Evaluation 6

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpplease follow all directions2 years ago23.10.202315Report issuefiles (1)ModuleSixMemoGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdfModuleSixMemoGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdfIHP 604 Module Six Memo Guidelines and RubricOverviewThroughout this module, you have been learning about evaluation methods. In this assignment, you will describe different evaluation methods for a healthcare quality improvement initiative,justify this method after its initial launch date, and discuss how evaluation methods for this initiative should change over time. By successfully completing this assignment, you will gain theknowledge and skills required to complete a portion of your project due later in this course.For the purposes of this assignment, imagine that you are employed in the quality department of a hospital. Your hospital recently implemented an ongoing professional practice evaluation(OPPE) using criteria speci�c to The Joint Commission medical staff standard. The Joint Commission (E-dition) standard that is applied during the OPPE is:Introduction to Standard MS.08.01.03 Ongoing Professional Practice EvaluationThe ongoing professional practice evaluation allows the organization to identify professional practice trends that impact on quality of care and patient safety. Such identi�cation mayrequire intervention by the organized medical staff. The criteria used in the ongoing professional practice evaluation may include the following:Review of operative and other clinical procedure(s) performed and their outcomesPattern of blood and pharmaceutical usage (obtain from laboratory and pharmacy directors, respectively)Requests for tests and proceduresLength of stay patternsMorbidity and mortality dataPractitioner’s use of consultantsOther relevant criteria as determined by the organized medical staffThe information used in the ongoing professional practice evaluation may be acquired through the following:Periodic chart reviewDirect observationMonitoring of diagnostic and treatment techniquesDiscussion with other individuals involved in the care of each patient. including consulting physicians, assistants at surgery, and nursing and administrative personnelAs a result of the OPPE process, it was found that two credentialed providers, two urology surgeons speci�cally, have been found to be de�cient on the OPPE in the area of infections: bothsurgeons’ post-operative urosurgery patients have been experiencing antibiotic-resistant urinary tract infections. Not only does this impact the quality of the care per the standards, but it canalso impact the social marketing of the hospital, increase the costs of care, increase patient length of stay, and decrease reimbursement.https://e-dition.jcrinc.com/ProxyLogin.aspx?lnk=02a12d392046https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=9568&url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.snhu.edu%2Fcontent%2Fenforced%2F1394627-IHP-604-Q1480-OL-TRAD-GR.23TW1%2FModule%2520Six%2520Memo%2520Guidelines%2520and%2520Rubric.html&lang=en_us&readid=d2l_read_element_1Therefore, your task is to recommend an evaluation method for 3, 6, and 12 months intended to evaluate the reduction in infection rates as part of a quality improvement initiative. Then, youwill need to justify your evaluation method and why the method(s) should be employed after the initiative launch. Lastly, you will discuss how this evaluation method should change over timeto accurately assess the initiative over time. As you complete this assignment, re�ect on the following: How do you address the urinary tract infection rates in periods of 3, 6, and 12 months,and how will you lay out a plan for these urology surgeons? After all, the medical executive committee (MEC) of your hospital is held accountable to ful�ll the OPPE requirements. If these twosurgeons continue to have post-operative patients with infections, the MEC will determine what happens next. The MEC is committed to reducing patient harm and, speci�cally, they arecommitted to having an active OPPE process to drive quality improvements.PromptWrite a memo that is to be shared with the MEC. This memo will discuss the evaluation methods that could be employed to address the situation described in the scenario. Use at least twoscholarly sources to support your claims.Speci�cally, you must address the following rubric criteria:Evaluation methods at 3, 6, and 12 months: Recommend evaluation methods for reducing infection rates as a quality improvement initiative at 3, 6, and 12 months.Justify an evaluation method: Justify an evaluation method for healthcare quality improvement initiative at 3, 6, and 12 months after initiative launch.Why evaluation methods change: Discusses how evaluation methods for healthcare quality improvement initiatives should change over time, depending on the change of infection ratesover time.What to SubmitSubmit this assignment as a 3-to 4-page, double-spaced memo. You should cite at least two sources. Sources should be cited according to APA style. If you need writing support, you can accessthe Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.Module Six Memo RubricCriteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueEvaluation Methods at 3, 6,and 12 MonthsExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageRecommends evaluationmethods for qualityimprovement initiative at 3, 6,and 12 monthsShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 35Justi�cation of an EvaluationMethodExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageJusti�es evaluation method forhealthcare qualityimprovement initiative at 3, 6,and 12 months after initiativelaunchShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 20https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1394627&type=content&rcode=snhu-1412232Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueWhy Evaluation MethodsChangeExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDiscusses how evaluationmethods for healthcare qualityimprovement initiatives shouldchange over timeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 20Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful mannerClearly conveys meaning withcorrect grammar, sentencestructure, and spelling,demonstrating anunderstanding of audience andpurposeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, negativelyimpacting readabilitySubmission has critical errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, preventingunderstanding of ideas15Scholarly Sources Incorporates more than twoscholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or useof sources is exceptionallyinsightfulIncorporates two scholarly,current (within the last �veyears) sources that supportclaimsIncorporates fewer than twoscholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or notall sources support claimsDoes not incorporate sources 5APA Style Formats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with no errorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with fewer than �veerrorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with �ve or more errorsDoes not format in-textcitations and reference listaccording to APA style5Total: 100%ModuleSixMemoGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdfIHP 604 Module Six Memo Guidelines and RubricOverviewThroughout this module, you have been learning about evaluation methods. In this assignment, you will describe different evaluation methods for a healthcare quality improvement initiative,justify this method after its initial launch date, and discuss how evaluation methods for this initiative should change over time. By successfully completing this assignment, you will gain theknowledge and skills required to complete a portion of your project due later in this course.For the purposes of this assignment, imagine that you are employed in the quality department of a hospital. Your hospital recently implemented an ongoing professional practice evaluation(OPPE) using criteria speci�c to The Joint Commission medical staff standard. The Joint Commission (E-dition) standard that is applied during the OPPE is:Introduction to Standard MS.08.01.03 Ongoing Professional Practice EvaluationThe ongoing professional practice evaluation allows the organization to identify professional practice trends that impact on quality of care and patient safety. Such identi�cation mayrequire intervention by the organized medical staff. The criteria used in the ongoing professional practice evaluation may include the following:Review of operative and other clinical procedure(s) performed and their outcomesPattern of blood and pharmaceutical usage (obtain from laboratory and pharmacy directors, respectively)Requests for tests and proceduresLength of stay patternsMorbidity and mortality dataPractitioner’s use of consultantsOther relevant criteria as determined by the organized medical staffThe information used in the ongoing professional practice evaluation may be acquired through the following:Periodic chart reviewDirect observationMonitoring of diagnostic and treatment techniquesDiscussion with other individuals involved in the care of each patient. including consulting physicians, assistants at surgery, and nursing and administrative personnelAs a result of the OPPE process, it was found that two credentialed providers, two urology surgeons speci�cally, have been found to be de�cient on the OPPE in the area of infections: bothsurgeons’ post-operative urosurgery patients have been experiencing antibiotic-resistant urinary tract infections. Not only does this impact the quality of the care per the standards, but it canalso impact the social marketing of the hospital, increase the costs of care, increase patient length of stay, and decrease reimbursement.https://e-dition.jcrinc.com/ProxyLogin.aspx?lnk=02a12d392046https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=9568&url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.snhu.edu%2Fcontent%2Fenforced%2F1394627-IHP-604-Q1480-OL-TRAD-GR.23TW1%2FModule%2520Six%2520Memo%2520Guidelines%2520and%2520Rubric.html&lang=en_us&readid=d2l_read_element_1Therefore, your task is to recommend an evaluation method for 3, 6, and 12 months intended to evaluate the reduction in infection rates as part of a quality improvement initiative. Then, youwill need to justify your evaluation method and why the method(s) should be employed after the initiative launch. Lastly, you will discuss how this evaluation method should change over timeto accurately assess the initiative over time. As you complete this assignment, re�ect on the following: How do you address the urinary tract infection rates in periods of 3, 6, and 12 months,and how will you lay out a plan for these urology surgeons? After all, the medical executive committee (MEC) of your hospital is held accountable to ful�ll the OPPE requirements. If these twosurgeons continue to have post-operative patients with infections, the MEC will determine what happens next. The MEC is committed to reducing patient harm and, speci�cally, they arecommitted to having an active OPPE process to drive quality improvements.PromptWrite a memo that is to be shared with the MEC. This memo will discuss the evaluation methods that could be employed to address the situation described in the scenario. Use at least twoscholarly sources to support your claims.Speci�cally, you must address the following rubric criteria:Evaluation methods at 3, 6, and 12 months: Recommend evaluation methods for reducing infection rates as a quality improvement initiative at 3, 6, and 12 months.Justify an evaluation method: Justify an evaluation method for healthcare quality improvement initiative at 3, 6, and 12 months after initiative launch.Why evaluation methods change: Discusses how evaluation methods for healthcare quality improvement initiatives should change over time, depending on the change of infection ratesover time.What to SubmitSubmit this assignment as a 3-to 4-page, double-spaced memo. You should cite at least two sources. Sources should be cited according to APA style. If you need writing support, you can accessthe Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.Module Six Memo RubricCriteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueEvaluation Methods at 3, 6,and 12 MonthsExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageRecommends evaluationmethods for qualityimprovement initiative at 3, 6,and 12 monthsShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 35Justi�cation of an EvaluationMethodExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageJusti�es evaluation method forhealthcare qualityimprovement initiative at 3, 6,and 12 months after initiativelaunchShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 20https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/common/dialogs/quickLink/quickLink.d2l?ou=1394627&type=content&rcode=snhu-1412232Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueWhy Evaluation MethodsChangeExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDiscusses how evaluationmethods for healthcare qualityimprovement initiatives shouldchange over timeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 20Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful mannerClearly conveys meaning withcorrect grammar, sentencestructure, and spelling,demonstrating anunderstanding of audience andpurposeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, negativelyimpacting readabilitySubmission has critical errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, preventingunderstanding of ideas15Scholarly Sources Incorporates more than twoscholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or useof sources is exceptionallyinsightfulIncorporates two scholarly,current (within the last �veyears) sources that supportclaimsIncorporates fewer than twoscholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or notall sources support claimsDoes not incorporate sources 5APA Style Formats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with no errorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with fewer than �veerrorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with �ve or more errorsDoes not format in-textcitations and reference listaccording to APA style5Total: 100%Bids(57)Dr. Ellen RMPROF_ALISTERSheryl Hoganfirstclass tutorProf Double RFiona DavaMUSYOKIONES A+Isabella HarvardDr CloverMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssignJudithTutorpacesetters2121STELLAR GEEK A+Jahky BProWritingGuruColeen AndersonDr. Everleigh_JKBrilliant GeekWIZARD_KIMShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Peer Response 3oe – 2 copies- hillaryIntroduction to nursingIT AssignmentOne page per question…Briefly summarize the facts of the case 2. List the primary issues or source of conflict in the case 3. What conflict styles are identified in the case? 4. Identify any conflict resolution theory that could explain the conflict.Both parts needs to be done within 12 hrs from nowThe IOM published report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,”MGTWrite an abstract on Digital Forensics Techniques?Managerial Economics – 6 (2)

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now