Nursing

/in /by

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Critical Appraisal of Research

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

· Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

By Day 7 of Week 7

Submit Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

· Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

· Click the Week 7 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

· Click the Week 7 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

· Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.

· If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.

· Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

 

To access your rubric:

Week 7 Assignment Rubric

 

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

 

To check your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

Submit your Week 7 Assignment Draft and review the originality report

 

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 7

 

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 7 Assignment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name: NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric

 

· Grid View

· List View

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity.

 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing.
Part 3B: Evidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research. 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed. The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained. The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided. Accurate, complete, and full APA citations are provided for the research reviewed.

 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed. The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided. Accurate and complete APA citations are provided for the research reviewed.

 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed. The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided. Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations are provided for the research reviewed.

 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing. The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field, or are missing. A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided. Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations are provided for the research reviewed or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.

 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Required Uniform Assignment: Case Study Presentation

/in /by

Required Uniform Assignment: Case Study Presentation

NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Guidelines V2 Revised: 5/2019 11

Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to help students build communication skills, utilize evidence‐based research relevant to nursing practice, and apply concepts of safety and quality in nursing care of adults. The goals of this assignment are to:

• foster teamwork and collaboration through effective communication • Utilize research evidence to promote safe and quality nursing care for adults in acute care settings.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO 1. Provide effective professional nursing care for adult patients and their families in acute care settings using

the nursing process. (PO#1) CO 3. Demonstrate effective communication skills necessary for collaboration with other health care team

members and for providing professional nursing care to adult patients and their families. (PO #3) CO 4. Apply critical thinking strategies to make good clinical decisions in the adult patient clinical setting. (PO#4) CO 8. Utilize nursing research literature while providing care to adult patients and their families in acute care

settings. (PO #8)

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

Total points possible: 100 points

Preparing the assignment The student group must develop a case study based on an actual or potential clinical‐based situation on the adult health topics presented during the 8‐week session. The student group must present the topic and literature for the case scenario. Students must include the following information in the case study presentation:

A. Health History – age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

B. Laboratory/Diagnostic Testing – describe the diagnostic tests ordered/completed, pertinent results (including normal and abnormal ranges), and rationales for the use of each diagnostic test.

C. Collaborative Management – provide list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending. Additionally, provide an overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the care of the person and family and the interdisciplinary goals that have been set. Briefly list the role of the team member in the patient’s care and the ways in which the nurse collaborates to meet the interdisciplinary goals.

D. Nursing management – using the nursing process, develop two plans of care ‐ 1 related to one priority physiological nursing diagnosis and 1 related to one priority psychosocial nursing diagnosis. Please include the following information in each plan of care:

• Priority nursing diagnosis • short and 1 long‐term goal • to 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements, • to 5 evaluative statements based on interventions, and • A minimum of 3 potential patient education needs for consideration.

 

 

 

2

NR324/329 Adult Health I

Required Uniform Assignment: Case Study Presentation

NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Guidelines V2 Revised: 5/2019 21

Assignment Submission Requirements: • Students must receive approval from the faculty on the selected topic for the case study presentation

assignment. The faculty will facilitate selection of topics during class. • Each student in the group must contribute to the development of the case study information. • Each student group must submit a 1‐page typed paper containing the Health History, Laboratory/Diagnostic

Testing, and Collaborative Management elements of the case study. • Each student group must submit a 1‐page typed paper of the plan of care addressing the priority

physiological nursing diagnosis and a 1‐page typed paper of the plan of care addressing the priority psychosocial nursing diagnosis. Students may choose to submit a concept map for each of the priority nursing diagnoses instead of a plan of care. Each concept map must incorporate the same information required for the plans of care.

• Each student group must submit a reference list with each member’s nursing care plan or concept map, formatted according to APA 6TH edition. A minimum of at least three (3) references are required for this assignment. Student must cite at least two (2) research or evidence‐based practice (EBP) sources. All resources must be within 5 years of publication.

• Each student group is required to develop and present a 15 minute presentation on a topic from the case study, the plan of care or the concept map. Each group presentation will all an additional 5 minutes for questions and answers relevant to the content of the presentation and/or the clinical experience.

* If a student in the group is absent the day of the presentation, the student group will not be penalized.

 

 

NR324/329 Adult Health I Required Uniform Assignment: Case Study Presentation

 

NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Guidelines V2 Revised: 5/2019 31

Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

Assignment Section and Required Criteria

(Points possible/% of total points available)

Highest Level of Performance

High Level of Performance

Satisfactory Level of Performance

Unsatisfactory Level of

Performance

Health History (10 points/10%)

10 points 9 points 8 points 0 points

Required criteria 1. Presents pertinent and relevant information on: the

person’s age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

• Comprehensively presents key/relevant Information accurately and in sufficient detail: person’s age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

 

• One of the key/relevant Information not presented: person’s age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

• Key/relevant information are accurate and presented in sufficient detail.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

 

Two of the key/relevant Information not presented: person’s age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

Key/relevant information may be inaccurate and/or insufficient in detail.

Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

 

3 or more of the key/relevant Information not presented: person’s age, gender, ethnicity, past and current medical history, chief complaint, and history of present illness on admission.

Key/relevant information may be inaccurate and/or insufficient in detail. • Information is not clear, organized, or professional in appearance.

 

Laboratory and Diagnostic Testing (10 points/10%)

10 points 9 points 8 points 0 points

Required criteria 1. Presents description of the ordered/completed

diagnostic tests, pertinent results (including normal and abnormal ranges), and rationales for each diagnostic test.

• Comprehensively presents key/relevant Information accurately and in sufficient detail: description of the ordered/completed diagnostic tests, pertinent results (normal and abnormal ranges),

• One of the key/relevant Information not presented: description of the ordered/ completed diagnostic tests, pertinent results (normal and abnormal ranges), and rationales for each diagnostic test.

• Two of the key/relevant Information not presented: description of the ordered/ completed diagnostic tests, pertinent results (normal and abnormal ranges), and rationales for each diagnostic test.

• 3 or more of the key/relevant Information not presented: description of the ordered/ completed diagnostic tests, pertinent results (normal and abnormal ranges), and rationales for each diagnostic test.

 

 

NR324/329 Adult Health I Required Uniform Assignment: Case Study Presentation

 

NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Guidelines V2 Revised: 5/2019 41

and rationales for each diagnostic test.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

 

• Key/relevant information are accurate and presented in sufficient detail.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

 

• Key/relevant information are accurate and presented in sufficient detail.

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner

 

• Key/relevant information may be inaccurate and/or insufficient in detail.

• Information is not clear, organized, or professional in appearance.

 

Collaborative Management (20 points/20%)

20 points 15 points 10 points 0 points

Required criteria Presents list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending Additionally, provide an overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the person and family. Briefly list their role in the care provided and how nursing collaborates in meeting interdisciplinary goals.

• Comprehensive discussion of collaborative management including: list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending. • Complete overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the person and family; Listed ALL key/relevant roles in the care provided and how nursing collaborates in meeting interdisciplinary goals. • Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner.

 

• Discussed collaborative management, but does not include 1of these items: list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending

• Complete overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the person and family; Listed most of the key/relevant roles in the care provided and how nursing collaborates in meeting interdisciplinary goals

• Information presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner.

 

• Discussed collaborative management, but does not include 2 of these items: list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending.

• General overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the person and family; Listed SOME key/relevant roles in the care provided and how nursing collaborates in meeting interdisciplinary goals.

• Information is not presented in a clear, organized, and/or professional manner.

 

• Poor/Minimal discussion of collaborative management which does not include 3 or more of these items: list of medications, treatments, dietary prescriptions, and procedures that have been ordered, administered, completed, and/or pending.

• Poor/Broad overview of members of the healthcare team involved in managing the person and family; Listed SOME of key/relevant roles in the care provided and how nursing collaborates in meeting interdisciplinary goals.

• Information is not presented in a clear, organized, and/or professional manner.

 

Nursing Management: Physiologic 15 points 12 points 8 points 0 points

 

 

NR324/329 Adult Health I Required Uniform Assignment: Case Study Presentation

 

NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Guidelines V2 Revised: 5/2019 51

(15 points/15%) Required criteria Utilized the nursing process to develop two plans of care: 1 physiological and 1 psychosocial nursing diagnosis Included the following information in each* plan of care:

1. Priority nursing diagnosis 2. 1 short‐term and 1 long‐term goal 3. 3 ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale

statements 4. 3 ‐ 5 evaluative statements based on

interventions 5. A minimum of 3 teaching considerations

Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for physiological nursing diagnosis

All information in the plan of care included: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short‐term and 1 long‐ term goal o 3 ‐ 5 nursing interventions

with rationale statements o 3 ‐ 5 evaluative

statements based on interventions

o A minimum of 3 teaching considerations

 

Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for physiological nursing diagnosis

Missing 1 item of information in the plan of care: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short‐ term and 1 long‐ term goal o 3 ‐ 5 nursing

interventions with rationale statements

o 3 ‐ 5 evaluative statements based on interventions

o A minimum of 3 teaching considerations

 

Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for physiological nursing diagnosis

Missing 2 items of information in the plan of care: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short‐term and 1 long‐ term goal o 3 ‐ 5 nursing

interventions with rationale statements

o 3 ‐ 5 evaluative statements based on interventions

o A minimum of 3 teaching considerations

 

Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for physiological nursing diagnosis

Missing 3 or more items of information in the care plan: o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short‐term and 1 long‐ term goal o 3 ‐ 5 nursing

interventions with rationale statements

o 3 ‐ 5 evaluative statements based on interventions

o A minimum of 3 teaching considerations

 

Nursing Management: Psychosocial (15 points/15%)

15 points 12 points 8 points 0 points

Required criteria Utilized the nursing process to develop two plans of care: 1 physiological and 1 psychosocial nursing diagnosis Included the following information in each* plan of care:

1. Priority nursing diagnosis 2. 1 short‐term and 1 long‐term goal 3. 3 ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale

statements

Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for psychosocial nursing diagnosis

All information in the plan of care included:

o Priority nursing diagnosis o short‐term and 1 long‐ term goal

o 3 ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements

Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for psychosocial nursing diagnosis

Missing 1 item of information in the plan of care:

o o Priority nursing diagnosis o o 1 short‐term and 1 long‐ term goal

Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for psychosocial nursing diagnosis

Missing 2 items of information in the plan of care:

o o Priority nursing diagnosis o o 1 short‐term and 1 long‐ term goal o 3 ‐ 5 nursing

Used the nursing process to develop a plan of care for psychosocial nursing diagnosis

Missing 3 or more items of information in the care plan:

o Priority nursing diagnosis o 1 short‐term and 1 long‐ term goal o 3 ‐ 5 nursing

 

 

NR324/329 Adult Health I Required Uniform Assignment: Case Study Presentation

 

NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Guidelines V2 Revised: 5/2019 61

4. 3 ‐ 5 evaluative statements based on interventions

5. A minimum of 3 teaching considerations

o 3 ‐ 5 evaluative statements based on interventions

o A minimum of 3 teaching considerations

 

o 3 ‐ 5 nursing interventions with rationale statements o 3 ‐ 5 evaluative statements based on interventions o A minimum of 3 teaching considerations

 

interventions with rationale statements o 3 ‐ 5 evaluative statements based on interventions o A minimum of 3 teaching considerations

 

interventions with rationale statements o 3 ‐ 5 evaluative statements based on interventions o A minimum of 3 teaching considerations

 

Presentation (25 points/25%)

25 points 20 points 15 points 0 points

Required criteria 1. All components of the assignment guidelines

included. 2. Information presented in a logical, interesting

sequence which audience can follow. 3. Participation by all group members. 4. All presenters are professional and

demonstrated appropriate presence throughout presentation.

5. Used presentation materials and methods effectively.

6. Responded appropriately to audience questions.

• ALL required assignment components are present.

• Information is presented in a logical sequence; main ideas easy for the audience to follow.

• Participation is by all group members.

• Presenters are professional • Presenters maintained

appropriate eye contact with audience and projected voices for all audience to hear.

• Presenters addressed audience questions appropriately.

• Used presentation materials and methods effectively. • Presenters stayed within allotted 20‐minute timeframe.

• ONE required assignment component is missing.

• Information is presented in a logical sequence; main ideas easy for the audience to follow.

• Participation is by all group members.

• Presenters are professional.

• Presenters have limited eye contact OR the audience has difficulty hearing the presenters.

• Presenters addressed audience questions appropriately.

• Used presentation materials and methods effectively. • Presenters stayed within allotted 20‐ minute timeframe.

• 1‐2 required assignment components are missing.

• Information is not presented in a logical sequence, yet main ideas are still obvious.

• Participation is by all group members.

• Presenters are professional.

• Presenters have limited eye contact OR the audience has difficulty hearing the presenters.

• Presenters addressed audience questions appropriately.

• Used presentation materials and methods effectively. • Presenters stayed within 5 minutes of the allotted 20 minute timeframe.

• 3 or more required assignment components are missing.

• There is no logical sequence to presentation of material; main ideas difficult to follow.

• Some members did not participate.

• Some or ALL presenters are unprofessional.

• Presenters have limited eye contact OR the audience has difficulty hearing the presenters.

• Presenters did not address audience questions appropriately.

• Did not effectively use presentation materials and methods. • Presenters stayed within 5‐10 minutes of the allotted 20 minute time frame.

 

 

NR324/329 Adult Health I Required Uniform Assignment: Case Study Presentation

 

NR324/329 RUA: Case Presentation Guidelines V2 Revised: 5/2019 71

APA Style and Organization (5 points/5%)

5 points 4 points 2 points 0 points

Required criteria 1. References are submitted with assignment. 2. Uses appropriate APA format (6th ed.) and is free

of errors. 3. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors. 4. Used at least three (3) different sources, with at

least two (2) from research literature.

• More than 3 references used, at least 2 are research articles

• References submitted with assignment

• Citations and references are listed using APA format (6th ed.) and are free of errors.

 

• Exactly 3 references used, at least 2 are research articles

• References submitted with assignment

• Citations and references are listed using APA format (6th ed.), but have one type of error.

 

• Two (2) references used, at least 1 is a research article

• References submitted with assignment

• Citations and references are listed using APA format (6th ed.), but have two types of errors.

 

• One to Two references used, but are NOT research articles

• References submitted with assignment

• Citations and references are listed using APA format for citations and, but have three or more types of errors.

 

 

 

    • Purpose
    • Preparing the assignment

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Help with assignment see rubric and assignment details

/in /by

Deliverable 5 – Staffing Justification Email

Assignment Content

  1. Competency
    Apply principles of professional identity and professionalism.
    Student Success Criteria
    View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.
    Scenario
    You are making a staffing assignment knowing that you are short staffed. You have five registered nurses (RNs), two licensed practical nurses (LPNs), and two nursing assistants. Those nine employees need to provide a 12-hour shift of services to 30 number of clients with a high acuity required to a ratio of nurse to client at 1:3.
    Client acuity level

    • Six acuity level 1
    • Eight acuity level 2
    • Nine acuity level 3
    • Seven acuity level 4
    • You will use the acuity-based staffing model to develop the staffing assignment based on the needs of the clients and a template has been created to use (see resources below).
      Instructions
      As you create this assignment, include the following in an email to your manager to justify your short staffing plan:
    • Complete the staffing assignment based on the acuity level.
    • Defend how you would direct the staff to their assigned roles for this shift and provide a rationale for the staffing assignment.
    • Describe how you would communicate with each level of care provider to assure the best outcomes possible.
    • Address how you would assure client equity in the delivery of services.
    • Reflect on how you, as a nursing leader, created the staffing assignment based on your core professional values.
    • Describe your professional identity characteristics that supported your decision for the staffing assignment.
    • Provides stated ideas with professional language and attribution for credible sources with correct APA citation, spelling, and grammar.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

week 2 discussion

/in /by

 Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, pick two (2) of the leading causes of the American Revolution.

  • The Proclamation Act of 1763
  • The Navigation Acts
  • The Stamp Act
  • The Declaratory Act
  • The Townsend Act
  • The Boston Massacre
  • The Coercive Acts

Then, address the following for your selections:

  • Analyze the cause and effect of two acts passed by the British Parliament on British North America. Which of your two selections do you consider the most significant and why?
  • Examine and explain the significance of the Declaration of Independence to the development of the American Revolution.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Why Study Other Religions?

/in /by

1-Why is studying other religions a good idea in a practical sense? You should discuss it with your family & friends;
but answer this 1st question without looking up any sources.

2-Why is studying other religions a good idea in a Christian moral sense (according to Pope Saint John 23rd & Pope
Saint John Paul 2nd)? Before answering:

A-Watch & Listen:
*Replacement Theology Explained in 6 Minutes – Rabbi Jack Zimmerman of Jewish Voice Ministries –
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Im2Fz-gDS7A)

[ALL NECESSARY READING & CONSULTING DOCUMENTS CAN BE FOUND in the “MODULE 1 FILES” FOLDER]:
https://stu.instructure.com/courses/25176/files/folder/MODULE%201%20FILES

B-Read:
*Nostra Aetate & Beyond Notes – Roncalli & Wojtyla – Dr. David Masters
*Antisemitism’s Scriptural Roots

C-Consult:
*Nostra Aetate: Declaration on the Relation of the Church to Non-Christian Religions – Vatican Council II
*Ecumenical & Interreligious Issues – US Bishops
*The Gifts & the Calling of God are Irrevocable – Vatican Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews
*Notes on the Correct Way to Present the Jews & Judaism in Preaching & Catechesis of the Roman Catholic Church
– Vatican Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews
*Orthodox Rabbis’ New View of Christianity
*New View of Jewish-Christian Relations
*Criteria for the Evaluation of Dramatizations of the Passion – US Bishops’ Comm for Ecumenical & Interreligious Affairs
*God’s Mercy Endures Forever: Guidelines on the Presentation of Jews & Judaism in Catholic Preaching – US Bishops
*We Remember
*Roots of Anti-Judaism Symposium
*Our Elder Brothers
*Guidelines for Religious Relations with Jews
*Guidelines & Suggestions for Implementing Nostra Aetate
*Holocaust Teaching Guide for Catholic Schools – Napolitano
*Dominus Iesus – Vatican Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

UTA NURS3335 Quiz 2 Latest 2021/UTA NURS3335 Quiz 2 Latest 2021

/in /by

Question 1

The theory of holism asserts that parts of a whole are in intimate interconnection, such that they cannot exist or be understood independently of the whole.

True

False

Question 2

The holistic theory is comprised of all of the following interrelated dimensional parts except:

Emotional

Mental

Occupational

Spiritual

Physical

Question 3

The western medical approach that focuses on treating the illness only is referred to as:

holistic medicine

allopathic medicine

Question 4

The approach to health and wellness that utilizes non-mainstream practices along with conventional medicine is referred to as:

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

unit 8 DQ

/in /by

A 49-year-old female is discussing age-related changes with the nurse practitioner. She states that she is having irregular periods and “hot flashes.”

  1. What other assessment data would substantiate the diagnosis of menopause?
  2. What type of therapy would you expect this patient to receive? Why?

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

case

/in /by

Eric Johnson is a 21-year-old Caucasian male who is in his senior year of college. The patient has a history of seasonal allergies. He does not remember what his allergist told him to take for his allergies in the past. He wants to know what he can take.  He presents to the clinic today with complaints of a stuffy nose, shortness of breath, fever TMAX 102 at home, and a productive cough. He also notes that over the past few months he has also noticed a watery discharge and burning when he urinates. He does admit to having unprotected intercourse last month. He undergoes rapid testing and a chest x-ray while in the clinic.   His diagnoses are pneumonia, chlamydia, and seasonal allergies.

Clinic Vital Signs: BP 125/75, HR 116, Temp 102.5, O2 94%. He has no known drug allergies.

Q1. What are the recommended medications to start this specific patient on? Please provide the drug class, generic & trade name, and the initial starting dose.

Q2. Please discuss the mechanism of action of each of the drugs you listed.

Q3. Please discuss the side effect profile of each medication you listed.

Q4. Are there any interactions between any of the medications you prescribed?

Q5. What other non-pharmacological interventions would be suggested?

 

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Leveraging Human Capital

/in /by

Week 7- Leveraging Human Capital

Throughout this course, you have analyzed your current work environment to identify the acquiring, developing, and training practices. Employees are the biggest asset and contribute to the culture and overall performance of the organization. This project requires you to determine how to leverage the human capital within your organization. Use the research you have complied throughout this course to determine how to appropriately develop and motivate your employees.

Develop a written proposal (1,000-1,250 words), discussing performance indicators, rewards and incentives, and a plan for motivating employees. Your proposal must include the following:

· Describe tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance on the job.

 

· How will you identify an employee’s strengths and skills to leverage their performance?

 

 

· Develop strategies to improve employee performance. How will you provide employees with rewards and incentives for performance improvement?

 

· How will you integrate rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain the employees?

 

 

· Describe a vision for the overall culture you aspire to develop in your organization, relative to the employees being the biggest asset.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

 

 

 

 

Rubric

 

Tasks and Performance Indicators assessment

Tasks and Performance Indicators

16.5 points

Criteria Description

Tasks and Performance Indicators

5. Excellent

16.5 points

A comprehensive description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included.

4. Good

14.36 points

A clear description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included.

3. Satisfactory

13.04 points

A description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included and minimally describes the tasks and performance of employees.

2. Less than Satisfactory

12.21 points

The written proposal does not include a description of tasks and performance indicators.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance is included but is incomplete or lacks details.

collapse Identifying Employee Strengths and Skills to Leverage Performance assessment

Identifying Employee Strengths and Skills to Leverage Performance

16.5 points

Criteria Description

Identifying Employee Strengths and Skills to Leverage Performance

5. Excellent

16.5 points

There is a well-developed description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills to improve performance.

4. Good

14.36 points

There is a detailed description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills to improve performance.

3. Satisfactory

13.04 points

There is some description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills to improve performance.

2. Less than Satisfactory

12.21 points

The written proposal includes a description of leveraging on employee strengths and skills but the description is incomplete or lacks details.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The written proposal does not include leveraging on human capital.

collapse Strategies to Improve Performance assessment

Strategies to Improve Performance

16.5 points

Criteria Description

Strategies to Improve Performance

5. Excellent

16.5 points

The written proposal includes a comprehensive description of strategies to improve employee performance and thoroughly discusses rewards and incentives for performance improvement.

4. Good

14.36 points

The written proposal includes strategies to improve employee performance and discusses rewards and incentives for performance improvement.

3. Satisfactory

13.04 points

The written proposal includes a detailed description of strategies to improve employee performance and adequately discusses rewards and incentives for performance improvement.

2. Less than Satisfactory

12.21 points

The written proposal includes strategies to improve employee performance but they are incomplete or lack details.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The written proposal does not include strategies to improve employee performance.

collapse Integration of Rewards and Incentives to Remain Competitive assessment

Integration of Rewards and Incentives to Remain Competitive

16.5 points

Criteria Description

Integration of Rewards and Incentives to Remain Competitive

5. Excellent

16.5 points

The written proposal includes a clear description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.

4. Good

14.36 points

The written proposal includes an appropriate description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.

3. Satisfactory

13.04 points

The written proposal includes a vague description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.

2. Less than Satisfactory

12.21 points

The written proposal includes a thorough description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain employees.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The written proposal does not include a description of the integration of rewards and incentives to remain competitive.

collapse Culture Within the Organization assessment

Culture Within the Organization

11 points

Criteria Description

Culture Within the Organization

5. Excellent

11 points

There is a well-developed description of the aspired culture within the organization relative to the employees being the biggest asset.

4. Good

9.57 points

There is a detailed description of the aspired culture within the organization relative to the employees being the biggest asset.

3. Satisfactory

8.69 points

There is some description of the aspired culture within the organization relative to the employees being the biggest asset.

2. Less than Satisfactory

8.14 points

The written proposal includes a description of the culture within the organization but is incomplete or lacks details.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The written proposal does not include a description of the culture within the organization.

collapse Thesis Development and Purpose assessment

Thesis Development and Purpose

7.7 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

7.7 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

4. Good

6.7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

3. Satisfactory

6.08 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.7 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

collapse Argument Logic and Construction assessment

Argument Logic and Construction

8.8 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

8.8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

7.66 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

6.95 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less than Satisfactory

6.51 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

collapse Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) assessment

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

5.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

4.79 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

4.35 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.07 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

collapse Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) assessment

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5.5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

5.5 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

4.79 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

4.35 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.07 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

collapse Documentation of Sources assessment

Documentation of Sources

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Holistic Plan: Caring For Self

/in /by

1. Personal Assessment Made an assessment of self on body/mind/spirit dimensions. Describes current diet, exercise routine, and study habits/schedule; relaxation, renewal. Described spiritual practices (prayer, meditation, spending time in nature, etc.).

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

2. Developing Goals. Looked at self-assessment and critically evaluated it. Identified which activities are fulfilling to self in mind-body-spirit? Which areas need attention? Wrote specific goals to address mind-body-spirit self-care.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

3. Setting the intention. Describe how will set an intention for wholeness and balance in his/her life

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

4. Paying attention to self-talk. Demonstrated listening to and reflecting upon inner dialogue. Identified an inner critic or an inner coach; always negative or try to be open and nonjudgmental?

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

5. Simplifying life. Described how self organizes/simplifies/reduces or eliminates clutter and redundancy. Gave specific examples, such as organizing workspace or setting limits on time on social media.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

6. Developing comic vision. Described how to include positive humor in life. Described activities that bring joy, e.g., watching a funny film or sit-com. Explored new ways to develop comic vision such as laughter yoga.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

7. Building support systems Identified who supports self emotionally/spiritually/holistically? Discussed how will nurture healthy supportive relationships and how will address unhealthy relationships.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

8. Exploring holistic modalities Identified holistic modalities noted in Table 2 of Riley (2003) that have tried or want to utilize in support of self-care; discussed how will use these modalities. Included references for chosen modalities.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

9. Applying self-care at work Discussed how will care for self at work. Included examples such as preparing a nourishing and appealing lunch, using breaks for meditation or prayer, listening to music during commute, etc.

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Overall Scholarship Plan has a logical flow. Use the 9 criteria above as subheading.
150-200 words per section/criteria are required and free of spelling and grammatical errors.
No title page and reference page needed. Use your full name as running head and appear on each page, include page numbers.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now