and environmental development (PROCEED) form the PRECEDE-PROCEED model. This is the most widely used planning model in health promotion and health education. The model has grown from the original five-phase planning model to a comprehensive planning and evaluation process.

For this assignment, you will focus on a single phase of the model: the educational and ecological assessment.

From among the following health behaviors, select one that you would like to focus on:

  • Unprotected intercourse among teens
  • Poor medication compliance
  • Overexposure to the sun

Using the readings for this week and the Internet, write a 2–3-page paper.

Cover the following:

  • Describe, in brief, the health behavior you selected.
  • Discuss why this behavior is problematic.
  • Identify two to three predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling (PRE) factors for the health behavior using empirical support. Explain how you derived these factors.
  • Discuss possible interventions based on the PRE factors.

Submit your response in a 2–3-page Microsoft Word document

Utilize at least three scholarly journal articles for examples and support. Cite all sources using the APA format. Make sure all references are cited in APA format. References should be current at least within the last 5 years. Remember that references should be used to support your peer responses.

Evaluation Criteria:

The students should have:

  • Selected and described a health behavior from the options given.
  • Explained why this health behavior is problematic.
  • Identified two to three predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors (PRE) for the health behavior, using empirical support. Explained how they derived these factors.
  • Discussed possible interventions based on the PRE factors selected.
  • Justified their answers with appropriate research and reasoning.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

POLICY MODEL

/in /by

Policy models provide the framework for moving policy forward. However, not all policy models will be effective for all priorities. Therefore, it is important to appraise policy models with the specific advocacy priority in mind.

For this Assignment, you will choose from four policymaking frameworks, the one that best fits your advocacy priority. You will construct a written response, with evidence, explaining the selected framework, providing specific detail regarding how it is the best fit and will move the priority forward.

 

  • Review the twelve policy models outlined in Health Policy: Applications for Nurses and Other Health Professionals (Chapter 9, pp. 119-125)
  • Consider which of the twelve models might best fit your priority determined in Week 2.
  • You are encouraged to search the literature for examples of how the selected policymaking model has been used in the past.
  • Review the exemplar examples in the Week 4 Learning Resources.

THE ASSIGNMENT: (2 PAGES)

Submit a 2-page written response detailing your selection of one policymaking framework that best supports your priority—particularly, getting your priority on the agenda.

In your response, explain why the framework best describes how you might proceed in effectively moving your advocacy priority forward in the policymaking process.

Support your response with evidence.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Nursing and counseling theory

/in /by

Select one nursing theory and one counseling theory to best guide your practice in psychotherapy.
Note: For guidance on nursing and counseling theories, refer to this week’s Learning Resources.

Explain why you selected these theories. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.

For the assignment write on  Nursing Theory (Hildegard Peplau’s Interpersonal Theory) and the  Counselling Theory (Humanistic Approach)

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Discussion post

/in /by

 Define critical thinking and evidence-based practice. Discuss what critical thinking in nursing practice entails and explain why it is important. Discuss the role of critical thinking and evidence-based practice as they relate to patient outcomes.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Assessment 2 Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination

/in /by

Assessment 2

Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination

 

Select a community organization or group that you feel would be interested in learning about ethical and policy issues that affect the coordination of care. Then, develop and record a 10-12-slide, 20-minute presentation, with audio, intended for that audience. Create a detailed narrative script or speakers notes for your presentation, 4-5 pages in length.

introduction

This assessment provides an opportunity for you to develop a presentation for a local community organization, which provides an overview of ethical standards and relevant policy issues that affect the coordination of care. Completing this assessment will strengthen your understanding of ethical issues and policies related to the coordination and continuum of care, and will empower you to be a stronger advocate and nursing professional.

Prepation

It would be an excellent choice to complete the Vila Health: Ethical Decision Making activity prior to developing the presentation. The activity provides a helpful update on the ethical principles that will help with success in this assessment.

Scenario

Your nurse manager at the community care center is well connected and frequently speaks to a variety of community organizations and groups. She has noticed the good work you are doing in your new care coordination role and respects your speaking and presentation skills. Consequently, she thought that an opportunity to speak publicly about contemporary issues in care coordination would be beneficial for your career and has suggested reaching out to a community organization or support group to gauge their interest in hearing from you, as a care center representative, on a topic of interest to both you and your prospective audience. You have agreed that this is a good idea and have decided to research a community organization or support group that might be interested in learning about ethical and policy issues related to the coordination of care.

To prepare for this assessment, you may wish to:

· Research your selected community organization or support group.

· Review the  Code of Ethics for Nurses With Interpretive Statements and associated health policy issues, specifically, the ACA.

· Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete.

· Allocate sufficient time to rehearse your presentation before recording the final version for submission.

 

For this assessment:

· Use the  Assessment 02 Supplement: Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination [PDF]  Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination [PDF]

Assessment 02 – Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination For this assessment, select a community organization or group that you feel would be interested in learning about ethical and policy issues that affect the coordination of care. Then, develop and record a 10–12-slide, 20-minute presentation, with audio, intended for that audience. Create a detailed narrative script or speakers notes for your presentation, 4–5 pages in length.

Before you complete the instructions detailed in the courseroom, first select one of the following community organizations or groups: • American Cancer Society: This organization provides support to cancer patients and their families and advocates for policies that improve cancer care.

• National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI): NAMI provides education, support, and advocacy for individuals and families affected by mental illness.

After you have selected one of the problems/issues from the list above, return to the detailed instructions in the courseroom to complete your assessment.

 

· to select the community organization or support group that you plan to address.

· Develop a PowerPoint with typed speaker notes (the script for your voice recording) and audio voice-over recording, intended for that audience. Video is not required.

Note: PowerPoint has a feature to type the speaker notes directly into the presentation. You are encouraged to use that feature or you may choose to submit a separate document. See  Microsoft Office Software  for technical support about the use of PowerPoint, including voice recording and speaker notes.

For this assessment, develop your presentation slides and speaker notes, then record your presentation. You are  not required to deliver your presentation to an actual audience.

Presentation Format and Length

You may use PowerPoint (recommended) or other suitable presentation software to create your slides and add your voice over. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:

· Title slide.

· Presentation title.

· Your name.

· Date.

· Course number and title.

· References (at the end of your presentation).

Your slide deck should consist of 10–12 slides,  not including a title and references slide with typed speaker notes and audio voice over. Your presentation should not exceed 20 minutes.

Create a detailed narrative script for your presentation, approximately 4–5 pages in length.

Supporting Evidence

Cite 3–5 credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications to support your presentation. Include your source citations on a references page appended to your narrative script.

Grading Requirements

The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

· Explain how governmental policies related to the health and/or safety of the community affect the coordination of care.

· Provide examples of a specific policy affecting the organization or group.

· Refer to the assessment resources for help in locating relevant policies.

· Be sure influential policies include the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA).

· Identify national, state, and local policy provisions that raise ethical questions or dilemmas for care coordination.

· What are the implications and consequences of specific policy provisions?

· What evidence do you have to support your conclusions?

· Assess the impact of the code of ethics for nurses on the coordination and continuum of care.

· Consider the factors that contribute to health, health disparities, and access to services.

· Consider the social determinants of health identified in Healthy People 2020 as a framework for your assessment.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

AACN BSN Essentials and Your Future Practice

/in /by

This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

CO2: Demonstrate leadership strategies that promote safety and improve quality in nursing practice and increase collaboration with other disciplines when planning patient-centered care within systems-based practice. (PO2)

CO5: Apply concepts of professionalism when planning for personal, intellectual, and professional development. (PO5)

Select one of the AACN BSN Essentials, and elaborate on its meaning and importance in your own future professional nursing practice.

In your post (intended to provide a clear and thorough answer), be sure to

  1. identify the AACN BSN Essential that you have selected by name and number;
  2. explain why you selected this Essential; and
  3. explain how this Essential will be used to improve quality in your future professional nursing career.

Professor’s Post: As our course comes to a close, please reflect on the knowledge you have gained during this course.  The AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice (2008) and the Massachusetts Department of Higher Education Nursing Initiative (2016) nursing core competencies have helped set the stage for your future BSN courses (Chamberlain College of Nursing, 2018).  The knowledge and understanding you have gained from these resources will help shape and guide your practice as a professional nurse.  For this week, focus your attention on the AACN Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice, but I encourage you to use both of these resources during your future coursework and during your practice as a professional nurse.

Reference

Chamberlain College of Nursing. (2018). NR351 Transitions in Professional Nursing: Week 8 lesson. Downers Grove, IL: Online Publication.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now