m9 project

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpReferenceplease follow directions, use the provide attachments for reference.2 years ago03.11.202325Report issuefiles (3)quickCheckinitiativeproject.docxprocessmatrics.docxProjectGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdfquickCheckinitiativeproject.docx2IHP 604 Module Three Project Preparation Quick CheckPrecious TeasleySouthern New Hampshire UniversityIHP-604-Q1480 Healthcare Quality Improvement 23TW1Professor Barbara BrophySeptember 29th, 2023IHP 604 Module Three Project PreparationHealthcare OrganizationThe healthcare organisation chosen is Mass General Brigham. Mass General Brigham is in the state of Massachusetts in Boston and is considered the biggest healthcare facility based on the number of employees. The hospital has more than 74,000 employees working as physicians, nurses, support staff, researchers, and carers (Mass General Brigham, 2023). The healthcare institutions under Mass General Brigham like the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) have also excelled, as they are the largest private hospitals in the US to receive money from the National Institutes of Health. The Mass General Brigham institutions maintain a combined research budget of more than $1.7 billion (Mass General Brigham, 2023). The healthcare institution has more than 200 residency and fellowship programmes, making it one of the most extensive and competitive medical education programmes in the nation. Medical students and residents often rotate between academic medical centers, community hospitals, and specialty hospitals.Public-facing dataThe healthcare institution has in the past shown its desire to work with communities surrounding the hospital. In its 2022 community assessment report, the institution highlighted various challenges facing surrounding communities, like mental health and drug misuse. The community assessment report for 2022 has the information that will be needed for the project to establish a clear quality improvement initiative.Why the Organisation and Public Facing DataThe choice of the organisation is based on its size, the expenditure that goes towards research, and its work with communities. Previous work with communities for the organisation has been successful, with the organisation initiating projects that have helped the communities. The public-facing data is readily available on the internet and on the organization’s website. This makes it easier to access the data that will be effective for the project.ReferencesMass General Brigham. (2023). About Mass General Brigham. retrieved fromhttps://innovation.massgeneralbrigham.org/about/about-mass-general-brighamMass General Hospital. (2022). Community Health Needs Assessment Report 2022. Retrieved fromhttps://www.massgeneral.org/assets/mgh/pdf/community-health/cchi/2022_chna_rreport.pdfprocessmatrics.docx4Process Metrics, Outcome Metrics, and Data NeedsStudent’s NameInstitution AffiliationCourse Name & NumberInstructor’s NameDateProcess Metrics, Outcome Metrics, and Data NeedsMass General Brigham, a major healthcare facility, uses process and outcome measures to evaluate its quality improvement project (Dukhanin et al., 2018). Let’s explore process and result metrics and their justifications:a) Process Metric: Hospital Readmission Rateb) Outcome Metric: Patient Satisfaction ScoreJustificationa)Process Metric (Hospital Readmission Rate):Healthcare efficiency and efficacy are measured by this statistic. The hospital readmission rate is the proportion of patients readmitted within 30 days following discharge (Dukhanin et al., 2018). A reduced hospital readmission rate means that patients are getting proper care during hospitalization and transferring easily to post-discharge treatment.b)Outcome Metric (Patient Satisfaction Score):Patient happiness is the ultimate aim of every healthcare improvement project. Surveys collect patient satisfaction levels, which represent their care perspective (Doupe et al., 2019). Better patient satisfaction levels imply superior treatment and happiness with their healthcare experience.How the Process Metric can help gauge progress toward the Outcome Metric:The link between these measures is important. By monitoring and decreasing hospital readmission rates, healthcare institutions can improve patient satisfaction.Here is the process:a)Reduced hospital Readmissions:A decreased hospital readmission rate indicates that initial therapy was successful in reducing problems and relapses. Successful recoveries reduce hospitalizations (Reddy et al., 2019).b)Improved Care Transitions:The organization may improve discharge planning, follow-up care, medication management, and patient education to reduce readmissions (Reddy et al., 2019). These enhancements may increase patient happiness and experience.c)Positive patient feedback:Positive encounters lead to improved survey satisfaction rates for patients. This is particularly true if they believe their care staff was attentive, communicated well, and supported them throughout their post-hospital transition (Reddy et al., 2019).In conclusion, the hospital readmission rate is a key indication of patient satisfaction. Mass General Brigham can increase patient satisfaction by minimizing readmissions via procedural changes. This shows how process measurements may help healthcare quality improvement projects achieve their goals.ReferencesDoupe, P., Faghmous, J., & Basu, S. (2019). Machine Learning for Health Services Researchers.Value in Health,22(7), 808–815.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.012Dukhanin, V., Topazian, R., & DeCamp, M. (2018). Metrics and evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decisionmaking: A systematic review.International Journal of Health Policy and Management,7(10), 889–903.https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.43Reddy, S., Allan, S., Coghlan, S., & Cooper, P. (2019). A governance model for the application of AI in health care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,27(3), 491–497.https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz192ProjectGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdfIHP 604 Project Guidelines and RubricCompetenciesIn this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competencies:Analyze healthcare quality metricsDetermine an opportunity for a healthcare improvement initiativeRecommend a healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation processOverviewThroughout this course, you have learned how to analyze healthcare quality metrics, determine an opportunity for a healthcare improvement initiative, and recommend a healthcare qualityimprovement implementation plan and evaluation process. In this project, you will demonstrate the knowledge and skills needed to improve healthcare delivery for an organization. Choose aclinically or non-clinically based healthcare organization that releases public-facing data. You may decide to select a local organization or one where you work or have been a patient. For thisproject, you will be creating a healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation report in which you will describe the issue at the outset, the setting, the problem to be solved, theparties affected, and the reason why the issue is important to address. You will recommend a concise implementation plan and describe in detail how you plan to evaluate if yourimplementation was successful.ScenarioFor the purposes of this project, imagine that you work on a team that monitors quality and risk management within the organization you selected. Whether you are coming from a nursing lensor a healthcare administration lens, your task is to analyze the healthcare quality metrics for the organization you selected. Based upon your analysis of the data, you will determine anopportunity for a healthcare improvement initiative for the organization. Then, you will provide a recommendation so that the organization can improve the quality and/or safety of itshealthcare delivery. Finally, describe how you will evaluate the effectiveness of your plan.DirectionsYour report should contain the following sections:1. Metric analysis: Analyze the healthcare quality metrics of your chosen healthcare organization based on their public data.A. Interpret the data and metrics related to the effectiveness of a healthcare organization.B. Assess the validity and quality of the healthcare quality improvement data that support the need for the improvement opportunity you will include in your report.https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=9568&url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.snhu.edu%2Fcontent%2Fenforced%2F1394627-IHP-604-Q1480-OL-TRAD-GR.23TW1%2FProject%2520Guidelines%2520and%2520Rubric.html&lang=en_us&readid=d2l_read_element_1C. Derive insights and opportunities from the data.2. Opportunity for improvement: Determine an opportunity for a healthcare quality improvement initiative for the healthcare organization you selected.A. Explain how the metrics drive an opportunity for improvement.B. Determine an evidence-based quality improvement tool for addressing an improvement opportunity.C. Apply a problem-solving framework or tool to identify what could have been done differently based on the metrics and show and/or describe your application of the tool orframework.3. Recommendation: Provide a recommendation for the organization you selected so that the organization can improve the quality and/or safety of its healthcare delivery and determinehow to evaluate if your recommendations were successful.A. Develop a healthcare quality improvement initiative using a framework, such as plan-do-study-act (PDSA), root cause analysis (RCA), and failure mode effect analysis (FMEA).B. Determine an evaluation method for a healthcare quality improvement initiative for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and describe that method in detail.C. Determine data-collection tool(s).Your project should provide evidence from at least �ve scholarly sources.What to SubmitTo complete this project, you must submit the following:Healthcare Quality Improvement Initiative and Evaluation ReportSubmit your healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation report as a Word document. Your submission should be approximately 4 to 6 pages with 12-point Times New Romanfont, double spacing, and one-inch margins. You must also include an APA-style title page. At least �ve sources within the past �ve years should be cited according to APA style.Supporting MaterialsThe following resources support your work on the project:Website: Find and Compare Nursing Homes, Hospitals, and Other Providers Near YouThis website will help you �nd and compare homes, hospitals, and other providers near you.Website: AHRQThe Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website will help you �nd metrics from healthcare providers. The data visualizations under the Data tab are also worth exploring. AHRQ alsohas toolkits and best/leading practices that you may want to refer to.https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/?providerType=Physician&redirect=truehttps://www.ahrq.gov/Project RubricCriteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueMetric Analysis:InterpretationExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageInterprets data and metricsrelated to effectiveness of ahealthcare organizationShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Metric Analysis: Validity andQualityExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageAssesses validity and quality ofhealthcare qualityimprovement dataShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Metric Analysis: Insights andOpportunitiesExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDerives insights andopportunities from dataShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: ExplanationExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageExplains how metrics driveimprovement opportunityShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: Tool SelectionExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines qualityimprovement tool foraddressing improvementopportunityShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: Problem-Solving FrameworkExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageApplies problem-solvingframework to identify whatcould have been donedifferently based on metrics,and shows and/or describes itsapplicationShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Recommendation: Initiative Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDevelops concise healthcarequality improvement initiativeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueRecommendation:Evaluation MethodExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines evaluation methodfor healthcare qualityimprovement initiative anddescribes methodShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Recommendation: DataCollectionExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines data collectiontool(s)Shows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 5Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful mannerClearly conveys meaning withcorrect grammar, sentencestructure, and spelling,demonstrating anunderstanding of audience andpurposeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, negativelyimpacting readabilitySubmission has critical errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, preventingunderstanding of ideas5Scholarly Sources Incorporates more than �vescholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or useof sources is exceptionallyinsightfulIncorporates �ve scholarly,current (within the last �veyears) sources that supportclaimsIncorporates fewer than �vescholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or notall sources support claimsDoes not incorporate sources 5Citations and Attributions Formats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with no errorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with fewer than �veerrorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with �ve or more errorsDoes not format in-textcitations and reference listaccording to APA style5Total: 100%ProjectGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdfIHP 604 Project Guidelines and RubricCompetenciesIn this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competencies:Analyze healthcare quality metricsDetermine an opportunity for a healthcare improvement initiativeRecommend a healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation processOverviewThroughout this course, you have learned how to analyze healthcare quality metrics, determine an opportunity for a healthcare improvement initiative, and recommend a healthcare qualityimprovement implementation plan and evaluation process. In this project, you will demonstrate the knowledge and skills needed to improve healthcare delivery for an organization. Choose aclinically or non-clinically based healthcare organization that releases public-facing data. You may decide to select a local organization or one where you work or have been a patient. For thisproject, you will be creating a healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation report in which you will describe the issue at the outset, the setting, the problem to be solved, theparties affected, and the reason why the issue is important to address. You will recommend a concise implementation plan and describe in detail how you plan to evaluate if yourimplementation was successful.ScenarioFor the purposes of this project, imagine that you work on a team that monitors quality and risk management within the organization you selected. Whether you are coming from a nursing lensor a healthcare administration lens, your task is to analyze the healthcare quality metrics for the organization you selected. Based upon your analysis of the data, you will determine anopportunity for a healthcare improvement initiative for the organization. Then, you will provide a recommendation so that the organization can improve the quality and/or safety of itshealthcare delivery. Finally, describe how you will evaluate the effectiveness of your plan.DirectionsYour report should contain the following sections:1. Metric analysis: Analyze the healthcare quality metrics of your chosen healthcare organization based on their public data.A. Interpret the data and metrics related to the effectiveness of a healthcare organization.B. Assess the validity and quality of the healthcare quality improvement data that support the need for the improvement opportunity you will include in your report.https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=9568&url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.snhu.edu%2Fcontent%2Fenforced%2F1394627-IHP-604-Q1480-OL-TRAD-GR.23TW1%2FProject%2520Guidelines%2520and%2520Rubric.html&lang=en_us&readid=d2l_read_element_1C. Derive insights and opportunities from the data.2. Opportunity for improvement: Determine an opportunity for a healthcare quality improvement initiative for the healthcare organization you selected.A. Explain how the metrics drive an opportunity for improvement.B. Determine an evidence-based quality improvement tool for addressing an improvement opportunity.C. Apply a problem-solving framework or tool to identify what could have been done differently based on the metrics and show and/or describe your application of the tool orframework.3. Recommendation: Provide a recommendation for the organization you selected so that the organization can improve the quality and/or safety of its healthcare delivery and determinehow to evaluate if your recommendations were successful.A. Develop a healthcare quality improvement initiative using a framework, such as plan-do-study-act (PDSA), root cause analysis (RCA), and failure mode effect analysis (FMEA).B. Determine an evaluation method for a healthcare quality improvement initiative for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and describe that method in detail.C. Determine data-collection tool(s).Your project should provide evidence from at least �ve scholarly sources.What to SubmitTo complete this project, you must submit the following:Healthcare Quality Improvement Initiative and Evaluation ReportSubmit your healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation report as a Word document. Your submission should be approximately 4 to 6 pages with 12-point Times New Romanfont, double spacing, and one-inch margins. You must also include an APA-style title page. At least �ve sources within the past �ve years should be cited according to APA style.Supporting MaterialsThe following resources support your work on the project:Website: Find and Compare Nursing Homes, Hospitals, and Other Providers Near YouThis website will help you �nd and compare homes, hospitals, and other providers near you.Website: AHRQThe Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website will help you �nd metrics from healthcare providers. The data visualizations under the Data tab are also worth exploring. AHRQ alsohas toolkits and best/leading practices that you may want to refer to.https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/?providerType=Physician&redirect=truehttps://www.ahrq.gov/Project RubricCriteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueMetric Analysis:InterpretationExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageInterprets data and metricsrelated to effectiveness of ahealthcare organizationShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Metric Analysis: Validity andQualityExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageAssesses validity and quality ofhealthcare qualityimprovement dataShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Metric Analysis: Insights andOpportunitiesExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDerives insights andopportunities from dataShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: ExplanationExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageExplains how metrics driveimprovement opportunityShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: Tool SelectionExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines qualityimprovement tool foraddressing improvementopportunityShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: Problem-Solving FrameworkExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageApplies problem-solvingframework to identify whatcould have been donedifferently based on metrics,and shows and/or describes itsapplicationShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Recommendation: Initiative Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDevelops concise healthcarequality improvement initiativeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueRecommendation:Evaluation MethodExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines evaluation methodfor healthcare qualityimprovement initiative anddescribes methodShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Recommendation: DataCollectionExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines data collectiontool(s)Shows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 5Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful mannerClearly conveys meaning withcorrect grammar, sentencestructure, and spelling,demonstrating anunderstanding of audience andpurposeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, negativelyimpacting readabilitySubmission has critical errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, preventingunderstanding of ideas5Scholarly Sources Incorporates more than �vescholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or useof sources is exceptionallyinsightfulIncorporates �ve scholarly,current (within the last �veyears) sources that supportclaimsIncorporates fewer than �vescholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or notall sources support claimsDoes not incorporate sources 5Citations and Attributions Formats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with no errorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with fewer than �veerrorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with �ve or more errorsDoes not format in-textcitations and reference listaccording to APA style5Total: 100%quickCheckinitiativeproject.docx2IHP 604 Module Three Project Preparation Quick CheckPrecious TeasleySouthern New Hampshire UniversityIHP-604-Q1480 Healthcare Quality Improvement 23TW1Professor Barbara BrophySeptember 29th, 2023IHP 604 Module Three Project PreparationHealthcare OrganizationThe healthcare organisation chosen is Mass General Brigham. Mass General Brigham is in the state of Massachusetts in Boston and is considered the biggest healthcare facility based on the number of employees. The hospital has more than 74,000 employees working as physicians, nurses, support staff, researchers, and carers (Mass General Brigham, 2023). The healthcare institutions under Mass General Brigham like the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) have also excelled, as they are the largest private hospitals in the US to receive money from the National Institutes of Health. The Mass General Brigham institutions maintain a combined research budget of more than $1.7 billion (Mass General Brigham, 2023). The healthcare institution has more than 200 residency and fellowship programmes, making it one of the most extensive and competitive medical education programmes in the nation. Medical students and residents often rotate between academic medical centers, community hospitals, and specialty hospitals.Public-facing dataThe healthcare institution has in the past shown its desire to work with communities surrounding the hospital. In its 2022 community assessment report, the institution highlighted various challenges facing surrounding communities, like mental health and drug misuse. The community assessment report for 2022 has the information that will be needed for the project to establish a clear quality improvement initiative.Why the Organisation and Public Facing DataThe choice of the organisation is based on its size, the expenditure that goes towards research, and its work with communities. Previous work with communities for the organisation has been successful, with the organisation initiating projects that have helped the communities. The public-facing data is readily available on the internet and on the organization’s website. This makes it easier to access the data that will be effective for the project.ReferencesMass General Brigham. (2023). About Mass General Brigham. retrieved fromhttps://innovation.massgeneralbrigham.org/about/about-mass-general-brighamMass General Hospital. (2022). Community Health Needs Assessment Report 2022. Retrieved fromhttps://www.massgeneral.org/assets/mgh/pdf/community-health/cchi/2022_chna_rreport.pdfprocessmatrics.docx4Process Metrics, Outcome Metrics, and Data NeedsStudent’s NameInstitution AffiliationCourse Name & NumberInstructor’s NameDateProcess Metrics, Outcome Metrics, and Data NeedsMass General Brigham, a major healthcare facility, uses process and outcome measures to evaluate its quality improvement project (Dukhanin et al., 2018). Let’s explore process and result metrics and their justifications:a) Process Metric: Hospital Readmission Rateb) Outcome Metric: Patient Satisfaction ScoreJustificationa)Process Metric (Hospital Readmission Rate):Healthcare efficiency and efficacy are measured by this statistic. The hospital readmission rate is the proportion of patients readmitted within 30 days following discharge (Dukhanin et al., 2018). A reduced hospital readmission rate means that patients are getting proper care during hospitalization and transferring easily to post-discharge treatment.b)Outcome Metric (Patient Satisfaction Score):Patient happiness is the ultimate aim of every healthcare improvement project. Surveys collect patient satisfaction levels, which represent their care perspective (Doupe et al., 2019). Better patient satisfaction levels imply superior treatment and happiness with their healthcare experience.How the Process Metric can help gauge progress toward the Outcome Metric:The link between these measures is important. By monitoring and decreasing hospital readmission rates, healthcare institutions can improve patient satisfaction.Here is the process:a)Reduced hospital Readmissions:A decreased hospital readmission rate indicates that initial therapy was successful in reducing problems and relapses. Successful recoveries reduce hospitalizations (Reddy et al., 2019).b)Improved Care Transitions:The organization may improve discharge planning, follow-up care, medication management, and patient education to reduce readmissions (Reddy et al., 2019). These enhancements may increase patient happiness and experience.c)Positive patient feedback:Positive encounters lead to improved survey satisfaction rates for patients. This is particularly true if they believe their care staff was attentive, communicated well, and supported them throughout their post-hospital transition (Reddy et al., 2019).In conclusion, the hospital readmission rate is a key indication of patient satisfaction. Mass General Brigham can increase patient satisfaction by minimizing readmissions via procedural changes. This shows how process measurements may help healthcare quality improvement projects achieve their goals.ReferencesDoupe, P., Faghmous, J., & Basu, S. (2019). Machine Learning for Health Services Researchers.Value in Health,22(7), 808–815.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.012Dukhanin, V., Topazian, R., & DeCamp, M. (2018). Metrics and evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decisionmaking: A systematic review.International Journal of Health Policy and Management,7(10), 889–903.https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.43Reddy, S., Allan, S., Coghlan, S., & Cooper, P. (2019). A governance model for the application of AI in health care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,27(3), 491–497.https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz192ProjectGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdfIHP 604 Project Guidelines and RubricCompetenciesIn this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competencies:Analyze healthcare quality metricsDetermine an opportunity for a healthcare improvement initiativeRecommend a healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation processOverviewThroughout this course, you have learned how to analyze healthcare quality metrics, determine an opportunity for a healthcare improvement initiative, and recommend a healthcare qualityimprovement implementation plan and evaluation process. In this project, you will demonstrate the knowledge and skills needed to improve healthcare delivery for an organization. Choose aclinically or non-clinically based healthcare organization that releases public-facing data. You may decide to select a local organization or one where you work or have been a patient. For thisproject, you will be creating a healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation report in which you will describe the issue at the outset, the setting, the problem to be solved, theparties affected, and the reason why the issue is important to address. You will recommend a concise implementation plan and describe in detail how you plan to evaluate if yourimplementation was successful.ScenarioFor the purposes of this project, imagine that you work on a team that monitors quality and risk management within the organization you selected. Whether you are coming from a nursing lensor a healthcare administration lens, your task is to analyze the healthcare quality metrics for the organization you selected. Based upon your analysis of the data, you will determine anopportunity for a healthcare improvement initiative for the organization. Then, you will provide a recommendation so that the organization can improve the quality and/or safety of itshealthcare delivery. Finally, describe how you will evaluate the effectiveness of your plan.DirectionsYour report should contain the following sections:1. Metric analysis: Analyze the healthcare quality metrics of your chosen healthcare organization based on their public data.A. Interpret the data and metrics related to the effectiveness of a healthcare organization.B. Assess the validity and quality of the healthcare quality improvement data that support the need for the improvement opportunity you will include in your report.https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=9568&url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.snhu.edu%2Fcontent%2Fenforced%2F1394627-IHP-604-Q1480-OL-TRAD-GR.23TW1%2FProject%2520Guidelines%2520and%2520Rubric.html&lang=en_us&readid=d2l_read_element_1C. Derive insights and opportunities from the data.2. Opportunity for improvement: Determine an opportunity for a healthcare quality improvement initiative for the healthcare organization you selected.A. Explain how the metrics drive an opportunity for improvement.B. Determine an evidence-based quality improvement tool for addressing an improvement opportunity.C. Apply a problem-solving framework or tool to identify what could have been done differently based on the metrics and show and/or describe your application of the tool orframework.3. Recommendation: Provide a recommendation for the organization you selected so that the organization can improve the quality and/or safety of its healthcare delivery and determinehow to evaluate if your recommendations were successful.A. Develop a healthcare quality improvement initiative using a framework, such as plan-do-study-act (PDSA), root cause analysis (RCA), and failure mode effect analysis (FMEA).B. Determine an evaluation method for a healthcare quality improvement initiative for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and describe that method in detail.C. Determine data-collection tool(s).Your project should provide evidence from at least �ve scholarly sources.What to SubmitTo complete this project, you must submit the following:Healthcare Quality Improvement Initiative and Evaluation ReportSubmit your healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation report as a Word document. Your submission should be approximately 4 to 6 pages with 12-point Times New Romanfont, double spacing, and one-inch margins. You must also include an APA-style title page. At least �ve sources within the past �ve years should be cited according to APA style.Supporting MaterialsThe following resources support your work on the project:Website: Find and Compare Nursing Homes, Hospitals, and Other Providers Near YouThis website will help you �nd and compare homes, hospitals, and other providers near you.Website: AHRQThe Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website will help you �nd metrics from healthcare providers. The data visualizations under the Data tab are also worth exploring. AHRQ alsohas toolkits and best/leading practices that you may want to refer to.https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/?providerType=Physician&redirect=truehttps://www.ahrq.gov/Project RubricCriteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueMetric Analysis:InterpretationExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageInterprets data and metricsrelated to effectiveness of ahealthcare organizationShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Metric Analysis: Validity andQualityExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageAssesses validity and quality ofhealthcare qualityimprovement dataShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Metric Analysis: Insights andOpportunitiesExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDerives insights andopportunities from dataShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: ExplanationExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageExplains how metrics driveimprovement opportunityShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: Tool SelectionExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines qualityimprovement tool foraddressing improvementopportunityShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: Problem-Solving FrameworkExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageApplies problem-solvingframework to identify whatcould have been donedifferently based on metrics,and shows and/or describes itsapplicationShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Recommendation: Initiative Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDevelops concise healthcarequality improvement initiativeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueRecommendation:Evaluation MethodExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines evaluation methodfor healthcare qualityimprovement initiative anddescribes methodShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Recommendation: DataCollectionExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines data collectiontool(s)Shows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 5Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful mannerClearly conveys meaning withcorrect grammar, sentencestructure, and spelling,demonstrating anunderstanding of audience andpurposeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, negativelyimpacting readabilitySubmission has critical errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, preventingunderstanding of ideas5Scholarly Sources Incorporates more than �vescholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or useof sources is exceptionallyinsightfulIncorporates �ve scholarly,current (within the last �veyears) sources that supportclaimsIncorporates fewer than �vescholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or notall sources support claimsDoes not incorporate sources 5Citations and Attributions Formats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with no errorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with fewer than �veerrorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with �ve or more errorsDoes not format in-textcitations and reference listaccording to APA style5Total: 100%quickCheckinitiativeproject.docx2IHP 604 Module Three Project Preparation Quick CheckPrecious TeasleySouthern New Hampshire UniversityIHP-604-Q1480 Healthcare Quality Improvement 23TW1Professor Barbara BrophySeptember 29th, 2023IHP 604 Module Three Project PreparationHealthcare OrganizationThe healthcare organisation chosen is Mass General Brigham. Mass General Brigham is in the state of Massachusetts in Boston and is considered the biggest healthcare facility based on the number of employees. The hospital has more than 74,000 employees working as physicians, nurses, support staff, researchers, and carers (Mass General Brigham, 2023). The healthcare institutions under Mass General Brigham like the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) have also excelled, as they are the largest private hospitals in the US to receive money from the National Institutes of Health. The Mass General Brigham institutions maintain a combined research budget of more than $1.7 billion (Mass General Brigham, 2023). The healthcare institution has more than 200 residency and fellowship programmes, making it one of the most extensive and competitive medical education programmes in the nation. Medical students and residents often rotate between academic medical centers, community hospitals, and specialty hospitals.Public-facing dataThe healthcare institution has in the past shown its desire to work with communities surrounding the hospital. In its 2022 community assessment report, the institution highlighted various challenges facing surrounding communities, like mental health and drug misuse. The community assessment report for 2022 has the information that will be needed for the project to establish a clear quality improvement initiative.Why the Organisation and Public Facing DataThe choice of the organisation is based on its size, the expenditure that goes towards research, and its work with communities. Previous work with communities for the organisation has been successful, with the organisation initiating projects that have helped the communities. The public-facing data is readily available on the internet and on the organization’s website. This makes it easier to access the data that will be effective for the project.ReferencesMass General Brigham. (2023). About Mass General Brigham. retrieved fromhttps://innovation.massgeneralbrigham.org/about/about-mass-general-brighamMass General Hospital. (2022). Community Health Needs Assessment Report 2022. Retrieved fromhttps://www.massgeneral.org/assets/mgh/pdf/community-health/cchi/2022_chna_rreport.pdfprocessmatrics.docx4Process Metrics, Outcome Metrics, and Data NeedsStudent’s NameInstitution AffiliationCourse Name & NumberInstructor’s NameDateProcess Metrics, Outcome Metrics, and Data NeedsMass General Brigham, a major healthcare facility, uses process and outcome measures to evaluate its quality improvement project (Dukhanin et al., 2018). Let’s explore process and result metrics and their justifications:a) Process Metric: Hospital Readmission Rateb) Outcome Metric: Patient Satisfaction ScoreJustificationa)Process Metric (Hospital Readmission Rate):Healthcare efficiency and efficacy are measured by this statistic. The hospital readmission rate is the proportion of patients readmitted within 30 days following discharge (Dukhanin et al., 2018). A reduced hospital readmission rate means that patients are getting proper care during hospitalization and transferring easily to post-discharge treatment.b)Outcome Metric (Patient Satisfaction Score):Patient happiness is the ultimate aim of every healthcare improvement project. Surveys collect patient satisfaction levels, which represent their care perspective (Doupe et al., 2019). Better patient satisfaction levels imply superior treatment and happiness with their healthcare experience.How the Process Metric can help gauge progress toward the Outcome Metric:The link between these measures is important. By monitoring and decreasing hospital readmission rates, healthcare institutions can improve patient satisfaction.Here is the process:a)Reduced hospital Readmissions:A decreased hospital readmission rate indicates that initial therapy was successful in reducing problems and relapses. Successful recoveries reduce hospitalizations (Reddy et al., 2019).b)Improved Care Transitions:The organization may improve discharge planning, follow-up care, medication management, and patient education to reduce readmissions (Reddy et al., 2019). These enhancements may increase patient happiness and experience.c)Positive patient feedback:Positive encounters lead to improved survey satisfaction rates for patients. This is particularly true if they believe their care staff was attentive, communicated well, and supported them throughout their post-hospital transition (Reddy et al., 2019).In conclusion, the hospital readmission rate is a key indication of patient satisfaction. Mass General Brigham can increase patient satisfaction by minimizing readmissions via procedural changes. This shows how process measurements may help healthcare quality improvement projects achieve their goals.ReferencesDoupe, P., Faghmous, J., & Basu, S. (2019). Machine Learning for Health Services Researchers.Value in Health,22(7), 808–815.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.012Dukhanin, V., Topazian, R., & DeCamp, M. (2018). Metrics and evaluation tools for patient engagement in healthcare organization- and system-level decisionmaking: A systematic review.International Journal of Health Policy and Management,7(10), 889–903.https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.43Reddy, S., Allan, S., Coghlan, S., & Cooper, P. (2019). A governance model for the application of AI in health care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,27(3), 491–497.https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz192ProjectGuidelinesandRubric-IHP-604-Q1480HealthcareQualityImprovement23TW1.pdfIHP 604 Project Guidelines and RubricCompetenciesIn this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competencies:Analyze healthcare quality metricsDetermine an opportunity for a healthcare improvement initiativeRecommend a healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation processOverviewThroughout this course, you have learned how to analyze healthcare quality metrics, determine an opportunity for a healthcare improvement initiative, and recommend a healthcare qualityimprovement implementation plan and evaluation process. In this project, you will demonstrate the knowledge and skills needed to improve healthcare delivery for an organization. Choose aclinically or non-clinically based healthcare organization that releases public-facing data. You may decide to select a local organization or one where you work or have been a patient. For thisproject, you will be creating a healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation report in which you will describe the issue at the outset, the setting, the problem to be solved, theparties affected, and the reason why the issue is important to address. You will recommend a concise implementation plan and describe in detail how you plan to evaluate if yourimplementation was successful.ScenarioFor the purposes of this project, imagine that you work on a team that monitors quality and risk management within the organization you selected. Whether you are coming from a nursing lensor a healthcare administration lens, your task is to analyze the healthcare quality metrics for the organization you selected. Based upon your analysis of the data, you will determine anopportunity for a healthcare improvement initiative for the organization. Then, you will provide a recommendation so that the organization can improve the quality and/or safety of itshealthcare delivery. Finally, describe how you will evaluate the effectiveness of your plan.DirectionsYour report should contain the following sections:1. Metric analysis: Analyze the healthcare quality metrics of your chosen healthcare organization based on their public data.A. Interpret the data and metrics related to the effectiveness of a healthcare organization.B. Assess the validity and quality of the healthcare quality improvement data that support the need for the improvement opportunity you will include in your report.https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=9568&url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.snhu.edu%2Fcontent%2Fenforced%2F1394627-IHP-604-Q1480-OL-TRAD-GR.23TW1%2FProject%2520Guidelines%2520and%2520Rubric.html&lang=en_us&readid=d2l_read_element_1C. Derive insights and opportunities from the data.2. Opportunity for improvement: Determine an opportunity for a healthcare quality improvement initiative for the healthcare organization you selected.A. Explain how the metrics drive an opportunity for improvement.B. Determine an evidence-based quality improvement tool for addressing an improvement opportunity.C. Apply a problem-solving framework or tool to identify what could have been done differently based on the metrics and show and/or describe your application of the tool orframework.3. Recommendation: Provide a recommendation for the organization you selected so that the organization can improve the quality and/or safety of its healthcare delivery and determinehow to evaluate if your recommendations were successful.A. Develop a healthcare quality improvement initiative using a framework, such as plan-do-study-act (PDSA), root cause analysis (RCA), and failure mode effect analysis (FMEA).B. Determine an evaluation method for a healthcare quality improvement initiative for 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and describe that method in detail.C. Determine data-collection tool(s).Your project should provide evidence from at least �ve scholarly sources.What to SubmitTo complete this project, you must submit the following:Healthcare Quality Improvement Initiative and Evaluation ReportSubmit your healthcare quality improvement initiative and evaluation report as a Word document. Your submission should be approximately 4 to 6 pages with 12-point Times New Romanfont, double spacing, and one-inch margins. You must also include an APA-style title page. At least �ve sources within the past �ve years should be cited according to APA style.Supporting MaterialsThe following resources support your work on the project:Website: Find and Compare Nursing Homes, Hospitals, and Other Providers Near YouThis website will help you �nd and compare homes, hospitals, and other providers near you.Website: AHRQThe Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website will help you �nd metrics from healthcare providers. The data visualizations under the Data tab are also worth exploring. AHRQ alsohas toolkits and best/leading practices that you may want to refer to.https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/?providerType=Physician&redirect=truehttps://www.ahrq.gov/Project RubricCriteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueMetric Analysis:InterpretationExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageInterprets data and metricsrelated to effectiveness of ahealthcare organizationShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Metric Analysis: Validity andQualityExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageAssesses validity and quality ofhealthcare qualityimprovement dataShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Metric Analysis: Insights andOpportunitiesExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDerives insights andopportunities from dataShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: ExplanationExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageExplains how metrics driveimprovement opportunityShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: Tool SelectionExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines qualityimprovement tool foraddressing improvementopportunityShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Opportunity forImprovement: Problem-Solving FrameworkExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageApplies problem-solvingframework to identify whatcould have been donedifferently based on metrics,and shows and/or describes itsapplicationShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Recommendation: Initiative Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDevelops concise healthcarequality improvement initiativeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Criteria Exemplary (100%) Pro�cient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) ValueRecommendation:Evaluation MethodExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines evaluation methodfor healthcare qualityimprovement initiative anddescribes methodShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 10Recommendation: DataCollectionExceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful manner, usingindustry-speci�c languageDetermines data collectiontool(s)Shows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors oromissionsDoes not attempt criterion 5Articulation of Response Exceeds pro�ciency in anexceptionally clear andinsightful mannerClearly conveys meaning withcorrect grammar, sentencestructure, and spelling,demonstrating anunderstanding of audience andpurposeShows progress towardpro�ciency, but with errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, negativelyimpacting readabilitySubmission has critical errors ingrammar, sentence structure,and spelling, preventingunderstanding of ideas5Scholarly Sources Incorporates more than �vescholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or useof sources is exceptionallyinsightfulIncorporates �ve scholarly,current (within the last �veyears) sources that supportclaimsIncorporates fewer than �vescholarly, current (within thelast �ve years) sources, or notall sources support claimsDoes not incorporate sources 5Citations and Attributions Formats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with no errorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with fewer than �veerrorsFormats in-text citations andreference list according to APAstyle with �ve or more errorsDoes not format in-textcitations and reference listaccording to APA style5Total: 100%123Bids(66)Dr. Ellen RMSTELLAR GEEK A+Prof Double RDoctor.NamiraProWritingGuruYoung NyanyaJahky BSheryl HoganDr. Adeline ZoeDr M. MichelleAshley Elliesherry proffWIZARD_KIMIsabella HarvardColeen AndersonPROF_ALISTERQuality AssignmentsElprofessoriNightingaleMUSYOKIONES A+Show All Bidsother Questions(10)chapter 9 for PROFESSOR2013 ONLYAlternative Energies and Tradeoffs MatrixInternal ControlsAssignment 4 Week 8 Describe some of the challenges and opportunities modern technology presents for families and communication. Possible grade Student grade The paper addresses the issues specified by the assignment 20 The author shows insight and soHumanititesHW 5 MicronEDD RESPONSE, minimal 4 sentence answer to stay brilliant and relevant as head of the class.Accounting Weekly Exercises for Geniusalert92 onlyat $80.00psychology discussion 2Analyzing Persuasive Media

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now