This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcome (CO).

CO3: Demonstrate effective verbal, written, and technological communication using legal and ethical standards for transferring knowledge using success resources provided to Chamberlain students. (PO3)

How do you use informatics (not technology) in your nursing practice? What ethical issues have arisen or might arise from use of informatics in professional nursing?

Professor’s post: Nursing has come a long way since the era of Florence Nightingale.  Everywhere we look we are surrounded by technology and informatics.  Every day we are learning new processes in the world of nursing informatics. Due to this we need to be prepared and ready for any changes to informatics in the future.  Massachusetts Department of Higher Education Nursing Initiative (2016) stated that the Nurse of the Future “uses informatics, and knowledge of the larger healthcare delivery system, to support and enhance patient care” (p. 27).  Along with this we need to make ourselves aware of the challenges we might face, such as ethical issues that may arise from the use of informatics.  

Please refer to the original discussion topic assigned questions and address each question completely.

Reference

Massachusetts Department of Higher Education Nursing Initiative. (2016). Massachusetts Nurse of the Future Nursing Core Competencies© Registered Nurse. Retrieved from http://www.mass.edu/nahi/documents/NOFRNCompetencies_updated_March20 16.pdf

Respond to this post with a positive response :

Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research.

Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.

Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.

Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.

Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.

Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.

Use  references

EXAMPLE OF A REFERENCE:

If you cannot locate a doi number, this is how the reference should look: 

Quelly, S. B. (2017). Characteristics Associated with School Nurse Childhood Obesity Prevention Practices. Pediatric Nursing, 43(4). Retrieved from https://www.pediatricnursing.net/issues/17julaug/abstr5.html

                                                       Main Post

            My experience with using Grammarly and Safe Assign were not as daunting as I expected.  Grammarly is an app-based program that can be attached to Office 365 and Firefox.  The link for Grammarly was found on the academic guides page.  I used the site search box to find the app’s location. From there it was as easy as following directions and downloading the app.  I copy and pasted the paraphrased assignment and received an 83/100 for performance.  Other scores given were for word and sentence length, those scores were a 4.9 and a10.9.  The only issue found was the “Go Premium” offer that was $11.99 a month or $139.95a year.  There will not be a subscription ordered.  Grammarly will be used in my Word program on a trial basis. It can’t hurt to see what needs to be fixed in real time.  Another academic integrity tool is Safe Assign.  This tool is defined in the academic answers portion of the academic guide by stating, “SafeAssign is a tool that helps students prevent plagiarism and aids in identifying opportunities to add properly cited sources rather than just paraphrasing.” (Walden, 2011) Finding Safe Assign in Blackboard was very easy.  It is in the toolbar on the bottom left-hand side of the page.  Once on the site, it is as easy as browsing your computer for the document and simply upload it.   The only issue I have with Safe Assign is it is not in real time, you must wait for the site to review your work then make the changes needed.  In my opinion, Grammarly is a better tool for writing and having a real-time view of the paper being written.

A resource that I would recommend is the Online Writing Lab (OWL).  It is the base from where the American Psychological Association (APA) is explained in detail.  In the APA overview and workshop section of the OWL, it states, “Establish your credibility or ethos in the field by demonstrating an awareness of your audience and their needs as fellow researchers.” (Purdue Writing Lab, 2018) This is why we should use APA when scholarly writing.  Credibility is key when writing anything at a master’s level.  When using APA, we research ideas and information from scientific journals, and at the same time distribute that knowledge in the form of scholarly writings.  Using the OWL for any APA formatting question creates a solid base for building an educational publication to be reviewed by your peers. (APA, 2010, pg.9)

Grammar in its basic form decides how a writer will be received by the reader.  Incorrect grammar sidetracks the reader from the tone an author has set.  A format that I constantly work on is the use of parallel construction.  On page 84 of, the “Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.)” parallel construction is covered.  This is two ideas covered in a sentence that will improve the reader’s comprehension.  (APA, 2010, pg.84) Another format important to consider is the explanation of abbreviations.  Abbreviations in scientific writing are used to shorten long drawn out titles. The key in using abbreviations is to initially explain what the abbreviation is and use it at least four times.  There is a balance that must be attained.  Using too many abbreviations jumbles up the sentence and make it difficult to read, but not using enough causes the reader to lose interest with repetitive phrasing. (APA, 2010, pg.106-107)

References

American Psychological Association. (2010, pg.9,84). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Purdue Writing Lab. (2018). APA Style Introduction // Purdue Writing Lab. [online] Available at: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html [Accessed 10 Dec. 2018].

Walden University. (2012d).  Walden University: APA style. Retrieved from http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/APA.htm

Comment1

During the analysis conducted with my mentor, we believe that from the clinical point of view the results obtained from the patients will be positively impacted through the implementation of the EBP, and the application of the knowledge acquired from the planned educational proposal. The professionals who participate in the educational project will be able to learn the importance of the application of EBP in the daily routine and this will result in better health care provided to patients. This increase in positive results is synonymous with quality, therefore the organization will benefit from providing their patients with a high-quality service which will make the standards of the same, stay above what is required. All the aforementioned, makes the financial cost of implementing the educational project is not noticed. In any case, the expenses are expected to be minimal, but the benefits that the plan will bring will make disappear the possible economic barrier that could represent the implementation of the proposal for the administration of the organization. Healthcare expenditures must be correlated with high quality and efficiency in the delivery of services to improve health outcomes. In a very good study carried out by Hussey, Wertheimer, and Mehrotra, 2013, they point out that “One possibility is that improvements in quality will require increases in cost (or conversely, cost reductions could reduce quality). In reality, the association between cost and quality probably falls between these 2 extremes, that some types of health care costs are associated with high quality and others with poor quality. The effect depends on where the money is spent”.

Comment2

Evidence-based practice is associated with higher quality care and better patient outcomes than care that is steeped in tradition. However, the integration of evidence-based practice implementation into daily clinical practice remains inconsistent, and the chasm between research and bedside practice remains substantial. Practice changes most of the time requires an upfront investment of time and resources. These investments are designed to create an improvement in outcomes, whether clinical (e.g., reduced infections), organizational (e.g., shorter length of stay), or fiscal (e.g., reduced unplanned readmissions, which helps the organization avoid Medicare penalties). Any of these may have cost implications. Some EBP improvements may not create cost savings but may achieve an equally valuable outcome (e.g., patient satisfaction) that helps fulfill the organizational mission. 

Respond to this post with a positive response :

Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research

Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.

Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.

Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.

Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.

Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.

Use  references

EXAMPLE OF A REFERENCE:

If you cannot locate a doi number, this is how the reference should look: 

Quelly, S. B. (2017). Characteristics Associated with School Nurse Childhood Obesity Prevention Practices. Pediatric Nursing, 43(4). Retrieved from https://www.pediatricnursing.net/issues/17julaug/abstr5.html

                                                     MAIN POST

                               Scholarly Writing and Plagiarism

Learning is a journey and not a destination. A part of this journey was to use Grammarly and SafeAssign. I will discuss my experience with those two platforms as well as my perception of paraphrasing and plagiarism. The internet is full of resources, so I will be sharing an online resource that supports scholarly writing. Finally, I will share two American Psychological Association (APA) formatting rules that I believe are useful for academic writers.

 I have never used Grammarly before, but I like that I can check grammar in real time. I did not know such a tool was in existence and I will be using Grammarly for all my assignments going forward before sending. However, SafeAssign is not a new tool for me. When I went to Western Governors University, I used TurnItIn, which is similar to SafeAssign. It checks how much of your paper matches other known scholarly works. I wrote a sample paragraph with SafeAssign, and it was a 0% match. I like to see my works matching at 5% or less as a matter of philosophy. It is easy to avoid plagiarism if two things are remembered. Use thoughts that originate from your cranium and cite works according to APA rules and Walden University requirements. During this process, my insight was learning how to paraphrase better. Walden University (2012) states that paraphrasing is beyond simply rearranging a sentence and choosing synonyms. I realized paraphrasing is about turning the whole idea into your own words and then citing the author.

Scholarly writing is a term that can be confusing for many students. I had no idea what it meant until I researched the topic. According to Jackson State University (2015), scholarly writing is structured and seeks feedback from the audience. It would seem that this is the purpose of using discussion boards in an online learning environment. I believe that this online resource is useful, and I plan on adding it as a bookmark as a reminder of the essentials of scholarly writing.

As previously mentioned, proper APA style and formatting is essential in scholarly writing. A rule that I was not versed in was related to in-text citations with more than five authors. The APA Manual states, “when a work has six or more authors, cite only the surname of the first author followed by et al” (American Psychological Association, 2010, p. 175). Also, I did not know that the following rule existed. According to the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 170), presenting your existing work as new when it is not is the definition of self-plagiarism. I found this to be an interesting rule that I had not considered before and will make sure I never do.

                                             References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Jackson State University. (2015). What Is “Scholarly Writing”? Retrieved from http://www.jsums.edu/wrightcenter/2015/04/29/what-is-scholarly-writing/

Walden University. (2012). Walden University: Proofreading and revising. Retrieved from http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/872.htm

Personal Philosophy of Nursing Essay 

Use the questions from Box 3-2 on page 111 of your textbook as a guide as you write your personal philosophy of nursing. The essay is to be typewritten and double-spaced (1,000 words) and should include the following: 

1. Introduction that includes who you are and where you practice nursing 

2. Definition of nursing 

3. Assumptions or underlying beliefs 

4. Definitions and examples of the major domains of nursing 

5. Summary that includes answers to the following questions: a. How are the domains connected? b. What is your vision of nursing for the future? c. What are the challenges that you will face as a nurse? d. What are your goals for professional development? 

Grading Criteria for the Philosophy of Nursing Essay: 

Introduction   10%

Definition of nursing   20% 

Assumptions or underlying beliefs   20% 

Definitions of major domains of nursing    25% 

Summary   10%

Organization, focus, grammar, spelling, 

punctuation, and usage (writing rubric)    10% 

APA     5% 

Total    100%