Part 1 Discussion:
Workplace Environment Assessment

How healthy is your workplace?

You may think your current organization operates seamlessly,
or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things
that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a
patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of
your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues
you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much
deeper than leadership recognizes.

There are many factors and measures that may impact
organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can
institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be
sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the
use of tools in measuring workplace civility.

To Prepare:

Review
the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on
page 20 of Clark (2015).

Review
and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.

By Day 3 of Week 7

Post a brief description of the
results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is
your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a
situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace. How was this
addressed? Be specific and provide examples.

To Prepare:

Review
the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on
page 20 of Clark (2015).

Review
and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.

By Day 3 of Week 7

Post a brief description of the results of your
Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace?
Explain why your workplace
is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced
incivility in the workplace. How was this addressed? Be specific and provide
examples.

Rubric Detail

Main Posting

45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of
the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and
synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and
current credible sources.

Supported by at
least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and
concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current
APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the
discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis
of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post
has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at
least three credible sources.

Written clearly and
concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to
current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of
the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria
are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking
reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents
knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with
two credible sources.

Written somewhat
concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA
formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to
the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or
superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and
critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent
knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or
no credible sources.

Not written clearly
or concisely.

Contains more than
two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to
current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness

10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by
day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day
3.

First Response

17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits
synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to
questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear,
concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly
sources.

Demonstrates
synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is
professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty
questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is
effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits
critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is
professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty
questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear,
concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible
sources.

Response is
effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic
and may have some depth.

Responses posted in
the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty
questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack
clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are
cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be
on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in
the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty
questions are missing.

No credible sources
are cited.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper