Professional Accountability

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpnursingHomeworka year ago18.02.202415Report issuefiles (2)professionalaccountability415.docxNRS-415Rubric-ProfessionalAccountabilityReflection.pdfprofessionalaccountability415.docxhe purpose of this assignment is to evaluate personal and professional accountability in the context of social media. Social media plays a significant role in modern society and is now a common tool used by individuals and organizations alike to evaluate a person’s values, authenticity, and reputation. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates for employment. Inappropriate or unprofessional conduct on social media can pose legal problems for nurses as well as damage public trust in nursing.For this assignment, log-in to each social media platform for which you have an account. Review your profile and most recent activity including pictures and posts. If you do not have a social media account, access one of the following social media platforms in order to view the social media posts and activities of others: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok. Reflect on the information and content you and others post on a daily basis.In 500-750 words, summarize your findings. Include the following in your summary:1. Describe the posts, conversations, and images you evaluated.2. Does the activity on social media appear to align with your personal values and the professional values of your discipline?3. Would family, friends, and colleagues consider the posts, conversations, and images authentic and representative of who you are as unique individuals?4. Does the activity on social media respect the human value and dignity of others as reflected in Christian values?5. Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with professional values, regulatory requirements, and workplace policies in both personal and professional interactions. Include a discussion of how personal conduct can violate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 or be considered unethical and unprofessional. Provide an example to support your answer.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing EducationThis assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 8.1, 8.5, 9.1, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 10.2.NRS-415Rubric-ProfessionalAccountabilityReflection.pdfProfessional Accountability Reflection – RubricPost Engagement 27.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDescribe posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be consideredinappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.5. Target 27.5 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isthorough.4. Acceptable 24.48 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isdetailed.3. Approaching 21.73 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is presentbut lacks detail.2. Insufficient 20.63 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isincomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is notpresent.Collapse All© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Standard of Conduct 33 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent withregulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives,including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical orunprofessional.5. Target 33 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is thorough and includes substantial supporting detail andexamples.4. Acceptable 29.37 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is detailed and includes examples.3. Approaching 26.07 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is present but lacks detail or examples.2. Insufficient 24.75 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Christian Values and Social Media 16.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values and areas that couldbe improved.5. Target 16.5 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is thorough.4. Acceptable 14.69 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is detailed.3. Approaching 13.04 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is present but lacks detail.2. Insufficient 12.38 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearlydirected to a specific audience.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of theappropriate audience is demonstrated.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionallyweak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very littleawareness of the intended audience.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriateaudience is evident.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Development, Structure, and Conclusion 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionAdvances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolvesfrom development.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progressionof ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to thedevelopment of the purpose.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build oneach other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsLimited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There areinconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplisticand not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsWriting lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Someorganization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear andnot supported by the overall development of the purpose.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsNo advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connectionsbetween paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Evidence 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionSelects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considersother perspectives.5. Target 6.6 pointsSpecific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others areclearly considered.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsRelevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsEvidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation orintegration of other perspectives is present.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsEvidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives issuperficial or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsEvidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing reliesentirely on the perspective of the writer.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Mechanics of Writing 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentencestructure, etc.5. Target 6.6 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentencestructure are used throughout.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentencestructure are used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generallyappropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in languagechoice or sentence structure are recurrent.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect languagechoice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Format/Documentation 4.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,appropriate to assignment and discipline.5. Target 4.4 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.4. Acceptable 3.92 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.3. Approaching 3.48 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obviouserrors.2. Insufficient 3.3 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errorsin documentation of sources are evident.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.Total 110 points© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/NRS-415Rubric-ProfessionalAccountabilityReflection.pdfProfessional Accountability Reflection – RubricPost Engagement 27.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDescribe posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be consideredinappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.5. Target 27.5 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isthorough.4. Acceptable 24.48 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isdetailed.3. Approaching 21.73 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is presentbut lacks detail.2. Insufficient 20.63 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isincomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is notpresent.Collapse All© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Standard of Conduct 33 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent withregulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives,including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical orunprofessional.5. Target 33 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is thorough and includes substantial supporting detail andexamples.4. Acceptable 29.37 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is detailed and includes examples.3. Approaching 26.07 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is present but lacks detail or examples.2. Insufficient 24.75 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Christian Values and Social Media 16.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values and areas that couldbe improved.5. Target 16.5 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is thorough.4. Acceptable 14.69 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is detailed.3. Approaching 13.04 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is present but lacks detail.2. Insufficient 12.38 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearlydirected to a specific audience.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of theappropriate audience is demonstrated.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionallyweak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very littleawareness of the intended audience.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriateaudience is evident.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Development, Structure, and Conclusion 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionAdvances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolvesfrom development.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progressionof ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to thedevelopment of the purpose.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build oneach other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsLimited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There areinconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplisticand not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsWriting lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Someorganization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear andnot supported by the overall development of the purpose.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsNo advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connectionsbetween paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Evidence 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionSelects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considersother perspectives.5. Target 6.6 pointsSpecific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others areclearly considered.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsRelevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsEvidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation orintegration of other perspectives is present.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsEvidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives issuperficial or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsEvidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing reliesentirely on the perspective of the writer.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Mechanics of Writing 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentencestructure, etc.5. Target 6.6 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentencestructure are used throughout.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentencestructure are used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generallyappropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in languagechoice or sentence structure are recurrent.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect languagechoice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Format/Documentation 4.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,appropriate to assignment and discipline.5. Target 4.4 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.4. Acceptable 3.92 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.3. Approaching 3.48 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obviouserrors.2. Insufficient 3.3 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errorsin documentation of sources are evident.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.Total 110 points© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/professionalaccountability415.docxhe purpose of this assignment is to evaluate personal and professional accountability in the context of social media. Social media plays a significant role in modern society and is now a common tool used by individuals and organizations alike to evaluate a person’s values, authenticity, and reputation. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates for employment. Inappropriate or unprofessional conduct on social media can pose legal problems for nurses as well as damage public trust in nursing.For this assignment, log-in to each social media platform for which you have an account. Review your profile and most recent activity including pictures and posts. If you do not have a social media account, access one of the following social media platforms in order to view the social media posts and activities of others: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok. Reflect on the information and content you and others post on a daily basis.In 500-750 words, summarize your findings. Include the following in your summary:1. Describe the posts, conversations, and images you evaluated.2. Does the activity on social media appear to align with your personal values and the professional values of your discipline?3. Would family, friends, and colleagues consider the posts, conversations, and images authentic and representative of who you are as unique individuals?4. Does the activity on social media respect the human value and dignity of others as reflected in Christian values?5. Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with professional values, regulatory requirements, and workplace policies in both personal and professional interactions. Include a discussion of how personal conduct can violate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 or be considered unethical and unprofessional. Provide an example to support your answer.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing EducationThis assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 8.1, 8.5, 9.1, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 10.2.NRS-415Rubric-ProfessionalAccountabilityReflection.pdfProfessional Accountability Reflection – RubricPost Engagement 27.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDescribe posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be consideredinappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.5. Target 27.5 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isthorough.4. Acceptable 24.48 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isdetailed.3. Approaching 21.73 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is presentbut lacks detail.2. Insufficient 20.63 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isincomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is notpresent.Collapse All© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Standard of Conduct 33 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent withregulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives,including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical orunprofessional.5. Target 33 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is thorough and includes substantial supporting detail andexamples.4. Acceptable 29.37 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is detailed and includes examples.3. Approaching 26.07 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is present but lacks detail or examples.2. Insufficient 24.75 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Christian Values and Social Media 16.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values and areas that couldbe improved.5. Target 16.5 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is thorough.4. Acceptable 14.69 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is detailed.3. Approaching 13.04 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is present but lacks detail.2. Insufficient 12.38 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearlydirected to a specific audience.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of theappropriate audience is demonstrated.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionallyweak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very littleawareness of the intended audience.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriateaudience is evident.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Development, Structure, and Conclusion 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionAdvances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolvesfrom development.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progressionof ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to thedevelopment of the purpose.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build oneach other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsLimited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There areinconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplisticand not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsWriting lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Someorganization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear andnot supported by the overall development of the purpose.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsNo advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connectionsbetween paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Evidence 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionSelects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considersother perspectives.5. Target 6.6 pointsSpecific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others areclearly considered.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsRelevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsEvidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation orintegration of other perspectives is present.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsEvidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives issuperficial or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsEvidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing reliesentirely on the perspective of the writer.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Mechanics of Writing 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentencestructure, etc.5. Target 6.6 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentencestructure are used throughout.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentencestructure are used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generallyappropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in languagechoice or sentence structure are recurrent.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect languagechoice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Format/Documentation 4.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,appropriate to assignment and discipline.5. Target 4.4 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.4. Acceptable 3.92 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.3. Approaching 3.48 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obviouserrors.2. Insufficient 3.3 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errorsin documentation of sources are evident.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.Total 110 points© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/professionalaccountability415.docxhe purpose of this assignment is to evaluate personal and professional accountability in the context of social media. Social media plays a significant role in modern society and is now a common tool used by individuals and organizations alike to evaluate a person’s values, authenticity, and reputation. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates for employment. Inappropriate or unprofessional conduct on social media can pose legal problems for nurses as well as damage public trust in nursing.For this assignment, log-in to each social media platform for which you have an account. Review your profile and most recent activity including pictures and posts. If you do not have a social media account, access one of the following social media platforms in order to view the social media posts and activities of others: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok. Reflect on the information and content you and others post on a daily basis.In 500-750 words, summarize your findings. Include the following in your summary:1. Describe the posts, conversations, and images you evaluated.2. Does the activity on social media appear to align with your personal values and the professional values of your discipline?3. Would family, friends, and colleagues consider the posts, conversations, and images authentic and representative of who you are as unique individuals?4. Does the activity on social media respect the human value and dignity of others as reflected in Christian values?5. Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with professional values, regulatory requirements, and workplace policies in both personal and professional interactions. Include a discussion of how personal conduct can violate the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 or be considered unethical and unprofessional. Provide an example to support your answer.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing EducationThis assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 8.1, 8.5, 9.1, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 10.2.NRS-415Rubric-ProfessionalAccountabilityReflection.pdfProfessional Accountability Reflection – RubricPost Engagement 27.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDescribe posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might be consideredinappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.5. Target 27.5 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isthorough.4. Acceptable 24.48 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isdetailed.3. Approaching 21.73 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is presentbut lacks detail.2. Insufficient 20.63 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing isincomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA description of posts that have been engaged with or viewed that might beconsidered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing is notpresent.Collapse All© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Standard of Conduct 33 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent withregulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personal lives,including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical orunprofessional.5. Target 33 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is thorough and includes substantial supporting detail andexamples.4. Acceptable 29.37 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is detailed and includes examples.3. Approaching 26.07 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is present but lacks detail or examples.2. Insufficient 24.75 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of a nurse’s responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistentwith regulatory requirements and workplace policies in both work and personallives, including how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethicalor unprofessional, is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Christian Values and Social Media 16.5 pointsCriteria DescriptionDiscuss areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values and areas that couldbe improved.5. Target 16.5 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is thorough.4. Acceptable 14.69 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is detailed.3. Approaching 13.04 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is present but lacks detail.2. Insufficient 12.38 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is incomplete or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsA discussion of the areas of social media activity that reflect Christian values as theyrelate to human value and dignity for all individuals and areas that could beimproved is not present.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Thesis, Position, or Purpose 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearlydirected to a specific audience.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of theappropriate audience is demonstrated.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionallyweak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very littleawareness of the intended audience.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriateaudience is evident.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Development, Structure, and Conclusion 7.7 pointsCriteria DescriptionAdvances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolvesfrom development.5. Target 7.7 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progressionof ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to thedevelopment of the purpose.4. Acceptable 6.85 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build oneach other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.3. Approaching 6.08 pointsLimited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There areinconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplisticand not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.2. Insufficient 5.78 pointsWriting lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Someorganization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear andnot supported by the overall development of the purpose.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsNo advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connectionsbetween paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Evidence 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionSelects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considersother perspectives.5. Target 6.6 pointsSpecific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others areclearly considered.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsRelevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsEvidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation orintegration of other perspectives is present.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsEvidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives issuperficial or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsEvidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing reliesentirely on the perspective of the writer.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Mechanics of Writing 6.6 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentencestructure, etc.5. Target 6.6 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentencestructure are used throughout.4. Acceptable 5.87 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentencestructure are used.3. Approaching 5.21 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generallyappropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.2. Insufficient 4.95 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in languagechoice or sentence structure are recurrent.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect languagechoice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/Format/Documentation 4.4 pointsCriteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,appropriate to assignment and discipline.5. Target 4.4 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.4. Acceptable 3.92 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.3. Approaching 3.48 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obviouserrors.2. Insufficient 3.3 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errorsin documentation of sources are evident.1. Unsatisfactory 0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.Total 110 points© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/https://www.gce.com/12Bids(64)Dr. Ellen RMPROF_ALISTERSheryl HoganProf Double REmily ClareDr. Sarah BlakeProf. TOPGRADEfirstclass tutorDemi_RoseFiona DavaMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssigngrA+de plusJahky BProWritingGuruIsabella HarvardBrilliant GeekTutor Cyrus KenShow All Bidsother Questions(10)3 page paper on outsourcingBSHS 422 Cultural Competency AssessmentI need help with BIP2 Tasks 1 and 2 from WGU.Rehabilitation Paperi have to write a resaerch essay81Finance Pinegarcan you do it?Please see below and contactDocument Analysis

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now