Nursing human case study assignment

/in /by

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpNursMSN8 months ago11.12.202410Report issuefiles (1)advancedhealthweek3assignment1.docxadvancedhealthweek3assignment1.docxCase Study Assignment: differential diagnoses and diagnostic testingWhen seeking to identify a patient’s health condition, advanced practice nurses can use a diverse selection of diagnostic tests and assessment tools to help in understanding a patient’s condition. In turn, beginning with a differential diagnosis supports the process of further applying information to narrow the possibilities of what the condition may be and working to arrive at the most accurate diagnosis for planning treatment.For this Case Study Assignment, you will determine the physical exams and diagnostic tests that would be most appropriate for gaining information and better understanding of your patient’s condition. Then, based on your analysis, you will formulate a differential diagnosis for the patient.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo prepare:· By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign a patient profile for this Assignment.Note:Please see theCourse Announcementssection of the classroom for your patient profile Assignment.· Review this week’s Learning Resources.· Review the details of the patient case study.· Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition.· Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.· Identifythree to five (3–5)possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.Assignment: Diagnostic ReasoningInclude the following:· Identify the patient’s chief complaint.· Identify what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Be specific and explain your reasoning.· Explain how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.· Identifythree to five (3–5)possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient. Explain your thinking.·CASE STUDY FOR WEEK #3·20 y/o female college student has had abdominal pain for the last 2 weeks. Some mornings she has nausea and vomiting, but today she is here with abdominal cramps and nausea. She has lost 8 pounds while has no appetite. She has been having diarrhea for the last few days. No past medical/surgical History or relevant social history.submission informationBefore submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access theTurnitin Draftsfrom theStart Herearea.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment asWK3Assgn1_LastName_FirstInitial2. Then, click onStart Assignmentnear the top of the page.3. Next, click onUpload Fileand selectSubmit Assignmentfor review.4. RubricNURS_6512_Week 3_Assignment 1_RubricNURS_6512_Week 3_Assignment 1_RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify the patient’s chief complaint.15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the assigned patient’s chief complaint.12 to >9.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains the assigned patient’s chief complaint.9 to >6.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the assigned patient’s chief complaint.6 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is inaccurate and/or missing an explanation of the assigned patient’s chief complaint.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Be specific and explain your reasoning.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly, accurately, and in detail Identifies physical exams and diagnostic tests that are most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition; reasoning for the exams/tests is clear, accurate, and detailed.17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately Identifies physical exams and diagnostic tests that are most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition; reasoning for the exams/tests is specific and accurate.14 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely and with some inaccuracy Identifies physical exams and diagnostic tests that are appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition; reasoning for the exams/tests is vague and somewhat accurate.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is inaccurate and/or missing identification of physical exams and diagnostic tests that are appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition; reasoning for the exams/tests is inaccurate or missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.12 to >9.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.9 to >6.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.6 to >0 ptsPoorThe response explains inaccurately and/or is missing how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify three to five (3–5) possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient. Explain your thinking.35 to >29.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly, accurately, and in detail identifies four or five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient; with clear, accurate, and detailed reasoning for each possible condition.29 to >23.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately identifies three to five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient; with accurate reasoning for each possible condition.23 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely and lacking specificity identifies three possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient; with vague reasoning for each possible condition.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inadequately identifies fewer than three possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient; with inadequate or missing reasoning for each possible condition.35 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: Paragraph Development and Organization — Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused and neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing Standards — Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: APA The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 100image1.jpegadvancedhealthweek3assignment1.docxCase Study Assignment: differential diagnoses and diagnostic testingWhen seeking to identify a patient’s health condition, advanced practice nurses can use a diverse selection of diagnostic tests and assessment tools to help in understanding a patient’s condition. In turn, beginning with a differential diagnosis supports the process of further applying information to narrow the possibilities of what the condition may be and working to arrive at the most accurate diagnosis for planning treatment.For this Case Study Assignment, you will determine the physical exams and diagnostic tests that would be most appropriate for gaining information and better understanding of your patient’s condition. Then, based on your analysis, you will formulate a differential diagnosis for the patient.ResourcesBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCESTo prepare:· By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign a patient profile for this Assignment.Note:Please see theCourse Announcementssection of the classroom for your patient profile Assignment.· Review this week’s Learning Resources.· Review the details of the patient case study.· Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition.· Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.· Identifythree to five (3–5)possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.Assignment: Diagnostic ReasoningInclude the following:· Identify the patient’s chief complaint.· Identify what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Be specific and explain your reasoning.· Explain how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.· Identifythree to five (3–5)possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient. Explain your thinking.·CASE STUDY FOR WEEK #3·20 y/o female college student has had abdominal pain for the last 2 weeks. Some mornings she has nausea and vomiting, but today she is here with abdominal cramps and nausea. She has lost 8 pounds while has no appetite. She has been having diarrhea for the last few days. No past medical/surgical History or relevant social history.submission informationBefore submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access theTurnitin Draftsfrom theStart Herearea.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment asWK3Assgn1_LastName_FirstInitial2. Then, click onStart Assignmentnear the top of the page.3. Next, click onUpload Fileand selectSubmit Assignmentfor review.4. RubricNURS_6512_Week 3_Assignment 1_RubricNURS_6512_Week 3_Assignment 1_RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify the patient’s chief complaint.15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains the assigned patient’s chief complaint.12 to >9.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains the assigned patient’s chief complaint.9 to >6.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains the assigned patient’s chief complaint.6 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is inaccurate and/or missing an explanation of the assigned patient’s chief complaint.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Be specific and explain your reasoning.20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly, accurately, and in detail Identifies physical exams and diagnostic tests that are most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition; reasoning for the exams/tests is clear, accurate, and detailed.17 to >14.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately Identifies physical exams and diagnostic tests that are most appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition; reasoning for the exams/tests is specific and accurate.14 to >13.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely and with some inaccuracy Identifies physical exams and diagnostic tests that are appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition; reasoning for the exams/tests is vague and somewhat accurate.13 to >0 ptsPoorThe response is inaccurate and/or missing identification of physical exams and diagnostic tests that are appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition; reasoning for the exams/tests is inaccurate or missing.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.15 to >12.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly, accurately, and in detail explains how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.12 to >9.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.9 to >6.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely and with some inaccuracy explains how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.6 to >0 ptsPoorThe response explains inaccurately and/or is missing how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify three to five (3–5) possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient. Explain your thinking.35 to >29.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly, accurately, and in detail identifies four or five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient; with clear, accurate, and detailed reasoning for each possible condition.29 to >23.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately identifies three to five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient; with accurate reasoning for each possible condition.23 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response vaguely and lacking specificity identifies three possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient; with vague reasoning for each possible condition.17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inadequately identifies fewer than three possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient; with inadequate or missing reasoning for each possible condition.35 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: Paragraph Development and Organization — Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused and neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.3 to >2.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.2 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: English Writing Standards — Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: APA The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 100image1.jpegBids(54)Dr. Ellen RMDr. Aylin JMProf Double RProf. TOPGRADEEmily ClareDr. Sarah Blakefirstclass tutorDemi_RoseMUSYOKIONES A+Dr ClovergrA+de plusSheryl HoganProWritingGuruDr. Everleigh_JKColeen AndersonIsabella HarvardBrilliant GeekWIZARD_KIMPROF_ALISTERAshley EllieShow All Bidsother Questions(10)essayDone200 word personal definition of “accurate empathy”can you give feedback to my peers/classmate (follow the red guide please) 1 paragraphp chartBMGT/364 Case Study #1 Cyber Software, Inc. Planning and OrganizingOnly for guru2009.respond to student #2 W/C 150BUS 401 Week 5 final paper Evaluation of Corporate Performance

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now