Nursing Homework week 4
Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpLiterature review about Picot question, instruction attacheda month ago30.05.202518Report issuefiles (2)AboutPicotQuestion.docxPICOWORKSHEET.docxAboutPicotQuestion.docx· This paper IS NOT A RESEARCH·You are expected to develop a Literature review about the topic -PICO selected·PLEASE, be brief, concise and clear. Use the following headings:1.Introduction:Background of the topic. Significance -Why did you select this topic?2.Discussion:I ask that you DO NOT DISCUSS ANY RESULTS because you are not performing a research. Here you discuss about what you find in literature regarding the PICO, how the problem is approach, and the practice implications.3.Conclusion:You will make a brief summary of your paper.Maximum 2 pages.Please refer to the discussion rubric.APA style required.PICOWORKSHEET.docxArlinis Cabrera GarcesMiami Regional UniversityMSN5300. Advanced Nursing Inquiry and Evidence-Based PracticeProfessor: Patricio Bidart, DNP, FNP-CMay 17, 2025PICO WorksheetOriginal RevisedDefine your Question using PICOPAdults aged 30–65 years with a confirmed diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for at least one year, currently receiving outpatient care in primary healthcare settings.Diabetes Mellitus is one of the most frequently occurring chronic diseases in the practice of Family Nurse Practitioners. Addressing this health problem contributes to reducing the different complications associated with this pathology that interfere with the quality of life and also increase the morbidity and mortality in the community.IImplementation of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices as part of routine diabetes management for a minimum duration of 6 monthsMethodologyQuantitative research; Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to assess differences in HbA1c outcomes and adherence rates between CGM and SMBG usersCUse of standard self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) via finger-stick testing performed at home as recommended by ADA guidelinesOReduction in HbA1c levels by ≥0.5% over 6 months, improvement in glycemic variability, and increased patient adherence to monitoring protocolsState your Question resulting from PICO:In adults aged 30–65 with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, does real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 6 months, compared to traditional finger-stick self-monitoring, result in a ≥0.5% reduction in HbA1c and improved adherence to glucose monitoring?Rev. May 2020 MSN5300 KmRKey Words· Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus· Continuous Glucose Monitoring· Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose· HbA1c reduction· Glycemic control· Adherence· Randomized Controlled TrialOther Criteria· Age: 30–65 years· English language· Published within the last 10 years (2015–2025)· Peer-reviewed journals· Outpatient/primary care settingsData bases· CINAHL· PubMed· Cochrane Library· MEDLINE· Scopusimage1.pngPICOWORKSHEET.docxArlinis Cabrera GarcesMiami Regional UniversityMSN5300. Advanced Nursing Inquiry and Evidence-Based PracticeProfessor: Patricio Bidart, DNP, FNP-CMay 17, 2025PICO WorksheetOriginal RevisedDefine your Question using PICOPAdults aged 30–65 years with a confirmed diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for at least one year, currently receiving outpatient care in primary healthcare settings.Diabetes Mellitus is one of the most frequently occurring chronic diseases in the practice of Family Nurse Practitioners. Addressing this health problem contributes to reducing the different complications associated with this pathology that interfere with the quality of life and also increase the morbidity and mortality in the community.IImplementation of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices as part of routine diabetes management for a minimum duration of 6 monthsMethodologyQuantitative research; Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to assess differences in HbA1c outcomes and adherence rates between CGM and SMBG usersCUse of standard self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) via finger-stick testing performed at home as recommended by ADA guidelinesOReduction in HbA1c levels by ≥0.5% over 6 months, improvement in glycemic variability, and increased patient adherence to monitoring protocolsState your Question resulting from PICO:In adults aged 30–65 with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, does real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 6 months, compared to traditional finger-stick self-monitoring, result in a ≥0.5% reduction in HbA1c and improved adherence to glucose monitoring?Rev. May 2020 MSN5300 KmRKey Words· Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus· Continuous Glucose Monitoring· Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose· HbA1c reduction· Glycemic control· Adherence· Randomized Controlled TrialOther Criteria· Age: 30–65 years· English language· Published within the last 10 years (2015–2025)· Peer-reviewed journals· Outpatient/primary care settingsData bases· CINAHL· PubMed· Cochrane Library· MEDLINE· Scopusimage1.pngAboutPicotQuestion.docx· This paper IS NOT A RESEARCH·You are expected to develop a Literature review about the topic -PICO selected·PLEASE, be brief, concise and clear. Use the following headings:1.Introduction:Background of the topic. Significance -Why did you select this topic?2.Discussion:I ask that you DO NOT DISCUSS ANY RESULTS because you are not performing a research. Here you discuss about what you find in literature regarding the PICO, how the problem is approach, and the practice implications.3.Conclusion:You will make a brief summary of your paper.Maximum 2 pages.Please refer to the discussion rubric.APA style required.PICOWORKSHEET.docxArlinis Cabrera GarcesMiami Regional UniversityMSN5300. Advanced Nursing Inquiry and Evidence-Based PracticeProfessor: Patricio Bidart, DNP, FNP-CMay 17, 2025PICO WorksheetOriginal RevisedDefine your Question using PICOPAdults aged 30–65 years with a confirmed diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for at least one year, currently receiving outpatient care in primary healthcare settings.Diabetes Mellitus is one of the most frequently occurring chronic diseases in the practice of Family Nurse Practitioners. Addressing this health problem contributes to reducing the different complications associated with this pathology that interfere with the quality of life and also increase the morbidity and mortality in the community.IImplementation of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices as part of routine diabetes management for a minimum duration of 6 monthsMethodologyQuantitative research; Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to assess differences in HbA1c outcomes and adherence rates between CGM and SMBG usersCUse of standard self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) via finger-stick testing performed at home as recommended by ADA guidelinesOReduction in HbA1c levels by ≥0.5% over 6 months, improvement in glycemic variability, and increased patient adherence to monitoring protocolsState your Question resulting from PICO:In adults aged 30–65 with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, does real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 6 months, compared to traditional finger-stick self-monitoring, result in a ≥0.5% reduction in HbA1c and improved adherence to glucose monitoring?Rev. May 2020 MSN5300 KmRKey Words· Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus· Continuous Glucose Monitoring· Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose· HbA1c reduction· Glycemic control· Adherence· Randomized Controlled TrialOther Criteria· Age: 30–65 years· English language· Published within the last 10 years (2015–2025)· Peer-reviewed journals· Outpatient/primary care settingsData bases· CINAHL· PubMed· Cochrane Library· MEDLINE· Scopusimage1.pngAboutPicotQuestion.docx· This paper IS NOT A RESEARCH·You are expected to develop a Literature review about the topic -PICO selected·PLEASE, be brief, concise and clear. Use the following headings:1.Introduction:Background of the topic. Significance -Why did you select this topic?2.Discussion:I ask that you DO NOT DISCUSS ANY RESULTS because you are not performing a research. Here you discuss about what you find in literature regarding the PICO, how the problem is approach, and the practice implications.3.Conclusion:You will make a brief summary of your paper.Maximum 2 pages.Please refer to the discussion rubric.APA style required.PICOWORKSHEET.docxArlinis Cabrera GarcesMiami Regional UniversityMSN5300. Advanced Nursing Inquiry and Evidence-Based PracticeProfessor: Patricio Bidart, DNP, FNP-CMay 17, 2025PICO WorksheetOriginal RevisedDefine your Question using PICOPAdults aged 30–65 years with a confirmed diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for at least one year, currently receiving outpatient care in primary healthcare settings.Diabetes Mellitus is one of the most frequently occurring chronic diseases in the practice of Family Nurse Practitioners. Addressing this health problem contributes to reducing the different complications associated with this pathology that interfere with the quality of life and also increase the morbidity and mortality in the community.IImplementation of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices as part of routine diabetes management for a minimum duration of 6 monthsMethodologyQuantitative research; Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to assess differences in HbA1c outcomes and adherence rates between CGM and SMBG usersCUse of standard self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) via finger-stick testing performed at home as recommended by ADA guidelinesOReduction in HbA1c levels by ≥0.5% over 6 months, improvement in glycemic variability, and increased patient adherence to monitoring protocolsState your Question resulting from PICO:In adults aged 30–65 with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, does real-time continuous glucose monitoring for 6 months, compared to traditional finger-stick self-monitoring, result in a ≥0.5% reduction in HbA1c and improved adherence to glucose monitoring?Rev. May 2020 MSN5300 KmRKey Words· Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus· Continuous Glucose Monitoring· Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose· HbA1c reduction· Glycemic control· Adherence· Randomized Controlled TrialOther Criteria· Age: 30–65 years· English language· Published within the last 10 years (2015–2025)· Peer-reviewed journals· Outpatient/primary care settingsData bases· CINAHL· PubMed· Cochrane Library· MEDLINE· Scopusimage1.png12Bids(48)Dr. Ellen RMMathProgrammingMISS HILLARY A+Dr. Aylin JMProf Double REmily Clarefirstclass tutorMiss Deannasherry proffMUSYOKIONES A+Dr ClovergrA+de plusSheryl HoganProWritingGuruDr. Everleigh_JKIsabella HarvardBrilliant GeekWIZARD_KIMPROF_ALISTERAshley EllieShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Assignment 23 Justification Report – Part 3 (Final)cs questionRespond to Discussion Question 4Marketing Management QuizUsing Strengths to Increase MotivationWhich protocol was used for the telephone to attempt to register with the PBXcase studiesMatlab AssignmentApplication: Product Strategy, Pricing, and Distribution Marketing information is critical throughout the product life cycle. The marketing function also plays an essential role in determining pricing and distribution for products or services. Prepare fSex and Violence Paper
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

