Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpa month ago04.06.202510Report issuefiles (2)samplesweet.docx6003Cweek2Assignment.docxsamplesweet.docxAcademic and Professional NetworkDespite being rigorous and requiring both academic knowledge and practical practice, a Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) program is crucial for advancing a person’s career in the nursing field. In order to succeed, an MSN student requires a solid network of academic and professional resources that can help them navigate the challenges of advanced nursing courses and the necessary development of clinical and leadership abilities. Numerous resources have been made available by Walden University to promote the success of nursing students, and the school offers additional opportunities for development and assistance within the larger nursing field.Academic and professional individuals or teams to collaborate with in this MSN program and as a practicing nurse.The MSN program’s academic environment necessitates that a person have access to the appropriate individuals and resources who can influence their achievement. In Walden University’s MSN program, I have selected two key academic allies with whom I would work: my faculty advisor and study group. A study group is a crucial tool for my academic performance in the MSN degree since participation in the group facilitates idea sharing, mutual support in trying times, and the explanation of difficult ideas. My MSN program’s study group was chosen for collaboration for a number of reasons, including the chance to hone the communication and teamwork skills that are essential for clinical and academic settings. Another factor in my decision to choose the study group was the members’ varied backgrounds and expertise, which would help me in my MSN program by offering a range of viewpoints on nursing-related topics (Bumby & Litwack in 2021). Last but not least, I choose the study group to help me better comprehend and retain the course information for the MSN program by sharing essential resources like notes, study materials, and other academic materials.Since Walden University’s faculty adviser is an experienced professional who helps with course selection, career planning, and research direction, they are another crucial individual to work with for my academic support in the MSN program. Based on their vast experience in nursing education and their interest in research that closely relates to my professional aspirations, I choose the faculty advisor (Walden, 2020). As a crucial component of developing the evidence-based practice skills necessary for my MSN program, the faculty adviser will assist me by offering mentorship on research assignments. Additionally, the adviser will give me program-specific academic guidance to help me effectively fulfill the requirements of the MSN program requirements. Finally, the faculty advisor will assist with possibilities for professional growth, such as conferences and publications, which will raise my academic and professional reputation.Similar to the academic resources for my MSN program, professional networks are crucial since they aid in my growth as a practicing nurse. The preceptor and professional nursing organizations are the two groups of people I have decided to work with during my MSN program. A preceptor is a qualified and experienced healthcare professional who serves as a coach and teacher for nursing students throughout their clinical rotations. The preceptor’s main responsibility is to help students apply their theoretical knowledge to practical clinical settings. They are necessary at all nursing school levels, including the I chose the nurse preceptor for my MSN program in part because of their dedication to ongoing education and professional growth, which will serve as an example of the value of lifetime learning. The preceptor can provide me helpful criticism that will help me advance my clinical expertise and professional demeanor. The preceptor will help me succeed in this program by assisting me with the clinical protocols and procedures, which will guarantee that I form safe and capable practice habits. Additionally, the preceptor will guide me through the intricacies of patient care, from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up, and foster the critical thinking and reflective practice necessary for advanced nursing positions.While pursuing my MSN, I would also work with professional nursing groups. Professional nursing organizations provide networking opportunities, nursing resources, and advocacy for the nursing profession (Sanford, 2020). I have selected these nursing organizations as they provide access to the latest research and continuing education opportunities that are important for one to stay relevant and current in the nursing field. Also, these organizations provide opportunities for networking with other professionals, leading to collaborative opportunities and career advancement, as well as advocate for policies supporting nursing practice and healthcare improvement. The professional nursing organizations will support my success in the MSN program through the provision of success to specialized knowledge and resources that would enhance my academic and clinical practice. Additionally, it would give me access to a wider network of nursing experts who could assist, collaborate, and mentor me, as well as possibilities for professional growth through webinars, conferences, and certification programs. In conclusion, nursing students’ success in the MSN program and as practicing nurses depends on their ability to develop academic and professional networks. Navigating the difficulties that advanced nursing education and clinical practice face would be made easier with the assistance of the faculty adviser, study group, preceptor, and professional nursing organizations. These people and their team will offer the direction, materials, and assistance required to succeed both professionally and academically.ReferencesBumby, J. C., & Litwack, K. (2021). Student experiences in an academic support program to diversify the nursing workforce. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104615 Gholizadeh, L., Shahbazi, S., Valizadeh, S., Mohammadzad, M., Ghahramanian, A., & Shohani, M. (2022). Nurse preceptors’ perceptions of benefits, rewards, support, and commitment to the preceptor role in a new preceptorship program. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03534-0 Sanford, K. D. (2020). Always a nurse: a profession for a lifetime. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/naq.0000000000000399 Walden, C. (2020). Nursing Faculty Experiences with Cultural competence and teaching culturally diverse students (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University)6003Cweek2Assignment.docx2Comparison of Presidential Agendas on Mental Health: Biden vs. TrumpGlory MbahWalden UniversityNURS 6003CDr Danny Lee05/08/2025IntroductionMental health is an increasingly visible and pressing public health issue in the United States. Anxiety, depression, substance use disorders, and suicide rates have been rising, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. Both the Trump and Biden administrations have addressed this issue, but their approaches differ significantly in terms of policy, funding, and priorities. This paper compares how each administration tackled mental health, highlighting differences in agenda setting, resource allocation, and potential impacts on national health. As healthcare professionals, understanding these priorities is essential for engaging in policy advocacy and shaping effective, sustainable interventions.Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid (Narrative Format)The population health concern selected for this comparison is mental health, particularly in the context of increased needs post-pandemic.President Joe Biden’s Approach:President Biden has made mental health a cornerstone of his broader healthcare reform. In 2022, he launched a national strategy to address the mental health crisis, emphasizing three main goals: strengthening system capacity, connecting Americans to care, and supporting a healthier society (White House, 2022). His administration expanded funding for mental health services through the American Rescue Plan and proposed large increases in federal mental health spending, including school-based services and crisis response systems. Mental health parity, telehealth access, and integration of behavioral health into primary care are key tenets of Biden’s approach.President Donald Trump’s Approach:President Trump also recognized mental health as a public concern, particularly in connection to opioid addiction and veteran health. His administration emphasized community-based care, funding mental health services through programs like the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHCs) (“Mental Health & Substance Use Disorder,” 2025). In 2020, the Trump administration launched the “988” Suicide Prevention Lifeline initiative, which was a significant step toward improving emergency mental health response. However, funding levels and coordination across agencies were often criticized as inadequate compared to the scope of the crisis.Resource Allocation:Biden’s administration proposed over $10 billion in new funding for mental health initiatives in 2023 alone, including expanding mental health providers in underserved communities. Trump’s administration allocated funding through targeted grants and substance abuse prevention programs, but with less emphasis on systemic reforms (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). While both administrations increased investment in mental health, Biden’s approach reflects a more comprehensive strategy with higher funding levels.Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis (Narrative Format)The primary agency that would support addressing the mental health crisis is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), specifically the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). SAMHSA is equipped with the mandate, expertise, and infrastructure to implement large-scale mental health initiatives and to partner with state and local health departments, making it the most effective agency for this task.Mental health typically gets on the presidential agenda due to rising public concern, supported by data on suicide rates, overdose deaths, and provider shortages. Events such as mass shootings or public health emergencies can also elevate mental health issues to national attention (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). To remain on the agenda, mental health must be tied to measurable outcomes, bipartisan support, and sustained media and public advocacy.A strong champion is essential to move the issue forward. Senator Tina Smith (D-MN), who has openly spoken about her own experience with depression and advocates for mental health reform, would be an effective sponsor (“Mental Health & Substance Use Disorder,” 2025). Her legislative efforts and personal commitment make her a credible and passionate advocate, capable of mobilizing both policymakers and public opinion.Part 3: Fact SheetMental Health in America: Why It Must Stay on the Legislative AgendaThe Crisis:Nearly one in five U.S. adults experiences mental illness each year (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). The pandemic further worsened mental health outcomes across all demographics, especially youth and frontline workers.The Impact:Untreated mental health conditions cost the U.S. economy over $200 billion annually in lost productivity, healthcare, and criminal justice costs.Legislative Needs:Increased federal funding for mental health services, stronger parity enforcement, expanded access through telehealth, and workforce development are critical.Why Now:The bipartisan rollout of the 988 mental health hotline shows strong momentum. Building on this, legislation must support systemic reforms.The Nurse’s Role:Nurses are frontline witnesses to mental health crises. As trusted professionals, they provide direct care, gather data, and advocate for policy that reflects community needs. Nurses must be empowered to influence mental health legislation through professional organizations and direct engagement with policymakers.ConclusionComparing the healthcare agendas of Presidents Biden and Trump highlights both continuity and contrast in addressing mental health. While both recognized the importance of the issue, Biden’s administration adopted a more comprehensive, federally coordinated strategy. Engaging with agencies like SAMHSA and working with champions like Senator Smith are vital to keeping mental health on the legislative agenda. Nurses, as direct care providers and advocates, are central to this mission and must actively participate in shaping policy for lasting impact.ReferencesMental Health & Substance Use Disorder. (2025, March 26). Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://www.hhs.gov/programs/prevention-and-wellness/mental-health-substance-use-disorder/index.htmlMental health by the numbers. (2024, February 12). Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://www.nami.org/about-mental-illness/mental-health-by-the-numbers/The White House. (2022, July 15). FACT SHEET: President Biden to announce strategy to address our national mental health crisis, as part of unity agenda in his First State of the union. Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/01/fact-sheet-president-biden-to-announce-strategy-to-address-our-national-mental-health-crisis-as-part-of-unity-agenda-in-his-first-state-of-the-union/6003Cweek2Assignment.docx2Comparison of Presidential Agendas on Mental Health: Biden vs. TrumpGlory MbahWalden UniversityNURS 6003CDr Danny Lee05/08/2025IntroductionMental health is an increasingly visible and pressing public health issue in the United States. Anxiety, depression, substance use disorders, and suicide rates have been rising, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. Both the Trump and Biden administrations have addressed this issue, but their approaches differ significantly in terms of policy, funding, and priorities. This paper compares how each administration tackled mental health, highlighting differences in agenda setting, resource allocation, and potential impacts on national health. As healthcare professionals, understanding these priorities is essential for engaging in policy advocacy and shaping effective, sustainable interventions.Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid (Narrative Format)The population health concern selected for this comparison is mental health, particularly in the context of increased needs post-pandemic.President Joe Biden’s Approach:President Biden has made mental health a cornerstone of his broader healthcare reform. In 2022, he launched a national strategy to address the mental health crisis, emphasizing three main goals: strengthening system capacity, connecting Americans to care, and supporting a healthier society (White House, 2022). His administration expanded funding for mental health services through the American Rescue Plan and proposed large increases in federal mental health spending, including school-based services and crisis response systems. Mental health parity, telehealth access, and integration of behavioral health into primary care are key tenets of Biden’s approach.President Donald Trump’s Approach:President Trump also recognized mental health as a public concern, particularly in connection to opioid addiction and veteran health. His administration emphasized community-based care, funding mental health services through programs like the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHCs) (“Mental Health & Substance Use Disorder,” 2025). In 2020, the Trump administration launched the “988” Suicide Prevention Lifeline initiative, which was a significant step toward improving emergency mental health response. However, funding levels and coordination across agencies were often criticized as inadequate compared to the scope of the crisis.Resource Allocation:Biden’s administration proposed over $10 billion in new funding for mental health initiatives in 2023 alone, including expanding mental health providers in underserved communities. Trump’s administration allocated funding through targeted grants and substance abuse prevention programs, but with less emphasis on systemic reforms (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). While both administrations increased investment in mental health, Biden’s approach reflects a more comprehensive strategy with higher funding levels.Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis (Narrative Format)The primary agency that would support addressing the mental health crisis is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), specifically the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). SAMHSA is equipped with the mandate, expertise, and infrastructure to implement large-scale mental health initiatives and to partner with state and local health departments, making it the most effective agency for this task.Mental health typically gets on the presidential agenda due to rising public concern, supported by data on suicide rates, overdose deaths, and provider shortages. Events such as mass shootings or public health emergencies can also elevate mental health issues to national attention (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). To remain on the agenda, mental health must be tied to measurable outcomes, bipartisan support, and sustained media and public advocacy.A strong champion is essential to move the issue forward. Senator Tina Smith (D-MN), who has openly spoken about her own experience with depression and advocates for mental health reform, would be an effective sponsor (“Mental Health & Substance Use Disorder,” 2025). Her legislative efforts and personal commitment make her a credible and passionate advocate, capable of mobilizing both policymakers and public opinion.Part 3: Fact SheetMental Health in America: Why It Must Stay on the Legislative AgendaThe Crisis:Nearly one in five U.S. adults experiences mental illness each year (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). The pandemic further worsened mental health outcomes across all demographics, especially youth and frontline workers.The Impact:Untreated mental health conditions cost the U.S. economy over $200 billion annually in lost productivity, healthcare, and criminal justice costs.Legislative Needs:Increased federal funding for mental health services, stronger parity enforcement, expanded access through telehealth, and workforce development are critical.Why Now:The bipartisan rollout of the 988 mental health hotline shows strong momentum. Building on this, legislation must support systemic reforms.The Nurse’s Role:Nurses are frontline witnesses to mental health crises. As trusted professionals, they provide direct care, gather data, and advocate for policy that reflects community needs. Nurses must be empowered to influence mental health legislation through professional organizations and direct engagement with policymakers.ConclusionComparing the healthcare agendas of Presidents Biden and Trump highlights both continuity and contrast in addressing mental health. While both recognized the importance of the issue, Biden’s administration adopted a more comprehensive, federally coordinated strategy. Engaging with agencies like SAMHSA and working with champions like Senator Smith are vital to keeping mental health on the legislative agenda. Nurses, as direct care providers and advocates, are central to this mission and must actively participate in shaping policy for lasting impact.ReferencesMental Health & Substance Use Disorder. (2025, March 26). Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://www.hhs.gov/programs/prevention-and-wellness/mental-health-substance-use-disorder/index.htmlMental health by the numbers. (2024, February 12). Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://www.nami.org/about-mental-illness/mental-health-by-the-numbers/The White House. (2022, July 15). FACT SHEET: President Biden to announce strategy to address our national mental health crisis, as part of unity agenda in his First State of the union. Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/01/fact-sheet-president-biden-to-announce-strategy-to-address-our-national-mental-health-crisis-as-part-of-unity-agenda-in-his-first-state-of-the-union/samplesweet.docxAcademic and Professional NetworkDespite being rigorous and requiring both academic knowledge and practical practice, a Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) program is crucial for advancing a person’s career in the nursing field. In order to succeed, an MSN student requires a solid network of academic and professional resources that can help them navigate the challenges of advanced nursing courses and the necessary development of clinical and leadership abilities. Numerous resources have been made available by Walden University to promote the success of nursing students, and the school offers additional opportunities for development and assistance within the larger nursing field.Academic and professional individuals or teams to collaborate with in this MSN program and as a practicing nurse.The MSN program’s academic environment necessitates that a person have access to the appropriate individuals and resources who can influence their achievement. In Walden University’s MSN program, I have selected two key academic allies with whom I would work: my faculty advisor and study group. A study group is a crucial tool for my academic performance in the MSN degree since participation in the group facilitates idea sharing, mutual support in trying times, and the explanation of difficult ideas. My MSN program’s study group was chosen for collaboration for a number of reasons, including the chance to hone the communication and teamwork skills that are essential for clinical and academic settings. Another factor in my decision to choose the study group was the members’ varied backgrounds and expertise, which would help me in my MSN program by offering a range of viewpoints on nursing-related topics (Bumby & Litwack in 2021). Last but not least, I choose the study group to help me better comprehend and retain the course information for the MSN program by sharing essential resources like notes, study materials, and other academic materials.Since Walden University’s faculty adviser is an experienced professional who helps with course selection, career planning, and research direction, they are another crucial individual to work with for my academic support in the MSN program. Based on their vast experience in nursing education and their interest in research that closely relates to my professional aspirations, I choose the faculty advisor (Walden, 2020). As a crucial component of developing the evidence-based practice skills necessary for my MSN program, the faculty adviser will assist me by offering mentorship on research assignments. Additionally, the adviser will give me program-specific academic guidance to help me effectively fulfill the requirements of the MSN program requirements. Finally, the faculty advisor will assist with possibilities for professional growth, such as conferences and publications, which will raise my academic and professional reputation.Similar to the academic resources for my MSN program, professional networks are crucial since they aid in my growth as a practicing nurse. The preceptor and professional nursing organizations are the two groups of people I have decided to work with during my MSN program. A preceptor is a qualified and experienced healthcare professional who serves as a coach and teacher for nursing students throughout their clinical rotations. The preceptor’s main responsibility is to help students apply their theoretical knowledge to practical clinical settings. They are necessary at all nursing school levels, including the I chose the nurse preceptor for my MSN program in part because of their dedication to ongoing education and professional growth, which will serve as an example of the value of lifetime learning. The preceptor can provide me helpful criticism that will help me advance my clinical expertise and professional demeanor. The preceptor will help me succeed in this program by assisting me with the clinical protocols and procedures, which will guarantee that I form safe and capable practice habits. Additionally, the preceptor will guide me through the intricacies of patient care, from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up, and foster the critical thinking and reflective practice necessary for advanced nursing positions.While pursuing my MSN, I would also work with professional nursing groups. Professional nursing organizations provide networking opportunities, nursing resources, and advocacy for the nursing profession (Sanford, 2020). I have selected these nursing organizations as they provide access to the latest research and continuing education opportunities that are important for one to stay relevant and current in the nursing field. Also, these organizations provide opportunities for networking with other professionals, leading to collaborative opportunities and career advancement, as well as advocate for policies supporting nursing practice and healthcare improvement. The professional nursing organizations will support my success in the MSN program through the provision of success to specialized knowledge and resources that would enhance my academic and clinical practice. Additionally, it would give me access to a wider network of nursing experts who could assist, collaborate, and mentor me, as well as possibilities for professional growth through webinars, conferences, and certification programs. In conclusion, nursing students’ success in the MSN program and as practicing nurses depends on their ability to develop academic and professional networks. Navigating the difficulties that advanced nursing education and clinical practice face would be made easier with the assistance of the faculty adviser, study group, preceptor, and professional nursing organizations. These people and their team will offer the direction, materials, and assistance required to succeed both professionally and academically.ReferencesBumby, J. C., & Litwack, K. (2021). Student experiences in an academic support program to diversify the nursing workforce. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104615 Gholizadeh, L., Shahbazi, S., Valizadeh, S., Mohammadzad, M., Ghahramanian, A., & Shohani, M. (2022). Nurse preceptors’ perceptions of benefits, rewards, support, and commitment to the preceptor role in a new preceptorship program. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03534-0 Sanford, K. D. (2020). Always a nurse: a profession for a lifetime. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/naq.0000000000000399 Walden, C. (2020). Nursing Faculty Experiences with Cultural competence and teaching culturally diverse students (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University)6003Cweek2Assignment.docx2Comparison of Presidential Agendas on Mental Health: Biden vs. TrumpGlory MbahWalden UniversityNURS 6003CDr Danny Lee05/08/2025IntroductionMental health is an increasingly visible and pressing public health issue in the United States. Anxiety, depression, substance use disorders, and suicide rates have been rising, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. Both the Trump and Biden administrations have addressed this issue, but their approaches differ significantly in terms of policy, funding, and priorities. This paper compares how each administration tackled mental health, highlighting differences in agenda setting, resource allocation, and potential impacts on national health. As healthcare professionals, understanding these priorities is essential for engaging in policy advocacy and shaping effective, sustainable interventions.Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid (Narrative Format)The population health concern selected for this comparison is mental health, particularly in the context of increased needs post-pandemic.President Joe Biden’s Approach:President Biden has made mental health a cornerstone of his broader healthcare reform. In 2022, he launched a national strategy to address the mental health crisis, emphasizing three main goals: strengthening system capacity, connecting Americans to care, and supporting a healthier society (White House, 2022). His administration expanded funding for mental health services through the American Rescue Plan and proposed large increases in federal mental health spending, including school-based services and crisis response systems. Mental health parity, telehealth access, and integration of behavioral health into primary care are key tenets of Biden’s approach.President Donald Trump’s Approach:President Trump also recognized mental health as a public concern, particularly in connection to opioid addiction and veteran health. His administration emphasized community-based care, funding mental health services through programs like the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHCs) (“Mental Health & Substance Use Disorder,” 2025). In 2020, the Trump administration launched the “988” Suicide Prevention Lifeline initiative, which was a significant step toward improving emergency mental health response. However, funding levels and coordination across agencies were often criticized as inadequate compared to the scope of the crisis.Resource Allocation:Biden’s administration proposed over $10 billion in new funding for mental health initiatives in 2023 alone, including expanding mental health providers in underserved communities. Trump’s administration allocated funding through targeted grants and substance abuse prevention programs, but with less emphasis on systemic reforms (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). While both administrations increased investment in mental health, Biden’s approach reflects a more comprehensive strategy with higher funding levels.Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis (Narrative Format)The primary agency that would support addressing the mental health crisis is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), specifically the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). SAMHSA is equipped with the mandate, expertise, and infrastructure to implement large-scale mental health initiatives and to partner with state and local health departments, making it the most effective agency for this task.Mental health typically gets on the presidential agenda due to rising public concern, supported by data on suicide rates, overdose deaths, and provider shortages. Events such as mass shootings or public health emergencies can also elevate mental health issues to national attention (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). To remain on the agenda, mental health must be tied to measurable outcomes, bipartisan support, and sustained media and public advocacy.A strong champion is essential to move the issue forward. Senator Tina Smith (D-MN), who has openly spoken about her own experience with depression and advocates for mental health reform, would be an effective sponsor (“Mental Health & Substance Use Disorder,” 2025). Her legislative efforts and personal commitment make her a credible and passionate advocate, capable of mobilizing both policymakers and public opinion.Part 3: Fact SheetMental Health in America: Why It Must Stay on the Legislative AgendaThe Crisis:Nearly one in five U.S. adults experiences mental illness each year (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). The pandemic further worsened mental health outcomes across all demographics, especially youth and frontline workers.The Impact:Untreated mental health conditions cost the U.S. economy over $200 billion annually in lost productivity, healthcare, and criminal justice costs.Legislative Needs:Increased federal funding for mental health services, stronger parity enforcement, expanded access through telehealth, and workforce development are critical.Why Now:The bipartisan rollout of the 988 mental health hotline shows strong momentum. Building on this, legislation must support systemic reforms.The Nurse’s Role:Nurses are frontline witnesses to mental health crises. As trusted professionals, they provide direct care, gather data, and advocate for policy that reflects community needs. Nurses must be empowered to influence mental health legislation through professional organizations and direct engagement with policymakers.ConclusionComparing the healthcare agendas of Presidents Biden and Trump highlights both continuity and contrast in addressing mental health. While both recognized the importance of the issue, Biden’s administration adopted a more comprehensive, federally coordinated strategy. Engaging with agencies like SAMHSA and working with champions like Senator Smith are vital to keeping mental health on the legislative agenda. Nurses, as direct care providers and advocates, are central to this mission and must actively participate in shaping policy for lasting impact.ReferencesMental Health & Substance Use Disorder. (2025, March 26). Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://www.hhs.gov/programs/prevention-and-wellness/mental-health-substance-use-disorder/index.htmlMental health by the numbers. (2024, February 12). Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://www.nami.org/about-mental-illness/mental-health-by-the-numbers/The White House. (2022, July 15). FACT SHEET: President Biden to announce strategy to address our national mental health crisis, as part of unity agenda in his First State of the union. Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/01/fact-sheet-president-biden-to-announce-strategy-to-address-our-national-mental-health-crisis-as-part-of-unity-agenda-in-his-first-state-of-the-union/samplesweet.docxAcademic and Professional NetworkDespite being rigorous and requiring both academic knowledge and practical practice, a Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) program is crucial for advancing a person’s career in the nursing field. In order to succeed, an MSN student requires a solid network of academic and professional resources that can help them navigate the challenges of advanced nursing courses and the necessary development of clinical and leadership abilities. Numerous resources have been made available by Walden University to promote the success of nursing students, and the school offers additional opportunities for development and assistance within the larger nursing field.Academic and professional individuals or teams to collaborate with in this MSN program and as a practicing nurse.The MSN program’s academic environment necessitates that a person have access to the appropriate individuals and resources who can influence their achievement. In Walden University’s MSN program, I have selected two key academic allies with whom I would work: my faculty advisor and study group. A study group is a crucial tool for my academic performance in the MSN degree since participation in the group facilitates idea sharing, mutual support in trying times, and the explanation of difficult ideas. My MSN program’s study group was chosen for collaboration for a number of reasons, including the chance to hone the communication and teamwork skills that are essential for clinical and academic settings. Another factor in my decision to choose the study group was the members’ varied backgrounds and expertise, which would help me in my MSN program by offering a range of viewpoints on nursing-related topics (Bumby & Litwack in 2021). Last but not least, I choose the study group to help me better comprehend and retain the course information for the MSN program by sharing essential resources like notes, study materials, and other academic materials.Since Walden University’s faculty adviser is an experienced professional who helps with course selection, career planning, and research direction, they are another crucial individual to work with for my academic support in the MSN program. Based on their vast experience in nursing education and their interest in research that closely relates to my professional aspirations, I choose the faculty advisor (Walden, 2020). As a crucial component of developing the evidence-based practice skills necessary for my MSN program, the faculty adviser will assist me by offering mentorship on research assignments. Additionally, the adviser will give me program-specific academic guidance to help me effectively fulfill the requirements of the MSN program requirements. Finally, the faculty advisor will assist with possibilities for professional growth, such as conferences and publications, which will raise my academic and professional reputation.Similar to the academic resources for my MSN program, professional networks are crucial since they aid in my growth as a practicing nurse. The preceptor and professional nursing organizations are the two groups of people I have decided to work with during my MSN program. A preceptor is a qualified and experienced healthcare professional who serves as a coach and teacher for nursing students throughout their clinical rotations. The preceptor’s main responsibility is to help students apply their theoretical knowledge to practical clinical settings. They are necessary at all nursing school levels, including the I chose the nurse preceptor for my MSN program in part because of their dedication to ongoing education and professional growth, which will serve as an example of the value of lifetime learning. The preceptor can provide me helpful criticism that will help me advance my clinical expertise and professional demeanor. The preceptor will help me succeed in this program by assisting me with the clinical protocols and procedures, which will guarantee that I form safe and capable practice habits. Additionally, the preceptor will guide me through the intricacies of patient care, from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up, and foster the critical thinking and reflective practice necessary for advanced nursing positions.While pursuing my MSN, I would also work with professional nursing groups. Professional nursing organizations provide networking opportunities, nursing resources, and advocacy for the nursing profession (Sanford, 2020). I have selected these nursing organizations as they provide access to the latest research and continuing education opportunities that are important for one to stay relevant and current in the nursing field. Also, these organizations provide opportunities for networking with other professionals, leading to collaborative opportunities and career advancement, as well as advocate for policies supporting nursing practice and healthcare improvement. The professional nursing organizations will support my success in the MSN program through the provision of success to specialized knowledge and resources that would enhance my academic and clinical practice. Additionally, it would give me access to a wider network of nursing experts who could assist, collaborate, and mentor me, as well as possibilities for professional growth through webinars, conferences, and certification programs. In conclusion, nursing students’ success in the MSN program and as practicing nurses depends on their ability to develop academic and professional networks. Navigating the difficulties that advanced nursing education and clinical practice face would be made easier with the assistance of the faculty adviser, study group, preceptor, and professional nursing organizations. These people and their team will offer the direction, materials, and assistance required to succeed both professionally and academically.ReferencesBumby, J. C., & Litwack, K. (2021). Student experiences in an academic support program to diversify the nursing workforce. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104615 Gholizadeh, L., Shahbazi, S., Valizadeh, S., Mohammadzad, M., Ghahramanian, A., & Shohani, M. (2022). Nurse preceptors’ perceptions of benefits, rewards, support, and commitment to the preceptor role in a new preceptorship program. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03534-0 Sanford, K. D. (2020). Always a nurse: a profession for a lifetime. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/naq.0000000000000399 Walden, C. (2020). Nursing Faculty Experiences with Cultural competence and teaching culturally diverse students (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University)6003Cweek2Assignment.docx2Comparison of Presidential Agendas on Mental Health: Biden vs. TrumpGlory MbahWalden UniversityNURS 6003CDr Danny Lee05/08/2025IntroductionMental health is an increasingly visible and pressing public health issue in the United States. Anxiety, depression, substance use disorders, and suicide rates have been rising, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. Both the Trump and Biden administrations have addressed this issue, but their approaches differ significantly in terms of policy, funding, and priorities. This paper compares how each administration tackled mental health, highlighting differences in agenda setting, resource allocation, and potential impacts on national health. As healthcare professionals, understanding these priorities is essential for engaging in policy advocacy and shaping effective, sustainable interventions.Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid (Narrative Format)The population health concern selected for this comparison is mental health, particularly in the context of increased needs post-pandemic.President Joe Biden’s Approach:President Biden has made mental health a cornerstone of his broader healthcare reform. In 2022, he launched a national strategy to address the mental health crisis, emphasizing three main goals: strengthening system capacity, connecting Americans to care, and supporting a healthier society (White House, 2022). His administration expanded funding for mental health services through the American Rescue Plan and proposed large increases in federal mental health spending, including school-based services and crisis response systems. Mental health parity, telehealth access, and integration of behavioral health into primary care are key tenets of Biden’s approach.President Donald Trump’s Approach:President Trump also recognized mental health as a public concern, particularly in connection to opioid addiction and veteran health. His administration emphasized community-based care, funding mental health services through programs like the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHCs) (“Mental Health & Substance Use Disorder,” 2025). In 2020, the Trump administration launched the “988” Suicide Prevention Lifeline initiative, which was a significant step toward improving emergency mental health response. However, funding levels and coordination across agencies were often criticized as inadequate compared to the scope of the crisis.Resource Allocation:Biden’s administration proposed over $10 billion in new funding for mental health initiatives in 2023 alone, including expanding mental health providers in underserved communities. Trump’s administration allocated funding through targeted grants and substance abuse prevention programs, but with less emphasis on systemic reforms (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). While both administrations increased investment in mental health, Biden’s approach reflects a more comprehensive strategy with higher funding levels.Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis (Narrative Format)The primary agency that would support addressing the mental health crisis is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), specifically the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). SAMHSA is equipped with the mandate, expertise, and infrastructure to implement large-scale mental health initiatives and to partner with state and local health departments, making it the most effective agency for this task.Mental health typically gets on the presidential agenda due to rising public concern, supported by data on suicide rates, overdose deaths, and provider shortages. Events such as mass shootings or public health emergencies can also elevate mental health issues to national attention (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). To remain on the agenda, mental health must be tied to measurable outcomes, bipartisan support, and sustained media and public advocacy.A strong champion is essential to move the issue forward. Senator Tina Smith (D-MN), who has openly spoken about her own experience with depression and advocates for mental health reform, would be an effective sponsor (“Mental Health & Substance Use Disorder,” 2025). Her legislative efforts and personal commitment make her a credible and passionate advocate, capable of mobilizing both policymakers and public opinion.Part 3: Fact SheetMental Health in America: Why It Must Stay on the Legislative AgendaThe Crisis:Nearly one in five U.S. adults experiences mental illness each year (“Mental health by the numbers,” 2024). The pandemic further worsened mental health outcomes across all demographics, especially youth and frontline workers.The Impact:Untreated mental health conditions cost the U.S. economy over $200 billion annually in lost productivity, healthcare, and criminal justice costs.Legislative Needs:Increased federal funding for mental health services, stronger parity enforcement, expanded access through telehealth, and workforce development are critical.Why Now:The bipartisan rollout of the 988 mental health hotline shows strong momentum. Building on this, legislation must support systemic reforms.The Nurse’s Role:Nurses are frontline witnesses to mental health crises. As trusted professionals, they provide direct care, gather data, and advocate for policy that reflects community needs. Nurses must be empowered to influence mental health legislation through professional organizations and direct engagement with policymakers.ConclusionComparing the healthcare agendas of Presidents Biden and Trump highlights both continuity and contrast in addressing mental health. While both recognized the importance of the issue, Biden’s administration adopted a more comprehensive, federally coordinated strategy. Engaging with agencies like SAMHSA and working with champions like Senator Smith are vital to keeping mental health on the legislative agenda. Nurses, as direct care providers and advocates, are central to this mission and must actively participate in shaping policy for lasting impact.ReferencesMental Health & Substance Use Disorder. (2025, March 26). Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://www.hhs.gov/programs/prevention-and-wellness/mental-health-substance-use-disorder/index.htmlMental health by the numbers. (2024, February 12). Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://www.nami.org/about-mental-illness/mental-health-by-the-numbers/The White House. (2022, July 15). FACT SHEET: President Biden to announce strategy to address our national mental health crisis, as part of unity agenda in his First State of the union. Retrieved June 3, 2025, fromhttps://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/01/fact-sheet-president-biden-to-announce-strategy-to-address-our-national-mental-health-crisis-as-part-of-unity-agenda-in-his-first-state-of-the-union/12Bids(54)Dr. Ellen RMMISS HILLARY A+Dr. Aylin JMnicohwilliamProf Double Rfirstclass tutorDoctor.NamiraMiss DeannaMUSYOKIONES A+Dr ClovergrA+de plusSheryl HoganProWritingGuruIsabella HarvardBrilliant GeekWIZARD_KIMPROF_ALISTERAshley ElliePremiumLarry KellyShow All Bidsother Questions(10)last oneEthicsMGT 465 Week 2 Team Assignment Business Plan Practicepayment for purposeECO 205 Week 6 Assignment Labor Market ResearchHUM 112 Discussionproject managemnt part 2COM 220-Week 8-Checkpoint Research Paper RevisionBusiness Income TaxationM5-Assignment 1: LASA: IPO Presentation
Get Answer Over WhatsApp
Order Paper Now
