db

/in /by

Please share your research, experience, and thoughts:   Using the ethical principle of justice, determine whether health care in this country should be a right or a privilege. Are the uninsured and the insured “unequals” that should be treated according to their differences? Does the type of health insurance that one has also create a system of “unequals”? If so, are the unequals being treated according to their differences?  Specifically, what should health care providers “do” to positively contribute to help foster a healthier society?  Your research, experience, and opinion are welcomed in this forum.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Teaching plan 2

/in /by

Based on the feedback offered by the provider, identify the best approach for teaching. Prepare a presentation to accompany the teaching plan and present the information to your community. Select one of the following options for delivery of the presentation:

  1. PowerPoint presentation – no more than 30 minutes
  2. Pamphlet presentation – 1 to 2 pages
  3. Poster presentation

Select one of the following as the focus for the teaching plan:

  1. Primary Prevention/Health Promotion
  2. Secondary Prevention/Screenings for a Vulnerable Population
  3. Bioterrorism/Disaster
  4. Environmental Issues

Complete the “Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal.” This will help you organize your plan and create an outline for the written assignment.

  1. After completing the teaching proposal, review the teaching plan with a community health and public health provider in your local community.
  2. Request feedback (strengths and opportunities for improvement) from the provider.
  3. Complete the “Community Teaching Experience” form.

NRS-427V-RS-CommunityTeachingWorkPlanProposal.docx

 

In 1,500-2,000 words, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The written portion of this assignment should include:

  1. Summary of teaching plan
  2. Epidemiological rationale for topic
  3. Evaluation of teaching experience
  4. Community response to teaching
  5. Areas of strengths and areas of improvement

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

clinical experiences

/in /by

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpgcuBSNBased on your clinical experiences with those who are dying, how have these experiences shaped your view of death and impacted your ability to demonstrate the qualities of empathy?Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to the “Discussion Question Rubric” and “Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.a year ago07.02.202410Report issueBids(60)Dr. Ellen RMMathProgrammingPROF_ALISTERSheryl HoganProf Double REmily ClareDr. Sarah BlakeDemi_RoseMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverDiscount AssigngrA+de plusJahky BTop MalaikaDr. Everleigh_JKIsabella HarvardTutor Cyrus KenWIZARD_KIMTeacher A+ WorkAshley EllieShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Journal: Group Think AssignmentPsychology Stats team worksheetCritically evaluate the impact of current and emerging trends on organizations.GgwpdiscussionBusiness Continuity PlanUnit 4: ProjectDiscusionC120 Interpersonal Communication KIM WOODShealth issue and cultural diversity

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Medical law and ethics

/in /by

Follow the instructions under Discussion Board Rubric and Guidelines  to create your post and respond to at least one other student. Internal citations and references are required.

This week’s post has 2 parts:

Part 1:  Please answer 2 of the following questions below as your original (no additional responses needed for Part 1).  Place in the subject line which 2 questions you are answering.  Ideally, as a group, you will cover all of the questions at least once.

1.    What are the legal uses of the health record?

2.    Are the entries made in the health record ordinarily subject to cross-examination? Why or why not?

3.    What questions are typically presented to the custodian of records in order to introduce a health record into evidence?

4.    What legal processes may be used to remove the health record from the health-care provider’s safekeeping?

5.    Should the health information manager assume that each subpoena presented requires the release of the information requested? Why or why not?

6.    How should the health information manager handle an invalid subpoena duces tecum?

Part 2:  Answer the question below and respond to at least one other learner.

Please review the article at: http://www.rightinginjustice.com/news/2013/11/22/whistleblower-asks-court-to-punish-florida-hospital-for-destroying-evidence/   Hospital destroyed medical records in false claims case, says it was a mistake (Feel free to explore other perspectives on this case)  Based on the information in chapter 9, what is your evaluation of this case?  Feel free to do further research on the case and bring in additional information.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Assignment: Practicum –SOAP Note And Time Log

/in /by

Patient has to be less than 18 years old

 

In addition to Journal Entries, SOAP Note submissions are a way to reflect on your Practicum experiences and connect these experiences to your classroom experience. SOAP Notes, such as the ones required in this course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care. Please refer to this week’s Learning Resources for guidance on writing SOAP Notes.

Select a patient who you examined during the last 3 weeks. With this patient in mind, address the following in a SOAP Note:

  • Subjective: What details did the patient or parent provide regarding the personal and medical history? Include any discrepancies between the details provided by the child and details provided by the parent, as well as possible reasons for these discrepancies.
  • Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment? Include pertinent positive and negative physical exam findings. Describe whether the patient presented with any growth and development or psychosocial issues.
  • Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why?
  • Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management? Include pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters, as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan.
  • Reflection notes: What was your “aha” moment? What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation?

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Trends

/in /by

Instructions

Reaching out a Solution

This assignment is designed to assist you in developing a thoughtful process for advocating about an issue as a nurse, from identifying a problem that needs to be solved through articulating a process for doing so.

This assignment consists of answering each of the questions listed below from the “Political Analysis and Strategies” chapter of your course textbook. Write each question as a new topic area; then follow with a paragraph or two to answer the question. Be sure to use APA guidelines for writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources, if any used. This project should be no longer than 4 pages.

Let us assume that you are a school nurse in a high school. At a recent school athletic event, a spectator suffered a cardiac arrest in the stands. A coach of the home team went into the high school to fetch the automatic emergency defibrillator (AED) only to find out that it was not readily available. In the meantime, an emergency squad arrived and resuscitated the spectator. On Monday morning, you learn of the absence of the AED only to find out that it had been locked in the custodian’s closet. Reflect on the following questions outlined in the “Political Analysis and Strategies” chapter:

  • What is the issue?
  • Is it my issue, and can I solve it?
  • Is this the real issue or merely a symptom of a larger one?
  • Does it need an immediate solution, or can it wait?
  • Is it likely to go away by itself?
  • Can I risk ignoring it?
  • What are the possible solutions? Are there risks to these solutions?
  • What steps would you need to take in order to solve the issue?
  • Does anyone else at the school need to be involved in the solution?
  • Where is the power leverage in the school to reach the preferred solution?

Reaching a solution requires the use of power vested in the nurse. Review Box 9-1 (Sources of Power) and determine which type(s) of power the school nurse has in this situation. State your reasons for your answer.

Submission Details:

  • Submit your response in a 4-page Microsoft Word document.
  • Name your document SU_NSG4068_W4_Project_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
  • Submit your document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
  • Cite sources in the APA format on a separate page.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Microbiology

/in /by

Need a 3-5 paper on staphylococcus areus 2 pages of references and no plagiarism, in apa

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Professional Accountability

/in /by

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpnursingHomeworka year ago18.02.202415Report issuefiles (2)professionalaccountability415.docxNRS-415Rubric-ProfessionalAccountabilityReflection.pdfprofessionalaccountability415.docxhe purpose of this assignment is to evaluate personal and professional accountability in the context of social media. Social media plays a significant role in modern society and is now a common tool used by individuals and organizations alike to evaluate a person’s values, authenticity, and reputation. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates for employment. Inappropriate or unprofessional conduct on social media can pose legal problems for nurses as well as damage public trust in nursing.For this assignment, log-in to each social media platform for which you have an account. Review your profile and most recent activity including pictures and posts. If you do not have a social media account, access one of the following social media platforms in order to view the social media posts and activities of others: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok. Reflect on the information and content you and others post on a daily basis.In 500-750 words, summarize your findings. Include the following in your summary:1. Describe the posts, conversations, and images you evaluated.2. Does the activity on social media appear to align with your personal values and the professional values of your discipline?3. Would family, friends, and colleagues consider the posts, conversations, and images authentic and representative of who you are as unique individuals?4. Does the activity on social media respect the human value and dignity of others as reflected in Christian values?5. Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with professional values, regulatory requirements, and workplace policies in both personal and professional interactions. Include a discussion of how personal conduct can violate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 or be considered unethical and unprofessional. Provide an example to support your answer.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing EducationThis assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 8.1, 8.5, 9.1, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 10.2.NRS-415Rubric-ProfessionalAccountabilityReflection.pdfProfessional Accountability Reflection – RubricPost Engagement 27.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDescribe posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be consideredinappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.5. Target 27.5 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isthorough.4. Acceptable 24.48 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isdetailed.3. Approaching 21.73 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is presentbut lacks detail.2. Insufficient 20.63 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isincomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is notpresent.Collapse All© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Standard of Conduct 33 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent withregulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives,including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical orunprofessional.5. Target 33 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is thorough and includes substantial supporting detail andexamples.4. Acceptable 29.37 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is detailed and includes examples.3. Approaching 26.07 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is present but lacks detail or examples.2. Insufficient 24.75 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Christian Values and Social Media 16.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values and areas that couldbe improved.5. Target 16.5 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is thorough.4. Acceptable 14.69 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is detailed.3. Approaching 13.04 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is present but lacks detail.2. Insufficient 12.38 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearlydirected to a specific audience.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of theappropriate audience is demonstrated.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionallyweak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very littleawareness of the intended audience.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriateaudience is evident.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Development, Structure, and Conclusion 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionAdvances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolvesfrom development.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progressionof ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to thedevelopment of the purpose.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build oneach other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsLimited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There areinconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplisticand not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsWriting lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Someorganization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear andnot supported by the overall development of the purpose.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsNo advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connectionsbetween paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Evidence 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionSelects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considersother perspectives.5. Target 6.6 pointsSpecific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others areclearly considered.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsRelevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsEvidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation orintegration of other perspectives is present.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsEvidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives issuperficial or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsEvidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing reliesentirely on the perspective of the writer.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Mechanics of Writing 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentencestructure, etc.5. Target 6.6 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentencestructure are used throughout.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentencestructure are used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generallyappropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in languagechoice or sentence structure are recurrent.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect languagechoice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Format/Documentation 4.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,appropriate to assignment and discipline.5. Target 4.4 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.4. Acceptable 3.92 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.3. Approaching 3.48 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obviouserrors.2. Insufficient 3.3 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errorsin documentation of sources are evident.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.Total 110 points© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/NRS-415Rubric-ProfessionalAccountabilityReflection.pdfProfessional Accountability Reflection – RubricPost Engagement 27.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDescribe posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be consideredinappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.5. Target 27.5 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isthorough.4. Acceptable 24.48 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isdetailed.3. Approaching 21.73 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is presentbut lacks detail.2. Insufficient 20.63 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isincomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is notpresent.Collapse All© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Standard of Conduct 33 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent withregulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives,including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical orunprofessional.5. Target 33 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is thorough and includes substantial supporting detail andexamples.4. Acceptable 29.37 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is detailed and includes examples.3. Approaching 26.07 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is present but lacks detail or examples.2. Insufficient 24.75 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Christian Values and Social Media 16.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values and areas that couldbe improved.5. Target 16.5 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is thorough.4. Acceptable 14.69 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is detailed.3. Approaching 13.04 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is present but lacks detail.2. Insufficient 12.38 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearlydirected to a specific audience.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of theappropriate audience is demonstrated.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionallyweak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very littleawareness of the intended audience.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriateaudience is evident.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Development, Structure, and Conclusion 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionAdvances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolvesfrom development.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progressionof ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to thedevelopment of the purpose.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build oneach other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsLimited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There areinconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplisticand not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsWriting lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Someorganization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear andnot supported by the overall development of the purpose.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsNo advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connectionsbetween paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Evidence 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionSelects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considersother perspectives.5. Target 6.6 pointsSpecific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others areclearly considered.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsRelevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsEvidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation orintegration of other perspectives is present.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsEvidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives issuperficial or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsEvidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing reliesentirely on the perspective of the writer.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Mechanics of Writing 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentencestructure, etc.5. Target 6.6 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentencestructure are used throughout.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentencestructure are used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generallyappropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in languagechoice or sentence structure are recurrent.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect languagechoice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Format/Documentation 4.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,appropriate to assignment and discipline.5. Target 4.4 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.4. Acceptable 3.92 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.3. Approaching 3.48 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obviouserrors.2. Insufficient 3.3 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errorsin documentation of sources are evident.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.Total 110 points© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/professionalaccountability415.docxhe purpose of this assignment is to evaluate personal and professional accountability in the context of social media. Social media plays a significant role in modern society and is now a common tool used by individuals and organizations alike to evaluate a person’s values, authenticity, and reputation. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates for employment. Inappropriate or unprofessional conduct on social media can pose legal problems for nurses as well as damage public trust in nursing.For this assignment, log-in to each social media platform for which you have an account. Review your profile and most recent activity including pictures and posts. If you do not have a social media account, access one of the following social media platforms in order to view the social media posts and activities of others: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok. Reflect on the information and content you and others post on a daily basis.In 500-750 words, summarize your findings. Include the following in your summary:1. Describe the posts, conversations, and images you evaluated.2. Does the activity on social media appear to align with your personal values and the professional values of your discipline?3. Would family, friends, and colleagues consider the posts, conversations, and images authentic and representative of who you are as unique individuals?4. Does the activity on social media respect the human value and dignity of others as reflected in Christian values?5. Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with professional values, regulatory requirements, and workplace policies in both personal and professional interactions. Include a discussion of how personal conduct can violate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 or be considered unethical and unprofessional. Provide an example to support your answer.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing EducationThis assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 8.1, 8.5, 9.1, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 10.2.NRS-415Rubric-ProfessionalAccountabilityReflection.pdfProfessional Accountability Reflection – RubricPost Engagement 27.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDescribe posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be consideredinappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.5. Target 27.5 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isthorough.4. Acceptable 24.48 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isdetailed.3. Approaching 21.73 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is presentbut lacks detail.2. Insufficient 20.63 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isincomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is notpresent.Collapse All© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Standard of Conduct 33 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent withregulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives,including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical orunprofessional.5. Target 33 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is thorough and includes substantial supporting detail andexamples.4. Acceptable 29.37 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is detailed and includes examples.3. Approaching 26.07 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is present but lacks detail or examples.2. Insufficient 24.75 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Christian Values and Social Media 16.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values and areas that couldbe improved.5. Target 16.5 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is thorough.4. Acceptable 14.69 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is detailed.3. Approaching 13.04 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is present but lacks detail.2. Insufficient 12.38 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearlydirected to a specific audience.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of theappropriate audience is demonstrated.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionallyweak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very littleawareness of the intended audience.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriateaudience is evident.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Development, Structure, and Conclusion 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionAdvances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolvesfrom development.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progressionof ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to thedevelopment of the purpose.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build oneach other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsLimited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There areinconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplisticand not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsWriting lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Someorganization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear andnot supported by the overall development of the purpose.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsNo advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connectionsbetween paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Evidence 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionSelects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considersother perspectives.5. Target 6.6 pointsSpecific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others areclearly considered.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsRelevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsEvidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation orintegration of other perspectives is present.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsEvidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives issuperficial or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsEvidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing reliesentirely on the perspective of the writer.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Mechanics of Writing 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentencestructure, etc.5. Target 6.6 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentencestructure are used throughout.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentencestructure are used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generallyappropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in languagechoice or sentence structure are recurrent.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect languagechoice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Format/Documentation 4.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,appropriate to assignment and discipline.5. Target 4.4 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.4. Acceptable 3.92 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.3. Approaching 3.48 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obviouserrors.2. Insufficient 3.3 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errorsin documentation of sources are evident.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.Total 110 points© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/professionalaccountability415.docxhe purpose of this assignment is to evaluate personal and professional accountability in the context of social media. Social media plays a significant role in modern society and is now a common tool used by individuals and organizations alike to evaluate a person’s values, authenticity, and reputation. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates for employment. Inappropriate or unprofessional conduct on social media can pose legal problems for nurses as well as damage public trust in nursing.For this assignment, log-in to each social media platform for which you have an account. Review your profile and most recent activity including pictures and posts. If you do not have a social media account, access one of the following social media platforms in order to view the social media posts and activities of others: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok. Reflect on the information and content you and others post on a daily basis.In 500-750 words, summarize your findings. Include the following in your summary:1. Describe the posts, conversations, and images you evaluated.2. Does the activity on social media appear to align with your personal values and the professional values of your discipline?3. Would family, friends, and colleagues consider the posts, conversations, and images authentic and representative of who you are as unique individuals?4. Does the activity on social media respect the human value and dignity of others as reflected in Christian values?5. Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with professional values, regulatory requirements, and workplace policies in both personal and professional interactions. Include a discussion of how personal conduct can violate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 or be considered unethical and unprofessional. Provide an example to support your answer.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing EducationThis assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 8.1, 8.5, 9.1, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 10.2.NRS-415Rubric-ProfessionalAccountabilityReflection.pdfProfessional Accountability Reflection – RubricPost Engagement 27.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDescribe posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be consideredinappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.5. Target 27.5 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isthorough.4. Acceptable 24.48 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isdetailed.3. Approaching 21.73 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is presentbut lacks detail.2. Insufficient 20.63 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isincomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is notpresent.Collapse All© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Standard of Conduct 33 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent withregulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives,including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical orunprofessional.5. Target 33 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is thorough and includes substantial supporting detail andexamples.4. Acceptable 29.37 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is detailed and includes examples.3. Approaching 26.07 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is present but lacks detail or examples.2. Insufficient 24.75 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Christian Values and Social Media 16.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values and areas that couldbe improved.5. Target 16.5 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is thorough.4. Acceptable 14.69 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is detailed.3. Approaching 13.04 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is present but lacks detail.2. Insufficient 12.38 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearlydirected to a specific audience.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of theappropriate audience is demonstrated.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionallyweak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very littleawareness of the intended audience.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriateaudience is evident.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Development, Structure, and Conclusion 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionAdvances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolvesfrom development.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progressionof ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to thedevelopment of the purpose.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build oneach other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsLimited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There areinconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplisticand not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsWriting lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Someorganization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear andnot supported by the overall development of the purpose.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsNo advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connectionsbetween paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Evidence 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionSelects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considersother perspectives.5. Target 6.6 pointsSpecific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others areclearly considered.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsRelevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsEvidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation orintegration of other perspectives is present.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsEvidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives issuperficial or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsEvidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing reliesentirely on the perspective of the writer.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Mechanics of Writing 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentencestructure, etc.5. Target 6.6 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentencestructure are used throughout.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentencestructure are used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generallyappropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in languagechoice or sentence structure are recurrent.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect languagechoice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Format/Documentation 4.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,appropriate to assignment and discipline.5. Target 4.4 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.4. Acceptable 3.92 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.3. Approaching 3.48 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obviouserrors.2. Insufficient 3.3 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errorsin documentation of sources are evident.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.Total 110 points© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/12Bids(64)Dr. Ellen RMPROF_ALISTERSheryl HoganProf Double REmily ClareDr. Sarah BlakeProf. TOPGRADEfirstclass tutorDemi_RoseFiona DavaMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssigngrA+de plusJahky BProWritingGuruIsabella HarvardBrilliant GeekTutor Cyrus KenShow All Bidsother Questions(10)3 page paper on outsourcingBSHS 422 Cultural Competency AssessmentI need help with BIP2 Tasks 1 and 2 from WGU.Rehabilitation Paperi have to write a resaerch essay81Finance Pinegarcan you do it?Please see below and contactDocument Analysis

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Week_13

/in /by

Discussion Question:

Discuss the FDA approach for liver safety for new drugs?

Support discussion with 1 journal no older than 5 years, APA style, no plagiarism, minimum of two paragraphs.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

NSG 6101

/in /by

Two paragraph only

 

Is it possible that a researcher would need to use both parametric and non-parametric tests with the date collected?

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now