Nursing Week3 Dropbox Assignment research Critique

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpnursingAssigmenta year ago26.01.202414Report issuefiles (4)Week2ApplofEvidence2.docxW3ApplEBdiscussion2.docxWeek3-DropboxAssignment-ResearchCritique.docxArticleCritiqueTemplate11.2023.docxWeek2ApplofEvidence2.docx4Week2 Appl of Evidence1.What was the research design?The research method was a systematic review. From database creation until the fourth week of April 2020, the authors searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Global Index Medicus, African Index Medicus, and African Journals Online. They focused on quasi-experimental research, cluster randomized trials, and randomized trials of depression detection therapies in primary care. A PROSPERO pre-registered protocol (CRD42020166291) was followed throughout the evaluation.2.Was the sampling method and size appropriate for the research question? Explain.Methodology and sample size seem to be suitable for answering the research question. After completing a thorough search across a wide number of databases and carrying out a systematic review, the research comprised a substantial number of articles. This method ensures that a broad variety of sources are used, which in turn increases the applicability of the results.3.What were the dependent and independent (outcome) variables?The capacity of the primary healthcare system to identify depression served as the dependent variable, while the numerous treatments that were designed to improve detection served as the independent variables. The major objective of this research is to ascertain whether or not these treatments are effective in increasing the number of people who are diagnosed with depression.4.Were valid and reliable instruments/surveys used to measure outcomes? Explain.Case studies, interviews, record checks, and chart audits are some of the methods that are discussed in this article. These methods are necessary for accurate and trustworthy data assessment. On the other hand, the book does not in any way provide a comprehensive description of the psychometric features of these instruments.5.What were the main results of the study?Combinations of treatments, such as screening, feedback, and professional training, were shown to be more helpful than individual therapies in improving the diagnosis of depression, as indicated by the primary findings of the research. It was also reassuring to see that efforts were being made to raise detection rates via the implementation of policies, integrated care plans, and quality improvement initiatives.6.Was there statistical significance? Explain.The statistical significance of the data is not mentioned explicitly anywhere in the text. However, it is also mentioned that a number of clinical studies shown that certain therapies resulted in significant enhancements, which suggests that the results could have statistical relevance. For the purpose of determining the level of statistical significance, further information and statistical analysis would be necessary.7.How would you use the study results in your practice to make a difference in patient outcomes?As a consequence of the findings of the research, therapeutic approaches might be influenced, which could ultimately result in improved patient outcomes. In order to enhance the diagnosis of depression in primary care settings, the results emphasize the need of integrating many treatments. These therapies include guidelines and collaborative care packages, training for practitioners, screening, and feedback. When these components are included into complete therapies, medical professionals may be able to improve their capacity to diagnose and treat depression.ReferencesHabtamu, K., Birhane, R., Demissie, M., & Fekadu, A. (2024). Interventions to improve the detection of depression in primary healthcare: systematic review.Systematic Reviews,12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02177-6W3ApplEBdiscussion2.docx5Week 3 Appl Evidence-Based Rerch discussion1.What was the research design?The research design for employed was qualitative study. Authors performed semi structured qualitative interviews with diabetes specialists and patients. The qualitative study examined diabetics’ telemedicine experiences, perspectives, hurdles, facilitators, problems, and rewards. Interview transcripts underwent narrative, descriptive, and reflexive thematic analysis.2.How were study participants chosen and was the sample size appropriate?Purposive sampling was used to choose research participants, targeting diabetes patients and healthcare professionals who had received telehealth visits after March 1, 2020. Patient recruiting included portal messaging, secure emails, and phone calls. Clinicians were contacted via phone or email. Interviews included 18 patients and 6 healthcare practitioners. The sample size was suitable for qualitative study, meeting code saturation requirements and enabling for a complete examination of telehealth for diabetes care experiences and viewpoints.3.Does the research methods fit the purpose of the study? Explain.Yes, research methodologies suit the study. Qualitative semi structured interviews and thematic analysis were optimal for studying the complex experiences, obstacles, facilitators, problems, and advantages of telehealth for diabetes care in the Deep South. Because the study focuses on patients and doctors, qualitative methods must be profound. Journey maps and narrative, descriptive strategies encouraged patient-clinician transition exploration. A mixed-method research in a natural experiment used qualitative and quantitative data for understanding.4.Are data collection and analysis techniques appropriate for this type of study? Explain.Yes, qualitative research may gather and analyze data. The thoughts of patients and doctors on diabetes telehealth were gathered via semi-structured interviews. The data was grasped owing to expert qualitative researchers, reflexive thematic analysis, and narrative descriptive analysis. Patient-clinician trip maps were presented. A more comprehensive investigation was possible using deductive and inductive coding. The qualitative analysis tool NVivo facilitated data management. The study’s methods were appropriate for examining the challenges, facilitators, issues, and benefits of telehealth for diabetes treatment.5.Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified? Explain.Yes, the study appropriately describes the issue as the Deep South’s diabetic telemedicine adoption. The research addresses diabetics’ and doctors’ pros and cons of this change. Patient-clinician interactions are evaluated for efficiency, effectiveness, safety, and technology use. Using narrative, descriptive, and qualitative interviews, researchers may learn about Deep South citizens who manage their diabetes using telemedicine.6.What are the reported results?The study found five themes about telehealth for diabetes management: convenience, safety, and comfort; the relative value of in-person visits and telehealth; potential drawbacks of telehealth convenience; the double-edged role of technology; and the importance of controlling expectations and visit efficiency. Personal experiences varied by diabetes management, technological comfort, and health system compliance. Professionals should be adaptable, communicate well, and help patients to optimize efficiency.7.How may the results be applied in clinical practice?Telehealth diabetes therapy may benefit from the study. These results may help clinicians prepare patients for telemedicine by setting expectations. Block scheduling in-person and telemedicine appointments may boost productivity. Telehealth improvements may include managing expectations, overcoming technology challenges, and understanding patient experiences. These guidelines may improve diabetes patients’ engagement, satisfaction, and health, particularly in poor regions like the Deep South.ReferencesBazzano, A. N., Patel, T., Nauman, E., Cernigliaro, D., & Shi, L. (2024). Optimizing Telehealth for Diabetes Management in the Deep South: qualitative study of barriers and facilitators on the patient and clinician journey. (Preprint).Journal of Medical Internet Research,26, e43583–e43583. https://doi.org/10.2196/43583Week3-DropboxAssignment-ResearchCritique.docxNSG 4000 – Appl of Evidence-Based RerchWeek 3 – Dropbox Assignment – Research Critique***This assignment utilizes TurnItIn.  When you submit this assignment to the assignment drop box, it will automatically be submitted to TurnItIn.  You will receive an Originality Score along with an Originality Report that should be carefully reviewed.  If revisions need to be made to your assignment, you will be able to make additional submissions, and you will quickly receive updated Originally feedback. It is important to plan ahead so that you have enough time to review your originality feedback and make any revisions to your assignment before the final due date. Please see instructions for using TurnItIn in the Course Welcome module under Useful Resources.Directions:For this assignment, you will critiquetwoscholarly peer-reviewed research articles using the template provided. Use theprimary quantitativeandprimary qualitativeresearch articles you shared in Weeks 2 and 3 discussions (SEE BOTH ARTICLES ATTACHED). Both articles must be recent and publishedthis year in a nursing journal. Email your instructor the two articles by Wednesday in Week 3 if you need guidance based on the discussion grading feedback.Donotuse any direct quotes when completing this assignment. As shown on the template, an APA formatted title and references pages are required. Delete the questions from the templatebeforeyou submit the assignment for grading.Use this template: Article Critique Template (SEE TEMPLATE ATTACHED)Research Critique Grading RubricCriteriaRatingsBackground5 ptsExceptionalExcellent background where the author(s) foundation for why anyone would care about this topic was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Importance of Study5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context of the importance of the topic to nursing was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Purpose5 ptsExceptionalExcellent purpose of the study clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Literature Review5 ptsExceptionalExcellent literature review where the identified gap in the literature that was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Research Design5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context identifying the correct research design for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Sample10 ptsExceptionalExcellent context meeting the following criteria were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles: · Description of the sample (Who? How many? Exclusion and inclusion criteria?) · Description of the sampling method (sample selection process)? · Sample sizeData Collection5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where the data collection procedures were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Analysis5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where the data analysis was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Findings/Results5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where the study outcomes and validity of the results were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Limitations5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where study limitations were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Conclusions5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context explaining the conclusions supported by data were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Practice Changes10 ptsExceptionalExcellent context clearly explaining the study’s impact on practice changes for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Research Recommendations10 ptsExceptionalExcellent future research recommendations were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Grammar, Mechanics and Organization10 ptsExceptionalExcellent grammar, mechanics and organization with no errors in in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of paragraphs; and use of complete sentences. The template provided was used to complete the assignment.APA Format for Page Set Up, In-Text Citations and References.10 ptsExceptionalExcellent APA format meeting all of the 3 criteria for both articles: · Title page is free from APA errors. · Correctly APA formatted in-text citations of the references used. · Correct APA formatting on the references page.ArticleCritiqueTemplate11.2023.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new windowArticleCritiqueTemplate11.2023.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new windowWeek2ApplofEvidence2.docx4Week2 Appl of Evidence1.What was the research design?The research method was a systematic review. From database creation until the fourth week of April 2020, the authors searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Global Index Medicus, African Index Medicus, and African Journals Online. They focused on quasi-experimental research, cluster randomized trials, and randomized trials of depression detection therapies in primary care. A PROSPERO pre-registered protocol (CRD42020166291) was followed throughout the evaluation.2.Was the sampling method and size appropriate for the research question? Explain.Methodology and sample size seem to be suitable for answering the research question. After completing a thorough search across a wide number of databases and carrying out a systematic review, the research comprised a substantial number of articles. This method ensures that a broad variety of sources are used, which in turn increases the applicability of the results.3.What were the dependent and independent (outcome) variables?The capacity of the primary healthcare system to identify depression served as the dependent variable, while the numerous treatments that were designed to improve detection served as the independent variables. The major objective of this research is to ascertain whether or not these treatments are effective in increasing the number of people who are diagnosed with depression.4.Were valid and reliable instruments/surveys used to measure outcomes? Explain.Case studies, interviews, record checks, and chart audits are some of the methods that are discussed in this article. These methods are necessary for accurate and trustworthy data assessment. On the other hand, the book does not in any way provide a comprehensive description of the psychometric features of these instruments.5.What were the main results of the study?Combinations of treatments, such as screening, feedback, and professional training, were shown to be more helpful than individual therapies in improving the diagnosis of depression, as indicated by the primary findings of the research. It was also reassuring to see that efforts were being made to raise detection rates via the implementation of policies, integrated care plans, and quality improvement initiatives.6.Was there statistical significance? Explain.The statistical significance of the data is not mentioned explicitly anywhere in the text. However, it is also mentioned that a number of clinical studies shown that certain therapies resulted in significant enhancements, which suggests that the results could have statistical relevance. For the purpose of determining the level of statistical significance, further information and statistical analysis would be necessary.7.How would you use the study results in your practice to make a difference in patient outcomes?As a consequence of the findings of the research, therapeutic approaches might be influenced, which could ultimately result in improved patient outcomes. In order to enhance the diagnosis of depression in primary care settings, the results emphasize the need of integrating many treatments. These therapies include guidelines and collaborative care packages, training for practitioners, screening, and feedback. When these components are included into complete therapies, medical professionals may be able to improve their capacity to diagnose and treat depression.ReferencesHabtamu, K., Birhane, R., Demissie, M., & Fekadu, A. (2024). Interventions to improve the detection of depression in primary healthcare: systematic review.Systematic Reviews,12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02177-6W3ApplEBdiscussion2.docx5Week 3 Appl Evidence-Based Rerch discussion1.What was the research design?The research design for employed was qualitative study. Authors performed semi structured qualitative interviews with diabetes specialists and patients. The qualitative study examined diabetics’ telemedicine experiences, perspectives, hurdles, facilitators, problems, and rewards. Interview transcripts underwent narrative, descriptive, and reflexive thematic analysis.2.How were study participants chosen and was the sample size appropriate?Purposive sampling was used to choose research participants, targeting diabetes patients and healthcare professionals who had received telehealth visits after March 1, 2020. Patient recruiting included portal messaging, secure emails, and phone calls. Clinicians were contacted via phone or email. Interviews included 18 patients and 6 healthcare practitioners. The sample size was suitable for qualitative study, meeting code saturation requirements and enabling for a complete examination of telehealth for diabetes care experiences and viewpoints.3.Does the research methods fit the purpose of the study? Explain.Yes, research methodologies suit the study. Qualitative semi structured interviews and thematic analysis were optimal for studying the complex experiences, obstacles, facilitators, problems, and advantages of telehealth for diabetes care in the Deep South. Because the study focuses on patients and doctors, qualitative methods must be profound. Journey maps and narrative, descriptive strategies encouraged patient-clinician transition exploration. A mixed-method research in a natural experiment used qualitative and quantitative data for understanding.4.Are data collection and analysis techniques appropriate for this type of study? Explain.Yes, qualitative research may gather and analyze data. The thoughts of patients and doctors on diabetes telehealth were gathered via semi-structured interviews. The data was grasped owing to expert qualitative researchers, reflexive thematic analysis, and narrative descriptive analysis. Patient-clinician trip maps were presented. A more comprehensive investigation was possible using deductive and inductive coding. The qualitative analysis tool NVivo facilitated data management. The study’s methods were appropriate for examining the challenges, facilitators, issues, and benefits of telehealth for diabetes treatment.5.Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified? Explain.Yes, the study appropriately describes the issue as the Deep South’s diabetic telemedicine adoption. The research addresses diabetics’ and doctors’ pros and cons of this change. Patient-clinician interactions are evaluated for efficiency, effectiveness, safety, and technology use. Using narrative, descriptive, and qualitative interviews, researchers may learn about Deep South citizens who manage their diabetes using telemedicine.6.What are the reported results?The study found five themes about telehealth for diabetes management: convenience, safety, and comfort; the relative value of in-person visits and telehealth; potential drawbacks of telehealth convenience; the double-edged role of technology; and the importance of controlling expectations and visit efficiency. Personal experiences varied by diabetes management, technological comfort, and health system compliance. Professionals should be adaptable, communicate well, and help patients to optimize efficiency.7.How may the results be applied in clinical practice?Telehealth diabetes therapy may benefit from the study. These results may help clinicians prepare patients for telemedicine by setting expectations. Block scheduling in-person and telemedicine appointments may boost productivity. Telehealth improvements may include managing expectations, overcoming technology challenges, and understanding patient experiences. These guidelines may improve diabetes patients’ engagement, satisfaction, and health, particularly in poor regions like the Deep South.ReferencesBazzano, A. N., Patel, T., Nauman, E., Cernigliaro, D., & Shi, L. (2024). Optimizing Telehealth for Diabetes Management in the Deep South: qualitative study of barriers and facilitators on the patient and clinician journey. (Preprint).Journal of Medical Internet Research,26, e43583–e43583. https://doi.org/10.2196/43583Week3-DropboxAssignment-ResearchCritique.docxNSG 4000 – Appl of Evidence-Based RerchWeek 3 – Dropbox Assignment – Research Critique***This assignment utilizes TurnItIn.  When you submit this assignment to the assignment drop box, it will automatically be submitted to TurnItIn.  You will receive an Originality Score along with an Originality Report that should be carefully reviewed.  If revisions need to be made to your assignment, you will be able to make additional submissions, and you will quickly receive updated Originally feedback. It is important to plan ahead so that you have enough time to review your originality feedback and make any revisions to your assignment before the final due date. Please see instructions for using TurnItIn in the Course Welcome module under Useful Resources.Directions:For this assignment, you will critiquetwoscholarly peer-reviewed research articles using the template provided. Use theprimary quantitativeandprimary qualitativeresearch articles you shared in Weeks 2 and 3 discussions (SEE BOTH ARTICLES ATTACHED). Both articles must be recent and publishedthis year in a nursing journal. Email your instructor the two articles by Wednesday in Week 3 if you need guidance based on the discussion grading feedback.Donotuse any direct quotes when completing this assignment. As shown on the template, an APA formatted title and references pages are required. Delete the questions from the templatebeforeyou submit the assignment for grading.Use this template: Article Critique Template (SEE TEMPLATE ATTACHED)Research Critique Grading RubricCriteriaRatingsBackground5 ptsExceptionalExcellent background where the author(s) foundation for why anyone would care about this topic was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Importance of Study5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context of the importance of the topic to nursing was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Purpose5 ptsExceptionalExcellent purpose of the study clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Literature Review5 ptsExceptionalExcellent literature review where the identified gap in the literature that was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Research Design5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context identifying the correct research design for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Sample10 ptsExceptionalExcellent context meeting the following criteria were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles: · Description of the sample (Who? How many? Exclusion and inclusion criteria?) · Description of the sampling method (sample selection process)? · Sample sizeData Collection5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where the data collection procedures were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Analysis5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where the data analysis was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Findings/Results5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where the study outcomes and validity of the results were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Limitations5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where study limitations were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Conclusions5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context explaining the conclusions supported by data were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Practice Changes10 ptsExceptionalExcellent context clearly explaining the study’s impact on practice changes for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Research Recommendations10 ptsExceptionalExcellent future research recommendations were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Grammar, Mechanics and Organization10 ptsExceptionalExcellent grammar, mechanics and organization with no errors in in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of paragraphs; and use of complete sentences. The template provided was used to complete the assignment.APA Format for Page Set Up, In-Text Citations and References.10 ptsExceptionalExcellent APA format meeting all of the 3 criteria for both articles: · Title page is free from APA errors. · Correctly APA formatted in-text citations of the references used. · Correct APA formatting on the references page.ArticleCritiqueTemplate11.2023.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new windowWeek2ApplofEvidence2.docx4Week2 Appl of Evidence1.What was the research design?The research method was a systematic review. From database creation until the fourth week of April 2020, the authors searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Global Index Medicus, African Index Medicus, and African Journals Online. They focused on quasi-experimental research, cluster randomized trials, and randomized trials of depression detection therapies in primary care. A PROSPERO pre-registered protocol (CRD42020166291) was followed throughout the evaluation.2.Was the sampling method and size appropriate for the research question? Explain.Methodology and sample size seem to be suitable for answering the research question. After completing a thorough search across a wide number of databases and carrying out a systematic review, the research comprised a substantial number of articles. This method ensures that a broad variety of sources are used, which in turn increases the applicability of the results.3.What were the dependent and independent (outcome) variables?The capacity of the primary healthcare system to identify depression served as the dependent variable, while the numerous treatments that were designed to improve detection served as the independent variables. The major objective of this research is to ascertain whether or not these treatments are effective in increasing the number of people who are diagnosed with depression.4.Were valid and reliable instruments/surveys used to measure outcomes? Explain.Case studies, interviews, record checks, and chart audits are some of the methods that are discussed in this article. These methods are necessary for accurate and trustworthy data assessment. On the other hand, the book does not in any way provide a comprehensive description of the psychometric features of these instruments.5.What were the main results of the study?Combinations of treatments, such as screening, feedback, and professional training, were shown to be more helpful than individual therapies in improving the diagnosis of depression, as indicated by the primary findings of the research. It was also reassuring to see that efforts were being made to raise detection rates via the implementation of policies, integrated care plans, and quality improvement initiatives.6.Was there statistical significance? Explain.The statistical significance of the data is not mentioned explicitly anywhere in the text. However, it is also mentioned that a number of clinical studies shown that certain therapies resulted in significant enhancements, which suggests that the results could have statistical relevance. For the purpose of determining the level of statistical significance, further information and statistical analysis would be necessary.7.How would you use the study results in your practice to make a difference in patient outcomes?As a consequence of the findings of the research, therapeutic approaches might be influenced, which could ultimately result in improved patient outcomes. In order to enhance the diagnosis of depression in primary care settings, the results emphasize the need of integrating many treatments. These therapies include guidelines and collaborative care packages, training for practitioners, screening, and feedback. When these components are included into complete therapies, medical professionals may be able to improve their capacity to diagnose and treat depression.ReferencesHabtamu, K., Birhane, R., Demissie, M., & Fekadu, A. (2024). Interventions to improve the detection of depression in primary healthcare: systematic review.Systematic Reviews,12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02177-6W3ApplEBdiscussion2.docx5Week 3 Appl Evidence-Based Rerch discussion1.What was the research design?The research design for employed was qualitative study. Authors performed semi structured qualitative interviews with diabetes specialists and patients. The qualitative study examined diabetics’ telemedicine experiences, perspectives, hurdles, facilitators, problems, and rewards. Interview transcripts underwent narrative, descriptive, and reflexive thematic analysis.2.How were study participants chosen and was the sample size appropriate?Purposive sampling was used to choose research participants, targeting diabetes patients and healthcare professionals who had received telehealth visits after March 1, 2020. Patient recruiting included portal messaging, secure emails, and phone calls. Clinicians were contacted via phone or email. Interviews included 18 patients and 6 healthcare practitioners. The sample size was suitable for qualitative study, meeting code saturation requirements and enabling for a complete examination of telehealth for diabetes care experiences and viewpoints.3.Does the research methods fit the purpose of the study? Explain.Yes, research methodologies suit the study. Qualitative semi structured interviews and thematic analysis were optimal for studying the complex experiences, obstacles, facilitators, problems, and advantages of telehealth for diabetes care in the Deep South. Because the study focuses on patients and doctors, qualitative methods must be profound. Journey maps and narrative, descriptive strategies encouraged patient-clinician transition exploration. A mixed-method research in a natural experiment used qualitative and quantitative data for understanding.4.Are data collection and analysis techniques appropriate for this type of study? Explain.Yes, qualitative research may gather and analyze data. The thoughts of patients and doctors on diabetes telehealth were gathered via semi-structured interviews. The data was grasped owing to expert qualitative researchers, reflexive thematic analysis, and narrative descriptive analysis. Patient-clinician trip maps were presented. A more comprehensive investigation was possible using deductive and inductive coding. The qualitative analysis tool NVivo facilitated data management. The study’s methods were appropriate for examining the challenges, facilitators, issues, and benefits of telehealth for diabetes treatment.5.Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified? Explain.Yes, the study appropriately describes the issue as the Deep South’s diabetic telemedicine adoption. The research addresses diabetics’ and doctors’ pros and cons of this change. Patient-clinician interactions are evaluated for efficiency, effectiveness, safety, and technology use. Using narrative, descriptive, and qualitative interviews, researchers may learn about Deep South citizens who manage their diabetes using telemedicine.6.What are the reported results?The study found five themes about telehealth for diabetes management: convenience, safety, and comfort; the relative value of in-person visits and telehealth; potential drawbacks of telehealth convenience; the double-edged role of technology; and the importance of controlling expectations and visit efficiency. Personal experiences varied by diabetes management, technological comfort, and health system compliance. Professionals should be adaptable, communicate well, and help patients to optimize efficiency.7.How may the results be applied in clinical practice?Telehealth diabetes therapy may benefit from the study. These results may help clinicians prepare patients for telemedicine by setting expectations. Block scheduling in-person and telemedicine appointments may boost productivity. Telehealth improvements may include managing expectations, overcoming technology challenges, and understanding patient experiences. These guidelines may improve diabetes patients’ engagement, satisfaction, and health, particularly in poor regions like the Deep South.ReferencesBazzano, A. N., Patel, T., Nauman, E., Cernigliaro, D., & Shi, L. (2024). Optimizing Telehealth for Diabetes Management in the Deep South: qualitative study of barriers and facilitators on the patient and clinician journey. (Preprint).Journal of Medical Internet Research,26, e43583–e43583. https://doi.org/10.2196/43583Week3-DropboxAssignment-ResearchCritique.docxNSG 4000 – Appl of Evidence-Based RerchWeek 3 – Dropbox Assignment – Research Critique***This assignment utilizes TurnItIn.  When you submit this assignment to the assignment drop box, it will automatically be submitted to TurnItIn.  You will receive an Originality Score along with an Originality Report that should be carefully reviewed.  If revisions need to be made to your assignment, you will be able to make additional submissions, and you will quickly receive updated Originally feedback. It is important to plan ahead so that you have enough time to review your originality feedback and make any revisions to your assignment before the final due date. Please see instructions for using TurnItIn in the Course Welcome module under Useful Resources.Directions:For this assignment, you will critiquetwoscholarly peer-reviewed research articles using the template provided. Use theprimary quantitativeandprimary qualitativeresearch articles you shared in Weeks 2 and 3 discussions (SEE BOTH ARTICLES ATTACHED). Both articles must be recent and publishedthis year in a nursing journal. Email your instructor the two articles by Wednesday in Week 3 if you need guidance based on the discussion grading feedback.Donotuse any direct quotes when completing this assignment. As shown on the template, an APA formatted title and references pages are required. Delete the questions from the templatebeforeyou submit the assignment for grading.Use this template: Article Critique Template (SEE TEMPLATE ATTACHED)Research Critique Grading RubricCriteriaRatingsBackground5 ptsExceptionalExcellent background where the author(s) foundation for why anyone would care about this topic was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Importance of Study5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context of the importance of the topic to nursing was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Purpose5 ptsExceptionalExcellent purpose of the study clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Literature Review5 ptsExceptionalExcellent literature review where the identified gap in the literature that was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Research Design5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context identifying the correct research design for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Sample10 ptsExceptionalExcellent context meeting the following criteria were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles: · Description of the sample (Who? How many? Exclusion and inclusion criteria?) · Description of the sampling method (sample selection process)? · Sample sizeData Collection5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where the data collection procedures were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Analysis5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where the data analysis was clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Findings/Results5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where the study outcomes and validity of the results were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Limitations5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context where study limitations were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Conclusions5 ptsExceptionalExcellent context explaining the conclusions supported by data were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Practice Changes10 ptsExceptionalExcellent context clearly explaining the study’s impact on practice changes for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Research Recommendations10 ptsExceptionalExcellent future research recommendations were clearly stated for both the quantitative and qualitative articles.Grammar, Mechanics and Organization10 ptsExceptionalExcellent grammar, mechanics and organization with no errors in in the following: spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; logical sequence of paragraphs; and use of complete sentences. The template provided was used to complete the assignment.APA Format for Page Set Up, In-Text Citations and References.10 ptsExceptionalExcellent APA format meeting all of the 3 criteria for both articles: · Title page is free from APA errors. · Correctly APA formatted in-text citations of the references used. · Correct APA formatting on the references page.ArticleCritiqueTemplate11.2023.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new window1234Bids(73)Dr. Ellen RMMathProgrammingDr. Aylin JMPROF_ALISTERProf Double RSheryl HoganEmily Clarefirstclass tutorDemi_RoseMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverJudithTutorDiscount AssignTop MalaikaProWritingGuruDr. Everleigh_JKColeen AndersonIsabella HarvardBrilliant GeekTutor Cyrus KenShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Principles of Accounting`FOR NYANYA ONLYIdentify and discuss some of the problems or dangers in using project networks. Explain under what circumstances they can be beneficial and when they can be dangerous.UMUC Haricuts IFSM 300 Stage 4A+ PaperCloud computingHhhhdhdhdvdbsjsjksiehrhznjSpace Matrix Needed for Microsoft CorpWeek 4 Assignment: Emotional Intelligence (EI) – Nursing

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now