Week 5 Assignment: Presentation Final Outline, Description of Visuals, and References

 

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 3, 6, 7
  • Lesson 1, 2
  • Link (Word doc): Outline TemplatePreview the document
  • Minimum of 4 scholarly sources

Instructions
For the final outline, continue conducting research for your presentation, locating specific scholarly sources to include on your references page.

Include and submit the following components:

  • Title page (title of speech, name of presenter, audience prepared for – school or institution, date)
    • You can use this information to create your first slide in PowerPoint.
  • General goal, specific goal, thesis statement, introduction paragraph (written out), body in outline format using complete sentences, summary paragraph (written out) (approximately 4 pages)
  • Visuals and their description plan (1-2 pages)
    • This section should include a minimum of 5 images you will use for your PowerPoint slides with a description of how and why you will be using each image. Paste the images onto the document (Do not simply provide a URL for each image).
  • Reference page with minimum of 4 authoritative, outside scholarly sources
    • These sources can include the sources referenced during Weeks 2 and 3.
    • Anonymous authors or web pages are not acceptable.
    • References must be written in APA format with hanging indents, in alphabetical order, and with everything double spaced.
    • The word references should be centered.
    • Include copyrighted image resources in this list.
    • You can copy and paste this to use as the last slide in your PowerPoint.

Presentation Note: Do not copy and paste your table of contents, final outline, or visuals description plan into your PowerPoint slides. Your speech slides must be created as a meaningful presentation.

  • Use a few bullets for each slide with one phrase or one sentence for each bullet.
  • Do not put any paragraphs into the slides.

Any questions about this assignment may be discussed in the Course Q & A Forum.

Optional: Team Editing
This is not required or graded. Complete the following steps for team support on your outline. This is not a group project:

  • Early in the week (Day 1, 2, or 3), post in your group homepage a completed first or second outline draft with your team to ask for feedback. If you do not share I added this your first draft early in the week, you cannot expect other people to have time to review it for you. Provide good concrete constructive comments.
  • During the week (Days 1-5), respond to team members who have asked for your suggestions, comments, and corrections on their outlines. Try to respond as early as you can, or at least within 2 days. If you can’t review an outline or provide any comment within 2 days of receiving a team member’s outline, notify your team member about when to expect your comments. Day 5 should be your latest date to respond to other people, or Day 6 for emergency last-minute reviews. Remember that other people need time to use your ideas and revise their outlines!
  • Review the suggestions, comments, and corrections that you receive from your team and incorporate the best ideas into your first draft outline.
  • Save the end of your week (Days 6 and 7) for revising and updating your own outline and preparing the final outline version, completing the description of visuals (PowerPoint images plan) page, and checking the references page.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 3-4 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (minimum of 4 scholarly sources)

Grading

This activity will be graded based on W5 Presentation Outline Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 3

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Scenario

 

During a home visit for a 72-year-old Asian woman, the home health nurse notices that her prescription medications for hypertension and diabetes are untouched. Her daughter explains that she cannot get her mother to take the “Western pills” and that her mother has been using a variety of herbal remedies.

You are asked by your supervisor to provide a summary report that address the following:

  • How do you provide care for this patient that is culturally competent?
  • How does her culture play a role into her nursing care?
  • What techniques can you utilize to enhance the data collection process?
  • How will you incorporate patient centered care values while trying to complete a head to toe assessment?

Your report should be coherent and precise, and should address all the required components in a research-based manner using text support and outside research to create a set of responses to the supervisor prompts above.

The essay should be 1000-1250 words and should include at least three (3) citations. The sections should be clearly marked with headings so that your instructor knows which points you are addressing. Follow the guidelines for APA writing style. The title page and references page do not count towards the minimum word amount for this assignment.

Assignment Expectations

Length: 1000 – 1250 words; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner.

Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count towards the minimal word count for this assignment.

References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Week 5 Course Project: Parts 5 & 6 – Rehearsal

  

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

Introduction: Communication Change Challenge (CCC) Part 5 & 6
In Part 5, you will imagine implementing the new behaviors you identified in 4E. In Part 6, you will practice your new behavior by role-playing with a family member or close friend who is not directly involved in your goal. It is still not time to actually implement your new behaviors, as Parts 5 and 6 will help you to iron out the wrinkles.

Note: Submit both CCC Part 5 and CCC Part 6 in one document, but start a new page for CCC Part 6.

Instructions: Part 5

5A. Covert Rehearsal
Covert Rehearsal is an effective way of trying out new communication behaviors. Think about a time that you were daydreaming, or dreaming at night. You can use your imagination to think about an experience or situation that is not really happening at that time or in that place. You can do the same type of simulation on purpose to think about a time and place that will allow you to practice your new interpersonal communication skill to meet your goal as outlined in your new behaviors listed in CCC Part 4E.

By covertly rehearsing, you make it much more likely that you will be actually performing the behavior comfortably and effectively in real life situations. This surprising effect of covert rehearsal has been shown in numerous studies. What makes covert rehearsal particularly useful is that you can carry it around and do it anywhere – in the shower, cleaning, cooking, and so forth. The more you vary covertly rehearsing a particular episode, the more likely you will be able to perform well in the actual situation. For example, if you are planning to initiate and maintain a conversation with your neighbor, you should think through a number of possible topics and questions before finally choosing what you perceive to be the best options. In other words, think before you speak. Plan what you will say and do in a particular situation where you can practice your goal.

Covert rehearsal can be used both to prepare for an upcoming communication event, and to evaluate and revise an event that has already occurred – as in instant replay. This is done all the time for sports teams. Each player watches the game again and decides how he or she could do it better next time. Both planning ahead before a conversation and reflecting after a conversation will increase the probability that you will perform your new skill effectively the next time you use it.

Note that some people initially find it difficult to imagine specific conversations with others. Keep with it if you have difficulty. You will eventually succeed with practice, and when you do, you will be amazed at the effect. If you are having a hard time talking to people in your mind, speak to yourself out loud or speak to your reflection in the mirror. Think about the following:

  • Identify the situation you would like to practice; do you want to plan a new conversation, or replay a past situation but change the outcome?
  • Where will you have this conversation – in the kitchen, on the bus, in the cafeteria at lunch, at school in a classroom, in the board room, in your manager’s office, or at a friend’s house?
  • Provide a detailed narrative that identifies your selected communication event.
  • Write a description of your surroundings – date, time, location, specific room, physical surroundings and so forth, and the people who will participate in this communication event.
  • Name the people involved, what you will talk about, where it takes place, when it takes place, how it should occur, and why you need to plan for a better conversation next time.
  • How will your physical surroundings affect your rehearsal?

For this section, you are to select a communication event, related to your goal, for which you will prepare covertly. Choose one or more behaviors to work on that are listed in CCC Part 4E. Choose a communication event that you would like to prepare for privately or secretly – covertly. As you imagine yourself practicing your new skill, focus hard on specific interactions. Actually, think about an interpersonal communication exchange – what you say, and how the other person responds. Don’t just go through the motions. Really see yourself asking specific questions, making specific comments, and hearing the other person replying. As you imagine the sequence, practice precisely what you want to say and how you want to say it. Experiment with what feels to be the most effective and comfortable way for you to implement your new behaviors.

Submit a detailed narrative that identifies your selected communication event and include the following:

  • Description of your surroundings – date, time, location, specific room, physical surroundings and so forth
  • Explanation of how your physical surroundings will affect your rehearsal
  • Description of the people who will participate in this communication event
  • What you will talk about
  • How it should occur
  • Why you need to plan for a better conversation next time

5B. Covert Practice
In a quiet place, begin thinking about the conversation event from Part 5A, as you would like to see it evolve. When you hit rough spots, try a variety of options until you find a response that pleases you. If you are having trouble with this, pretend you are an author planning to write the dialogue for a reality TV episode, or you are composing lines for characters in a play or movie or book. Use the mirror technique and take turns role-playing both people in the conversation. You can also use puppets, stuffed animals, socks on your hands, or different hats or coats to take the parts of two people having a conversation.

What can you see in the background? The scenery department needs to know how to create the setting for the play, movie, or reality TV show. The illustrator needs to know what to draw or paint for the book you are writing. You need to know exactly what type of situation you are dealing with before you can write the dialogue for the characters.

When you are satisfied with your imagined scene, write it out so you can see how it looks and read it aloud so you can hear how it sounds. If you are writing a one-act play, you can plan and add stage directions.

Enter left: The wife enters the kitchen to angrily scream at the dawdling children who won’t eat their supper.

Then, write her exact words down so your actor will know what to do and say. Identify each speaker and use quotation marks for their exact words.

Wife, using a loud and angry voice: “Aren’t you children finished eating your supper yet?”

Plan and write down your nonverbal and verbal behaviors and responses, including your own behaviors and responses and the reactions of the other person in the communication event.

5C. Reflection
Reflect on this experience. Address your observations and reactions to the private covert rehearsal experience. (1-2 paragraphs)

  • How did you feel at first as you prepared for your private covert rehearsal?
  • How did you feel after you finished it?
  • What behaviors or patterns did you use from Part 4E?
  • Did you notice any new behaviors or patterns that you have not noted previously?

Instructions: Part 6
In Part 6, you will take your rehearsal a step further by role-playing with someone who is willing to lend you a hand. Practicing implementation of the new behaviors you identified in 4E will give you insight into how another person might react in a real-life situation, preparing you to respond or adapt when necessary.

6A. Shared Behavior Rehearsal
Shared behavior rehearsal is also known as “role-playing.” Rehearsing communication behavior is useful both before and after an event. Practicing before an event allows you to enter a communication situation in your most prepared state. Rehearsing a disappointing situation after it occurs gives you a chance to discover and remedy aspects of your own behavior that were less than satisfactory.

Like covert rehearsal, practicing the new communication behaviors that you identified in CCC Part 4E through role-play increases the likelihood that you will be successful in Part 7 when you actually implement the changes in real-life situations. Again, it may feel silly at first, but if you take the role-playing seriously, you will be amazed at what you will take away from it. Role-play your imagined scene for your conversation event with a friend or family member who is not directly involved in your communication problem. Say your lines as you planned them. Your practice partner may not really say what you thought he or she would say. Then, show him or her the written script, and have him or her read or act out the scenario. You can practice this a few times both with and without the script.

Write a detailed narrative of what happened in the behavior rehearsal.

  • What did you do?
  • How were your behaviors received?
  • How satisfied were you with your performance of the behaviors in your goal from Part 4E?

6B. Reflection on Observations and Reactions
Address your observations and reactions to the shared behavior rehearsal experience of role-playing with a friend or family member who is not directly involved in your communication problem. (1-2 paragraphs)

  • How did you choose your shared behavior rehearsal partner?
  • Does he or she know about the person or situation being focused on for your CCC goal?
  • Does he or she normally offer guidance and advice in a trustworthy manner already in your established relationship with this person?

6C. Reflection on Planning
Write your observations and reactions to the shared behavior rehearsal experience as far as planning is concerned. (1-2 paragraphs)

  • Did your shared behavioral rehearsal go as planned, or was it totally different than you imagined it would be?
  • How did you feel at first as you prepared for your shared behavioral rehearsal?
  • How did you feel after you finished it? What behaviors or patterns did you use from Part 4E?
  • Did you notice any new behaviors or patterns that you have not noted previously?

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 4-5 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page

Grading

This activity will be graded based on W5 CCC Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 2, 3, 4, 5

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

class4wk6asng

 

The purpose of this assignment is to document sources of research evidence that address a national practice problem, including the level and quality of each source of research evidence. A synthesis of the evidence is conducted to determine the overall strength and quality of the evidence. The development of an evidence table and synthesis are foundational to inform actions and decisions to improve healthcare outcomes. Construction of an evidence table and synthesis supports professional formation of the DNP practice scholar.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

  • Compare and contrast differences and similarities of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method designs. (POs 3, 9)
  • Analyze qualitative and quantitative data for the purposes of critical appraisal of evidence. (POs 3, 9)
  • Appraise systematic reviews for translation science. (POs 3, 5, 9)
  • Evaluate selected statistical methods for the purposes of critical appraisal of evidence. (POs 3, 5, 9)
  • Synthesize literature relevant to practice problems. (POs 3, 5, 9) 

PRACTICE PROBLEM WAS:  UNDER DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETES: CAUSE, EFFECTS AND RISK FACTORS

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS: 300

Preparing The Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of this assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. It is each student’s responsibility to save and maintain all artifacts required in the e-Portfolio (Links to an external site.).

  1. The assignment will include the following components.
    1. Title Page
    2. Introduction
      1. Purpose Statement
      2. Practice Problem Identification (identified in Weeks 1, 2, and 3 Discussion) (cited)
      3. Sources of Research Evidence Identification (identified in Weeks 1, 2, and 3 Discussion) (cited)
    3. Implications of the Practice Problem at the National Level and Local Level (1–2 paragraphs)
      1. Significance
      2. Prevalence
      3. Economic Ramifications
    4. Synthesis of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem, Including 2 Qualitative Research Studies, 2 Quantitative Research Studies, and 2 Systemactic Reviews (identified in Weeks 1, 2, and 3 Discussions) (2 paragraphs)
      1. Main Points/Salient Messages That Emerge From the Sources (Cited)
      2. Compare and Contrast Main Points From All Sources (Cited)
      3. Objective Discussion of Facts
    5. Appraisal of the Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem (1–2 paragraphs)
      1. Level of Evidence
      2. Quality Rating of Evidence
      3. Suitability of the Evidence to Address the Practice Problem
    6. Summary Tables of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem Using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Evidence Summary Tool (Links to an external site.)
      1. 2 Qualitative Research Studies (identified in Week 1 Discussion)
      2. 2 Quantitative Research Studies (identified in Week 2 Discussion)
      3. 2 Systematic Reviews (identified in Week 3 Discussion)
    7. Conclusion
      1. Summation of the Impact of the Practice Problem at the National Level and Local Level
      2. Summation of the Appraisal of Evidence to Address the Practice Problem
      3. Summation of the Evidence Synthesis
    8. References
      1. Reference Page With Complete References for the 6 Sources of Research Evidence
    9. APA Style and Organization
      1. APA Standards for Scholarly Papers
      2. Grammar and Mechanics
      3. Level I Headings are included

All Chamberlain University policies related to plagiarism must be observed. This written assignment will be screened for originality by Turnitin.

Rubric

Week 6—Evidence Synthesis Grading RubricWeek 6—Evidence Synthesis Grading RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionRequirements 1. Includes a focused purpose statement 2. Identifies selected practice problem 3. Identifies sources of research evidence30.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements.26.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements23.0 ptsIncludes no less than 1 requirements.0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications of the Practice Problem at the National Level and Local LevelRequirements 1. Describes the significance of the practice problem at the national level and local level 2. Discusses the prevalence of the practice problem at the national level and local level 3. Discusses the economic ramifications of the practice problem at the national level and local level40.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements35.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements31.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 1 requirement0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence SynthesisRequirements 1. Describes scope of the evidence synthesis 2. Discusses the main points of sources (sources are cited) 3. Describes the relationship of sources to other selected sources (sources are cited) 4. Discusses facts objectively 5. Presents ideas and claims (sources are cited)50.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 5 requirements43.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 4 requirements38.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence AppraisalRequirements 1. Describes the levels of evidence 2. Discusses the quality of evidence 3. Discusses the suitability of the evidence to address the practice problem50.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements43.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements38.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 1 requirement0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Summary ToolRequirements 1 Provides complete summary for first qualitative research study 2 Provides complete summary for second qualitative research study 3 Provides complete summary for first quantitative research study 4 Provides complete summary for second quantitative research study 5 Provides complete summary for first systematic review 6 Provides complete summary for second systematic review40.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 6 requirements35.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 5 requirements31.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 4 requirements0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionRequirements 1. Includes a summation of the impact of the practice problem at the national level 2. Includes a summation of the evidence appraisal 3. Includes a summation of the evidence synthesis30.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements26.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 2 requirements23.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 1 requirement0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferencesRequirements 1. Cites and references for 6 selected sources of evidence30.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 6 complete references26.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 5 complete references23.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 4 complete references0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and OrganizationRequirements 1. Uses APA standards for scholarly papers 2. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors 3. Uses required evidence summary table 4. Uses required Level I Headings30.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 4 requirements26.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 3 requirements23.0 ptsIncludes no fewer than 1 requirement0.0 ptsNo requirements for this section presented30.0 pts
Total Points: 300.0PreviousNext
 

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Teaching Plan Assignment

Choose a Patient to do an interview with and fill this form, then write about 1-page summary with the instructions on the guideline with an APA style. All instructions is in the file uploaded. 

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

I want a two paragraph answer of the question regarding the essay below (as soon as Possible)

You mention the ways of searching and importance of finding peer reviewed, scholarly articles.  How do you best determine what search engines to use to find these articles?  Is google.com a good way to search?  Why or why not?

  

Searching for evidence that can improve nursing outcomes

Improving nursing outcomes is essential in nursing practice. Setting up the levels of care provision helps in improving the quality of nursing care delivered and patient’s outcomes. Nursing outcomes, however, can be enhanced through theoretical viewpoints. The theoretical approach can offer adequate information that nurses require to enhance their practice skills and knowledge. Searching for evidence is often not easy; it is quite a challenging task that requires good skill sets. I will search for articles that are up to date and peer-reviewed. However, the most critical aspect is to ensure that the article has adequate information that can be used to enhance nursing practice decisions and skill set. The chosen article explains how nurses can incorporate evidence into a newly designed unit to improve patient’s outcomes. 

Concerning evidence integration, the article elaborates the need to incorporate well-understood ideas form research into practice. In aspects of nursing, education and science, the impact of evidence-based practices (EBP) resonated. The call for improved care and clinical improvement based on evidence underscores the need for safe, healthy and productive care redesign. In line with the numerous guidelines of national experts, initiatives have been implemented which maximize significant contributions which the caregiver should, should and will make in order to fulfil the EBP commitments fully. These initiatives include the introduction of realistic programs and curricula for training and reform, the theoretical models and innovations and the creation of a national research improvement network for research in new areas of technology and science. 

The chosen article was prepared by Tafelmeyer, Wicks, Brant, & Smith (2017). It is a recent article that approves the integration of evidence into clinical nursing practice. The article targets nurses who are situated in newly built nursing departments. However, it can be generalized under nursing practice as its information addresses all aspects of nursing practice. It expresses its point clearly and concisely through which all nurses can well understand and object to implement into their actual nursing practice. Sources used to cite the article appear very credible and citable. When sharing evidence, I can think of creating posters, presentations and paper distributions. I can put up stickers like reminders that I can put on the work fridge, on walls containing information and reminders as to what nurses are supposed to implement but in a concise manner.

Moreover, I can prepare presentations and give them in the form of fliers and magazines that individuals can read in their own free time. Besides, I can choose to share the information on social media where most of my colleagues are found. I can also create a website where all required information on improving nursing outcomes can be found and also where my colleagues can also post as well as retrieve necessary documents. Finally, I can seize an opportunity during nurse team meetings to present my ideas on how to enhance nursing practice for better and improved patient outcomes.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

quadroteen

 

In this assignment, you will review the interactive Endocrine Thyroid Case Study patient scenario and analyze the data to determine the health status of the patient. You will need a minimum of two evidence-based practice articles to include clinical practice guidelines, as well as the course textbook.

All papers must conform to the most recent APA standards.

RUBRIC

 

Clinical Case Study Rubric

Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.

Clinical Case Study Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsContent of Clinical Case StudyThe writer demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the case study subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner. The case study content and theories are well developed and linked to the course content, assignment requirements, and practical experience. The case study includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the assignment.

Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.

all instruction requirements noted

30 pointsThe writer demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, and the components of the case study are accurately represented with evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role content. Course materials and scholarly resources are present to support required concepts. The paper includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the case study.

Cites two references.

Most instruction requirements are noted.

26 pointsThe writer demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter. as evidenced by components of the case study and use of evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development. Course content is present but missing depth and or development.

Cites one reference.

23 pointsAbsent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development.

Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.

Significant content of case study is vague, inaccurately portrayed, or missing.

No references cited.

Submits assignment late.

20 points30Analysis and Synthesis of Case Study Content and Meaning with Content Related to Preventative GuidelinesThrough critical analysis, the submitted case study provides an accurate, clear, concise, and complete summary of the scenario.

Information from scholarly resources is synthesized, providing new information or insight related to the context of the assignment by providing both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints

Includes all major and minor relevant risk factors based on standard preventative guidelines for age and gender and treatment/follow-up plans.

all instruction requirements noted.

30 pointsCase study is complete, providing evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources.

Information is synthesized to help fulfill the case study requirements. The content supports at least one viewpoint.

Submission provides clarification of the assignment by correctly answering all posed questions within the instructions.

Includes all major risk factors and most minor relevant risk factors based on standard preventative guidelines for age and gender (i.e.’ to two minor risk factors are missing and/or one incorrect treatment plan).

Most instruction requirements are noted.

26 pointsLacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content without adding any new information or insight. Case study content may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete.

Risk factors are partially complete (i.e., missing one to two major risk factors or three to four minor risk factors, or two incorrect treatment plans).

Missing some instruction requirements.

23 pointsSubmission is primarily a summation of the assignment without further synthesis of course content or analysis of the scenario.

Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.

Multiple risk factors missing (e.g., three major risk or five to six minor risk factors or three incorrect treatment plans, or four or more major risk factors or seven or more minor risk factors or four or more incorrect treatment plans).

Scholarly reference(s) are incorrect or inappropriate for the topic case.

Missing several instruction requirements.

Submits assignment late.

20 points30Application of Knowledge To Clinical Aspect of Patient EncounterThe summary of the case study provides validated information via scholarly resources that offer a multidisciplinary approach to the scenario provided.

The student’s application in practice is accurate and plausible, and additional scholarly resources supporting the application are provided.

all questions posed within the assignment are answered correctly in a well-developed manner, applying knowledge with citations for validation.

Includes all relevant subjective and objective data; diagnostic testing; routine care to be provided; patient education; anticipatory guidance; review of previous diagnostics; and follow-up of acute concern and chronic health issues, etc.—based on assignment instructions.

all instruction requirements noted.

30 pointsA summary of the study, findings, and knowledge gained from the assignment is presented.

Student indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice.

all questions posed by the study are answered correctly.

Includes most of the routine content (subjective and objective data; diagnostic testing; routine care to be provided; education; anticipatory guidance; review of previous diagnostics; and follow-up) (is missing two minor details or one major detail).

Most instruction requirements are noted.

26 pointsComponents of the case study are summarized with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development, thus presenting a more superficial analysis of content between the assignment and the broader course content. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and or development.

Student’s explanation of how the information will be used within their professional practice is vague or incomplete.

One of the questions posed is not answered and/or one of the questions is answered incorrectly.

Includes some of the routine content (subjective and objective data; diagnostic testing; routine care to be provided; education; anticipatory guidance; review of previous diagnostics; and follow-up) (is missing three minor details or two major details).

Cited one reference.

Missing some instruction requirements.

23 pointsAbsent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.

Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.

Content of case study is inaccurately portrayed or missing.

Student’s explanation of how the information will be used within their professional practice is not feasible or appropriate, or student fails to explain how the information will be used within their personal practice.

Omits routine content (subjective and objective data; diagnostic testing; routine care to be provided; education; anticipatory guidance; review of previous diagnostics; and follow-up) (is missing four to five minor details or three major details or six or more minor details or four or more major details.

Two or more questions are not answered and/or are answered incorrectly.

No references cited.

Missing several instruction requirements.

Submits post late.

20 points30OrganizationWell-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument. Writing is concise, with a logical flow of ideas.

5 pointsOrganized content with an informative purpose statement, supportive content, and summary statement. Argument content is developed, with minimal issues in content flow.

4 pointsPoor organization and flow of ideas distract from content. Narrative is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work.

Purpose statement is noted.

3 pointsIllogical flow of ideas. Prose rambles. Purpose statement is unclear or missing.

Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.

No purpose statement.

Submits assignment late.

2 points5APA, Grammar, and SpellingCorrect APA formatting with no errors.

The writer correctly identifies reading audience, as demonstrated by appropriate language (avoids jargon and simplifies complex concepts appropriately).

Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions.

There are no spelling, punctuation, or word-usage errors.

5 pointsCorrect and consistent APA formatting of references and cites all references used.

No more than two unique APA errors.

The writer demonstrates correct usage of formal English language in sentence construction. Variation in sentence structure and word usage promotes readability.

There are minimal to no grammar, punctuation, or word-usage errors.

4 pointsThree to four unique APA formatting errors.

The writer occasionally uses awkward sentence construction or overuses/inappropriately uses complex sentence structure. Problems with word usage (evidence of incorrect use of thesaurus) and punctuation persist, often causing some difficulties with grammar. Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused.

Multiple grammar, punctuation, or word usage errors.

3 pointsFive or more unique formatting errors, or no attempt to format in APA.

The writer demonstrates limited understanding of formal written language use; writing is colloquial (conforms to spoken language).

The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented.

Grammar and punctuation are consistently incorrect. Spelling errors are numerous.

2 points5Total Points100 

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Family Interview – Compare and Contrast Cultures Paper

It is important to identify and understand your own family culture in order to be able to understand and respect other cultures. Interview a family member, and an individual from another culture with which you are unfamiliar. Some examples of an individual from another culture to consider for the assignment include a neighbor, coworker, patient, or friend. Please inform the individuals of the purpose of this assignment and make sure you receive their consent.

Interviews:

Review the “Family Interview ” template prior to the interview. Additional space is designated on the template for you to create three additional questions to ask both interviewees (family member and person from another culture). Additional questions should be relevant to the readings or discussion and should provide value to the interview by helping to understand culture.

Some of the questions may include:

  1. Family beliefs: Have they changed over generations?
  2. Educational and occupational status in the culture and in the family
  3. Communication methods: verbal and nonverbal
  4. Current family goals/priorities
  5. Family member roles and organizational systems
  6. Spiritual beliefs: current practice and death and dying
  7. Alternative lifestyles
  8. Work attitudes and structure

Written Paper:

Using the “Family Interview ” template, interview your designated family member and the person from another culture. Be sure to write your responses in a way that will assist you in writing your paper. After the interview is completed, write a paper of 750-1,000 words that includes the following:

  1. An introductory paragraph with the reasons for selecting the interviewees
  2. A summary of the responses from the interview template gathered from the interviewees
  3. A comparison and contrast of your findings between the two interviewees
  4. A reflective concluding paragraph on how family roles affect the cultural domains and relationships for each individual

General Requirements:

Submit both the completed “Family Interview” template and the written paper” to the instructor.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. 

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Delegation in Practice

Delegation in Practice

What does your State Board of Nursing (MA) say about Unlicensed Assistive Personnel and their role, and the role of the Registered Nurse? Describe the responsibilities of the Registered Nurse when delegating patient care tasks.

How does the ICU environment differ from a general medical-surgical unit as far as assigned responsibilities for Unlicensed Assistive Personnel?

Assignment Expectations:

Length: 750 to 1000 words

Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. These do not count towards the minimum word count for this assignment. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.

References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Please include at least two references

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Ethics in Science Communication Paper

Write a 1,250-word essay addressing the following issue:

Discuss scientific communication from an ethical perspective and how the scientific community attempts to monitor the information that is communicated. Reference at least three journal resources,

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. 

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now