Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpa year ago21.03.202420Report issuefiles (1)THEIMPACTOFNURSINGINFORMATICSONPATIENTOUTCOMESANDPATIENTCAREEFFICIENCIES.docxTHEIMPACTOFNURSINGINFORMATICSONPATIENTOUTCOMESANDPATIENTCAREEFFICIENCIES.docxTHE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIESIn the Discussion for this module, you considered the interaction of nurse informaticists with other specialists to ensure successful care. How is that success determined?Patient outcomes and the fulfillment of care goals is one of the major ways that healthcare success is measured. Measuring patient outcomes results in the generation of data that can be used to improve results. Nursing informatics can have a significant part in this process and can help to improve outcomes by improving processes, identifying at-risk patients, and enhancing efficiency.RESOURCESBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources.· Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:· Describe the project you propose.· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.· Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.· Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.LEARNING RESOURCESRequired Readings· McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022).Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.· Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 595–607)· Chapter 26, “Our Expanding Realities” (pp. 611–624)· Mosier, S., Roberts, W. D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A Systems-Level Method for Developing Nursing Informatics Solutions:The Role of Executive LeadershipLinks to an external site..JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration,49(11), 543-548.· Ng, Y. C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018).Integration of Mobile Health Applications in Health Information Technology InitiativesLinks to an external site.: Expanding Opportunities for Nurse Participation in Population Health.CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing,36(5), 209-213.· Sipes, C. (2016). Project management:Essential skill of nurse informaticistsLinks to an external site..Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 225, 252-256.·NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricNURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:· Describe the project you propose.· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the project proposed….The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response describes the project proposed….The response identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response topics are superficially addressed.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is very vague or missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving.· Explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples. Use sufficient supporting evidence in your response.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an accurate and detailed explanation, with sufficient supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response explains the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation, with some supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response is missing one or two of the required elements, contains little supporting evidence or elements are superficially addressed.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is very vague, lacking examples or supporting evidence, or missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with a detailed explanation why….The response accurately and clearly identifies the project team (by roles) and thoroughly explains in detail how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why….The response identifies the project team (by roles) and explains how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response is missing one or two of the required elements, or elements are superficially addressed.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is very vague or missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentAssignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed research articles and 2 or more course resources.8 to >7.0 ptsGoodAssignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed research articles and 2 course resources.7 to >6.0 ptsFairAssignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed research article and 1 course resource.6 to >0 ptsPoorAssignment includes: 1 or no resources.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) APA format errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) APA format errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 100·PreviousNextTHEIMPACTOFNURSINGINFORMATICSONPATIENTOUTCOMESANDPATIENTCAREEFFICIENCIES.docxTHE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIESIn the Discussion for this module, you considered the interaction of nurse informaticists with other specialists to ensure successful care. How is that success determined?Patient outcomes and the fulfillment of care goals is one of the major ways that healthcare success is measured. Measuring patient outcomes results in the generation of data that can be used to improve results. Nursing informatics can have a significant part in this process and can help to improve outcomes by improving processes, identifying at-risk patients, and enhancing efficiency.RESOURCESBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources.· Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:· Describe the project you propose.· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.· Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.· Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.LEARNING RESOURCESRequired Readings· McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022).Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge(5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.· Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 595–607)· Chapter 26, “Our Expanding Realities” (pp. 611–624)· Mosier, S., Roberts, W. D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A Systems-Level Method for Developing Nursing Informatics Solutions:The Role of Executive LeadershipLinks to an external site..JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration,49(11), 543-548.· Ng, Y. C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018).Integration of Mobile Health Applications in Health Information Technology InitiativesLinks to an external site.: Expanding Opportunities for Nurse Participation in Population Health.CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing,36(5), 209-213.· Sipes, C. (2016). Project management:Essential skill of nurse informaticistsLinks to an external site..Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 225, 252-256.·NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricNURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:· Describe the project you propose.· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the project proposed….The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response describes the project proposed….The response identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response topics are superficially addressed.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is very vague or missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving.· Explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples. Use sufficient supporting evidence in your response.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an accurate and detailed explanation, with sufficient supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response explains the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation, with some supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response is missing one or two of the required elements, contains little supporting evidence or elements are superficially addressed.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is very vague, lacking examples or supporting evidence, or missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with a detailed explanation why….The response accurately and clearly identifies the project team (by roles) and thoroughly explains in detail how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why….The response identifies the project team (by roles) and explains how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response is missing one or two of the required elements, or elements are superficially addressed.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is very vague or missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentAssignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed research articles and 2 or more course resources.8 to >7.0 ptsGoodAssignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed research articles and 2 course resources.7 to >6.0 ptsFairAssignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed research article and 1 course resource.6 to >0 ptsPoorAssignment includes: 1 or no resources.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) APA format errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) APA format errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 100·PreviousNextBids(52)Dr. Ellen RMMathProgrammingDr. Sarah Blakeabdul_rehman_Prof Double RYoung NyanyaJahky BDr. Adeline ZoeDr M. MichelleTutor Cyrus KenDr. Sophie MilesWIZARD_KIMProf SapolskyDr CloverPremiumColeen AndersongrA+de plusBrainy BrianPROF_ALISTERQuality AssignmentsShow All Bidsother Questions(10)For Kim Woods OnlyMarket for used cars Qd =154,000 -86Psupply: Qs=-100 +14 P what would be the quantityThe dean of School of Liberal Arts is interested to commission1. (80 points) Use the attached data set for the following questions (laborEcon.dta) .I.P.UNIT 1 ethics and criminal justiceThree dice are rolledFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTCase Study 7: Data BreachesCase Study 1: Keylogger ScamAssignment 1: Access Restrictions

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpnursingeducationidentify and discuss at least two potential ethical issues that could be of concern for nurses with telehealth-delivered care?a year ago21.03.202415Report issueBids(61)Miss DeannaDr. Ellen RMMathProgrammingnicohwilliamPROF_ALISTERSheryl HoganProf Double REmily ClareProf. TOPGRADEDr. Sarah Blakefirstclass tutorFiona DavaMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssigngrA+de plusJahky BProWritingGuruDr. Everleigh_JKShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Celebrity childhood experiencesRead professor comments and apply and make more interestingRead 2 articles and Write 3-4 pages essay about Gun controlPlease I need this tomorrow….For Prof_Dismuz Marketing group assignmentBusinessAre racial differences in I.Q. environmental or genetic?Deliverable 5 – Hypothesis Tests for Two SamplesAssignment 5: Impact IdentificationWeek 1 psy 645

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpnursingtheorySee attachment for instructionsa year ago28.03.202420Report issuefiles (2)AssignemntInstructions.docxProjectpart1.dotxAssignemntInstructions.docxEVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 2: ADVANCED LEVELS OF CLINICAL INQUIRY AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSTo Prepare:· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.· Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.· Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.· Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.The Assignment(Evidence-Based Project)Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic ReviewsCreate a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:· Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.· Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.· Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.· Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.· Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.Projectpart1.dotxMatrix Worksheet TemplateMatrix Worksheet TemplateUse this document to completePart 1of the Module 2 Assessment,Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research MethodologiesFullcitationof selected articleArticle #1Article #2Article #3Article #4Ayatollahi, H., Mirani, N., Nazari, F., & Razavi, N. (2018). Iranian healthcare professionals’ perspectives about factors influencing the use of telemedicine in diabetes management.World Journal of Diabetes, 9(6), 92–98.https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v9.i6.92Jepma, P., Snaterse, M., Du Puy, S., Peters, R. J. G., Scholte op Reimer, W. J. M. (2021). Older patients’ perspectives toward lifestyle-related secondary cardiovascular prevention after a hospital admission—a qualitative study.Age and Ageing,50(3), 936–943.https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa283Alageel, S., Gulliford, M. C., Wright, A., Khoshaba, B., & Burgess, C. (2020). Engagement with advice to reduce cardiovascular risk following a health check programme: a qualitative study. Health Expectations, 23(1), 193-201.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12991Halloway, S., Wilbur, J., Schoeny, M. E., et al. (2020). Feasibility of a Lifestyle Physical Activity Intervention to Prevent Memory Loss in Older Women With Cardiovascular Disease: A Mixed-Methods Approach.Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 52(4), 278-289.https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562119856233Whyyou chose this article and/orhow it relatesto the clinical issue of interest (include a briefexplanation of the ethicsof research related to your clinical issue of interest)This article is relevant to the clinical issue of diabetes management, particularly the use of telemedicine which can significantly impact patient care and outcomes. Comprehending healthcare professionals’ perspectives on telemedicine in diabetes management is essential for successful implementation and uptake of telemedicine technologies.This qualitative study investigates the viewpoints of aged cardiac patients regarding lifestyle-related secondary preventions post-hospital admission. It explores various determinants influencing patients’ moods and social influences regarding lifestyle modifications.I chose this article because it directly relates to the clinical issue of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and management which is a significant concern in healthcare. Understanding factors influencing engagement and adherence to lifestyle changes and medication is crucial for improving patient outcomes in CVD management.This article was selected because it addresses the clinical issue of memory loss prevention in aged females with cardiovascular conditions, which is pertinent to overall health outcomes in this population. Exploring the feasibility and effectiveness of lifestyle physical activities interventions in this context is crucial for enhancing quality of life and reducing disease burden.Briefdescription of the aimsof the research of each peer-reviewed articleThis research intends to identify factors influencing the use of telemedicine in diabetes management as perceived by healthcare professionals.The study intends to investigate the views, social factors, and self-worth of older cardiac patients about lifestyle-related secondary preventions following hospitalization.The research aims to examine factors influencing participation in and compliance to medications and lifestyle modification programs among people who have recently been determined to be at medium or high risk of CVD.The study aims to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a lifestyle physical exercise interventions to prevent memory decline in elderly women with cardiovascular conditions.Brief description of theresearch methodologyused Be sure to identify if the methodology used wasqualitative,quantitative, or amixed-methodsapproach. Be specific.Quantitative study using a Likert scale questionnaire with thirty-seven questions.This study employs a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with older cardiac clients.Qualitative study using individual semi-structured interviews.Mixed-methods approach combining quantitative measures with qualitative data collection through focus groups.A brief description of thestrengthsof each of the research methodologies used, includingreliabilityandvalidityof how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.Quantitative methods provide numerical data for analyzing healthcare professionals’ perspectives offering insights into the prevalence and distribution of attitudes and opinions. Statistical analysis enhances reliability and validity by quantifying responses and identifying significant associations between variables.The qualitative methodology encourages thorough explorations of patients’ perspectives and experiences thus offering rich and nuanced data. The study’s focus on patient perspectives contributes to patient-centered care and may inform interventions tailored to older cardiac patients’ needs.Qualitative methods allow for in-depth exploration of participants’ experiences, providing rich insights into their perspectives on CVD risk management. The Framework method enhances reliability and validity through systematic data analysis, ensuring rigorous interpretation of qualitative findings.The mixed-methods approach provides a comprehensive understanding of intervention feasibility and effectiveness, combining objective measures with qualitative insights. Concept analysis enhances reliability and validity by systematically identifying themes related to intervention participation.General Notes/CommentsThe study’s focus on healthcare professionals may overlook the perspectives of patients, which could be addressed in future research.The findings of this study offer valuable implications for healthcare professionals aiming to engage older patients effectively in lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular health.This qualitative study offers valuable insights into characteristics impacting cardiovascular disease risk persons’ participation in and adherence to lifestyle modification programs and medicines.The research’s use of self-reported measures may create biases and subsequent studies might integrate objective outcome measures for validation.© 2021 Walden University, LLC 4image1.emfProjectpart1.dotxMatrix Worksheet TemplateMatrix Worksheet TemplateUse this document to completePart 1of the Module 2 Assessment,Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research MethodologiesFullcitationof selected articleArticle #1Article #2Article #3Article #4Ayatollahi, H., Mirani, N., Nazari, F., & Razavi, N. (2018). Iranian healthcare professionals’ perspectives about factors influencing the use of telemedicine in diabetes management.World Journal of Diabetes, 9(6), 92–98.https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v9.i6.92Jepma, P., Snaterse, M., Du Puy, S., Peters, R. J. G., Scholte op Reimer, W. J. M. (2021). Older patients’ perspectives toward lifestyle-related secondary cardiovascular prevention after a hospital admission—a qualitative study.Age and Ageing,50(3), 936–943.https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa283Alageel, S., Gulliford, M. C., Wright, A., Khoshaba, B., & Burgess, C. (2020). Engagement with advice to reduce cardiovascular risk following a health check programme: a qualitative study. Health Expectations, 23(1), 193-201.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12991Halloway, S., Wilbur, J., Schoeny, M. E., et al. (2020). Feasibility of a Lifestyle Physical Activity Intervention to Prevent Memory Loss in Older Women With Cardiovascular Disease: A Mixed-Methods Approach.Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 52(4), 278-289.https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562119856233Whyyou chose this article and/orhow it relatesto the clinical issue of interest (include a briefexplanation of the ethicsof research related to your clinical issue of interest)This article is relevant to the clinical issue of diabetes management, particularly the use of telemedicine which can significantly impact patient care and outcomes. Comprehending healthcare professionals’ perspectives on telemedicine in diabetes management is essential for successful implementation and uptake of telemedicine technologies.This qualitative study investigates the viewpoints of aged cardiac patients regarding lifestyle-related secondary preventions post-hospital admission. It explores various determinants influencing patients’ moods and social influences regarding lifestyle modifications.I chose this article because it directly relates to the clinical issue of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and management which is a significant concern in healthcare. Understanding factors influencing engagement and adherence to lifestyle changes and medication is crucial for improving patient outcomes in CVD management.This article was selected because it addresses the clinical issue of memory loss prevention in aged females with cardiovascular conditions, which is pertinent to overall health outcomes in this population. Exploring the feasibility and effectiveness of lifestyle physical activities interventions in this context is crucial for enhancing quality of life and reducing disease burden.Briefdescription of the aimsof the research of each peer-reviewed articleThis research intends to identify factors influencing the use of telemedicine in diabetes management as perceived by healthcare professionals.The study intends to investigate the views, social factors, and self-worth of older cardiac patients about lifestyle-related secondary preventions following hospitalization.The research aims to examine factors influencing participation in and compliance to medications and lifestyle modification programs among people who have recently been determined to be at medium or high risk of CVD.The study aims to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a lifestyle physical exercise interventions to prevent memory decline in elderly women with cardiovascular conditions.Brief description of theresearch methodologyused Be sure to identify if the methodology used wasqualitative,quantitative, or amixed-methodsapproach. Be specific.Quantitative study using a Likert scale questionnaire with thirty-seven questions.This study employs a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with older cardiac clients.Qualitative study using individual semi-structured interviews.Mixed-methods approach combining quantitative measures with qualitative data collection through focus groups.A brief description of thestrengthsof each of the research methodologies used, includingreliabilityandvalidityof how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.Quantitative methods provide numerical data for analyzing healthcare professionals’ perspectives offering insights into the prevalence and distribution of attitudes and opinions. Statistical analysis enhances reliability and validity by quantifying responses and identifying significant associations between variables.The qualitative methodology encourages thorough explorations of patients’ perspectives and experiences thus offering rich and nuanced data. The study’s focus on patient perspectives contributes to patient-centered care and may inform interventions tailored to older cardiac patients’ needs.Qualitative methods allow for in-depth exploration of participants’ experiences, providing rich insights into their perspectives on CVD risk management. The Framework method enhances reliability and validity through systematic data analysis, ensuring rigorous interpretation of qualitative findings.The mixed-methods approach provides a comprehensive understanding of intervention feasibility and effectiveness, combining objective measures with qualitative insights. Concept analysis enhances reliability and validity by systematically identifying themes related to intervention participation.General Notes/CommentsThe study’s focus on healthcare professionals may overlook the perspectives of patients, which could be addressed in future research.The findings of this study offer valuable implications for healthcare professionals aiming to engage older patients effectively in lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular health.This qualitative study offers valuable insights into characteristics impacting cardiovascular disease risk persons’ participation in and adherence to lifestyle modification programs and medicines.The research’s use of self-reported measures may create biases and subsequent studies might integrate objective outcome measures for validation.© 2021 Walden University, LLC 4image1.emfAssignemntInstructions.docxEVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 2: ADVANCED LEVELS OF CLINICAL INQUIRY AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSTo Prepare:· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.· Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.· Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.· Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.The Assignment(Evidence-Based Project)Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic ReviewsCreate a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:· Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.· Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.· Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.· Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.· Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.Projectpart1.dotxMatrix Worksheet TemplateMatrix Worksheet TemplateUse this document to completePart 1of the Module 2 Assessment,Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research MethodologiesFullcitationof selected articleArticle #1Article #2Article #3Article #4Ayatollahi, H., Mirani, N., Nazari, F., & Razavi, N. (2018). Iranian healthcare professionals’ perspectives about factors influencing the use of telemedicine in diabetes management.World Journal of Diabetes, 9(6), 92–98.https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v9.i6.92Jepma, P., Snaterse, M., Du Puy, S., Peters, R. J. G., Scholte op Reimer, W. J. M. (2021). Older patients’ perspectives toward lifestyle-related secondary cardiovascular prevention after a hospital admission—a qualitative study.Age and Ageing,50(3), 936–943.https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa283Alageel, S., Gulliford, M. C., Wright, A., Khoshaba, B., & Burgess, C. (2020). Engagement with advice to reduce cardiovascular risk following a health check programme: a qualitative study. Health Expectations, 23(1), 193-201.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12991Halloway, S., Wilbur, J., Schoeny, M. E., et al. (2020). Feasibility of a Lifestyle Physical Activity Intervention to Prevent Memory Loss in Older Women With Cardiovascular Disease: A Mixed-Methods Approach.Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 52(4), 278-289.https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562119856233Whyyou chose this article and/orhow it relatesto the clinical issue of interest (include a briefexplanation of the ethicsof research related to your clinical issue of interest)This article is relevant to the clinical issue of diabetes management, particularly the use of telemedicine which can significantly impact patient care and outcomes. Comprehending healthcare professionals’ perspectives on telemedicine in diabetes management is essential for successful implementation and uptake of telemedicine technologies.This qualitative study investigates the viewpoints of aged cardiac patients regarding lifestyle-related secondary preventions post-hospital admission. It explores various determinants influencing patients’ moods and social influences regarding lifestyle modifications.I chose this article because it directly relates to the clinical issue of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and management which is a significant concern in healthcare. Understanding factors influencing engagement and adherence to lifestyle changes and medication is crucial for improving patient outcomes in CVD management.This article was selected because it addresses the clinical issue of memory loss prevention in aged females with cardiovascular conditions, which is pertinent to overall health outcomes in this population. Exploring the feasibility and effectiveness of lifestyle physical activities interventions in this context is crucial for enhancing quality of life and reducing disease burden.Briefdescription of the aimsof the research of each peer-reviewed articleThis research intends to identify factors influencing the use of telemedicine in diabetes management as perceived by healthcare professionals.The study intends to investigate the views, social factors, and self-worth of older cardiac patients about lifestyle-related secondary preventions following hospitalization.The research aims to examine factors influencing participation in and compliance to medications and lifestyle modification programs among people who have recently been determined to be at medium or high risk of CVD.The study aims to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a lifestyle physical exercise interventions to prevent memory decline in elderly women with cardiovascular conditions.Brief description of theresearch methodologyused Be sure to identify if the methodology used wasqualitative,quantitative, or amixed-methodsapproach. Be specific.Quantitative study using a Likert scale questionnaire with thirty-seven questions.This study employs a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with older cardiac clients.Qualitative study using individual semi-structured interviews.Mixed-methods approach combining quantitative measures with qualitative data collection through focus groups.A brief description of thestrengthsof each of the research methodologies used, includingreliabilityandvalidityof how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.Quantitative methods provide numerical data for analyzing healthcare professionals’ perspectives offering insights into the prevalence and distribution of attitudes and opinions. Statistical analysis enhances reliability and validity by quantifying responses and identifying significant associations between variables.The qualitative methodology encourages thorough explorations of patients’ perspectives and experiences thus offering rich and nuanced data. The study’s focus on patient perspectives contributes to patient-centered care and may inform interventions tailored to older cardiac patients’ needs.Qualitative methods allow for in-depth exploration of participants’ experiences, providing rich insights into their perspectives on CVD risk management. The Framework method enhances reliability and validity through systematic data analysis, ensuring rigorous interpretation of qualitative findings.The mixed-methods approach provides a comprehensive understanding of intervention feasibility and effectiveness, combining objective measures with qualitative insights. Concept analysis enhances reliability and validity by systematically identifying themes related to intervention participation.General Notes/CommentsThe study’s focus on healthcare professionals may overlook the perspectives of patients, which could be addressed in future research.The findings of this study offer valuable implications for healthcare professionals aiming to engage older patients effectively in lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular health.This qualitative study offers valuable insights into characteristics impacting cardiovascular disease risk persons’ participation in and adherence to lifestyle modification programs and medicines.The research’s use of self-reported measures may create biases and subsequent studies might integrate objective outcome measures for validation.© 2021 Walden University, LLC 4image1.emfAssignemntInstructions.docxEVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 2: ADVANCED LEVELS OF CLINICAL INQUIRY AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWSTo Prepare:· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.· Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.· Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically-appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.· Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.The Assignment(Evidence-Based Project)Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic ReviewsCreate a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:· Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.· Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.· Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.· Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.· Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.Projectpart1.dotxMatrix Worksheet TemplateMatrix Worksheet TemplateUse this document to completePart 1of the Module 2 Assessment,Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research MethodologiesFullcitationof selected articleArticle #1Article #2Article #3Article #4Ayatollahi, H., Mirani, N., Nazari, F., & Razavi, N. (2018). Iranian healthcare professionals’ perspectives about factors influencing the use of telemedicine in diabetes management.World Journal of Diabetes, 9(6), 92–98.https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v9.i6.92Jepma, P., Snaterse, M., Du Puy, S., Peters, R. J. G., Scholte op Reimer, W. J. M. (2021). Older patients’ perspectives toward lifestyle-related secondary cardiovascular prevention after a hospital admission—a qualitative study.Age and Ageing,50(3), 936–943.https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa283Alageel, S., Gulliford, M. C., Wright, A., Khoshaba, B., & Burgess, C. (2020). Engagement with advice to reduce cardiovascular risk following a health check programme: a qualitative study. Health Expectations, 23(1), 193-201.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12991Halloway, S., Wilbur, J., Schoeny, M. E., et al. (2020). Feasibility of a Lifestyle Physical Activity Intervention to Prevent Memory Loss in Older Women With Cardiovascular Disease: A Mixed-Methods Approach.Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 52(4), 278-289.https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562119856233Whyyou chose this article and/orhow it relatesto the clinical issue of interest (include a briefexplanation of the ethicsof research related to your clinical issue of interest)This article is relevant to the clinical issue of diabetes management, particularly the use of telemedicine which can significantly impact patient care and outcomes. Comprehending healthcare professionals’ perspectives on telemedicine in diabetes management is essential for successful implementation and uptake of telemedicine technologies.This qualitative study investigates the viewpoints of aged cardiac patients regarding lifestyle-related secondary preventions post-hospital admission. It explores various determinants influencing patients’ moods and social influences regarding lifestyle modifications.I chose this article because it directly relates to the clinical issue of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment and management which is a significant concern in healthcare. Understanding factors influencing engagement and adherence to lifestyle changes and medication is crucial for improving patient outcomes in CVD management.This article was selected because it addresses the clinical issue of memory loss prevention in aged females with cardiovascular conditions, which is pertinent to overall health outcomes in this population. Exploring the feasibility and effectiveness of lifestyle physical activities interventions in this context is crucial for enhancing quality of life and reducing disease burden.Briefdescription of the aimsof the research of each peer-reviewed articleThis research intends to identify factors influencing the use of telemedicine in diabetes management as perceived by healthcare professionals.The study intends to investigate the views, social factors, and self-worth of older cardiac patients about lifestyle-related secondary preventions following hospitalization.The research aims to examine factors influencing participation in and compliance to medications and lifestyle modification programs among people who have recently been determined to be at medium or high risk of CVD.The study aims to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a lifestyle physical exercise interventions to prevent memory decline in elderly women with cardiovascular conditions.Brief description of theresearch methodologyused Be sure to identify if the methodology used wasqualitative,quantitative, or amixed-methodsapproach. Be specific.Quantitative study using a Likert scale questionnaire with thirty-seven questions.This study employs a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with older cardiac clients.Qualitative study using individual semi-structured interviews.Mixed-methods approach combining quantitative measures with qualitative data collection through focus groups.A brief description of thestrengthsof each of the research methodologies used, includingreliabilityandvalidityof how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.Quantitative methods provide numerical data for analyzing healthcare professionals’ perspectives offering insights into the prevalence and distribution of attitudes and opinions. Statistical analysis enhances reliability and validity by quantifying responses and identifying significant associations between variables.The qualitative methodology encourages thorough explorations of patients’ perspectives and experiences thus offering rich and nuanced data. The study’s focus on patient perspectives contributes to patient-centered care and may inform interventions tailored to older cardiac patients’ needs.Qualitative methods allow for in-depth exploration of participants’ experiences, providing rich insights into their perspectives on CVD risk management. The Framework method enhances reliability and validity through systematic data analysis, ensuring rigorous interpretation of qualitative findings.The mixed-methods approach provides a comprehensive understanding of intervention feasibility and effectiveness, combining objective measures with qualitative insights. Concept analysis enhances reliability and validity by systematically identifying themes related to intervention participation.General Notes/CommentsThe study’s focus on healthcare professionals may overlook the perspectives of patients, which could be addressed in future research.The findings of this study offer valuable implications for healthcare professionals aiming to engage older patients effectively in lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular health.This qualitative study offers valuable insights into characteristics impacting cardiovascular disease risk persons’ participation in and adherence to lifestyle modification programs and medicines.The research’s use of self-reported measures may create biases and subsequent studies might integrate objective outcome measures for validation.© 2021 Walden University, LLC 4image1.emf12Bids(62)Dr. Ellen RMEmily ClareMathProgrammingMISS HILLARY A+abdul_rehman_Prof Double RDoctor.NamiraYoung NyanyaSTELLAR GEEK A+ProWritingGuruJahky BSheryl HoganDr. Adeline ZoeDr M. MichelleAshley EllieTutor Cyrus KenDr. Sophie MilesWIZARD_KIMnicohwilliamDr CloverShow All Bidsother Questions(10)home workNEED ASSISTANCE Due Sunday by 9pmHistory of Art from Middle Ages To Modern Times help!NPV PAYBACK AND CAPITAL BUDGETINGHuman BehaviorMIS 301 – Access TestB6028.42looking for someone to write a nursing dissertation-World CulturesWK6 Training and Development

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpHomeworkStudents will identify and evaluate nurses’ safety measures when administering medications at a specific healthcare facility. Each student will also evaluate an EHR system’s safety measures at one healthcare facility. Students will prepare a Powerpoint to present details of the assignments in no more than 20-25 minutes. Students should follow the assignment rubric the instructor provided to complete the assignment.Ruberic:Overview of hospital, bed, capacity and servicesThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of Safety Measures Used by Nurses When Administering MedicationsDescription of Safety Measures Used Within an EHR SystemThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation of Safety Measures Used by Nurses and Within an EHR SystemThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation/Writing Mechanics and Formatting Guidelinesa year ago22.03.202415Report issueBids(69)PROVEN STERLINGDr. Ellen RMMathProgrammingPROF_ALISTERSheryl HoganProf Double RProf. TOPGRADEEmily ClareDr. Sarah BlakeDoctor.NamiraDemi_RoseFiona DavaMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssigngrA+de plusJahky BProWritingGuruColeen AndersonShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Fire 5calculation of optical properties of nano particlesMichael SmithResearched Autobiography 5 pagesWK5PBEnglish 3MISS PROFESSOR ONLYSociologyI need a PowerPoint presentation about Islam marriage, abd what are wife’s rights in this marriage and what are the…i need someone to do my physics lab report

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpnursingProvide a response to the below questions according to the assessment completed from your collegue. You may also provide additional information, alternative points of view, research to support treatment, or patient education strategies you might use with the relevant patient.Questions1. What key factors should be assessed during the interview process to clarify the differences between bipolar anxiety and brief psychotic disorders. In considering the overlapping symptoms between bipolar disorder, brief psychotic disorder, and anxiety disorder.2. Identify some assessment tools or scales that can be utilized to aid in a more accurate differential diagnosis and describe how these tools help in distinguishing between those disorders.Week4assignment6675BuchananR-1.doca year ago21.03.20247Report issueBids(56)Miss DeannaPROF_ALISTERSheryl HoganProf Double RDr. Sarah BlakeDoctor.NamiraFiona DavaMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverJudithTutorMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssigngrA+de plusJahky BProWritingGuruColeen AndersonBrilliant GeekTutor Cyrus KenTeacher A+ WorkAshley EllieShow All Bidsother Questions(10)legalBUS611: WEEK 5 DISCUSSION 2geography projectHLT-310V Module 2 Case Study on Moral Status: Fetal Abnormality – Jessica is a 30-year-old immigrant from Mexico City……….Combining Content, Argument, and Structure—The Workshopaccoding to the passage, the revolution was faught MAINLY overPlease help!Summery the Faraday’s ice pail experimentPlanI have a paper need to be doing by Sunday

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now