week 2 interview A1
Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpinterviewplease follow all directions2 years ago03.12.202310Report issuefiles (2)HUMN_6161_Week02_RatingSamplesForMISpirit.pdfWeek2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdfHUMN_6161_Week02_RatingSamplesForMISpirit.pdf22From Building Motivational Interviewing Skills: A Practitioner Workbook by David B. Rosengren. Copyright 2009 by The Guilford Press. Permission to
photocopy this exercise is granted to purchasers of this book for personal use only (see copyright page for details).(cont.)ExErcisE 2.2 Rating Samples for MI SpiritHere are examples of short client statements and prac ti tion er responses. Review these exchanges and then decide if
the prac ti tion er’s response is consistent with the spirit of MI (thumbs up) or not (thumbs down). You might want to jot
down a few notes as to why you rated each sample as you did. Then look at the discussion for each example at the
end of this exercise.1. Sarah’s husband (Richard) : I’m just furious that she lied to me and had this affair behind my back. I can’t
believe I didn’t see it. I feel like such an idiot.Prac ti tion er: In retrospect, what signs did you overlook?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?2. Arthur: I know my dad told you I’m depressed, but I’m not. Just because I don’t want to play football doesn’t
mean I’m depressed.Prac ti tion er: Your father is worrying needlessly. What do you think he’s seeing that makes him worry this
way?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?3. Tanya : I need to come up with some sort of plan to help me get back on track now. This health crisis has
thrown me for a loop. I can’t think about anything else. What do you think I should do?Prac ti tion er: Well, I have some ideas about what might help, but first let me hear what you’ve already consid-
ered.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?4. Arthur: I’m not going to keep that stupid thought journal. How does it help me to monitor my “loser” thinking?
I’m coming here to feel better, and paying attention to all that makes me feel worse.Prac ti tion er: OK, Arthur, you might be right. This works for many folks, but not everyone. Maybe we need to try
a different way to approach this. We’ve talked about other ways to approach this issue. What makes sense to
you to practice instead?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?5. Tanya : They told me I have to have this surgery right away. But I don’t trust them, so I haven’t scheduled it
yet.23Rating Samples for MI Spirit (p. 2 of 2)Prac ti tion er: Why take the chance? They’re the experts, after all. Let’s call from this phone right now—maybe
you can get in this week.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?6. Sarah: I’ve had it with Richard’s guilt mongering. Okay, so I had an affair. I’m ready to end it and start working
on our marriage, but I don’t think he’s ever going to let me forget it. Maybe we should just get a divorce.Prac ti tion er: Sarah, you are the only one who can decide if you should stay in this marriage or leave it. I wonder
what signs you would need to feel more optimistic about working on things with Richard.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?7. Arthur’s mother (Peggy) : They had a little “surprise party” for me. Everyone showed up when I wasn’t looking
and then spent the next 2 hours telling me how my drinking hurt them. They think I’m an alcoholic! I might have
a drinking problem, but I’m damn sure not an alcoholic.Prac ti tion er: (gently) Peggy, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. I think if all those
people are telling you you’re an alcoholic, they’re probably right. You might be in denial, don’t you think?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?8. Arthur’s father (Lloyd) : I think Arthur is taking over too many of the household responsibilities. A boy his age
ought to be playing sports and chasing girls. Instead, he’s worrying about his younger brother and how the
house looks. He even does laundry. I can tell you I never did that at his age. But when I try to push him toward
more normal things, like football, he just gets mad at me and says I don’t understand him. What am I supposed
to do?Prac ti tion er: In families where alcohol has been a problem, it often works like this. What if you tried the chess
club or the school newspaper instead of pushing him toward football? I think he’d be more receptive to that. I
don’t think you recognize how smart Arthur is. It could be that he will never be all that interested in football.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?9. Tanya : My doctor gave me a long list of all the things I have to do to manage my care. It’s overwhelming. I have
to take medication three times a day. I can’t even remember to feed my dog every single day. I just can’t do it.
But I’m afraid I’ll die if I don’t.Prac ti tion er: (encouraging) You can do this. You have to.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?Week2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdfDue Dec 10 by 10:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2Start AssignmentBack to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567)There is an old adage that “practice makes perfect,” which is particularly relevant to learning a new set of
skills like those associated with motivational interviewing. Over the next several weeks, the Assignments
are designed to give you opportunities to practice specific motivational interviewing skills that are
introduced in the Discussions.In this week’s Discussion, you practiced applying the spirit of motivational interviewing to a service user
in the case study to which you were assigned. As you may remember, the spirit of motivational
interviewing is a heart-set and mindset that encompasses four elements that are crucial for building a
relationship with a service user: partnership, acceptance, compassion, and evocation (Miller & Rollnick,
2013). In this Assignment, you will review a series of practitioner statements to determine whether the
statements reflect the spirit of motivational interviewing.Reference:
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change(3rd ed.). The
Guilford Press.THE SPIRIT OF MOTIVATIONAL
INTERVIEWINGRESOURCESBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591)https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591HUMN_6161_Week2_Assignment_RubricReview the Learning Resources on the spirit of motivational interviewing.
Review the document entitled, “Rating Samples for MI Spirit.” Consider whether each of the
exchanges is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not?Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the
spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific.
In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational
interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of
motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft,
access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment
as WK2Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial.2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.TO PREPAREBY DAY 7SUBMISSION AND GRADING INFORMATIONhttps://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591Criteria Ratings Pts20 pts22.5 pts7.5 ptsExplain
whether
each
exchange in
the “Rating
Samples for
MI Spirit”
document is
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
Why, or why
not? Be
specific.20 to >17.8 pts
Exceeds
Expectations
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing is
accurate and
complete. Specific
and convincing
justifications are
provided.17.8 to >15.8 pts
Meets
Expectations
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing is
mostly accurate and
complete. Relevant
justifications are
provided.15.8 to >13.8 pts
FairExplanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing is
somewhat
inaccurate and/or
incomplete. Vague
justifications are
provided.13.8 to >0 pts
Needs
Improvement
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with
the spirit of
motivational
interviewing is
inaccurate,
incomplete, or
missing
altogether. No
justifications are
provided.In instances
where you
do not
believe that
the
exchange is
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing,
explain how
the
practitioner
could have
responded
to be
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
Again, be
specific.22.5 to >20.02 pts
Exceeds
Expectations
Explanation of how
the practitioner
could have
responded is
specific,
appropriate, and
consistent with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.20.02 to >17.78 pts
Meets Expectations
Explanation of how
the practitioner could
have responded is
mostly specific,
appropriate, and
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing,
although there may
be minor errors,
inaccuracies, or
missing details.17.78 to >15.52 pts
Fair
Explanation of how
the practitioner could
have responded is
vague, somewhat
inaccurate, or
somewhat
inconsistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing. There
may be errors,
inaccuracies, or
missing details.15.52 to >0 pts
Needs
Improvement
Explanation of
how the
practitioner
could have
responded is
missing,
inaccurate, or
inconsistent with
the spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
There may be
major errors,
inaccuracies,
and missing
details.Scholarly
Writing and
APA Style7.5 to >6.68 pts
Exceeds
Expectations6.68 to >5.93 pts
Meets
Expectations5.93 to >5.18 pts
Fair5.18 to >0 pts
Needs
ImprovementTotal Points: 50Criteria Ratings PtsThe paper is clear
and coherent.
Student writes with
proper grammar,
sentence structure,
and punctuation to
convey their
scholarly message.
Fewer than 5
errors occur in the
paper. The paper
displays proper
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
paraphrases
evidence from
scholarly sources
correctly and
integrates and
analyzes it
effectively. Includes
citations and a
reference list that
are mostly
formatted correctly
in APA Style.
Headings and
paper formatting
reflect proper APA.The paper is mostly
clear and coherent.
Errors in grammar,
sentence structure,
and punctuation are
minor, minimal (5-8),
and do not interfere
with the scholarly
message. The paper
displays effective
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
paraphrases
evidence from
scholarly sources
correctly, but
integration and
analysis could be
improved. Includes
citations and a
reference list, but
they contain minor
APA errors.
Headings and paper
formatting contain
minor APA errors.The paper is
somewhat clear and
coherent. Errors in
grammar, sentence
structure, and
punctuation are
minor but frequent
(9-12) and
occasionally
interfere with the
message. The paper
has lapses in
scholarly voice. The
paper lacks clear
organization or
occasionally strays
from the focus.
Student occasionally
paraphrases source
information
incorrectly. Includes
citations and a
reference list, but
they contain major
APA errors.
Headings and paper
formatting contain
major APA errors.The paper lacks
clarity and
coherence.
Errors in
grammar,
sentence
structure, and
punctuation are
major, pervasive
(13+), and
interfere with the
message. The
paper shows little
or no attention to
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
consistently
paraphrases
source
information
incorrectly
(resulting in
accidental
plagiarism)
and/or relies
exclusively on
direct quotes.
Citations are
infrequent or
missing. Little or
no attempt has
been made to
provide a
reference list or
to formatWeek2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdfDue Dec 10 by 10:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2Start AssignmentBack to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567)There is an old adage that “practice makes perfect,” which is particularly relevant to learning a new set of
skills like those associated with motivational interviewing. Over the next several weeks, the Assignments
are designed to give you opportunities to practice specific motivational interviewing skills that are
introduced in the Discussions.In this week’s Discussion, you practiced applying the spirit of motivational interviewing to a service user
in the case study to which you were assigned. As you may remember, the spirit of motivational
interviewing is a heart-set and mindset that encompasses four elements that are crucial for building a
relationship with a service user: partnership, acceptance, compassion, and evocation (Miller & Rollnick,
2013). In this Assignment, you will review a series of practitioner statements to determine whether the
statements reflect the spirit of motivational interviewing.Reference:
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change(3rd ed.). The
Guilford Press.THE SPIRIT OF MOTIVATIONAL
INTERVIEWINGRESOURCESBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591)https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591HUMN_6161_Week2_Assignment_RubricReview the Learning Resources on the spirit of motivational interviewing.
Review the document entitled, “Rating Samples for MI Spirit.” Consider whether each of the
exchanges is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not?Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the
spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific.
In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational
interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of
motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft,
access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment
as WK2Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial.2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.TO PREPAREBY DAY 7SUBMISSION AND GRADING INFORMATIONhttps://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591Criteria Ratings Pts20 pts22.5 pts7.5 ptsExplain
whether
each
exchange in
the “Rating
Samples for
MI Spirit”
document is
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
Why, or why
not? Be
specific.20 to >17.8 pts
Exceeds
Expectations
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing is
accurate and
complete. Specific
and convincing
justifications are
provided.17.8 to >15.8 pts
Meets
Expectations
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing is
mostly accurate and
complete. Relevant
justifications are
provided.15.8 to >13.8 pts
FairExplanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing is
somewhat
inaccurate and/or
incomplete. Vague
justifications are
provided.13.8 to >0 pts
Needs
Improvement
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with
the spirit of
motivational
interviewing is
inaccurate,
incomplete, or
missing
altogether. No
justifications are
provided.In instances
where you
do not
believe that
the
exchange is
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing,
explain how
the
practitioner
could have
responded
to be
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
Again, be
specific.22.5 to >20.02 pts
Exceeds
Expectations
Explanation of how
the practitioner
could have
responded is
specific,
appropriate, and
consistent with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.20.02 to >17.78 pts
Meets Expectations
Explanation of how
the practitioner could
have responded is
mostly specific,
appropriate, and
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing,
although there may
be minor errors,
inaccuracies, or
missing details.17.78 to >15.52 pts
Fair
Explanation of how
the practitioner could
have responded is
vague, somewhat
inaccurate, or
somewhat
inconsistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing. There
may be errors,
inaccuracies, or
missing details.15.52 to >0 pts
Needs
Improvement
Explanation of
how the
practitioner
could have
responded is
missing,
inaccurate, or
inconsistent with
the spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
There may be
major errors,
inaccuracies,
and missing
details.Scholarly
Writing and
APA Style7.5 to >6.68 pts
Exceeds
Expectations6.68 to >5.93 pts
Meets
Expectations5.93 to >5.18 pts
Fair5.18 to >0 pts
Needs
ImprovementTotal Points: 50Criteria Ratings PtsThe paper is clear
and coherent.
Student writes with
proper grammar,
sentence structure,
and punctuation to
convey their
scholarly message.
Fewer than 5
errors occur in the
paper. The paper
displays proper
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
paraphrases
evidence from
scholarly sources
correctly and
integrates and
analyzes it
effectively. Includes
citations and a
reference list that
are mostly
formatted correctly
in APA Style.
Headings and
paper formatting
reflect proper APA.The paper is mostly
clear and coherent.
Errors in grammar,
sentence structure,
and punctuation are
minor, minimal (5-8),
and do not interfere
with the scholarly
message. The paper
displays effective
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
paraphrases
evidence from
scholarly sources
correctly, but
integration and
analysis could be
improved. Includes
citations and a
reference list, but
they contain minor
APA errors.
Headings and paper
formatting contain
minor APA errors.The paper is
somewhat clear and
coherent. Errors in
grammar, sentence
structure, and
punctuation are
minor but frequent
(9-12) and
occasionally
interfere with the
message. The paper
has lapses in
scholarly voice. The
paper lacks clear
organization or
occasionally strays
from the focus.
Student occasionally
paraphrases source
information
incorrectly. Includes
citations and a
reference list, but
they contain major
APA errors.
Headings and paper
formatting contain
major APA errors.The paper lacks
clarity and
coherence.
Errors in
grammar,
sentence
structure, and
punctuation are
major, pervasive
(13+), and
interfere with the
message. The
paper shows little
or no attention to
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
consistently
paraphrases
source
information
incorrectly
(resulting in
accidental
plagiarism)
and/or relies
exclusively on
direct quotes.
Citations are
infrequent or
missing. Little or
no attempt has
been made to
provide a
reference list or
to formatHUMN_6161_Week02_RatingSamplesForMISpirit.pdf22From Building Motivational Interviewing Skills: A Practitioner Workbook by David B. Rosengren. Copyright 2009 by The Guilford Press. Permission to
photocopy this exercise is granted to purchasers of this book for personal use only (see copyright page for details).(cont.)ExErcisE 2.2 Rating Samples for MI SpiritHere are examples of short client statements and prac ti tion er responses. Review these exchanges and then decide if
the prac ti tion er’s response is consistent with the spirit of MI (thumbs up) or not (thumbs down). You might want to jot
down a few notes as to why you rated each sample as you did. Then look at the discussion for each example at the
end of this exercise.1. Sarah’s husband (Richard) : I’m just furious that she lied to me and had this affair behind my back. I can’t
believe I didn’t see it. I feel like such an idiot.Prac ti tion er: In retrospect, what signs did you overlook?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?2. Arthur: I know my dad told you I’m depressed, but I’m not. Just because I don’t want to play football doesn’t
mean I’m depressed.Prac ti tion er: Your father is worrying needlessly. What do you think he’s seeing that makes him worry this
way?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?3. Tanya : I need to come up with some sort of plan to help me get back on track now. This health crisis has
thrown me for a loop. I can’t think about anything else. What do you think I should do?Prac ti tion er: Well, I have some ideas about what might help, but first let me hear what you’ve already consid-
ered.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?4. Arthur: I’m not going to keep that stupid thought journal. How does it help me to monitor my “loser” thinking?
I’m coming here to feel better, and paying attention to all that makes me feel worse.Prac ti tion er: OK, Arthur, you might be right. This works for many folks, but not everyone. Maybe we need to try
a different way to approach this. We’ve talked about other ways to approach this issue. What makes sense to
you to practice instead?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?5. Tanya : They told me I have to have this surgery right away. But I don’t trust them, so I haven’t scheduled it
yet.23Rating Samples for MI Spirit (p. 2 of 2)Prac ti tion er: Why take the chance? They’re the experts, after all. Let’s call from this phone right now—maybe
you can get in this week.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?6. Sarah: I’ve had it with Richard’s guilt mongering. Okay, so I had an affair. I’m ready to end it and start working
on our marriage, but I don’t think he’s ever going to let me forget it. Maybe we should just get a divorce.Prac ti tion er: Sarah, you are the only one who can decide if you should stay in this marriage or leave it. I wonder
what signs you would need to feel more optimistic about working on things with Richard.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?7. Arthur’s mother (Peggy) : They had a little “surprise party” for me. Everyone showed up when I wasn’t looking
and then spent the next 2 hours telling me how my drinking hurt them. They think I’m an alcoholic! I might have
a drinking problem, but I’m damn sure not an alcoholic.Prac ti tion er: (gently) Peggy, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. I think if all those
people are telling you you’re an alcoholic, they’re probably right. You might be in denial, don’t you think?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?8. Arthur’s father (Lloyd) : I think Arthur is taking over too many of the household responsibilities. A boy his age
ought to be playing sports and chasing girls. Instead, he’s worrying about his younger brother and how the
house looks. He even does laundry. I can tell you I never did that at his age. But when I try to push him toward
more normal things, like football, he just gets mad at me and says I don’t understand him. What am I supposed
to do?Prac ti tion er: In families where alcohol has been a problem, it often works like this. What if you tried the chess
club or the school newspaper instead of pushing him toward football? I think he’d be more receptive to that. I
don’t think you recognize how smart Arthur is. It could be that he will never be all that interested in football.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?9. Tanya : My doctor gave me a long list of all the things I have to do to manage my care. It’s overwhelming. I have
to take medication three times a day. I can’t even remember to feed my dog every single day. I just can’t do it.
But I’m afraid I’ll die if I don’t.Prac ti tion er: (encouraging) You can do this. You have to.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?Week2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdfDue Dec 10 by 10:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2Start AssignmentBack to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567)There is an old adage that “practice makes perfect,” which is particularly relevant to learning a new set of
skills like those associated with motivational interviewing. Over the next several weeks, the Assignments
are designed to give you opportunities to practice specific motivational interviewing skills that are
introduced in the Discussions.In this week’s Discussion, you practiced applying the spirit of motivational interviewing to a service user
in the case study to which you were assigned. As you may remember, the spirit of motivational
interviewing is a heart-set and mindset that encompasses four elements that are crucial for building a
relationship with a service user: partnership, acceptance, compassion, and evocation (Miller & Rollnick,
2013). In this Assignment, you will review a series of practitioner statements to determine whether the
statements reflect the spirit of motivational interviewing.Reference:
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change(3rd ed.). The
Guilford Press.THE SPIRIT OF MOTIVATIONAL
INTERVIEWINGRESOURCESBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591)https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591HUMN_6161_Week2_Assignment_RubricReview the Learning Resources on the spirit of motivational interviewing.
Review the document entitled, “Rating Samples for MI Spirit.” Consider whether each of the
exchanges is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not?Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the
spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific.
In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational
interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of
motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft,
access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment
as WK2Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial.2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.TO PREPAREBY DAY 7SUBMISSION AND GRADING INFORMATIONhttps://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591Criteria Ratings Pts20 pts22.5 pts7.5 ptsExplain
whether
each
exchange in
the “Rating
Samples for
MI Spirit”
document is
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
Why, or why
not? Be
specific.20 to >17.8 pts
Exceeds
Expectations
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing is
accurate and
complete. Specific
and convincing
justifications are
provided.17.8 to >15.8 pts
Meets
Expectations
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing is
mostly accurate and
complete. Relevant
justifications are
provided.15.8 to >13.8 pts
FairExplanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing is
somewhat
inaccurate and/or
incomplete. Vague
justifications are
provided.13.8 to >0 pts
Needs
Improvement
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with
the spirit of
motivational
interviewing is
inaccurate,
incomplete, or
missing
altogether. No
justifications are
provided.In instances
where you
do not
believe that
the
exchange is
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing,
explain how
the
practitioner
could have
responded
to be
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
Again, be
specific.22.5 to >20.02 pts
Exceeds
Expectations
Explanation of how
the practitioner
could have
responded is
specific,
appropriate, and
consistent with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.20.02 to >17.78 pts
Meets Expectations
Explanation of how
the practitioner could
have responded is
mostly specific,
appropriate, and
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing,
although there may
be minor errors,
inaccuracies, or
missing details.17.78 to >15.52 pts
Fair
Explanation of how
the practitioner could
have responded is
vague, somewhat
inaccurate, or
somewhat
inconsistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing. There
may be errors,
inaccuracies, or
missing details.15.52 to >0 pts
Needs
Improvement
Explanation of
how the
practitioner
could have
responded is
missing,
inaccurate, or
inconsistent with
the spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
There may be
major errors,
inaccuracies,
and missing
details.Scholarly
Writing and
APA Style7.5 to >6.68 pts
Exceeds
Expectations6.68 to >5.93 pts
Meets
Expectations5.93 to >5.18 pts
Fair5.18 to >0 pts
Needs
ImprovementTotal Points: 50Criteria Ratings PtsThe paper is clear
and coherent.
Student writes with
proper grammar,
sentence structure,
and punctuation to
convey their
scholarly message.
Fewer than 5
errors occur in the
paper. The paper
displays proper
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
paraphrases
evidence from
scholarly sources
correctly and
integrates and
analyzes it
effectively. Includes
citations and a
reference list that
are mostly
formatted correctly
in APA Style.
Headings and
paper formatting
reflect proper APA.The paper is mostly
clear and coherent.
Errors in grammar,
sentence structure,
and punctuation are
minor, minimal (5-8),
and do not interfere
with the scholarly
message. The paper
displays effective
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
paraphrases
evidence from
scholarly sources
correctly, but
integration and
analysis could be
improved. Includes
citations and a
reference list, but
they contain minor
APA errors.
Headings and paper
formatting contain
minor APA errors.The paper is
somewhat clear and
coherent. Errors in
grammar, sentence
structure, and
punctuation are
minor but frequent
(9-12) and
occasionally
interfere with the
message. The paper
has lapses in
scholarly voice. The
paper lacks clear
organization or
occasionally strays
from the focus.
Student occasionally
paraphrases source
information
incorrectly. Includes
citations and a
reference list, but
they contain major
APA errors.
Headings and paper
formatting contain
major APA errors.The paper lacks
clarity and
coherence.
Errors in
grammar,
sentence
structure, and
punctuation are
major, pervasive
(13+), and
interfere with the
message. The
paper shows little
or no attention to
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
consistently
paraphrases
source
information
incorrectly
(resulting in
accidental
plagiarism)
and/or relies
exclusively on
direct quotes.
Citations are
infrequent or
missing. Little or
no attempt has
been made to
provide a
reference list or
to formatHUMN_6161_Week02_RatingSamplesForMISpirit.pdf22From Building Motivational Interviewing Skills: A Practitioner Workbook by David B. Rosengren. Copyright 2009 by The Guilford Press. Permission to
photocopy this exercise is granted to purchasers of this book for personal use only (see copyright page for details).(cont.)ExErcisE 2.2 Rating Samples for MI SpiritHere are examples of short client statements and prac ti tion er responses. Review these exchanges and then decide if
the prac ti tion er’s response is consistent with the spirit of MI (thumbs up) or not (thumbs down). You might want to jot
down a few notes as to why you rated each sample as you did. Then look at the discussion for each example at the
end of this exercise.1. Sarah’s husband (Richard) : I’m just furious that she lied to me and had this affair behind my back. I can’t
believe I didn’t see it. I feel like such an idiot.Prac ti tion er: In retrospect, what signs did you overlook?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?2. Arthur: I know my dad told you I’m depressed, but I’m not. Just because I don’t want to play football doesn’t
mean I’m depressed.Prac ti tion er: Your father is worrying needlessly. What do you think he’s seeing that makes him worry this
way?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?3. Tanya : I need to come up with some sort of plan to help me get back on track now. This health crisis has
thrown me for a loop. I can’t think about anything else. What do you think I should do?Prac ti tion er: Well, I have some ideas about what might help, but first let me hear what you’ve already consid-
ered.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?4. Arthur: I’m not going to keep that stupid thought journal. How does it help me to monitor my “loser” thinking?
I’m coming here to feel better, and paying attention to all that makes me feel worse.Prac ti tion er: OK, Arthur, you might be right. This works for many folks, but not everyone. Maybe we need to try
a different way to approach this. We’ve talked about other ways to approach this issue. What makes sense to
you to practice instead?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?5. Tanya : They told me I have to have this surgery right away. But I don’t trust them, so I haven’t scheduled it
yet.23Rating Samples for MI Spirit (p. 2 of 2)Prac ti tion er: Why take the chance? They’re the experts, after all. Let’s call from this phone right now—maybe
you can get in this week.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?6. Sarah: I’ve had it with Richard’s guilt mongering. Okay, so I had an affair. I’m ready to end it and start working
on our marriage, but I don’t think he’s ever going to let me forget it. Maybe we should just get a divorce.Prac ti tion er: Sarah, you are the only one who can decide if you should stay in this marriage or leave it. I wonder
what signs you would need to feel more optimistic about working on things with Richard.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?7. Arthur’s mother (Peggy) : They had a little “surprise party” for me. Everyone showed up when I wasn’t looking
and then spent the next 2 hours telling me how my drinking hurt them. They think I’m an alcoholic! I might have
a drinking problem, but I’m damn sure not an alcoholic.Prac ti tion er: (gently) Peggy, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck. I think if all those
people are telling you you’re an alcoholic, they’re probably right. You might be in denial, don’t you think?Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?8. Arthur’s father (Lloyd) : I think Arthur is taking over too many of the household responsibilities. A boy his age
ought to be playing sports and chasing girls. Instead, he’s worrying about his younger brother and how the
house looks. He even does laundry. I can tell you I never did that at his age. But when I try to push him toward
more normal things, like football, he just gets mad at me and says I don’t understand him. What am I supposed
to do?Prac ti tion er: In families where alcohol has been a problem, it often works like this. What if you tried the chess
club or the school newspaper instead of pushing him toward football? I think he’d be more receptive to that. I
don’t think you recognize how smart Arthur is. It could be that he will never be all that interested in football.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?9. Tanya : My doctor gave me a long list of all the things I have to do to manage my care. It’s overwhelming. I have
to take medication three times a day. I can’t even remember to feed my dog every single day. I just can’t do it.
But I’m afraid I’ll die if I don’t.Prac ti tion er: (encouraging) You can do this. You have to.Thumbs up Thumbs downWhy?Week2_Assignment1.pdfinterview.pdfDue Dec 10 by 10:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2Start AssignmentBack to Week at a Glance
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567)There is an old adage that “practice makes perfect,” which is particularly relevant to learning a new set of
skills like those associated with motivational interviewing. Over the next several weeks, the Assignments
are designed to give you opportunities to practice specific motivational interviewing skills that are
introduced in the Discussions.In this week’s Discussion, you practiced applying the spirit of motivational interviewing to a service user
in the case study to which you were assigned. As you may remember, the spirit of motivational
interviewing is a heart-set and mindset that encompasses four elements that are crucial for building a
relationship with a service user: partnership, acceptance, compassion, and evocation (Miller & Rollnick,
2013). In this Assignment, you will review a series of practitioner statements to determine whether the
statements reflect the spirit of motivational interviewing.Reference:
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change(3rd ed.). The
Guilford Press.THE SPIRIT OF MOTIVATIONAL
INTERVIEWINGRESOURCESBe sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591)https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591HUMN_6161_Week2_Assignment_RubricReview the Learning Resources on the spirit of motivational interviewing.
Review the document entitled, “Rating Samples for MI Spirit.” Consider whether each of the
exchanges is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not?Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the
spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific.
In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational
interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of
motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft,
access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment
as WK2Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial.2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.TO PREPAREBY DAY 7SUBMISSION AND GRADING INFORMATIONhttps://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591Criteria Ratings Pts20 pts22.5 pts7.5 ptsExplain
whether
each
exchange in
the “Rating
Samples for
MI Spirit”
document is
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
Why, or why
not? Be
specific.20 to >17.8 pts
Exceeds
Expectations
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing is
accurate and
complete. Specific
and convincing
justifications are
provided.17.8 to >15.8 pts
Meets
Expectations
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing is
mostly accurate and
complete. Relevant
justifications are
provided.15.8 to >13.8 pts
FairExplanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing is
somewhat
inaccurate and/or
incomplete. Vague
justifications are
provided.13.8 to >0 pts
Needs
Improvement
Explanation of
whether each
exchange is
consistent with
the spirit of
motivational
interviewing is
inaccurate,
incomplete, or
missing
altogether. No
justifications are
provided.In instances
where you
do not
believe that
the
exchange is
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing,
explain how
the
practitioner
could have
responded
to be
consistent
with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
Again, be
specific.22.5 to >20.02 pts
Exceeds
Expectations
Explanation of how
the practitioner
could have
responded is
specific,
appropriate, and
consistent with the
spirit of
motivational
interviewing.20.02 to >17.78 pts
Meets Expectations
Explanation of how
the practitioner could
have responded is
mostly specific,
appropriate, and
consistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing,
although there may
be minor errors,
inaccuracies, or
missing details.17.78 to >15.52 pts
Fair
Explanation of how
the practitioner could
have responded is
vague, somewhat
inaccurate, or
somewhat
inconsistent with the
spirit of motivational
interviewing. There
may be errors,
inaccuracies, or
missing details.15.52 to >0 pts
Needs
Improvement
Explanation of
how the
practitioner
could have
responded is
missing,
inaccurate, or
inconsistent with
the spirit of
motivational
interviewing.
There may be
major errors,
inaccuracies,
and missing
details.Scholarly
Writing and
APA Style7.5 to >6.68 pts
Exceeds
Expectations6.68 to >5.93 pts
Meets
Expectations5.93 to >5.18 pts
Fair5.18 to >0 pts
Needs
ImprovementTotal Points: 50Criteria Ratings PtsThe paper is clear
and coherent.
Student writes with
proper grammar,
sentence structure,
and punctuation to
convey their
scholarly message.
Fewer than 5
errors occur in the
paper. The paper
displays proper
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
paraphrases
evidence from
scholarly sources
correctly and
integrates and
analyzes it
effectively. Includes
citations and a
reference list that
are mostly
formatted correctly
in APA Style.
Headings and
paper formatting
reflect proper APA.The paper is mostly
clear and coherent.
Errors in grammar,
sentence structure,
and punctuation are
minor, minimal (5-8),
and do not interfere
with the scholarly
message. The paper
displays effective
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
paraphrases
evidence from
scholarly sources
correctly, but
integration and
analysis could be
improved. Includes
citations and a
reference list, but
they contain minor
APA errors.
Headings and paper
formatting contain
minor APA errors.The paper is
somewhat clear and
coherent. Errors in
grammar, sentence
structure, and
punctuation are
minor but frequent
(9-12) and
occasionally
interfere with the
message. The paper
has lapses in
scholarly voice. The
paper lacks clear
organization or
occasionally strays
from the focus.
Student occasionally
paraphrases source
information
incorrectly. Includes
citations and a
reference list, but
they contain major
APA errors.
Headings and paper
formatting contain
major APA errors.The paper lacks
clarity and
coherence.
Errors in
grammar,
sentence
structure, and
punctuation are
major, pervasive
(13+), and
interfere with the
message. The
paper shows little
or no attention to
scholarly voice,
organization, and
focus. Student
consistently
paraphrases
source
information
incorrectly
(resulting in
accidental
plagiarism)
and/or relies
exclusively on
direct quotes.
Citations are
infrequent or
missing. Little or
no attempt has
been made to
provide a
reference list or
to format12Bids(60)Dr. Ellen RMMathProgrammingnicohwilliamPROF_ALISTERProf Double RSheryl HoganDemi_RoseFiona DavaIsabella HarvardMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverJudithTutorDiscount AssignSTELLAR GEEK A+Jahky BTop MalaikaProWritingGuruColeen AndersonDr. Everleigh_JKBrilliant GeekShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Suzanne123Relationship Dynamics on Org ChangeComparison PaperC++ 2-Dimensional Blackjack Programanalysis essayBrand Personality Presentationpaper for NJOSH onlyResearch paperliterature review-ony the 1-page proposal part- for Dr. Rocal ONLYWhat individual or collective actions can people take to improve our food systems, and what would be their impact?
Needs help with similar assignment?
We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper
Get Answer Over WhatsApp
Order Paper Now
