Nursing Assignment

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpAdvanced practice nursing requires specific education, training, and credentials.2 years ago08.09.202310Report issuefiles (1)Episode1-H5Pmsn.comEpisode1-H5Pmsn.comEpisode 1by: Tiffany Raber,
West Coast UniversityEpisode1-H5Pmsn.comEpisode 1by: Tiffany Raber,
West Coast UniversityBids(76)Miss DeannaDr. Ellen RMPROF_ALISTEREmily ClareSheryl HoganDr. Freya Walkerfirstclass tutorProf Double RFiona Davasherry proffMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssignJudithTutorIsabella Harvardpacesetters2121Jahky BColeen AndersonProWritingGuruShow All Bidsother Questions(10)ECON 201 OL1 MyEconLab on pearsonmylabandmastering.com Chapter 1 discussion from Hubbard EtextCalculations ShownCMGT 441 Week 4 Individual Assignment McBride Financial Services PaperCJA 304 Week 4 Individual Assignment Technology and Communication PaperFOR A-PLUS WRITERBIO 101 What is Life WorksheetBUS 402 Week FiveFinancial managmentweek 11 prof-hayat/MAT 300/ BUS 375Who should and should not serve on a Board of Directors (BOD)? Do you think that women should be equally represented? Should a BOD strive for diversity in its members? Should the CEO or other insiders be allowed to serve on the BOD?

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

week 1

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpNURSEGiven the critical role of fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base balance in maintaining overall health, how can nurse practitioners effectively assess and identify subtle imbalances in their patients? What are the key factors to consider when developing individualized treatment plans?2 years ago06.09.202320Report issueBids(79)Dr. Ellen RMMISS HILLARY A+abdul_rehman_Emily ClareSTELLAR GEEK A+Prof Double RDoctor.NamiraJahky BSheryl HoganDr M. MichelleAshley Elliesherry proffWIZARD_KIMnicohwilliamTutor FaithIsabella HarvardColeen AndersonBrainy BrianPROF_ALISTERQuality AssignmentsShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Finance Questions Capital StructureProject change managementIntell and Leadershipfree topicSWOT AnaylsisAdApplication of International LawINDIVIDUAL COUNSELING PHASE 5 IPEducation2.0 young

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

ALP 202

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpAPAReview your Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form you submitted last week and think about areas for which you would like to gain application-level experience and/or continued growth as an advanced practice nurse. How can your experiences in the practicum help you achieve these aims?Review the information related to developing objectives provided in this week’s Learning Resources. Your practicum learning objectives that you want to achieve during your practicum experience must be:Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results-focused, Time-bound.Reflective of the higher-order domains of Bloom’s taxonomy (i.e., application level and above)Note: Please make sure your objectives are individualized and outlined in your Practicum Experience Plan (PEP). While you may add previous objectives to continue to work toward. You must have 3 new objectives for each class, each quarter.Discuss your professional aims and your proposed practicum objectives with your Preceptor to ascertain if the necessary resources are available at your practicum site.Select one nursing theory and one counseling/psychotherapy theory to best guide your clinical practice. Explain why you selected these theories. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.Create a timeline of practicum activities that demonstrates how you plan to meet these goals and objectives based on your practicum requirements.THE main AssignmentPOST : Record the required information in each area of the Practicum Experience Plan template, including 3–4 measurable practicum learning objectives you will use to facilitate your learning during the practicum experience.LEARNING ResourcesCarlat, D. J. (2017). The psychiatric interview (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.For review as needed:“Section I. General Principles of Effective Interviewing” (Chapters 1–13)“Section III. Interviewing for Diagnosis: The Psychiatric Review of Symptoms” (Chapters 19–22) Appendixes A–CMeditrekLinks to an external site.https://edu.meditrek.com/Default.htmlNote: Use this website to log into Meditrek to report your clinical hours and patient encounters.Links to an external site.Walden University Academic Skills Center. (2017). Developing SMART goalsLinks to an external site..https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ld.php?content_id=51901492Complete this schedule.Part 2: Individualized Practicum Learning ObjectivesRefer to the instructions in Week 2 to create individualized practicum learning objectivesthat meet the requirements for this course. These objectives should be aligned specificallyto your Practicum experience. Your objectives should address your self-assessment of theskills found in the “PMHNP Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form” you completed in Week 1.As you develop your individualized practicum learning objective, be sure to write them using the SMART format. Use the resources found to guide your development.Once you review your resources, continue, and complete the following. Note: Please make sure each of your objectives are connected to your self-assessment. Also, consider that you will need to demonstrate how you are advancing your knowledge in the clinical specialty.YOU MUST HAVE 3 NEW OBJECTIVES EACH QUARTER. You may include previous practicum objectives; however, you still must have 3 new objectives for your current course.Objective 1: (Note: this objective should relate to a specific skill you would like to improve from your self-assessment)Planned Activities:Mode of Assessment: (Note: Verification will be documented )PRAC Course Outcome(s) Addressed:(for example) Develop professional plans in advanced nursing practice for the practicum experience(for example) Assess advanced practice nursing skills for strengths andopportunitiesObjective 2: (Note: this objective should relate to a specific skill you would like to improve from your self-assessment)Planned Activities:Mode of Assessment: (Note: Verification will be documented)PRAC Course Outcome(s) Addressed:Objective 3: (Note: this objective should relate to a specific skill you would like to improve from your self-assessment)Planned Activities:Mode of Assessment: (Note: Verification will be documented )PRAC Course Outcome(s) Addressed:wwk2aggn2PRAC6675.docxPracticum_Experience_Plan5.docx2 years ago08.09.202315Report issueBids(70)Miss DeannaDr. Ellen RMPROF_ALISTEREmily ClareProf. TOPGRADESheryl HoganDr. Freya Walkerfirstclass tutorProf Double RFiona DavaDemi_RoseMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssignJudithTutorIsabella Harvardpacesetters2121Jahky BColeen AndersonShow All Bidsother Questions(10)discussion assingmentPPT presentationEco-01IT 210 – Internship activity in Chapter 12, “Industry: Healthcare”IPO Presentation & MyAccountingLab Post-TestsManaging organisational changeDiscuss the issue of Global TerrorismI need an introduction, conclusion and a title for this workEthics in PsychologyDescribe the behavior patterns that result from the various variable schedules from both the experimental literature and human application.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

discussion 3 553

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpAPRNdiscussionTherapeutic communication is important to ensure patients are part of treatment planning. Provide discussion (250-350 words) of the following:How would you evaluate a patient’s ability to understand your instruction and their current knowledge base about their problem? What characteristics of the patient would be helpful?How would you be certain that the patient understands your medication instruction?What methods of therapeutic communication would be useful in advanced practice?instructions: length of 1 page to 1/2 is long enough. APA style. Has to have 3 references.2 years ago08.09.202312Report issueBids(74)Miss DeannaDr. Ellen RMPROF_ALISTEREmily ClareSheryl HoganDr. Freya Walkerfirstclass tutorUbaid TariqProf Double RFiona Davasherry proffMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssignJudithTutorIsabella Harvardpacesetters2121STELLAR GEEK A+Jahky BShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Computer Science Labmore 22who determines quality, organizations or customers?ACC 281 Week 2 Pre-Assessment – A Graded – Best Tutorial – All Questions Answered CorrectlyBUS 308 for guidancePlease do a good jobAdvertising projectANT 101 Week 1 DQ 2 Studying CultureACC 490 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Ch. 6 & 7 Textbook ExercisesApplication Considerations

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES – EBP

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpClinicalResearchDifferentiate between quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method research methodologiesAnalyze the relationship between peer-reviewed articles and clinical issuesAnalyze research ethics related to clinical issues and peer-reviewed researchAnalyze the aims of research studies presented in peer-reviewed articlesAnalyze research methodologies described in peer-reviewed articlesAnalyze strengths, reliability, and validity of research methodologies in peer-reviewed researchReferences:Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023).Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice(5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.Chapter 2, “Asking Compelling Clinical Questions” (pp. 37–60)Chapter 22, “Generating Evidence Through Quantitative and Qualitative Research” (pp. 731–776)Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.Health Information and Libraries JournalLinks to an external site., 26, 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.xHoare, Z., & Hoe, J. (2013). Understanding quantitative research: Part 2.Nursing StandardLinks to an external site., 27(18), 48–55. doi:10.7748/ns2013.01.27.18.48.c94882 years ago10.09.202315Report issueBids(78)Dr. Ellen RMnicohwilliamPROF_ALISTEREmily ClareSheryl HoganDr. Freya Walkerfirstclass tutorProf Double RDemi_Rosesherry proffMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssignJudithTutorIsabella HarvardSTELLAR GEEK A+Coleen AndersonProWritingGuruDr. Everleigh_JKShow All Bidsother Questions(10)A+ PaperI need this paper writtenEconomicsAssignment 1: Discussion—The Future of Social Securitycritique expert onlySuperior Manufacturing3 paragraphs,PreLap homeworkQuestion Answer Calculation HWbusiness paper

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

POLITICS AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpdiscussionPostBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.To Prepare:Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019).Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide(6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.Chapter 3, “Government Response: Legislation” (pp. 37–56)Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 180–183 only)Congress.govLinks to an external site.. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/Taylor, D., Olshansky, E., Fugate-Woods, N., Johnson-Mallard, V., Safriet, B. J., & Hagan, T. (2017).Corrigendum to position statement: Political interference in sexual and reproductive health research and health professional education.Nursing Outlook, 65(2), 346–350Links to an external site..United States House of RepresentativesLinks to an external site.. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.house.gov/United States SenateLinks to an external site.. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/United States Senate. (n.d.).Senate organization chart for the 117th CongressLinks to an external site..  https://www.senate.gov/reference/org_chart.htmDocument:Legislation Grid Template (Word document)Download Legislation Grid Template (Word document)Discussion:An explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.2 years ago12.09.20235Report issueBids(61)PROF_ALISTERSheryl HoganDr. Freya Walkerfirstclass tutorProf Double RDemi_RoseMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssignJudithTutorIsabella HarvardSTELLAR GEEK A+Coleen AndersonProWritingGuruBrilliant GeekWIZARD_KIMTeacher A+ WorkAshley ElliePROFESSOR DAISYShow All Bidsother Questions(10)international businesspsyC3016DeletedSocial Media and MarketingOutstanding Proof HWstat assignmentSocial ResearchEnglish Composition 11 – ENG102-O2A – 7092i need notes to be made on the following topicOrganizational Negotiations

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

DEVELOPING ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpBest2 years ago15.09.20237Report issuefiles (2)ouestionModule2_Assignment.pdfRubricModule2_Assignment.pdfouestionModule2_Assignment.pdfDue Sunday by 10:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2Start AssignmentBack to Module at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436554)Competing needs arise within any organization as employees seek to meet their targets and leaders
seek to meet company goals. As a leader, successful management of these goals requires establishing
priorities and allocating resources accordingly.Within a healthcare setting, the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients are often in conflict.
Mandatory overtime, implementation of staffing ratios, use of unlicensed assisting personnel, and
employer reductions of education benefits are examples of practices that might lead to conflicting needs
in practice.Leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution through policies, action, and inaction. In this
Assignment, you will further develop the white paper you began work on in Module 1 by addressing
competing needs within your organization.To Prepare:DEVELOPING ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES
AND PRACTICESRESOURCESBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436568)https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436554https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436568Review the national healthcare issue/stressor you examined in your Assignment for Module 1, and
review the analysis of the healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
Identify and review two evidence-based scholarly resources that focus on proposed policies/practices
to apply to your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post regarding
competing needs.The Assignment (1-2 pages):Developing Organizational Policies and PracticesAdd a section to the 2-3 page paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the
following in 1-2 pages:Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare
issue/stressor.
Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected
healthcare issue/stressor.
Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in
promoting ethics.
Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of
resources, workers, and patients, while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies.
Be specific and provide examples.
Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies, and provide two
scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.
Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 7 days to provide you
with quality feedback.Submit your revised paper.Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 3SUBMISSION INFORMATIONRubricModule2_Assignment.pdfCriteria Ratings Pts25 pts30 pts25 ptsAdd a section to the 2-3
page paper you
submitted in Module 1.
For this assignment, in
1-2 pages, address the
following: · Identify and
describe at least two
competing needs
impacting your selected
healthcare
issue/stressor.25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
identifies and
describes at least
two competing
needs impacting
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response
identifies and
describes at
least two
competing needs
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
identifies and
describes two
competing needs
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
identifies and
describes one
competing need
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected or
response is
missing.· Describe a relevant
policy or practice in your
organization that may
influence your selected
healthcare
issue/stressor. · Critique
the policy for ethical
considerations and
explain the policy’s
strengths and
challenges in promoting
ethics.30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
describes a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
accurately and
thoroughly
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains in
detail the policy’s
strengths and
challenges in
promoting ethics.26 to >23.0 pts
Good
The response
accurately
describes a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
accurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains the
policy’s strengths
and challenges
in promoting
ethics.23 to >20.0 pts
Fair
The response is
vague or
inaccurate in
describing a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
vaguely or
inaccurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains the
policy’s strengths
and challenges
in promoting
ethics.20 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is
vague and
inaccurate in
describing a
relevant policy
or practice in an
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected or
response is
missing. …The
response
vaguely and
inaccurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and vaguely and
inaccurately
explains the
policy’s
strengths and
challenges in
promoting ethics
or response is
missing.· Recommend one or
more policy or practice
changes designed to
balance the competing
needs of resources,
workers, and patients25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response
provides one or
more accurate,
clear, and22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response
provides one or
more
recommendations19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
provides one17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
vaguely and
inaccurately
provides oneCriteria Ratings Pts5 pts5 ptswhile addressing any
ethical shortcomings of
the existing policies. Be
specific and provide
examples.thorough
recommendations
for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies.
…Specific and
accurate
examples are
provided.for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies.
…Specific
examples are
provided.recommendation
for policy or
practice
changes
designed to
balance the
competing
needs of
resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies. …One
example is
provided.recommendation
for policy or
practice
changes
designed to
balance the
competing
needs of
resources,
workers, and
patients;
response
vaguely
addresses any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies or
response is
missing.
…Examples are
missing.Resource Synthesis 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response fully
integrates at least
2 outside
resources and 2
or 3 course-
specific
resources.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response fully
integrates at least
2 outside
resources and 1
course-specific
resource.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response
minimally
integrates
outside and
course-specific
resources.2 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
does not
integrate
outside and
course-specific
resources or
no in-text
citations are
used.Written Expression and
Formatting—Paragraph
Development and
Organization:Paragraphs
make clear points that
support well-developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity
of ideas. Sentences are
carefully focused—
neither long and
rambling nor short and
lacking substance. A
clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and
introduction is provided,
which delineates all
required criteria.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow, continuity,
and clarity. …A
clear and
comprehensive
purpose statement,
introduction, and
conclusion are
provided, which
delineates all
required criteria.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity 80% of
the time.
…Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment are
stated but are
brief and not
descriptive.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity 60–
79% of the time.
…Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of
the assignment
is vague or off
topic.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity less
than 60% of
the time. …No
purpose
statement,
introduction, or
conclusion is
provided.Total Points: 100Criteria Ratings Pts5 pts5 ptsWritten Expression and
Formatting—English
Writing Standards:
Correct grammar,
mechanics, and proper
punctuation.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few
(one or two)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains
several (three or
four) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (five
or more) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.Written Expression and
Formatting: The paper
follows correct APA
format for title page,
headings, font, spacing,
margins, indentations,
page numbers, running
head, parenthetical/in-
text citations, and
reference list.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
APA format with
no errors.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few
(one or two) APA
format errors.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several
(three or four)
APA format
errors.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many
(five or more)
APA format
errors.RubricModule2_Assignment.pdfCriteria Ratings Pts25 pts30 pts25 ptsAdd a section to the 2-3
page paper you
submitted in Module 1.
For this assignment, in
1-2 pages, address the
following: · Identify and
describe at least two
competing needs
impacting your selected
healthcare
issue/stressor.25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
identifies and
describes at least
two competing
needs impacting
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response
identifies and
describes at
least two
competing needs
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
identifies and
describes two
competing needs
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
identifies and
describes one
competing need
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected or
response is
missing.· Describe a relevant
policy or practice in your
organization that may
influence your selected
healthcare
issue/stressor. · Critique
the policy for ethical
considerations and
explain the policy’s
strengths and
challenges in promoting
ethics.30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
describes a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
accurately and
thoroughly
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains in
detail the policy’s
strengths and
challenges in
promoting ethics.26 to >23.0 pts
Good
The response
accurately
describes a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
accurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains the
policy’s strengths
and challenges
in promoting
ethics.23 to >20.0 pts
Fair
The response is
vague or
inaccurate in
describing a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
vaguely or
inaccurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains the
policy’s strengths
and challenges
in promoting
ethics.20 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is
vague and
inaccurate in
describing a
relevant policy
or practice in an
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected or
response is
missing. …The
response
vaguely and
inaccurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and vaguely and
inaccurately
explains the
policy’s
strengths and
challenges in
promoting ethics
or response is
missing.· Recommend one or
more policy or practice
changes designed to
balance the competing
needs of resources,
workers, and patients25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response
provides one or
more accurate,
clear, and22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response
provides one or
more
recommendations19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
provides one17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
vaguely and
inaccurately
provides oneCriteria Ratings Pts5 pts5 ptswhile addressing any
ethical shortcomings of
the existing policies. Be
specific and provide
examples.thorough
recommendations
for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies.
…Specific and
accurate
examples are
provided.for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies.
…Specific
examples are
provided.recommendation
for policy or
practice
changes
designed to
balance the
competing
needs of
resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies. …One
example is
provided.recommendation
for policy or
practice
changes
designed to
balance the
competing
needs of
resources,
workers, and
patients;
response
vaguely
addresses any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies or
response is
missing.
…Examples are
missing.Resource Synthesis 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response fully
integrates at least
2 outside
resources and 2
or 3 course-
specific
resources.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response fully
integrates at least
2 outside
resources and 1
course-specific
resource.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response
minimally
integrates
outside and
course-specific
resources.2 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
does not
integrate
outside and
course-specific
resources or
no in-text
citations are
used.Written Expression and
Formatting—Paragraph
Development and
Organization:Paragraphs
make clear points that
support well-developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity
of ideas. Sentences are
carefully focused—
neither long and
rambling nor short and
lacking substance. A
clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and
introduction is provided,
which delineates all
required criteria.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow, continuity,
and clarity. …A
clear and
comprehensive
purpose statement,
introduction, and
conclusion are
provided, which
delineates all
required criteria.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity 80% of
the time.
…Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment are
stated but are
brief and not
descriptive.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity 60–
79% of the time.
…Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of
the assignment
is vague or off
topic.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity less
than 60% of
the time. …No
purpose
statement,
introduction, or
conclusion is
provided.Total Points: 100Criteria Ratings Pts5 pts5 ptsWritten Expression and
Formatting—English
Writing Standards:
Correct grammar,
mechanics, and proper
punctuation.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few
(one or two)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains
several (three or
four) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (five
or more) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.Written Expression and
Formatting: The paper
follows correct APA
format for title page,
headings, font, spacing,
margins, indentations,
page numbers, running
head, parenthetical/in-
text citations, and
reference list.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
APA format with
no errors.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few
(one or two) APA
format errors.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several
(three or four)
APA format
errors.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many
(five or more)
APA format
errors.ouestionModule2_Assignment.pdfDue Sunday by 10:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2Start AssignmentBack to Module at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436554)Competing needs arise within any organization as employees seek to meet their targets and leaders
seek to meet company goals. As a leader, successful management of these goals requires establishing
priorities and allocating resources accordingly.Within a healthcare setting, the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients are often in conflict.
Mandatory overtime, implementation of staffing ratios, use of unlicensed assisting personnel, and
employer reductions of education benefits are examples of practices that might lead to conflicting needs
in practice.Leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution through policies, action, and inaction. In this
Assignment, you will further develop the white paper you began work on in Module 1 by addressing
competing needs within your organization.To Prepare:DEVELOPING ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES
AND PRACTICESRESOURCESBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436568)https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436554https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436568Review the national healthcare issue/stressor you examined in your Assignment for Module 1, and
review the analysis of the healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
Identify and review two evidence-based scholarly resources that focus on proposed policies/practices
to apply to your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post regarding
competing needs.The Assignment (1-2 pages):Developing Organizational Policies and PracticesAdd a section to the 2-3 page paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the
following in 1-2 pages:Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare
issue/stressor.
Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected
healthcare issue/stressor.
Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in
promoting ethics.
Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of
resources, workers, and patients, while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies.
Be specific and provide examples.
Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies, and provide two
scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.
Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 7 days to provide you
with quality feedback.Submit your revised paper.Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 3SUBMISSION INFORMATIONRubricModule2_Assignment.pdfCriteria Ratings Pts25 pts30 pts25 ptsAdd a section to the 2-3
page paper you
submitted in Module 1.
For this assignment, in
1-2 pages, address the
following: · Identify and
describe at least two
competing needs
impacting your selected
healthcare
issue/stressor.25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
identifies and
describes at least
two competing
needs impacting
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response
identifies and
describes at
least two
competing needs
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
identifies and
describes two
competing needs
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
identifies and
describes one
competing need
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected or
response is
missing.· Describe a relevant
policy or practice in your
organization that may
influence your selected
healthcare
issue/stressor. · Critique
the policy for ethical
considerations and
explain the policy’s
strengths and
challenges in promoting
ethics.30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
describes a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
accurately and
thoroughly
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains in
detail the policy’s
strengths and
challenges in
promoting ethics.26 to >23.0 pts
Good
The response
accurately
describes a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
accurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains the
policy’s strengths
and challenges
in promoting
ethics.23 to >20.0 pts
Fair
The response is
vague or
inaccurate in
describing a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
vaguely or
inaccurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains the
policy’s strengths
and challenges
in promoting
ethics.20 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is
vague and
inaccurate in
describing a
relevant policy
or practice in an
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected or
response is
missing. …The
response
vaguely and
inaccurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and vaguely and
inaccurately
explains the
policy’s
strengths and
challenges in
promoting ethics
or response is
missing.· Recommend one or
more policy or practice
changes designed to
balance the competing
needs of resources,
workers, and patients25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response
provides one or
more accurate,
clear, and22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response
provides one or
more
recommendations19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
provides one17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
vaguely and
inaccurately
provides oneCriteria Ratings Pts5 pts5 ptswhile addressing any
ethical shortcomings of
the existing policies. Be
specific and provide
examples.thorough
recommendations
for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies.
…Specific and
accurate
examples are
provided.for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies.
…Specific
examples are
provided.recommendation
for policy or
practice
changes
designed to
balance the
competing
needs of
resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies. …One
example is
provided.recommendation
for policy or
practice
changes
designed to
balance the
competing
needs of
resources,
workers, and
patients;
response
vaguely
addresses any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies or
response is
missing.
…Examples are
missing.Resource Synthesis 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response fully
integrates at least
2 outside
resources and 2
or 3 course-
specific
resources.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response fully
integrates at least
2 outside
resources and 1
course-specific
resource.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response
minimally
integrates
outside and
course-specific
resources.2 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
does not
integrate
outside and
course-specific
resources or
no in-text
citations are
used.Written Expression and
Formatting—Paragraph
Development and
Organization:Paragraphs
make clear points that
support well-developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity
of ideas. Sentences are
carefully focused—
neither long and
rambling nor short and
lacking substance. A
clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and
introduction is provided,
which delineates all
required criteria.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow, continuity,
and clarity. …A
clear and
comprehensive
purpose statement,
introduction, and
conclusion are
provided, which
delineates all
required criteria.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity 80% of
the time.
…Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment are
stated but are
brief and not
descriptive.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity 60–
79% of the time.
…Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of
the assignment
is vague or off
topic.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity less
than 60% of
the time. …No
purpose
statement,
introduction, or
conclusion is
provided.Total Points: 100Criteria Ratings Pts5 pts5 ptsWritten Expression and
Formatting—English
Writing Standards:
Correct grammar,
mechanics, and proper
punctuation.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few
(one or two)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains
several (three or
four) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (five
or more) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.Written Expression and
Formatting: The paper
follows correct APA
format for title page,
headings, font, spacing,
margins, indentations,
page numbers, running
head, parenthetical/in-
text citations, and
reference list.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
APA format with
no errors.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few
(one or two) APA
format errors.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several
(three or four)
APA format
errors.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many
(five or more)
APA format
errors.ouestionModule2_Assignment.pdfDue Sunday by 10:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2Start AssignmentBack to Module at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436554)Competing needs arise within any organization as employees seek to meet their targets and leaders
seek to meet company goals. As a leader, successful management of these goals requires establishing
priorities and allocating resources accordingly.Within a healthcare setting, the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients are often in conflict.
Mandatory overtime, implementation of staffing ratios, use of unlicensed assisting personnel, and
employer reductions of education benefits are examples of practices that might lead to conflicting needs
in practice.Leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution through policies, action, and inaction. In this
Assignment, you will further develop the white paper you began work on in Module 1 by addressing
competing needs within your organization.To Prepare:DEVELOPING ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES
AND PRACTICESRESOURCESBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436568)https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436554https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/80551/modules/items/2436568Review the national healthcare issue/stressor you examined in your Assignment for Module 1, and
review the analysis of the healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
Identify and review two evidence-based scholarly resources that focus on proposed policies/practices
to apply to your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post regarding
competing needs.The Assignment (1-2 pages):Developing Organizational Policies and PracticesAdd a section to the 2-3 page paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the
following in 1-2 pages:Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare
issue/stressor.
Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected
healthcare issue/stressor.
Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in
promoting ethics.
Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of
resources, workers, and patients, while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies.
Be specific and provide examples.
Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies, and provide two
scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.
Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 7 days to provide you
with quality feedback.Submit your revised paper.Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 3SUBMISSION INFORMATIONRubricModule2_Assignment.pdfCriteria Ratings Pts25 pts30 pts25 ptsAdd a section to the 2-3
page paper you
submitted in Module 1.
For this assignment, in
1-2 pages, address the
following: · Identify and
describe at least two
competing needs
impacting your selected
healthcare
issue/stressor.25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
identifies and
describes at least
two competing
needs impacting
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response
identifies and
describes at
least two
competing needs
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
identifies and
describes two
competing needs
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected.17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
identifies and
describes one
competing need
impacting the
healthcare
issue/stressor
selected or
response is
missing.· Describe a relevant
policy or practice in your
organization that may
influence your selected
healthcare
issue/stressor. · Critique
the policy for ethical
considerations and
explain the policy’s
strengths and
challenges in promoting
ethics.30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
describes a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
accurately and
thoroughly
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains in
detail the policy’s
strengths and
challenges in
promoting ethics.26 to >23.0 pts
Good
The response
accurately
describes a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
accurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains the
policy’s strengths
and challenges
in promoting
ethics.23 to >20.0 pts
Fair
The response is
vague or
inaccurate in
describing a
relevant policy or
practice in the
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected. …The
response
vaguely or
inaccurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and explains the
policy’s strengths
and challenges
in promoting
ethics.20 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is
vague and
inaccurate in
describing a
relevant policy
or practice in an
organization that
may influence
the healthcare
issue/stressor
selected or
response is
missing. …The
response
vaguely and
inaccurately
critiques the
policy for ethical
considerations
and vaguely and
inaccurately
explains the
policy’s
strengths and
challenges in
promoting ethics
or response is
missing.· Recommend one or
more policy or practice
changes designed to
balance the competing
needs of resources,
workers, and patients25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent
The response
provides one or
more accurate,
clear, and22 to >19.0 pts
Good
The response
provides one or
more
recommendations19 to >17.0 pts
Fair
The response
vaguely or
inaccurately
provides one17 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
vaguely and
inaccurately
provides oneCriteria Ratings Pts5 pts5 ptswhile addressing any
ethical shortcomings of
the existing policies. Be
specific and provide
examples.thorough
recommendations
for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies.
…Specific and
accurate
examples are
provided.for policy or
practice changes
designed to
balance the
competing needs
of resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies.
…Specific
examples are
provided.recommendation
for policy or
practice
changes
designed to
balance the
competing
needs of
resources,
workers, and
patients while
addressing any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies. …One
example is
provided.recommendation
for policy or
practice
changes
designed to
balance the
competing
needs of
resources,
workers, and
patients;
response
vaguely
addresses any
ethical
shortcomings of
the existing
policies or
response is
missing.
…Examples are
missing.Resource Synthesis 5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response fully
integrates at least
2 outside
resources and 2
or 3 course-
specific
resources.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response fully
integrates at least
2 outside
resources and 1
course-specific
resource.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Using proper in-
text citations, the
response
minimally
integrates
outside and
course-specific
resources.2 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
does not
integrate
outside and
course-specific
resources or
no in-text
citations are
used.Written Expression and
Formatting—Paragraph
Development and
Organization:Paragraphs
make clear points that
support well-developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity
of ideas. Sentences are
carefully focused—
neither long and
rambling nor short and
lacking substance. A
clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and
introduction is provided,
which delineates all
required criteria.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow, continuity,
and clarity. …A
clear and
comprehensive
purpose statement,
introduction, and
conclusion are
provided, which
delineates all
required criteria.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity 80% of
the time.
…Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment are
stated but are
brief and not
descriptive.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity 60–
79% of the time.
…Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of
the assignment
is vague or off
topic.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity less
than 60% of
the time. …No
purpose
statement,
introduction, or
conclusion is
provided.Total Points: 100Criteria Ratings Pts5 pts5 ptsWritten Expression and
Formatting—English
Writing Standards:
Correct grammar,
mechanics, and proper
punctuation.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few
(one or two)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains
several (three or
four) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (five
or more) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation errors
that interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.Written Expression and
Formatting: The paper
follows correct APA
format for title page,
headings, font, spacing,
margins, indentations,
page numbers, running
head, parenthetical/in-
text citations, and
reference list.5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
APA format with
no errors.4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Contains a few
(one or two) APA
format errors.3 to >2.0 pts
Fair
Contains several
(three or four)
APA format
errors.2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many
(five or more)
APA format
errors.12Bids(61)Miss DeannaSheryl HoganDr. Freya Walkerfirstclass tutorProf Double Rsherry proffMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverDiscount AssignJudithTutorIsabella Harvardpacesetters2121Jahky BColeen AndersonProWritingGuruBrilliant GeekAshley EllieAmerican TutorDiscount AnsKimendeShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Question For SiddharthAccounting Assignment – The Allowance Method and Notes ReceivableAnswered PaidSome people say that if marketers can differentiate a simple product like water you can differentiate anything…Do you think this is true? Do…week 2Legal Issues and their Resolutions— for rey writer onlyCJ202-week 4 and week 5Assignment 2: Discussion—ABC Analysisfor accountsguruonlyWhat does the character Chin Kee symbolise in the book, American Born Chinese

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

HERE2

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework help2 years ago15.09.20238Report issuefiles (1)1040assignment3.docx1040assignment3.docxIntroductionThe health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a shared vision and team goals (Mulvale et al., 2016). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality.You are encouraged to complete the Budgeting for Nurses activity before you develop the plan proposal. The activity consists of seven questions that will allow you the opportunity to check your knowledge of budgeting basics and as well as the value of financial resource management. The information gained from completing this formative will promote success with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal. Completing this activity also demonstrates your engagement in the course, requires just a few minutes of your time, and is not graded.Demonstration of Proficiency· Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.· Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.· Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.· Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.· Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.· Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.· Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.ReferenceMulvale, G., Embrett, M., & Shaghayegh, D. R. (2016). ‘Gearing up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: A systematic review and conceptual framework.BMC Family Practice,17.Professional ContextThis assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.ScenarioHaving reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course.However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.InstructionsFor this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview.The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.Using theInterdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX]Download Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX]will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end.Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.· Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.· Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.· Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.· Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.· Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.Additional Requirements·Length of submission:Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.·Number of references:Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.·APA formatting:Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.Note:Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment. TheWriting Feedback Toolis designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assessment, once your work has been evaluated.Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.1040assignment3.docxIntroductionThe health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a shared vision and team goals (Mulvale et al., 2016). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality.You are encouraged to complete the Budgeting for Nurses activity before you develop the plan proposal. The activity consists of seven questions that will allow you the opportunity to check your knowledge of budgeting basics and as well as the value of financial resource management. The information gained from completing this formative will promote success with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal. Completing this activity also demonstrates your engagement in the course, requires just a few minutes of your time, and is not graded.Demonstration of Proficiency· Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.· Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.· Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.· Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.· Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.· Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.· Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.ReferenceMulvale, G., Embrett, M., & Shaghayegh, D. R. (2016). ‘Gearing up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: A systematic review and conceptual framework.BMC Family Practice,17.Professional ContextThis assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.ScenarioHaving reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course.However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.InstructionsFor this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview.The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.Using theInterdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX]Download Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX]will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end.Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.· Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.· Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.· Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.· Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.· Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.Additional Requirements·Length of submission:Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.·Number of references:Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.·APA formatting:Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.Note:Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment. TheWriting Feedback Toolis designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assessment, once your work has been evaluated.Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.Bids(74)Miss DeannaDr. Ellen RMnicohwilliamPROF_ALISTERSheryl HoganDr. Freya WalkerProf Double RFiona DavaDemi_Rosesherry proffMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssignJudithTutorpacesetters2121STELLAR GEEK A+Jahky BColeen AndersonBrilliant GeekShow All Bidsother Questions(10)whoGlobal Business Plan – Part 12asapcussion 2: Market Equilibrium (Ultimate Writer wk 2Protocol in Organization Communicationmla formatting works cited reFOR PHYLLIS YOUNG!!!Inductive VS Deductive Argumentstraining and development paper

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Nursing help with homework

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpHelpHomeworkhelp2 years ago22.09.202340Report issuefiles (1)ProjectonEthicalIssues.docxProjectonEthicalIssues.docxProject on Ethical Issues1.Unit 3: Introduction (Required Content) (1 of 4)2.Unit 3 Discussion: Diversity in the Workplace (2 of 4)3.Current Assignment: Unit 3 Assessment: Project on Ethical Issues, Assignment (3 of 4)4.Unit 3 Assessment: Shadow Health – Conflict Management, Assignment (4 of 4)Instructions· Pick an ethical or legal issue in nursing leadership. You may use any of the subjects discussed in prior units or select an issue which is of significance nationally.· Create a PowerPoint presentation detailing this issue. Include background information, why this is an issue, the role of the leader in managing this issue, and proposed solutions.· Identify an ethical or legal issue in nursing, describe background information, and detail why the issue exists.· Identify an ethical or legal issue in nursing, identify the roles of the leader in managing the issue, and describe multiple proposed solutions.· This is to be a 10-15 slide presentation.· Add presenter notes to the slide to enhance the content of the slides, as if you were presenting to a group, and this is your script.· In PowerPoint, access “notes view” to see the presenter notes boxes.· Slides should not contain paragraphs of narrative. They should contain only bullet points or brief explanations.· The longer narratives go in your presenter notes.· Speaker’s notes content will be graded under the “content” sections of the rubric.·Lack of speaker’s notes will significantly affect the grades in those areas.· Create a reference slide and put all references used in the presentation.· 4-5 references are required.· Include citations on the slides.· For format and guidelines for PowerPoint presentations check out thePurdue Online Writing Lab (Links to an external site.)web site.ProjectonEthicalIssues.docxProject on Ethical Issues1.Unit 3: Introduction (Required Content) (1 of 4)2.Unit 3 Discussion: Diversity in the Workplace (2 of 4)3.Current Assignment: Unit 3 Assessment: Project on Ethical Issues, Assignment (3 of 4)4.Unit 3 Assessment: Shadow Health – Conflict Management, Assignment (4 of 4)Instructions· Pick an ethical or legal issue in nursing leadership. You may use any of the subjects discussed in prior units or select an issue which is of significance nationally.· Create a PowerPoint presentation detailing this issue. Include background information, why this is an issue, the role of the leader in managing this issue, and proposed solutions.· Identify an ethical or legal issue in nursing, describe background information, and detail why the issue exists.· Identify an ethical or legal issue in nursing, identify the roles of the leader in managing the issue, and describe multiple proposed solutions.· This is to be a 10-15 slide presentation.· Add presenter notes to the slide to enhance the content of the slides, as if you were presenting to a group, and this is your script.· In PowerPoint, access “notes view” to see the presenter notes boxes.· Slides should not contain paragraphs of narrative. They should contain only bullet points or brief explanations.· The longer narratives go in your presenter notes.· Speaker’s notes content will be graded under the “content” sections of the rubric.·Lack of speaker’s notes will significantly affect the grades in those areas.· Create a reference slide and put all references used in the presentation.· 4-5 references are required.· Include citations on the slides.· For format and guidelines for PowerPoint presentations check out thePurdue Online Writing Lab (Links to an external site.)web site.Bids(80)Miss DeannaDr. Ellen RMMISS HILLARY A+abdul_rehman_Emily ClareSTELLAR GEEK A+Prof Double RFortifiedYoung NyanyaProWritingGuruJahky BDr. Adeline ZoeSheryl HoganDr M. MichelleAshley EllieDr. Sophie MilesProf SapolskyIsabella HarvardColeen AndersonBrainy BrianShow All Bidsother Questions(10)FOR ACE WRITESDisscussion Only (PSY 110 SOCIAL PSY)poster helpETHICS 316 $8 DOLLARS PAPERWhat for Online WorkUnit 8 Marketing assignment powerpointfor prof conali k onlyCMGT 554 Week 3 Individual Assignment Patton-Fuller Community Hospital Networking ProjectMacroeconomic IndicatorsNRS-441V Week 1 Topic 1 DQ 1 – The CINAHL database

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Nursing homework

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpfastI need brief and concise answers to the assignment attached below.I will like to have it done in 24 hours.2 years ago22.09.202330Report issuefiles (1)AftershockDocumentaryReflection.docxAftershockDocumentaryReflection.docxAftershock Documentary ReflectionWatch the Maternal Mortality Documentary Aftershock on HuluRespond to a total of 10 questions below. In any combination (ex. 4a, 4b, 7, 8b, 8c, 9, 10, 11a, 17, 18)1. What was your overall reaction to the documentary?2. Was this a fair and balanced dive into this issue? Did you see any bias/influence/slant?3. How did the documentary directly and indirectly address racial stereotypes?4. Shamonya. What s/s of a PE did Shamony have?b. Why did medical personnel ask if she was “on drugs”? Was there a medical reason? It obviously upset members of her family,c. Do you believe her death could have been prevented? Explain your answer.5. Ambera. What s/s was Amber having that there might be complications happening?b. Freeze the labs at approx. 15min. What do you see? What does this mean? (one thing to note is they had lab values which means there was concern enough by the medical team to draw them)c. Freeze the medical records at approx. 16 min and read more than just what is highlighted6. Men’s Groupa. What is your reaction to this men’s support group?b. What was your reaction to Mustafa saying about the healthcare system “honestly, I just don’t think they care”7. Harvard Medical School (with Dr. Neel Shah): What are your thoughts about the VBAC calculator including race or any other medical calculator including race8. Hillcrest Medical Center, Tulsaa. What was your reaction to hear that our state was in the bottom 5 and that our maternal mortality is double the national average?b. What was your reaction to the discussion about cost and payment hospitals incur and receive. Do you think these “incentives” are consciously know by the docs and the rest of the healthcare team, or not?c. What was your reaction to Felicia comparing a black woman giving birth to a black man at a traffic stop with the police?9. Did you know that black women were experimented on to perfect skill of gynecology (and many other things)? Was is your reaction?10. Do you see a correlation between historical events and current trends in our healthcare environment? Explain your answer?11. Breathe Birth and Wellness, Tulsa (no we don’t have anything like this in OKC. We don’t have a practice of CNM in or out of the hospital setting)a. Explain what safety protocols are set up because they use Certified Nurse Midwives (that wouldn’t exist with a non-nurse midwife delivering at home)12. What is your reaction to the history of midwifery and the patriarchal shift, and repercussions from that shift?13. What is your reaction to some patients feeling “safer” delivering outside of the hospital, even though the hospital is the place with the OR and most advanced medical and life saving equipment?14. What non-pharm birthing interventions did you see during Felicia’s labor?15. House Committee on Oversight and Reform Hearing on the US Maternal Mortality Crisisa. Were you aware this happened last year? What is your reaction to congress taking up this cause?16. What is your reaction to the Harvard Medical School discussion?17. What overt or subtle political messaging or agenda’s did you see in this documentary? (example at 42:27 there was a Biden/Harris sign in the window) Did that effect your overall reaction to the documentary?18. What kind of coping displayed did you see by Shamony and Amber’s families?19. What did you learn about yourself/ your views/ your bias after watching this documentary?AftershockDocumentaryReflection.docxAftershock Documentary ReflectionWatch the Maternal Mortality Documentary Aftershock on HuluRespond to a total of 10 questions below. In any combination (ex. 4a, 4b, 7, 8b, 8c, 9, 10, 11a, 17, 18)1. What was your overall reaction to the documentary?2. Was this a fair and balanced dive into this issue? Did you see any bias/influence/slant?3. How did the documentary directly and indirectly address racial stereotypes?4. Shamonya. What s/s of a PE did Shamony have?b. Why did medical personnel ask if she was “on drugs”? Was there a medical reason? It obviously upset members of her family,c. Do you believe her death could have been prevented? Explain your answer.5. Ambera. What s/s was Amber having that there might be complications happening?b. Freeze the labs at approx. 15min. What do you see? What does this mean? (one thing to note is they had lab values which means there was concern enough by the medical team to draw them)c. Freeze the medical records at approx. 16 min and read more than just what is highlighted6. Men’s Groupa. What is your reaction to this men’s support group?b. What was your reaction to Mustafa saying about the healthcare system “honestly, I just don’t think they care”7. Harvard Medical School (with Dr. Neel Shah): What are your thoughts about the VBAC calculator including race or any other medical calculator including race8. Hillcrest Medical Center, Tulsaa. What was your reaction to hear that our state was in the bottom 5 and that our maternal mortality is double the national average?b. What was your reaction to the discussion about cost and payment hospitals incur and receive. Do you think these “incentives” are consciously know by the docs and the rest of the healthcare team, or not?c. What was your reaction to Felicia comparing a black woman giving birth to a black man at a traffic stop with the police?9. Did you know that black women were experimented on to perfect skill of gynecology (and many other things)? Was is your reaction?10. Do you see a correlation between historical events and current trends in our healthcare environment? Explain your answer?11. Breathe Birth and Wellness, Tulsa (no we don’t have anything like this in OKC. We don’t have a practice of CNM in or out of the hospital setting)a. Explain what safety protocols are set up because they use Certified Nurse Midwives (that wouldn’t exist with a non-nurse midwife delivering at home)12. What is your reaction to the history of midwifery and the patriarchal shift, and repercussions from that shift?13. What is your reaction to some patients feeling “safer” delivering outside of the hospital, even though the hospital is the place with the OR and most advanced medical and life saving equipment?14. What non-pharm birthing interventions did you see during Felicia’s labor?15. House Committee on Oversight and Reform Hearing on the US Maternal Mortality Crisisa. Were you aware this happened last year? What is your reaction to congress taking up this cause?16. What is your reaction to the Harvard Medical School discussion?17. What overt or subtle political messaging or agenda’s did you see in this documentary? (example at 42:27 there was a Biden/Harris sign in the window) Did that effect your overall reaction to the documentary?18. What kind of coping displayed did you see by Shamony and Amber’s families?19. What did you learn about yourself/ your views/ your bias after watching this documentary?Bids(77)Miss DeannaDr. Ellen RMMISS HILLARY A+abdul_rehman_Emily ClareSTELLAR GEEK A+Prof Double RSheryl HoganFortifiedYoung NyanyaProWritingGuruJahky BDr. Adeline ZoeDr M. MichelleAshley EllieDr. Sophie MilesWIZARD_KIMIsabella HarvardColeen AndersonBrainy BrianShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Brilliant Answerspaperpart 5BUINESS POLICY CURRENT EVENTAssignment 3Unit 2Download your Individual Project. Fill out the answer form, and submit it to your instructor. The main answer form for this assignment should be submitted by Sunday night at midnight. Click here to download your Individual Project. Please submit your ass5 page discussion paper DUE IN 3HRSMHA 616 Week 4 AssignmentInterview a person about his/her religion and write essay about the interview

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now