unit 9

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

DNP Project

DNP Project SWOT Analysis of the Organization

Strengths

What does the organization do well?

What unique resources can they draw on?

What do others see as their strengths?

Weaknesses

What needs improvement?

Where do they have fewer resources than other places?

What are others likely to see as weaknesses?

   
Opportunities

What opportunities are open to the organization?

What trends could they take advantage of?

How can they turn their strengths into opportunities?

Threats

What threats does the organization identify?

What is the competition doing?

   

 

Updated January 2022

DNP Project SWOT Analysis (October 2021) 2

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Diagnosis Research

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Disaster Recovery Plan

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

Evaluation and Management (E/M)A person in a scrubs using a computer  Description automatically generatedInsurance coding and billing is complex, but it boils down to how to accurately apply a code, or CPT (current procedural terminology), to the service that you provided. The payer then reimburses the service at a certain rate. As a provider, you will have to understand what codes to use and what documentation is necessary to support coding.For this Assignment, you will review evaluation and management (E/M) documentation for a case study patient. You will analyze the documentation to formulate DSM-5-TR diagnoses and ICD-10 coding. You will formulate a billing code for reimbursement of the case study. You will consider legal and ethical considerations for coding and billing. You will analyze and consider the documentation necessary to support accurate billing and coding procedures. Resources Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare· Review this week’s Learning Resources on coding, billing, reimbursement.· Review the E/M patient case scenario provided.The Assignment· Assign DSM-5-TR diagnoses, ICD-10, and reimbursement codes to services based on the patient case scenario. Then, in 2-3 pages, address the following. You will add your narrative answers to these questions to the bottom of the case scenario document and submit them altogether as one document.· What reimbursement billing code would you use for this session? Provide your justification for using this billing code.· Explain what pertinent information is required in documentation to support your chosen DSM-5-TR diagnoses, ICD-10 coding, and billing code.  · Explain what pertinent documentation is missing from the case scenario and what other information would be helpful to narrow your coding and billing options. (There are at least 12 missing pertinent components of documentation).· Discuss legal and ethical dilemmas related to overbilling, upcoding, and fraudulent practices. Propose 2 strategies for promoting legal and ethical coding and billing practices within your future clinical roles.· Finally, explain how to improve documentation to support coding and billing for maximum reimbursement.· Students,· For week 2, you will address coding, billing, and study plan.

 
NRNP_6675_Week2_Assignment1_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
In the E/M patient case scenario provided: • Assign DSM-5-TR diagnoses and ICD-10 codes, and reimbursement codes to services based on the patient case scenario. Provides justifications 20 to >17 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

DSM-5-TR diagnoses, ICD-10, and reimbursement codes assigned to the scenario are accurate. Response is justified and demonstrates critical thinking.

17 to >15 pts

Good 80%–89%

DSM-5-TR diagnoses, ICD-10, and reimbursement codes assigned to the scenario are mostly correct, with 1-2 minor errors. Response is justified but does not demonstrate critical thinking.

15 to >13 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Missing one of the DSM-5-TR diagnoses, ICD-10, or reimbursement codes assigned to the scenario; contains 2-3 significant errors. Justification is vague or inaccurate.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Missing two or more DSM-5-TR diagnoses, and ICD-10, or reimbursement codes assigned to the scenario; contains 4+ errors, or response is missing. Missing Justification.

/ 20 pts
In 2-3 pages, address the following on the provided template: • Explain what pertinent information is required in documentation to support your chosen DSM-5-TR diagnoses, ICD-10 coding, and billing code. 20 to >17 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and concisely explains what reimburse pertinent documentation information is required to support DSM-5-TR diagnoses and ICD-10 coding.

17 to >15 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately explains what pertinent documentation information is required to support DSM-5-TR diagnoses and ICD-10 coding.

15 to >13 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains what pertinent documentation information is required to support DSM-5-TR diagnoses and ICD-10 coding.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains what pertinent documentation information is required to support DSM-5-TR diagnoses and ICD-10 coding, or the explanation is incomplete or missing.

/ 20 pts
• Explain what pertinent documentation is missing from the case scenario, and what other information would be helpful to narrow your coding and billing options. (There are at least 12 missing pertinent components of documentation). 15 to >13 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and concisely identifies the pertinent missing information from the case scenario and clearly identifies what additional information would narrow coding and billing options. Discusses at least 7 or more missing components of documentation.

13 to >11 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately identifies the pertinent missing information from the case scenario and identifies what additional information would narrow coding and billing options. Discusses at least 4-6 missing components of documentation.

11 to >10 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately identifies the pertinent missing information from the case scenario and identifies what additional information would narrow coding and billing options. Discusses at least 2-3 missing components of documentation.

10 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the pertinent missing information from the case scenario or partially identifies what additional information would narrow coding and billing options, or this information is incomplete or missing. Discusses 1 or no conversation of missing components of documentation.

/ 15 pts
• Discuss legal and ethical dilemmas related to overbilling, upcoding, and fraudulent practices. Propose 2 strategies for promoting legal and ethical coding and billing practices within your future clinical roles. 15 to >13 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and concisely explains legal and ethical dilemmas with 2 strategy proposals for future clinical practice.

13 to >11 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately explains but is not concise in explanation of legal and ethical dilemmas with 2 strategy proposals for future clinical practice.

11 to >10 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains legal and ethical dilemmas with 1 strategy proposal for future clinical practice.

10 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response does not or vaguely, inaccurately explains either legal or ethical (not both) dilemmas with 1 or missing strategy proposals for future clinical practice.

/ 15 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. 5 to >4 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time…. Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided.

/ 5 pts
• Finally, explain how to improve documentation to support coding and billing for maximum reimbursement. 15 to >13 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response accurately and concisely explains how to improve documentation to support coding and billing for maximum reimbursement.

13 to >11 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response accurately explains how to improve documentation to support coding and billing for maximum reimbursement.

11 to >10 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains how to improve documentation to support coding and billing for maximum reimbursement.

10 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains how to improve documentation to support coding and billing for maximum reimbursement, or response may be incomplete or missing.

/ 15 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

/ 5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list. 5 to >4 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1-2 APA format errors

3.5 to >3 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains 3-4 APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains five or more APA format errors

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

W5 quality measure

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) ensures the quality of client care using defined standards. Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS)Links to an external site. is a performance measurement tool millions of health insurance plans use. HEDIS includes six domains of care:

  • Effectiveness of Care
  • Access/Availability of Care
  • Experience of Care
  • Utilization and Risk Adjusted Utilization
  • Health Plan Descriptive Information
  • Measures Collected Using Electronic Clinical Data Systems

Expand each HEDIS domain to review the associated performance measures. Select one NCQA HEDIS performance measure related to your future practice area.

General Instructions

  1. Download the Week 5 Nurse Practitioner Quality Measures Worksheet TemplateLinks to an external site.. Use of this template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.
  2. Complete the Risk Management Case Study Template using the provided scenario.
  3. Follow APA grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
  4. Provide an in-text citation from three scholarly sources to support your writing.
  5. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.

Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric).

  1. Identification of the Selected Performance Measure
    1. Identify the selected performance measure.
    2. Analyze the selected performance measure for clinical significance and evidence base.
    3. Describe practical implications for practice.
    4. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
  2. Implementation Planning
    1. Develop a quality improvement plan for implementing the selected performance measure in your current or future practice, including:
      1. Strategies for client education
      2. Clinical workflow integration
      3. Documentation
    2. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
  3. Measurement
    1. Identify a tool or data collection technique to measure the outcomes of implementing the selected performance measure. (e.g., survey, statistical analysis, etc.)
    2. Describe how the tool can be successfully implemented.
    3. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
  4. Application to Practice
    1. Discuss how the interventions can improve client outcomes.
    2. Discuss how the interventions can improve cost savings for the practice.
    3. Discuss how the interventions can improve client ratings (on an NP’s client scorecard).
    4. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
  5. Reflection
    1. Reflect on the importance of using NCQA HEDIS performance measures in clinical practice.
    2. Identify two key takeaways to apply to your current or future practice.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

cardiovascular disorder mindmap

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Nursing DISCUSSION/ASSIGNMENT: PATIENT MEDICATION GUIDE

Discussion/Assignment: Patient Medication Guide

This week, you will create a Medication Study Guide to share with your peers. This guide is intended to be a useful learning tool for you to use as you prepare for your clinical courses.

You will be assigned  one of the following medications to create your guide:

Chlorpromazine Fluphenazine Haloperidol Loxapine Perphenazine
Aripiprazole Asenapine Clozapine Iloperidone Olanzapine
Paliperidone Quetiapine Risperidone Ziprasidone Lurasidone
Brexpiprazole Cariprazine Lumateperone Benztropine Propranolol
Deutetrabenazine Valbenazine      

 

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare for this Assignment:

· Identify your assigned psychotropic medication agent.

· Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the medication resources indicated for this week.

· Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might recommend for the assessment and treatment of vulnerable patient populations requiring antidepressant therapy.

The Assignment

Create a 3- to 4-page (excluding visual elements) Medication Study Guide for your assigned psychotropic medication agents that may be utilized by you and colleagues for study. Your medication guide should be in the form of an outline and should include a title page, citations, and references. You should incorporate visual elements, such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards. Be creative!

Note: Your Medication Study Guide should  not be in the format of an APA paper.

Also Note: Your guide should be informed by the  FDA-Approved and Evidenced-Based, Clinical Practice Guidelines Research.

Areas of importance that you should address—but are not limited to—include:

· Title page

· Description of the psychopharmacological medication agent, including brand and generic names, as well as appropriate FDA indication uses

· Any supporting, valid, and reliable research for non-FDA uses

· Drug classification

· The medication mechanism of action

· The medication pharmacokinetics

· The medication pharmacodynamics

· Appropriate dosing, administration route, and any considerations for dosing alterations

· Considerations of use and dosing in specific specialty populations, such as children, adolescents, elderly, pregnant people, those exhibiting suicidal behaviors, etc.

· Definition of half-life, why half-life is important, and the half-life for your assigned medication

· Side effects/adverse reactions potential

· Discuss clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia Note: Be sure to include screening tools that would be utilized.

· Contraindications for use including significant drug to drug interactions

· Overdose considerations

· Diagnostics and labs monitoring comorbidities considerations

· Legal, ethical, and social considerations

· Pertinent patient education considerations

· References page

Support your rationale with a minimum of  three (3) academic resources.

Note: While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. You should be utilizing primary and secondary literature.

By Day 7 of Week 7

You will need to submit your Assignment to two places:

1. Week 7 Medication Guide Discussion forum (linked at the button below) as an attachment

2. Week 7 Medication Guide Assignment submission link

Although no responses are required in the Discussion forum, collegial Discussion is welcome. You are encouraged to utilize your peers’ submitted guides on their assigned medication for study.

Week 7 Discussion

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the  Turnitin Drafts from the  Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as  WK7Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on  Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on  Upload File and select  Submit Assignment for review.

 

Rubric

NURS_6630_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6630_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes brand and generic names, FDA uses, classification, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, dosing, administration, considerations for alternate dosing, considerations for prescribing specialty populations, definition of half-life, why half-life important, and what is the half-life for assigned medication, side effects/adverse reaction potentials, contraindications, overdose considerations, diagnostics/labs, and patient education consideration.
50 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

The study guide comprehensively and clearly describes all of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication.

36 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response clearly describes 75% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication.

24 to >11.0 pts

Fair

The response describes 50% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication. Noted some inaccuracy in information provided.

11 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes 25% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication. Noted significant inaccuracies in information provided.

 

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia with screening tool to be utilized included.
20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Includes screening tools.

18 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Includes screening tools.

15 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Provides inaccurate screening tools.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies clinical concerns with EPS and/or Tardive Dyskinesia, or it is missing. No screening tools.

 

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes legal, ethical and social considerations.
10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the analysis.

7 to >4.0 pts

Good

The response accurately analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the analysis.

4 to >1.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the analysis.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the analysis, or it is missing.

 

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 3–4 pages. Three evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources were used.
10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 3–4 pages. Three evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

7 to >4.0 pts

Good

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 5 pages. Three evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

4 to >1.0 pts

Fair

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline, but no visual elements included for the appropriate audience. The guide is not as succinct and is 6–7 pages. two (2) evidence-based, peer reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

The study guide is not properly formatted as an outline but is a paper. The guide is long, succinct, and is 8+ pages. One or no evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

 

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

 

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

 

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Mindmap

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

4k assess 3

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now