Judaism Discussion

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Nursing

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Week 7: Intervention for Proposed Clinical Change Project

You are designing an executable population-based change project addressing identified practice-related problems or questions. This strongly emphasizes collaboration between advanced practice nurses and community agencies and include working with an agency using practice data to provide answers, which are responsive to the needs of clinicians, administrators, and policy makers for improvement of programs or practices.

This section of the change project should include a discussion of key concepts.

1. Clarify the issue under study. 2. Propose solutions or interventions based on the literature 3. Compare other views on the problem and solutions. 4. Address the APRN role in the intervention and discuss implications for clinical

practice. 5. Discuss the implications of your change project. 6. Some important things to consider and address: 7. Does your intervention have a clear connection to your research problem? 8. What are the specific methods of data collection you are going to use, such as

surveys, interviews, questionnaires, or protocols? 9. How do you intend to analyze your results? 10. Provide a justification for subject selection and sampling procedure. 11. Describe potential limitations. Are there any practical limitations that could affect

your data collection? How will you attempt to control the limitations? 12. How will your change project help fill gaps in understanding the research

problem? 13. This section should be 6–7 pages in length, not including the cover or reference

page. You must reference a minimum of 5 scholarly articles.

14. Use the current APA format to style your paper and to cite your sources. Review

the rubric for more information on how the assignment will be graded.

 

Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

 

 

This criterion is linked to a

Learning Outcome Content 64 to >52.48 pts

Meets Expectations

Succinctly clarifies the issue under study. Provides

a brief summary of the project including main

points and anticipated findings. Provides keen

insight into obstacles and proposes sound,

creative solutions or interventions based on the

literature review findings. Expertly compares other

views on the problem and solutions with detail.

Uses examples to thoroughly address the FNP role

in the intervention and discusses implications for

clinical practice. Thoughtfully discusses the

implications of the change project and its

significance to the nursing profession and filling

gaps in knowledge. Accurately categorizes and

thoroughly explains specific methods of data

collection to be used. Explains in detail how data

will be analyzed and used. Provides a sound

justification for subject selection and sampling

procedure. Accurately and thoroughly describes

potential limitations to data collection and control.

Meets all of the criteria of the written assignment.

64 pts

 

This criterion is linked to a

Learning Outcome

Organization 8 to >6.56 pts

Meets Expectations

Content is well written throughout. Information is

well organized and clearly communicated.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Discussion

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Week 3 Learning Exercise Analysis

Solve one of the following Learning Exercises from Huston’s Leadership Roles and Management Functions in Nursing, 11th edition.

  • Learning Exercise 13.3 (page 321)
  • Learning Exercise 13.8 (pages 334-335)
  • Learning Exercise 13.10 (page 336)

List which Learning Exercise you are solving at the start of your analysis and provide a brief summary of the case. Be sure to apply an appropriate problem-solving/decision-making model (Traditional Problem-Solving Process, Managerial Decision-Making Model, The Nursing Process, or the Integrated Ethical Problem-Solving Model) in determining what you should do. Justify your decision with supporting evidence

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

POLICY/REGULATION FACT SHEET

As a professional nurse, you are expected to apply your expertise to patient care. On occasion, you will also be expected to share that expertise.

With evolving technology and continuous changes to regulations designed to keep up with these changes, there is usually a need to share information and expertise to inform colleagues, leadership, patients, and other stakeholders.

In this, you will study a recent nursing informatics-related healthcare policy and you will share the relevant details via a fact sheet designed to inform and educate.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Research Article Critique 5 Charts

  • Each student is assigned to a group with an assigned topic/research problem.  Complete the following as it relates to the topic.
  • Choose five (5) research articles identified in the search strategy formulation assignment
  • Of the chosen five articles qualitative and quantitative studies should be represented related to the Evidence-Based Research Group Project Topic.
  • Use research articles only published within the last 5 years (2017-2022 accepted). Do not use textbooks, opinion articles, commentaries, or case studies. Students may not share articles.
  • The research article must be referenced strictly with the AMA format using EndNote.
  • How to get EndNote
  • Use the Research Critique Template that reflects specific critique guidelines presented in Polit and Beck (2021) for quantitative or qualitative studies found on pages 102-109 and Chapter 2.
  • Answer each critique question, section by section.
  • Provide specific information from the article in the comment section to appraise each study so that the details may be understood.
  • Do not simply answer “Yes” or “No” to the questions but make critical comments about the research components of each study.
  • In each section of the critique, you are to identify the strengths and weaknesses, presenting your rationale (positive and negative critique comments) about the value of the study.

Use this Revised Template for Research Critique Assignment.docx

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Discussion

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

To prepare:

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

The Assignment

Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis in which you:

· Explain why you think the patient presented the symptoms described.

· Identify the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.

· Explain the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.

 

Hello students!

Please note the assignment for week 2 and make sure to follow the rubric.  If you have a high matching please email me the reason and I will review.

WEEK 2: 

(No more than 2-3 pages of content are allowed for your case study which does not include you cover page and resources) 

Scenario 2:   A 30-year-old male presents to the clinic with a chief complaint of abdominal pain and cramping with mucus in his stool worsening over the last few weeks.  He denies any fever but has had an increase in fatigue.  He reports a weight loss of 10 pounds in the last month.  His family history reveals his brother was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease.  His labs reveal an elevated ESR, normal B12, and negative stool testing.  He is sent for a plain abdominal x-ray which was normal.  

Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis in which you:

· Explain why you think the patient presented the symptoms described.

· Identify the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.

· Explain the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.

THOUGHTS TO CONSIDER IN WORKING WITH YOUR CASE:

· *Remember when you think of genes do not just think of congenital anomalies. Think environment, disease that would or could specifically modify the gene and cause mutation. 

· *When you have an injury to a gene why or how does this cause immunosuppression? If one is immunocompromised what as a provider should you do? Consider?

 

 

 

 

 

 

· NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6501_Week 2_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following:Explain why you think the patient presented the symptoms described.
30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for the symptoms supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for the symptoms supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >22.0 pts

Fair

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes reasons for the symptoms, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

22 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include reasons for the symptoms, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.

 

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease is missing.

 

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.
30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.

24 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.

 

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

 

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

 

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

 

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now