Leading Organizations for Quality Improvement Initiative

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpTOOLS FOR MEASURING QUALITY2 years ago12.12.202340Report issuefiles (2)Rubric5.docxwk.4.assign.1.leadingorganizationsassignment.docxRubric5.docxRubricNURS_8302_Week4_Assignment2_RubricNURS_8302_Week4_Assignment2_RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the three rate-based measures of quality you selected, and explain why.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly describes in detail three rate-based measures of quality…. The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the selection of the three rate-based measures described.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes three rate-based measures of quality…. The response provides accurate details that support the selection of the three rate-based measures described.15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes three rate-based measures of quality…. OR… The response describes less than three rate-based measures of quality…. The response provides inaccurate or vague details that may support the selection of the rate-based measures described.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes three rate-based measures of quality, or it is missing…. The response provides inaccurate and vague details that do not support the selection of the rate-based measures described, or it is missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDeconstruct each rate-based measure to include the definition of each measure, explanation of the numerical description of how the measure is constructed, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared externally, explanation of whether or not the measure is risk adjusted, and a description of the how goals might be set for each measure. Be specific, and provide examples.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail each of the three rate-based measures…. The response accurately and clearly explains all elements of each measure, including: the definition of the measure, explanation of the numerical description, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared, explanation of risk, and description of goals…. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains each of the three rate-based measures…. The response accurately explains the elements of each measure, including: the definition of the measure, explanation of the numerical description, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared, explanation of risk, and description of goals…. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains each of the three rate-based measures…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the elements of each measure…. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains each of the three rate-based measures, or it is missing…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the elements of each measure, or it is missing…. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described, or it is missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. Be specific as to the setting.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. … The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. … The response provides accurate details that support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. … The response inaccurately or vaguely provides details that may support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting, or it is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely provides details that do not support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described, or it is missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how each rate-based measure you selected relates to patient safety, to the cost of poor quality, and to the overall cost of healthcare delivery. Be specific, and provide examples.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how each rate-based measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery…. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery…. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery…. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery, or it is missing…. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described, or it is missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 100wk.4.assign.1.leadingorganizationsassignment.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new windowwk.4.assign.1.leadingorganizationsassignment.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new windowRubric5.docxRubricNURS_8302_Week4_Assignment2_RubricNURS_8302_Week4_Assignment2_RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the three rate-based measures of quality you selected, and explain why.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly describes in detail three rate-based measures of quality…. The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the selection of the three rate-based measures described.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes three rate-based measures of quality…. The response provides accurate details that support the selection of the three rate-based measures described.15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes three rate-based measures of quality…. OR… The response describes less than three rate-based measures of quality…. The response provides inaccurate or vague details that may support the selection of the rate-based measures described.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes three rate-based measures of quality, or it is missing…. The response provides inaccurate and vague details that do not support the selection of the rate-based measures described, or it is missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDeconstruct each rate-based measure to include the definition of each measure, explanation of the numerical description of how the measure is constructed, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared externally, explanation of whether or not the measure is risk adjusted, and a description of the how goals might be set for each measure. Be specific, and provide examples.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail each of the three rate-based measures…. The response accurately and clearly explains all elements of each measure, including: the definition of the measure, explanation of the numerical description, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared, explanation of risk, and description of goals…. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains each of the three rate-based measures…. The response accurately explains the elements of each measure, including: the definition of the measure, explanation of the numerical description, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared, explanation of risk, and description of goals…. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains each of the three rate-based measures…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the elements of each measure…. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains each of the three rate-based measures, or it is missing…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the elements of each measure, or it is missing…. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described, or it is missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. Be specific as to the setting.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. … The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. … The response provides accurate details that support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. … The response inaccurately or vaguely provides details that may support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting, or it is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely provides details that do not support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described, or it is missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how each rate-based measure you selected relates to patient safety, to the cost of poor quality, and to the overall cost of healthcare delivery. Be specific, and provide examples.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how each rate-based measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery…. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery…. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery…. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery, or it is missing…. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described, or it is missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 100wk.4.assign.1.leadingorganizationsassignment.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new windowRubric5.docxRubricNURS_8302_Week4_Assignment2_RubricNURS_8302_Week4_Assignment2_RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the three rate-based measures of quality you selected, and explain why.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly describes in detail three rate-based measures of quality…. The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the selection of the three rate-based measures described.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately describes three rate-based measures of quality…. The response provides accurate details that support the selection of the three rate-based measures described.15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes three rate-based measures of quality…. OR… The response describes less than three rate-based measures of quality…. The response provides inaccurate or vague details that may support the selection of the rate-based measures described.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes three rate-based measures of quality, or it is missing…. The response provides inaccurate and vague details that do not support the selection of the rate-based measures described, or it is missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDeconstruct each rate-based measure to include the definition of each measure, explanation of the numerical description of how the measure is constructed, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared externally, explanation of whether or not the measure is risk adjusted, and a description of the how goals might be set for each measure. Be specific, and provide examples.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail each of the three rate-based measures…. The response accurately and clearly explains all elements of each measure, including: the definition of the measure, explanation of the numerical description, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared, explanation of risk, and description of goals…. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains each of the three rate-based measures…. The response accurately explains the elements of each measure, including: the definition of the measure, explanation of the numerical description, explanation of how the data is collected, description of how the measure is compared, explanation of risk, and description of goals…. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains each of the three rate-based measures…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the elements of each measure…. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains each of the three rate-based measures, or it is missing…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the elements of each measure, or it is missing…. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the three rate-based measures described, or it is missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. Be specific as to the setting.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. … The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. … The response provides accurate details that support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting. … The response inaccurately or vaguely provides details that may support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains the importance of each measure to a chosen clinical organization and setting, or it is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely provides details that do not support the selection of the three rate-based measures and the clinical organization or setting described, or it is missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how each rate-based measure you selected relates to patient safety, to the cost of poor quality, and to the overall cost of healthcare delivery. Be specific, and provide examples.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail how each rate-based measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery…. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery…. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.15 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery…. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains how each measure relates to patient safety, cost of poor quality, and overall cost of healthcare delivery, or it is missing…. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the rate-based measures described, or it is missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.... No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting - English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 100wk.4.assign.1.leadingorganizationsassignment.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new window12Bids(59)MathProgrammingabdul_rehman_Emily ClareSTELLAR GEEK A+Prof Double RDoctor.NamiraYoung NyanyaProf. TOPGRADEJahky BProWritingGuruSheryl HoganDr. Adeline ZoeAshley EllieDr. Sophie MilesTutor Cyrus KenWIZARD_KIMColeen AndersonPremiumBrainy BrianPROF_ALISTERShow All Bidsother Questions(10)a response to a filmMGT450 Week 2 Discussion 1 and 2Psy 315 Week 4 Individual AssignmentBUSN 115 Week 1 Discussion Question 1, In What Manner is Wal-Mart Influencing AmericaNancy Carol onlyCAN YOU HELP ME??? 5 STAR WORK ONLY!!! ETHICS and SOCIAL JUSTICENormalizationAccounts Li 14152HLT-362V (HLT-362V-O103) Week 3 Benchmark: Hypothesis Testing Excel WorksheetDistinguished Budget Presentation Award

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now