Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpa month ago05.06.202540Report issuefiles (4)week3disccusionsweetcopy6050.docxweek3discussion60034sweet.docxweek3assignment6003sweetcopy.docxweek4assignmentsweetcopy.docxweek3disccusionsweetcopy6050.docxPo Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActPolitics and the Patient Prot Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).· Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.By Day 3 of Week 3Postan explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.By Day 6 of Week 3ection and Affordable Care Actlitics and the Patient Protection and AffordPolitics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Actweek3discussion60034sweet.docxUsing the Walden LibraryWhere can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.By Day 3 of Week 4Post the following:Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.By Day 6 of Week 4Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.week3assignment6003sweetcopy.docxAcademic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: Research AnalysisArchitect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module’s Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.· Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.· Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.The Assignment:Using the “Module 3 | Part 3” section of yourAcademic Success and Professional Development Plan Templatepresented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:· Your topic of interest.· A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.· Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.· Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template· Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.· Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:· Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.· Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.Note:Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.week4assignmentsweetcopy.docxLegislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy StatementAs a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself,If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently?Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.Part 1: Legislation GridBased on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:· Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.· Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.· Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.· Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy StatementBased on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:· Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.· Explain how the social determinants of income, age, education, or gender affect this legislation.· Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.· At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.By Day 7 of Week 4Submityour completed legislation grid and testimony/advocacy statement.submission informationBefore submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access theTurnitin Draftsfrom theStart Herearea.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment asWK4Assgn+LastName+Firstinitial2. Then, click onStart Assignmentnear the top of the page.3. Next, click onUpload Fileand selectSubmit Assignmentfor review.RubricNURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricNURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFederal and State LegislationPart 1: Legislation GridBased on the health- related bill you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:• Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.• Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.• Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.• Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?35 to >31.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the legislative intent of the health- related bill. …The response accurately identifies in detail the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies in detail the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response clearly and thoroughly describes in detail the current status of the health- related bill.31 to >27.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response accurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.27 to >24.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely or inaccurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.24 to >0 ptsPoorSummary of the legislative intent of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Identification of the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill are vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Identification of the populations targeted by the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …The description of the current status of the health- related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.35 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement• Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.• Explain how the social determinants of income, age, education, or gender affect this legislation.• Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.40 to >35.0 ptsExcellentTestimony clearly, accurately, and thoroughly provides statements that fully justifies a position for a health-related bill…. Response provides a detailed, thorough, and logical explanation of the social determinant affecting the topic, and how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and includes one or more clear and accurate supporting examples.35 to >31.0 ptsGoodTestimony clearly and accurately provides statements that somewhat justifies a position for a health-related bill. …Response provides an accurate explanation of the social determinant affecting the topic, and how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and may include at least one supporting example.31 to >27.0 ptsFairTestimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague or inaccurate. …Explanation of how to address the opponents and social determinant for the position for the health-related bill is vague or inaccurate, lacks logic, and/or the supporting examples are vague or inaccurate.27 to >0 ptsPoorTestimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing. …Explanation of how to address the opponents and social determinant for the position for the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentResponse includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.8 to >7.0 ptsGoodResponse includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.7 to >6.0 ptsFairResponse includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.6 to >0 ptsPoorResponse includes 2 or fewer resources.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and OrganizationParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas.Sentences are carefully focused– neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ...Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is incomplete or missing.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) APA format errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) APA format errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥5) APA format errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 100week4assignmentsweetcopy.docxLegislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy StatementAs a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself,If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently?Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.Part 1: Legislation GridBased on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:· Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.· Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.· Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.· Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy StatementBased on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:· Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.· Explain how the social determinants of income, age, education, or gender affect this legislation.· Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.· At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.By Day 7 of Week 4Submityour completed legislation grid and testimony/advocacy statement.submission informationBefore submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access theTurnitin Draftsfrom theStart Herearea.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment asWK4Assgn+LastName+Firstinitial2. Then, click onStart Assignmentnear the top of the page.3. Next, click onUpload Fileand selectSubmit Assignmentfor review.RubricNURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricNURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFederal and State LegislationPart 1: Legislation GridBased on the health- related bill you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:• Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.• Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.• Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.• Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?35 to >31.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the legislative intent of the health- related bill. …The response accurately identifies in detail the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies in detail the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response clearly and thoroughly describes in detail the current status of the health- related bill.31 to >27.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response accurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.27 to >24.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely or inaccurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.24 to >0 ptsPoorSummary of the legislative intent of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Identification of the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill are vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Identification of the populations targeted by the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …The description of the current status of the health- related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.35 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement• Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.• Explain how the social determinants of income, age, education, or gender affect this legislation.• Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.40 to >35.0 ptsExcellentTestimony clearly, accurately, and thoroughly provides statements that fully justifies a position for a health-related bill…. Response provides a detailed, thorough, and logical explanation of the social determinant affecting the topic, and how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and includes one or more clear and accurate supporting examples.35 to >31.0 ptsGoodTestimony clearly and accurately provides statements that somewhat justifies a position for a health-related bill. …Response provides an accurate explanation of the social determinant affecting the topic, and how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and may include at least one supporting example.31 to >27.0 ptsFairTestimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague or inaccurate. …Explanation of how to address the opponents and social determinant for the position for the health-related bill is vague or inaccurate, lacks logic, and/or the supporting examples are vague or inaccurate.27 to >0 ptsPoorTestimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing. …Explanation of how to address the opponents and social determinant for the position for the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentResponse includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.8 to >7.0 ptsGoodResponse includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.7 to >6.0 ptsFairResponse includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.6 to >0 ptsPoorResponse includes 2 or fewer resources.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and OrganizationParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas.Sentences are carefully focused– neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ...Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is incomplete or missing.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) APA format errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) APA format errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥5) APA format errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 100week3disccusionsweetcopy6050.docxPo Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActPolitics and the Patient Prot Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).· Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.By Day 3 of Week 3Postan explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.By Day 6 of Week 3ection and Affordable Care Actlitics and the Patient Protection and AffordPolitics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Actweek3discussion60034sweet.docxUsing the Walden LibraryWhere can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.By Day 3 of Week 4Post the following:Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.By Day 6 of Week 4Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.week3assignment6003sweetcopy.docxAcademic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: Research AnalysisArchitect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module’s Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.· Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.· Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.The Assignment:Using the “Module 3 | Part 3” section of yourAcademic Success and Professional Development Plan Templatepresented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:· Your topic of interest.· A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.· Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.· Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template· Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.· Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:· Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.· Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.Note:Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.week4assignmentsweetcopy.docxLegislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy StatementAs a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself,If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently?Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.Part 1: Legislation GridBased on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:· Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.· Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.· Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.· Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy StatementBased on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:· Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.· Explain how the social determinants of income, age, education, or gender affect this legislation.· Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.· At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.By Day 7 of Week 4Submityour completed legislation grid and testimony/advocacy statement.submission informationBefore submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access theTurnitin Draftsfrom theStart Herearea.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment asWK4Assgn+LastName+Firstinitial2. Then, click onStart Assignmentnear the top of the page.3. Next, click onUpload Fileand selectSubmit Assignmentfor review.RubricNURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricNURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFederal and State LegislationPart 1: Legislation GridBased on the health- related bill you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:• Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.• Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.• Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.• Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?35 to >31.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the legislative intent of the health- related bill. …The response accurately identifies in detail the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies in detail the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response clearly and thoroughly describes in detail the current status of the health- related bill.31 to >27.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response accurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.27 to >24.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely or inaccurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.24 to >0 ptsPoorSummary of the legislative intent of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Identification of the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill are vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Identification of the populations targeted by the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …The description of the current status of the health- related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.35 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement• Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.• Explain how the social determinants of income, age, education, or gender affect this legislation.• Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.40 to >35.0 ptsExcellentTestimony clearly, accurately, and thoroughly provides statements that fully justifies a position for a health-related bill…. Response provides a detailed, thorough, and logical explanation of the social determinant affecting the topic, and how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and includes one or more clear and accurate supporting examples.35 to >31.0 ptsGoodTestimony clearly and accurately provides statements that somewhat justifies a position for a health-related bill. …Response provides an accurate explanation of the social determinant affecting the topic, and how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and may include at least one supporting example.31 to >27.0 ptsFairTestimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague or inaccurate. …Explanation of how to address the opponents and social determinant for the position for the health-related bill is vague or inaccurate, lacks logic, and/or the supporting examples are vague or inaccurate.27 to >0 ptsPoorTestimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing. …Explanation of how to address the opponents and social determinant for the position for the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentResponse includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.8 to >7.0 ptsGoodResponse includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.7 to >6.0 ptsFairResponse includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.6 to >0 ptsPoorResponse includes 2 or fewer resources.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and OrganizationParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas.Sentences are carefully focused– neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ...Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is incomplete or missing.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) APA format errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) APA format errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥5) APA format errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 100week3disccusionsweetcopy6050.docxPo Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActPolitics and the Patient Prot Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).· Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.By Day 3 of Week 3Postan explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.By Day 6 of Week 3ection and Affordable Care Actlitics and the Patient Protection and AffordPolitics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Actweek3discussion60034sweet.docxUsing the Walden LibraryWhere can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.By Day 3 of Week 4Post the following:Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.By Day 6 of Week 4Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.week3assignment6003sweetcopy.docxAcademic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: Research AnalysisArchitect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module’s Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.· Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.· Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.The Assignment:Using the “Module 3 | Part 3” section of yourAcademic Success and Professional Development Plan Templatepresented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:· Your topic of interest.· A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.· Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.· Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template· Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.· Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:· Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.· Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.Note:Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.week4assignmentsweetcopy.docxLegislation Grid and Testimony/Advocacy StatementAs a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself,If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently?Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo Prepare:· Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.Part 1: Legislation GridBased on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:· Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.· Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.· Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.· Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy StatementBased on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:· Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.· Explain how the social determinants of income, age, education, or gender affect this legislation.· Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.· At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.By Day 7 of Week 4Submityour completed legislation grid and testimony/advocacy statement.submission informationBefore submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access theTurnitin Draftsfrom theStart Herearea.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment asWK4Assgn+LastName+Firstinitial2. Then, click onStart Assignmentnear the top of the page.3. Next, click onUpload Fileand selectSubmit Assignmentfor review.RubricNURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricNURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFederal and State LegislationPart 1: Legislation GridBased on the health- related bill you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:• Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.• Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.• Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.• Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?35 to >31.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the legislative intent of the health- related bill. …The response accurately identifies in detail the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies in detail the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response clearly and thoroughly describes in detail the current status of the health- related bill.31 to >27.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response accurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response accurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.27 to >24.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely or inaccurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the populations targeted by the health-related bill. …The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the current status of the health-related bill.24 to >0 ptsPoorSummary of the legislative intent of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Identification of the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill are vague and inaccurate or is missing. …Identification of the populations targeted by the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. …The description of the current status of the health- related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.35 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement• Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.• Explain how the social determinants of income, age, education, or gender affect this legislation.• Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.40 to >35.0 ptsExcellentTestimony clearly, accurately, and thoroughly provides statements that fully justifies a position for a health-related bill…. Response provides a detailed, thorough, and logical explanation of the social determinant affecting the topic, and how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and includes one or more clear and accurate supporting examples.35 to >31.0 ptsGoodTestimony clearly and accurately provides statements that somewhat justifies a position for a health-related bill. …Response provides an accurate explanation of the social determinant affecting the topic, and how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and may include at least one supporting example.31 to >27.0 ptsFairTestimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague or inaccurate. …Explanation of how to address the opponents and social determinant for the position for the health-related bill is vague or inaccurate, lacks logic, and/or the supporting examples are vague or inaccurate.27 to >0 ptsPoorTestimony used to justify a position for a health-related bill is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing. …Explanation of how to address the opponents and social determinant for the position for the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing.40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentResponse includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.8 to >7.0 ptsGoodResponse includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.7 to >6.0 ptsFairResponse includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.6 to >0 ptsPoorResponse includes 2 or fewer resources.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and OrganizationParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas.Sentences are carefully focused– neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. ...Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is incomplete or missing.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1-2) APA format errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3-4) APA format errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥5) APA format errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 1001234Bids(56)PROVEN STERLINGMiss DeannaDr. Ellen RMEmily ClareMathProgrammingDr. Aylin JMMISS HILLARY A+Dr Michelle Ellaabdul_rehman_STELLAR GEEK A+ProWritingGuruProf. TOPGRADEfirstclass tutorProf Double RTutor Cyrus KennicohwilliamIsabella HarvardMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverPROF_ALISTERShow All Bidsother Questions(10)I need help in Excel nowW9 265-2-2x + 10y = -20
-6x â 10y = -20Chemistry home workAfter watching Krugmanâs video this week, do you concur with the assessment that growing income inequality threatens the middle class?…133Gender Equality in Schools (ages 5-12)The Necklace by Guy de MaupassantLeadershipcentury wellness group chapter 7 from structured analysis and design
Get Answer Over WhatsApp
Order Paper Now
