Discuss the significance of Recovery principles in the provision of care for individuals with mental health problems”

CRITERIA

High Distinction (HD)

Distinction (DN)

Credit (CR)

Pass (P)

Fail (NN)

Criterion 1:

Discussion of key aspects of the Recovery approach for mental
health care 

Weighting: 40%

Demonstrated exceptional knowledge and understanding of the
Recovery approach, with inclusion of critical analysis.

Demonstrated very good knowledge and understanding of the
Recovery approach, with inclusion of clear examples discussed meaningfully.

Demonstrated good knowledge and understanding of the Recovery
approach.

Demonstrated fair knowledge and understanding of the Recovery
approach.

Did not demonstrate knowledge and
understanding of the Recovery approach. 

No evidence of clear
descriptions.

Criterion 2:

Discussion of issues relating to
mental health recovery

Weighting: 40%

Presented a comprehensive
discussion of key points with critical analysis of substance in succinct and
cogent manner.

Integrated a variety of credible
literature to support discussions and substantiate key points and ideas in
promoting meaningful mental health recovery.

Incorporated some relevant
evidence-based sources to support discussions in relation to its application
in mental health care.

Evidence of basic descriptions of issues in relation to the
application of the Recovery approach in promoting mental health
recovery. 

Very minimal or no references to
appropriate literature to support discussions of relevance, and/or failed to
use credible academic sources.

Criterion 3:

Overall presentation of academic writing and referencing

Weighting: 20%

Essay is presented in excellent
consistent academic style, with key points cogently integrated for fluency –
virtually free from spelling and grammatical errors.

Excellent integration of
pertinent referencing throughout.

Essay is presented with clear logical structure that helps
contain the substance of discussions coherently along with accuracy of
referencing.

Essay is written in a structured
manner for easy readability of key points. 

Minimal spelling and grammatical
errors, and good referencing application.

There is evidence of provision of
some structure aimed at presenting points that can be understood. Fair number
of spelling and grammatical errors detracting from readability.

Errors noted in the application
of referencing style.

Essay is incoherent – with no
clear structure to provide meaning. Failed to present information in an
academic style with numerous spelling, grammatical and/or terminology errors.

Incorrect referencing style or
made numerous referencing errors.