CR Deliverable 5

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpAPa year ago22.07.20248Report issuefiles (2)Deliverable5ClinicalReasoningandClinicalJudgment.docxDeliverable5TemplateCR.docxDeliverable5ClinicalReasoningandClinicalJudgment.docxNUR4153CBE Section 01CBE Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment (11 Weeks) – CBE Online Course – 2024 Summer QuarterDeliverable 5 – Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical JudgmentTop of FormBottom of FormAssignment Content1.Top of FormCompetencyModify clinical judgment within an iterative, outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning and client needs.Student Success CriteriaView the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.ScenarioYou were recently invited to your alma mater to participate in a clinical judgment roundtable with alums. The audience includes nursing students enrolled in their last term before graduation. You were asked to prepare a one-to-two-page handout for the round table discussion to facilitate a conversation about the outcomes-based dynamic cycle of clinical reasoning and clinical judgment.InstructionsCreate a one-to-two-page handout that includes the following information:· Summarize a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales.· Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.· Choose the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Resources·APA 7th Edition Guide·Writing GuideSubmit a Word document with your handout.Bottom of Form·A – 4 – MasteryComprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales.0B – 3 – ProficiencySatisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales.0C – 2 – CompetenceSomewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales.0F – 1 – No PassPartial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0·Criterion 20% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryDetailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.0B – 3 – ProficiencySatisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources.0C – 2 – CompetenceSomewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources.0F – 1 – No PassPartial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0·Criterion 30% of total gradeA – 4 – MasterySkillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0B – 3 – ProficiencySatisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0C – 2 – CompetenceSomewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0F – 1 – No PassVague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0·Criterion 4Deliverable5TemplateCR.docxTitleStudent NameRasmussen UniversityNUR4153: Clinical Reasoning and Clinical JudgmentInstructor Mindy FadellDateTitle*Be sure to erase blue font*Be sure to use APA use in-text citations and references toprovide detailed rationale*This should be a handout· Choose the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Scenario*Describeclinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales. What did you see with the vital signs? What was seen with assessment? Current medication etcAddress Why this clinical Experience was Challenging: (use references to support this)Clinical Judgement ProcessCUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis·Individual/Internal Factors (for Nurse)Knowledge • Skills • Level of experience • Confidence • Specialty background • Personal characteristics • Prior experience, education, emotions, confidence, personal values, professional orientation, and experiential learning.Environmental/ External Factors (for Client Situation):Client observation • Physical environment • Resources • Health/medical records • Time pressure/urgency • Task complexity • Consequences and risks • Cultural considerations, distractions interruptions and professional autonomyInternal Cues for Nurse:External Cues for PatientPriority Hypothesis:? (Use reference support):Why is this the priority?(Use reference support):Intervention 1(also known as Solution)::What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale (Use reference support):Intervention 2:What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale:(Use reference support):Second HypothesisCUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis·Internal Cues for Nurse:External Cues for PatientSecond Hypothesis:Intervention 1:What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale:(Use reference support):Intervention 2:What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale: (Use reference support):ReferencesSeehttps://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa/referencesDeliverable 5 – Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment· Format: Create a one-to-two-page handout·ABCFCriterion 1Comprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales.Satisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales.Somewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales.Partial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales.Criterion 2Detailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.Satisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources.Somewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources.Partial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources.Criterion 3Skillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Satisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Somewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Vague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Criterion 4Formal style is demonstrated throughout the document, including no spelling, grammar, or APA format errors.Formal style is demonstrated throughout most of the document, with minor spelling, grammar, or APA format errors.Formal style is demonstrated in some parts of the document but not maintained throughout. Some spelling, grammar, or APA format errors present.Lack of formal style in the document. Numerous spelling, grammar, or APA format errors are present.Deliverable5TemplateCR.docxTitleStudent NameRasmussen UniversityNUR4153: Clinical Reasoning and Clinical JudgmentInstructor Mindy FadellDateTitle*Be sure to erase blue font*Be sure to use APA use in-text citations and references toprovide detailed rationale*This should be a handout· Choose the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Scenario*Describeclinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales. What did you see with the vital signs? What was seen with assessment? Current medication etcAddress Why this clinical Experience was Challenging: (use references to support this)Clinical Judgement ProcessCUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis·Individual/Internal Factors (for Nurse)Knowledge • Skills • Level of experience • Confidence • Specialty background • Personal characteristics • Prior experience, education, emotions, confidence, personal values, professional orientation, and experiential learning.Environmental/ External Factors (for Client Situation):Client observation • Physical environment • Resources • Health/medical records • Time pressure/urgency • Task complexity • Consequences and risks • Cultural considerations, distractions interruptions and professional autonomyInternal Cues for Nurse:External Cues for PatientPriority Hypothesis:? (Use reference support):Why is this the priority?(Use reference support):Intervention 1(also known as Solution)::What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale (Use reference support):Intervention 2:What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale:(Use reference support):Second HypothesisCUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis·Internal Cues for Nurse:External Cues for PatientSecond Hypothesis:Intervention 1:What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale:(Use reference support):Intervention 2:What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale: (Use reference support):ReferencesSeehttps://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa/referencesDeliverable 5 – Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment· Format: Create a one-to-two-page handout·ABCFCriterion 1Comprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales.Satisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales.Somewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales.Partial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales.Criterion 2Detailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.Satisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources.Somewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources.Partial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources.Criterion 3Skillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Satisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Somewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Vague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Criterion 4Formal style is demonstrated throughout the document, including no spelling, grammar, or APA format errors.Formal style is demonstrated throughout most of the document, with minor spelling, grammar, or APA format errors.Formal style is demonstrated in some parts of the document but not maintained throughout. Some spelling, grammar, or APA format errors present.Lack of formal style in the document. Numerous spelling, grammar, or APA format errors are present.Deliverable5ClinicalReasoningandClinicalJudgment.docxNUR4153CBE Section 01CBE Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment (11 Weeks) – CBE Online Course – 2024 Summer QuarterDeliverable 5 – Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical JudgmentTop of FormBottom of FormAssignment Content1.Top of FormCompetencyModify clinical judgment within an iterative, outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning and client needs.Student Success CriteriaView the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.ScenarioYou were recently invited to your alma mater to participate in a clinical judgment roundtable with alums. The audience includes nursing students enrolled in their last term before graduation. You were asked to prepare a one-to-two-page handout for the round table discussion to facilitate a conversation about the outcomes-based dynamic cycle of clinical reasoning and clinical judgment.InstructionsCreate a one-to-two-page handout that includes the following information:· Summarize a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales.· Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.· Choose the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Resources·APA 7th Edition Guide·Writing GuideSubmit a Word document with your handout.Bottom of Form·A – 4 – MasteryComprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales.0B – 3 – ProficiencySatisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales.0C – 2 – CompetenceSomewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales.0F – 1 – No PassPartial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0·Criterion 20% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryDetailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.0B – 3 – ProficiencySatisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources.0C – 2 – CompetenceSomewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources.0F – 1 – No PassPartial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0·Criterion 30% of total gradeA – 4 – MasterySkillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0B – 3 – ProficiencySatisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0C – 2 – CompetenceSomewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0F – 1 – No PassVague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0·Criterion 4Deliverable5TemplateCR.docxTitleStudent NameRasmussen UniversityNUR4153: Clinical Reasoning and Clinical JudgmentInstructor Mindy FadellDateTitle*Be sure to erase blue font*Be sure to use APA use in-text citations and references toprovide detailed rationale*This should be a handout· Choose the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Scenario*Describeclinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales. What did you see with the vital signs? What was seen with assessment? Current medication etcAddress Why this clinical Experience was Challenging: (use references to support this)Clinical Judgement ProcessCUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis·Individual/Internal Factors (for Nurse)Knowledge • Skills • Level of experience • Confidence • Specialty background • Personal characteristics • Prior experience, education, emotions, confidence, personal values, professional orientation, and experiential learning.Environmental/ External Factors (for Client Situation):Client observation • Physical environment • Resources • Health/medical records • Time pressure/urgency • Task complexity • Consequences and risks • Cultural considerations, distractions interruptions and professional autonomyInternal Cues for Nurse:External Cues for PatientPriority Hypothesis:? (Use reference support):Why is this the priority?(Use reference support):Intervention 1(also known as Solution)::What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale (Use reference support):Intervention 2:What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale:(Use reference support):Second HypothesisCUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis·Internal Cues for Nurse:External Cues for PatientSecond Hypothesis:Intervention 1:What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale:(Use reference support):Intervention 2:What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale: (Use reference support):ReferencesSeehttps://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa/referencesDeliverable 5 – Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment· Format: Create a one-to-two-page handout·ABCFCriterion 1Comprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales.Satisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales.Somewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales.Partial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales.Criterion 2Detailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.Satisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources.Somewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources.Partial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources.Criterion 3Skillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Satisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Somewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Vague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Criterion 4Formal style is demonstrated throughout the document, including no spelling, grammar, or APA format errors.Formal style is demonstrated throughout most of the document, with minor spelling, grammar, or APA format errors.Formal style is demonstrated in some parts of the document but not maintained throughout. Some spelling, grammar, or APA format errors present.Lack of formal style in the document. Numerous spelling, grammar, or APA format errors are present.Deliverable5ClinicalReasoningandClinicalJudgment.docxNUR4153CBE Section 01CBE Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment (11 Weeks) – CBE Online Course – 2024 Summer QuarterDeliverable 5 – Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical JudgmentTop of FormBottom of FormAssignment Content1.Top of FormCompetencyModify clinical judgment within an iterative, outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning and client needs.Student Success CriteriaView the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.ScenarioYou were recently invited to your alma mater to participate in a clinical judgment roundtable with alums. The audience includes nursing students enrolled in their last term before graduation. You were asked to prepare a one-to-two-page handout for the round table discussion to facilitate a conversation about the outcomes-based dynamic cycle of clinical reasoning and clinical judgment.InstructionsCreate a one-to-two-page handout that includes the following information:· Summarize a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales.· Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.· Choose the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Resources·APA 7th Edition Guide·Writing GuideSubmit a Word document with your handout.Bottom of Form·A – 4 – MasteryComprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales.0B – 3 – ProficiencySatisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales.0C – 2 – CompetenceSomewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales.0F – 1 – No PassPartial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0·Criterion 20% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryDetailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.0B – 3 – ProficiencySatisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources.0C – 2 – CompetenceSomewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources.0F – 1 – No PassPartial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0·Criterion 30% of total gradeA – 4 – MasterySkillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0B – 3 – ProficiencySatisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0C – 2 – CompetenceSomewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0F – 1 – No PassVague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0·Criterion 4Deliverable5TemplateCR.docxTitleStudent NameRasmussen UniversityNUR4153: Clinical Reasoning and Clinical JudgmentInstructor Mindy FadellDateTitle*Be sure to erase blue font*Be sure to use APA use in-text citations and references toprovide detailed rationale*This should be a handout· Choose the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Scenario*Describeclinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales. What did you see with the vital signs? What was seen with assessment? Current medication etcAddress Why this clinical Experience was Challenging: (use references to support this)Clinical Judgement ProcessCUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis·Individual/Internal Factors (for Nurse)Knowledge • Skills • Level of experience • Confidence • Specialty background • Personal characteristics • Prior experience, education, emotions, confidence, personal values, professional orientation, and experiential learning.Environmental/ External Factors (for Client Situation):Client observation • Physical environment • Resources • Health/medical records • Time pressure/urgency • Task complexity • Consequences and risks • Cultural considerations, distractions interruptions and professional autonomyInternal Cues for Nurse:External Cues for PatientPriority Hypothesis:? (Use reference support):Why is this the priority?(Use reference support):Intervention 1(also known as Solution)::What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale (Use reference support):Intervention 2:What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale:(Use reference support):Second HypothesisCUE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS *Address for each hypothesis·Internal Cues for Nurse:External Cues for PatientSecond Hypothesis:Intervention 1:What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale:(Use reference support):Intervention 2:What is the next important intervention? What cues were significant? After you analyze your cues, what was your priority hypothesis? Describe themost appropriate client interventionsupported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Rationale: (Use reference support):ReferencesSeehttps://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa/referencesDeliverable 5 – Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment· Format: Create a one-to-two-page handout·ABCFCriterion 1Comprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales.Satisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales.Somewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales.Partial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales.Criterion 2Detailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.Satisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources.Somewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources.Partial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources.Criterion 3Skillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Satisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Somewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Vague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.Criterion 4Formal style is demonstrated throughout the document, including no spelling, grammar, or APA format errors.Formal style is demonstrated throughout most of the document, with minor spelling, grammar, or APA format errors.Formal style is demonstrated in some parts of the document but not maintained throughout. Some spelling, grammar, or APA format errors present.Lack of formal style in the document. Numerous spelling, grammar, or APA format errors are present.12Bids(56)Miss DeannaDr. Ellen RMMISS HILLARY A+Dr. Aylin JMSheryl HoganProf Double RDr. Sarah BlakeProWritingGurufirstclass tutorPROF_ALISTERDemi_RoseFiona DavaMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverJudithTutorDiscount AssigngrA+de plusColeen AndersonIsabella HarvardBrilliant GeekShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Industry Profile: Part 1 (Acquisition & Procurement Risk )I need help with marketing assignmentNeed help in project managementCan some one helpTutor helpWhat changes took place in the Soviet Union under Khrushchev’s leadership. Would Stalin have been able to maintain his power…Week 6NEED IN 7 HOURS or LESS NO EXCEPTIONSWeek 4 java commision calculatorfinance law homework

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now