Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpMSNplease read file thoroughly aand make sure what is expected pleasea year ago25.03.20241Report issuefiles (1)projects.docxprojects.docx2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic ReviewsCreate a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:· Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.· Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.· Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.· Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.· Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.Very importantFor this week’s assignment the focus is on systematic reviews, meta- analysis, scoping studies, etc.  Do NOT use a primary research article for this assignment  as you will get a poor grade for that work.  The focus of the assignment is on research articles that review multiple articles on a topic. Remember the articles that you select MUST be peer reviewed and published in the last 5 years (2018- present).Grading rubric below. Please straightly follow the rubrics For this work, make sure ever points is mentioned. The professor use the rubric to grade. Points is taken off if all details ask is not mentions. Please pleasePart 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples80 to >71.0 ptsExcellentThe presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the developed PICO(T) question. …The presentation clearly and accurately identifies four or more research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. …The presentation includes specific and relevant examples that fully support the research. …The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and accurate synthesis of two outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected, and fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUsing proper in-text citations, the presentation clearly and accurately provides at least four peer-reviewed systematic review type articles selected, describes the levels of evidence in each of the four articles selected, including a thorough and detailed explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.Resource SynthesisResource Formatting Appropriate peer-reviewed articles are included and citations use APA format.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentPresentation includes 4 or more peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …Citations use correct APA format with no errorsPowerPoint Presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentThe presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical orderWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.projects.docx2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic ReviewsCreate a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:· Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.· Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.· Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.· Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.· Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.Very importantFor this week’s assignment the focus is on systematic reviews, meta- analysis, scoping studies, etc.  Do NOT use a primary research article for this assignment  as you will get a poor grade for that work.  The focus of the assignment is on research articles that review multiple articles on a topic. Remember the articles that you select MUST be peer reviewed and published in the last 5 years (2018- present).Grading rubric below. Please straightly follow the rubrics For this work, make sure ever points is mentioned. The professor use the rubric to grade. Points is taken off if all details ask is not mentions. Please pleasePart 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. · Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. · Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples80 to >71.0 ptsExcellentThe presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest. …The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the developed PICO(T) question. …The presentation clearly and accurately identifies four or more research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected. …The presentation includes specific and relevant examples that fully support the research. …The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and accurate synthesis of two outside resources related to the peer-reviewed articles selected, and fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUsing proper in-text citations, the presentation clearly and accurately provides at least four peer-reviewed systematic review type articles selected, describes the levels of evidence in each of the four articles selected, including a thorough and detailed explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.Resource SynthesisResource Formatting Appropriate peer-reviewed articles are included and citations use APA format.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentPresentation includes 4 or more peer-reviewed articles selected using systematic reviews for clinical research. …Citations use correct APA format with no errorsPowerPoint Presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentThe presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical orderWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Bids(42)Jahky BPROF_ALISTERDiscount AssignTeacher A+ WorkFiona DavaBrilliant GeekTutor Cyrus KenAshley EllieProf Double RTopanswersColeen AndersonJudithTutorAmanda SmithQuality AssignmentsDr. BeneveLarry KellyMaria the tutorbrilliant answersBrainy BrianPROFESSOR URGENTShow All Bidsother Questions(10)The customer is always rightBusiness Statistics AssignmentquestionsGilgameshwriting assignment helpSystem Admin Max Points: 10.0 Active acquired immunity can be achieved through the use of childhood immunizations. Many parents voice concerns regarding the safety of vaccinations. What is your opinion on the current use of vaccinations? How would you eduTopic SelectionmidOperationsscience

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpMSNa year ago26.03.20241Report issuefiles (1)Scenari1.docxScenari1.docxScenario: A 38-year-old female presents to the emergency room with complaints of dyspnea and left leg pain.  Patient reports that her left leg started feeling heavy a few days ago and has also been red since she returned from a recent trip.  She denies any injury to her leg.  She reports that she started having some dyspnea in the last 24 hours.  Patient history is remarkable for systemic lupus erythematosus and a history of recent airplane travel.  She is also taking oral birth control.  Her bp is 130/84, heart rate 100, R 24, and temp is 100.4F.  Physical exam reveals unilateral +2 pitting leg edema to left leg with erythema.In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following· The pulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.· Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.· How these processes interact to affect the patient.Paper should be formatted according to APA 7th ed. Include anintroductionthat provides an overview to your paper and aconclusionthat summarizes your paperRubric below: please follow:Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain pulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Explain how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.Explain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation30 to >27.0 pExcellentThe response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.APA format. Title page and references page. Correct grammar/writing clarity/sentences structure.Scenari1.docxScenario: A 38-year-old female presents to the emergency room with complaints of dyspnea and left leg pain.  Patient reports that her left leg started feeling heavy a few days ago and has also been red since she returned from a recent trip.  She denies any injury to her leg.  She reports that she started having some dyspnea in the last 24 hours.  Patient history is remarkable for systemic lupus erythematosus and a history of recent airplane travel.  She is also taking oral birth control.  Her bp is 130/84, heart rate 100, R 24, and temp is 100.4F.  Physical exam reveals unilateral +2 pitting leg edema to left leg with erythema.In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following· The pulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.· Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.· How these processes interact to affect the patient.Paper should be formatted according to APA 7th ed. Include anintroductionthat provides an overview to your paper and aconclusionthat summarizes your paperRubric below: please follow:Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain pulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Explain how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.Explain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation30 to >27.0 pExcellentThe response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the pulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.APA format. Title page and references page. Correct grammar/writing clarity/sentences structure.Bids(44)PROF_ALISTERJahky BDiscount AssignTeacher A+ WorkFiona DavaBrilliant GeekTutor Cyrus KenTop MalaikaProf Double RAshley EllieTopanswersColeen AndersonJudithTutorAmanda SmithQuality AssignmentsDr. BeneveLarry KellyMaria the tutorRihAN_Mendozabrilliant answersShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Discussion #7for kim woodsMadoff case paperweek 5 3-19-15ECN 320 HW3• Based on the case study, identify three (3) considerations that the Best Protection Insurance Company could include in the promotional process that it utilizes to avoid future legal issues. Provide support for your rationale. • Suggest two (2) staffingfor A-plus writerWriting helpGeology Questionmodern auditing

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpResponsenursingPLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING POST OF A CLASSMATE IN 100 WORDS, Remember that your posts must be substantive and contribute to the dialogue that is taking place:The consumers frequently have the impression that herbal preparations are safe because of their natural origin which underlines the importance of health professionals instructing their patients on the potential risks and precautions that may accompany these natural remedies. Although they are nature based, herbal supplements sometimes interfere with the regular medications and pose health risks particularly when used without proper guidance (Edward & Ariche, 2019). It is vital for health practitioners to warn the patients of these risks and encourage them to seek professional advice before taking the herbal supplements. Additionally, patients need to be informed about the fact that the herbal products are not regulated by the FDA, so they can display different quality, potency, and purity (Edward & Ariche, 2019). Promoting patients to only acquire supplements from dependable sources and consulting healthcare workers before use will go a long way in minimizing the side effects and ensuring effective integration into treatment regimens.Educating patients about possible interactions between medications and herbal preparations is of great importance for medication safety and achieving optimal treatment effectiveness, as herb-drug interactions may affect efficacy and safety. Healthcare providers have to stress the necessity of patients to disclose all the medications and supplements that they are using to avoid adverse reactions or any other negative consequences (Edward & Ariche, 2019). The healthcare professionals impart the importance of communication and education to the patients thereby enabling the people to take wise choices regarding their health so that the risk of mixing drugs and using herbal preparations can be minimized.ReferencesEdward, E., & Ariche, C. K. (2019). Ethical issues in traditional herbal medical practice in Nigeria.International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI),2(4), 129-135.a year ago26.03.20246Report issueBids(65)Dr. Ellen RMnicohwilliamPROF_ALISTERSheryl HoganProf Double RDr. Sarah BlakeProWritingGurufirstclass tutorDoctor.NamiraFiona DavaMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverJudithTutorDiscount AssigngrA+de plusMARTHA92_PHDJahky BDr. Everleigh_JKColeen AndersonIsabella HarvardShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Discussion 2 Response to Classmates RevisedSentencing Proposal Assault of Officer 2nd attemptIntroduction to BiometricsCalculating RatiosProf Eliud – Research MethodsSTR581 w5 dq.2x^4+9x^2-400=0I need an Essay for History classCourse Research Projectshort essay

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpNursformat regarding Chest Pain and Di8erential Diagnosisa year ago26.03.202430Report issuefiles (1)AdvancedHealthAssessmentResearchpaperinstructions.pdfAdvancedHealthAssessmentResearchpaperinstructions.pdfSubmit a research paper in APA format regarding Chest Pain and Di8erential Diagnosis. The
student is to pick any three (3) di8erential diagnoses that can be associated with chest pain
and their approach in various clinical settings.

Research paper due in week 5.

See Rubric below

Include the following components in your research paper:
1. Title Page
2. Introduction (general)
3. Mention research studies (at least three articles) that validate the information presented
in your paper. (Publication date should be no more than five (5) years old).
4. Conclusion
5. References Page

Criteria Rating Points

Exemplary 100 pts
Competent 90 pts
Developing 80 pts
Emerging 70 pts
Not submitted 0 pts

A 20% similarity index for all assignments in Turnitin is preferred. More than 30% is not
acceptable. References will be taken into consideration and won’t count toward the
percentage.

If you need help with APA style, the link below is provided by the FNU online library under
the title “writing studio.”
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_gu
ide/general_format.htmlhttps://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.htmlhttps://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.htmlAdvancedHealthAssessmentResearchpaperinstructions.pdfSubmit a research paper in APA format regarding Chest Pain and Di8erential Diagnosis. The
student is to pick any three (3) di8erential diagnoses that can be associated with chest pain
and their approach in various clinical settings.

Research paper due in week 5.

See Rubric below

Include the following components in your research paper:
1. Title Page
2. Introduction (general)
3. Mention research studies (at least three articles) that validate the information presented
in your paper. (Publication date should be no more than five (5) years old).
4. Conclusion
5. References Page

Criteria Rating Points

Exemplary 100 pts
Competent 90 pts
Developing 80 pts
Emerging 70 pts
Not submitted 0 pts

A 20% similarity index for all assignments in Turnitin is preferred. More than 30% is not
acceptable. References will be taken into consideration and won’t count toward the
percentage.

If you need help with APA style, the link below is provided by the FNU online library under
the title “writing studio.”
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_gu
ide/general_format.htmlhttps://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.htmlhttps://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/general_format.htmlBids(57)Miss DeannaDr. Ellen RMEmily ClareDr. Sarah BlakeMISS HILLARY A+abdul_rehman_Sheryl HoganProf Double RYoung NyanyaSTELLAR GEEK A+ProWritingGuruJahky BDr M. MichelleAshley EllieTutor Cyrus KenDr. Sophie MilesDr CloverIsabella HarvardColeen AndersongrA+de plusShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Ethics and the Global Economy”assignment due sundayfiPROGRESS REPORTACCT444 Week 2 Quiz Latest 2017IntellProp_W4_A26mga3representative samplingCan you answer discussion questions pleaseSome online accounting class work

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now