Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpeducationplanningA plan to implement a bridge between evidence and clinical practicea year ago09.03.202450Report issuefiles (1)Assessment3Instructions.docxAssessment3Instructions.docxAssessment 3sessment 3Implementing Evidence-Based PracticeInstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1availableAttempt 2Attempt 3Create a poster presentation to communicate an implementation plan to bridge the gap between the evidence you will research and clinical practice. You will then record audio of no more than five minutes presenting your poster.Master’s-level nurses need to be able to think critically about the evidence, outcomes data, and other relevant information they encounter throughout their daily practice. Often the evidence or information that a nurse encounters, researches, or studies is not presented in the exact context of that nurse’s practice. A key skill of the master’s-level nurse is to transfer evidence from the context in which it was presented and apply it to a different context in order to maximize the benefit to patients in that new context.Collapse AllProfessional ContextMaster’s-level nurses understand the importance of utilizing evidence-based practice in their health care setting. The challenge is bridging the gap between the evidence and clinical practice. “This is the way we’ve always done it,” is a common response and may not indicate evidence-based practice is being utilized. Furthermore, when a practice problem is identified, what are the steps to communicate the need for change with the interprofessional team?One way to communicate the need for quality improvements, as well as your plans for achieving specific changes, is through a presentation poster. This type of communication tool is used in workplaces as well as professional and academic conferences. Being able to convey the essence and value of a project in a compelling and succinct way is a valuable skill, and it is vital within the constraints of a single poster.ScenarioYou have been asked to give a poster presentation based on your work and research on a clinical problem in your practice setting. The purpose is to lay out the evidence and a potential implementation plan to your colleagues in order to bridge the gap between the evidence and the practice and improve the quality and outcomes of care.InstructionsIdentify a clinical problem in your work setting and develop an implementation plan to carry out your evidence-based practice proposal using a poster presentation. You may use thePoster Presentation Template [PPTX]to help structure and organize your assessment submission.Your Implementation Plan should include the following:· Background on the clinical problem.· PICOT question.· Stakeholders that will be impacted.· Action plan for implementation.· Potential barriers to project implementation.· Baseline data that will be needed to evaluate outcomes.· Search strategy and databases used.· Summary of the evidence with a critical appraisal of its quality.The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your poster presentation addresses all of them.· Develop a PICOT question for a chosen clinical problem.· Include a graphic that is relevant to the clinical problem.· Provide a background on the clinical problem identified.· Outline an action plan to implement the evidence-based project that includes:· The recommended practice change.· Proposed timeline for implementation.· The tools or resources that will be needed to support the project.· Identify the stakeholders, opportunities for innovation, and potential barriers to the practice change needed for project implementation.· Who are the stakeholders who will be impacted?· What are areas of the project that present opportunities for innovation?· What are the potential barriers, such as a lack of knowledge, time, skill level, motivation, or resources that could impact project implementation?· Propose outcome criteria to evaluate the evidence-based practice project and how they will be measured.· How will outcomes be measured?· How do your outcomes align with the Quadruple Aim?· How will your outcome measures inform evidence-based practice, guidelines, or policies?· Evaluate the evidence that supports the need for practice change.· In the notes section of your poster presentation:· Describe your search strategy and databases that were used.· Summarize your findings with a critical appraisal of the quality and relevance of your resources.· Convey purpose of the poster presentation, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.· Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, using current APA style.If you choose not to use the provided template, there are templates in PowerPoint or on the Internet that can help you get started designing your poster.Before starting to record your presentation make sure you have:· Set up and tested your microphone and headset using the installation instructions provided by the manufacturer. You only need to use the headset if your audio is not clear or high quality when captured by the microphone.· Practice using the equipment to ensure the audio quality is sufficient.· ConsultUsing Kalturafor guidance on how to record your presentation and upload it in the courseroom.· Microsoft PowerPoint also allows you to record your narration with your slides. If you choose this option, simply submit your presentation to the appropriate area of the courseroom. Your narration will be included with your stories.· Remember to practice delivering and recording your presentation multiple times to ensure effective delivery.Note:If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact Disability Services at[email protected]to request accommodations.Submission Requirements·Font and font size: Appropriate size and weight for a presentation, generally 24–28 points for headings; no smaller than 18 points for bullet-point text. Use a suitable professional typeface, such as Times or Arial, throughout the presentation.·Length of presentation: No more than five minutes.·Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of current scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current source material is defined as no older than five years unless it is a seminal work.·APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.Competencies MeasuredBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:· Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.· Outline an action plan to implement the evidence-based practice project that includes the recommendations for practice change, a timeline, and tools or resources needed.· Propose outcome criteria for evaluating the evidence-based practice project and how the outcomes will be measured.· Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.· Identify the stakeholders, opportunities for innovation, and potential barriers to the practice change needed for project implementation.· Competency 3: Evaluate the value, relevance, and ethics of available evidence upon which clinical decisions are made.· Develop a PICOT question for a chosen clinical problem.· Evaluate the value and relevance of the evidence that supports the need for a practice change.· Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.· Convey purpose of the poster presentation in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.· Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.image1.wmfAssessment3Instructions.docxAssessment 3sessment 3Implementing Evidence-Based PracticeInstructionsResourcesActivityAttempt 1availableAttempt 2Attempt 3Create a poster presentation to communicate an implementation plan to bridge the gap between the evidence you will research and clinical practice. You will then record audio of no more than five minutes presenting your poster.Master’s-level nurses need to be able to think critically about the evidence, outcomes data, and other relevant information they encounter throughout their daily practice. Often the evidence or information that a nurse encounters, researches, or studies is not presented in the exact context of that nurse’s practice. A key skill of the master’s-level nurse is to transfer evidence from the context in which it was presented and apply it to a different context in order to maximize the benefit to patients in that new context.Collapse AllProfessional ContextMaster’s-level nurses understand the importance of utilizing evidence-based practice in their health care setting. The challenge is bridging the gap between the evidence and clinical practice. “This is the way we’ve always done it,” is a common response and may not indicate evidence-based practice is being utilized. Furthermore, when a practice problem is identified, what are the steps to communicate the need for change with the interprofessional team?One way to communicate the need for quality improvements, as well as your plans for achieving specific changes, is through a presentation poster. This type of communication tool is used in workplaces as well as professional and academic conferences. Being able to convey the essence and value of a project in a compelling and succinct way is a valuable skill, and it is vital within the constraints of a single poster.ScenarioYou have been asked to give a poster presentation based on your work and research on a clinical problem in your practice setting. The purpose is to lay out the evidence and a potential implementation plan to your colleagues in order to bridge the gap between the evidence and the practice and improve the quality and outcomes of care.InstructionsIdentify a clinical problem in your work setting and develop an implementation plan to carry out your evidence-based practice proposal using a poster presentation. You may use thePoster Presentation Template [PPTX]to help structure and organize your assessment submission.Your Implementation Plan should include the following:· Background on the clinical problem.· PICOT question.· Stakeholders that will be impacted.· Action plan for implementation.· Potential barriers to project implementation.· Baseline data that will be needed to evaluate outcomes.· Search strategy and databases used.· Summary of the evidence with a critical appraisal of its quality.The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your poster presentation addresses all of them.· Develop a PICOT question for a chosen clinical problem.· Include a graphic that is relevant to the clinical problem.· Provide a background on the clinical problem identified.· Outline an action plan to implement the evidence-based project that includes:· The recommended practice change.· Proposed timeline for implementation.· The tools or resources that will be needed to support the project.· Identify the stakeholders, opportunities for innovation, and potential barriers to the practice change needed for project implementation.· Who are the stakeholders who will be impacted?· What are areas of the project that present opportunities for innovation?· What are the potential barriers, such as a lack of knowledge, time, skill level, motivation, or resources that could impact project implementation?· Propose outcome criteria to evaluate the evidence-based practice project and how they will be measured.· How will outcomes be measured?· How do your outcomes align with the Quadruple Aim?· How will your outcome measures inform evidence-based practice, guidelines, or policies?· Evaluate the evidence that supports the need for practice change.· In the notes section of your poster presentation:· Describe your search strategy and databases that were used.· Summarize your findings with a critical appraisal of the quality and relevance of your resources.· Convey purpose of the poster presentation, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.· Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, using current APA style.If you choose not to use the provided template, there are templates in PowerPoint or on the Internet that can help you get started designing your poster.Before starting to record your presentation make sure you have:· Set up and tested your microphone and headset using the installation instructions provided by the manufacturer. You only need to use the headset if your audio is not clear or high quality when captured by the microphone.· Practice using the equipment to ensure the audio quality is sufficient.· ConsultUsing Kalturafor guidance on how to record your presentation and upload it in the courseroom.· Microsoft PowerPoint also allows you to record your narration with your slides. If you choose this option, simply submit your presentation to the appropriate area of the courseroom. Your narration will be included with your stories.· Remember to practice delivering and recording your presentation multiple times to ensure effective delivery.Note:If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact Disability Services at[email protected]to request accommodations.Submission Requirements·Font and font size: Appropriate size and weight for a presentation, generally 24–28 points for headings; no smaller than 18 points for bullet-point text. Use a suitable professional typeface, such as Times or Arial, throughout the presentation.·Length of presentation: No more than five minutes.·Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of current scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current source material is defined as no older than five years unless it is a seminal work.·APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.Competencies MeasuredBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:· Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care.· Outline an action plan to implement the evidence-based practice project that includes the recommendations for practice change, a timeline, and tools or resources needed.· Propose outcome criteria for evaluating the evidence-based practice project and how the outcomes will be measured.· Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.· Identify the stakeholders, opportunities for innovation, and potential barriers to the practice change needed for project implementation.· Competency 3: Evaluate the value, relevance, and ethics of available evidence upon which clinical decisions are made.· Develop a PICOT question for a chosen clinical problem.· Evaluate the value and relevance of the evidence that supports the need for a practice change.· Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.· Convey purpose of the poster presentation in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.· Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.image1.wmfBids(65)PROVEN STERLINGDr. Ellen RMEmily ClareDr. Sarah Blakeabdul_rehman_Prof Double RDoctor.NamiraSTELLAR GEEK A+ProWritingGuruJahky BProf. TOPGRADESheryl HoganDr. Adeline ZoeDr M. MichelleAshley Elliesherry proffDr. Sophie MilesWIZARD_KIMProf SapolskyDr CloverShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Your final portfolio for the class will be to create a marketing plan for…executive summaryAuditing two questions. A mature writer.What are the characteristics of a population for which it would be appropriate to use mean/median/mode? When would the characteristics…4 page single spaced neededAman purchased goods from Dhiraj& Co. amounting to  70,000. As per the terms, if Aman made full payment to Dhiraj&…Statement of Work – Product-BasedA+ Solution Fresh with 100% Score!assignmentAssignment 2: LASA 1: Case Studies Presentation

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpthankyouUsing data gathered from the course textbooks, the South University Online Library, and websites (World Health Organization, United Nations, etc.), create a profile of the nutrition habits of two countries.On the basis of your research, create a 3-page report ,APA style, that answers the following questions:What are the main sources of food for these countries? What are gaps in nutrition for these countries?How do social, political and cultural factors affect access to adequate nutrition in each country?Are there groups within the populations of each country that are affected at greater rates? Who are they? Why do you think this is?Does this affect other health issues in each country? How?a year ago04.03.202415Report issueBids(64)Miss DeannaDr. Ellen RMPROF_ALISTERSheryl HoganDr. Sarah BlakeEmily ClareProf. TOPGRADEfirstclass tutorDoctor.NamiraFiona DavaMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverJudithTutorMISS HILLARY A+Discount AssigngrA+de plusMARTHA92_PHDJahky BProWritingGuruColeen AndersonShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Write a 1,250-1,500 word draft of your business research paper. Use your logic model to develop the sequence for your paper. Include: Describe the health care administration issue or barrier you are addressing. Discuss resources needed, including key stakNeed 3 paragraghs about racism in America[email protected]For Catherine Owens1 page music reviewAssignmentDiscussionBusiness Plan Breakdown 1—The Choice of BusinessCase Study(200-250)wordFINAL PAPER

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpa year ago05.03.202430Report issuefiles (3)Asses2.docxAsses2-resourceslinkedbelowtohelpcompletethisassessment.docxExampleofAssessment2.pdfAsses2.docxAnalyze a professional environment and relevant data, and develop a change strategy (3-5 pages) and discuss how to implement it successfully.Collapse AllIntroductionNote: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, it is recommended that you complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.Knowing the best practice for our patients is very important in providing safe and effective care. Understanding best practices can help nurses identify areas of care that need to be improved. To identify areas of need, nurses must use evidence from various sources, such as the literature, clinical practice guidelines (CPG), professional organization practice alerts or position papers, and protocols. These sources of evidence can also be used to set goals for improvement and best practices with an eye toward improving the care experience or outcomes for patients.The challenge facing many care environments and health care practitioners is how to plan for change and implement changes. For if we cannot effectively implement changes in practice or procedure, then our goals of improving care will likely amount to nothing. This assessment focuses on allowing you to practice locating, assessing, analyzing, and implementing change strategies in order to improve patient outcomes related to one or more clinical goals.This assessment will take the form of a data table to identify areas for improvement and to set one or more outcome goals, as well as a narrative describing a change plan that would help you to achieve the goals you have set.Professional ContextOne area in health care that it is necessary to consider is the environment in which nurses work. It is important that this environment evolves and changes so that all patients are adequately supported. For this assessment, you will develop a change strategy to improve the health care environment. These changes can be rooted in a desire to improve clinical outcomes and data related to assessment accuracy, drug administration, or disease recovery rates. A key skill for master’s-level nurses is to be able to evaluate clinical data and create a change plan to help drive improvements in the data to reach set goals.ScenarioConsider a current environment. This could be your current care setting, the care setting presented in the scenario Vila Health: Using Concept Maps for Diagnosis, or a care setting in which you are interested in working. For the setting that you choose you will need to have a data set that depicts sub-optimal outcomes related to a clinical issue. This data could be from existing sources in the course, a relevant data set that already exists (a data set from the case study you used as a basis for your previous Concept Map assessment or from your current place of practice), or an appropriate data set that you have created yourself. (Note:if you choose to create your own data set, check with your instructor first for approval and guidance.)After you have selected an appropriate data set, use your understanding of the data to create at least one realistic goal (though you may create more) that will be driven by a change strategy appropriate for the environment and goal.Potential topics for this assessment could be:· Consider ways to help minimize the rate of secondary infections related to the condition, disease, or disorder that you focused on for your previous Concept Map assessment. As a starting point, you could ask yourself, “What could be changed to facilitate safety and minimize risks of infection?”· Consider how to help a patient experiencing traumatic stress or anxiety over hospitalization. As a starting point, you could ask yourself, “How could the care environment be changed to enhance coping?”Once you determine the change you would like to make, consider the following:· What data will you use to justify the change?· How can the team achieve this change with a reasonable cost?· What are the effects on the workplace?· What other implementation considerations do you need to consider to ensure that the change strategy is successful?· How does your change strategy address all aspects of the Quadruple Aim, especially the well-being of health care professionals?· Once the change strategy is implemented, how would you evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the care system if the desired outcomes are met?InstructionsYour assessment submission should include a data table that illustrates the current and desired states of the clinical issue you are attempting to improve through your application of change strategies. Additionally, you will need to explain the rationale for your decisions around your chosen change strategies, as well as how the change strategies will be successfully implemented. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your change strategy addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Change Strategy and Implementation scoring guide andGuiding Questions: Change Strategy and Implementation [DOCX]Download Guiding Questions: Change Strategy and Implementation [DOCX]to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.· Develop a data table that accurately reflects the current and desired states of one or more clinical outcomes.· Propose change strategies that will help to achieve the desired state of one or more clinical outcomes.· Justify the specific change strategies used to achieve desired outcomes.· Explain how change strategies will lead to quality improvement with regard to safety and equitable care.· Explain how change strategies will utilize interprofessional considerations to ensure successful implementation.· Communicate the change plan in a way that makes the data and rationale easily understood and compelling.· Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.Example assessment:You may use the assessment example,Assessment 2 Example [PDF]Download Assessment 2 Example [PDF], to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.Submission Requirements·Length of submission:3–5 double-spaced, typed pages, not including the title and reference pages. Your plan should be succinct yet substantive.·Number of references:Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that supports your goal setting, proposed change strategies, quality improvement, and interprofessional considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.·APA formatting:TheAPA Template Tutorial [DOCX]can help you in writing and formatting your analysis. No abstract is required.Competencies MeasuredBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:· Competency 1: Design patient-centered, evidence-based, advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality patient outcomes.· Develop a data table that accurately reflects the current and desired states of one or more clinical outcomes.· Competency 2: Develop change strategies for improving the care environment.· Propose change strategies that will help to achieve the desired state of one or more clinical outcomes.· Justify the specific change strategies used to achieve desired outcomes.· Competency 3: Apply quality improvement methods to practice that promote safe, equitable quality of care.· Explain how change strategies will lead to quality improvement with regard to safety and equitable care.· Competency 4: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional care systems in achieving desired health care improvement outcomes.· Explain how change strategies will utilize interprofessional considerations to ensure successful implementation.· Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.· Convey purpose of the assessment narrative in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence, and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.Asses2-resourceslinkedbelowtohelpcompletethisassessment.docxUse the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.Collapse AllAssessment· Bachman, T. E., Iyer, N. P., Newth, C. J. L., Ross, P. A., & Khemani, R. G. (2020).Thresholds for oximetry alarms and target range in the NICU: An observational assessment based on likely oxygen tension and maturity.BMC Pediatrics, 20, 1–8.· Dembek, Z. F., Chekol, T., & Wu, A. (2018).Best practice assessment of disease modelling for infectious disease outbreaks.Epidemiology and Infection, 146(10), 1207–1215.Change· Celebi Cakiroglu, O., Ulutas Hobek, G., & Harmanci Seren, A. K. (2022).Nurses’ views on change management in health care settings: A qualitative study.Journal of Nursing Management, 30(2), 439–446.· Hanrahan, K., Utech, J., Cullen, L., Tucker, S. J., & Gallagher-Ford, L. (2020).EBP 2.0: Implementing and sustaining change: Implementing improved central line flushing practices.The American Journal of Nursing, 120(8), 66–70.· Kourouche, S., Buckley, T., Van, C., Munroe, B., & Curtis, K. (2019).Designing strategies to implement a blunt chest injury care bundle using the behaviour change wheel: A multi-site mixed methods study.BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 461–461.· Rafferty, A. M. (2018).Nurses as change agents for a better future in health care: The politics of drift and dilution.Health Economics, Policy and Law, 13(3–4), 475–491.· Werlau, T., Soares-Sardinha, S., Overman, A. S., Chutz, J., Emory, J., Jones, C. M., Lee, G., & Smith-Miller, C. A. (2020).Creating microclimates of change.JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 50(7/8), 385–394.Evidence and Goal Setting· Crable, J. , Highfield, M. F. & Patmon, F. (2020).Evidence-based practice knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers.Nursing Critical Care, 15(5), 24–32.· DeVries, M. (2021).Beyond bean counting: Gathering and using data to drive improvements.Journal of Infusion Nursing, 44(1), 41–48.· Findlay, M., Rankin, N. M., Shaw, T., White, K., Boyer, M., Milross, C., De Abreu Lourenço, R., Brown, C., Collett, G., Beale, P., & Bauer, J. D. (2020).Best evidence to best practice: Implementing an innovative model of nutrition care for patients with head and neck cancer improves outcomes.Nutrients, 12(5), 1465.· Gannaway, P. (2020).Locating clinical practice guidelines.Nurse Educator, 45(1), 50.· Rohm, C. D., Whiteman, K., Swanson-Biearman, B., & Stephens, K. (2020).Interprofessional collaboration to reduce falls in the acute care setting.Medsurg Nursing,29(5), 303–307.· Stoner, M. S. (2020).Finding evidence-based resources for care.Home Healthcare Now, 38(1), 60.· Vermunt, N. P., Harmsen, M., Elwyn, G., Westert, G. P., Burgers, J. S., Olde Rikkert, M. G., & Faber, M. J. (2018).A three-goal model for patients with multimorbidity: A qualitative approach.Health Expectations, 21(2), 528–538.Pharmacology· Bruneau, J., Ahamad, K., Goyer, M. È., Poulin, G., Selby, P., Fischer, B., Wild, T. C., & Wood, E. (2018).Management of opioid use disorders: a national clinical practice guideline.Canadian Medical Association Journal, 190(9), E247–E257.· Gadbois, C., Chin, E. D., & Dalphonse, L. (2016).Health promotion in an opioid treatment program: An evidence-based nursing quality improvement project.Journal of Addictions Nursing, 27(2),127–142.· Lalau, J., Kajbaf, F., Bennis, Y., Lemaire, A., Belpaire, F., & De Broe, M. (2018).Metformin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease stages 3A, 3B, or 4.Diabetes Care, 31(3), 547–553.· Oster, E. (2018).Diabetes and diet: Purchasing behavior change in response to health information.American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(4), 308–348.Evidence-Based Practice· Asrat, H. D., & Mekonnen, H. B. (2021).Implementation of evidence-based practice: The experience of nurses and midwives.PLoS One, 16(8), 1–12.Biopsychosocial· Da Silva, J. A. P., Geenen, R., & Jacobs, J. W. G. (2018).Chronic widespread pain and increased mortality: Biopsychosocial interconnections.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(6), 790.· Wong, A., Samartzis, D., Cheung, P., & Cheung, J. (2019).How common is back pain and what biopsychosocial factors are associated with back pain in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 477(4), 676–686. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437349/ExampleofAssessment2.pdfThis file is too large to display.View in new windowExampleofAssessment2.pdfThis file is too large to display.View in new windowAsses2.docxAnalyze a professional environment and relevant data, and develop a change strategy (3-5 pages) and discuss how to implement it successfully.Collapse AllIntroductionNote: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, it is recommended that you complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.Knowing the best practice for our patients is very important in providing safe and effective care. Understanding best practices can help nurses identify areas of care that need to be improved. To identify areas of need, nurses must use evidence from various sources, such as the literature, clinical practice guidelines (CPG), professional organization practice alerts or position papers, and protocols. These sources of evidence can also be used to set goals for improvement and best practices with an eye toward improving the care experience or outcomes for patients.The challenge facing many care environments and health care practitioners is how to plan for change and implement changes. For if we cannot effectively implement changes in practice or procedure, then our goals of improving care will likely amount to nothing. This assessment focuses on allowing you to practice locating, assessing, analyzing, and implementing change strategies in order to improve patient outcomes related to one or more clinical goals.This assessment will take the form of a data table to identify areas for improvement and to set one or more outcome goals, as well as a narrative describing a change plan that would help you to achieve the goals you have set.Professional ContextOne area in health care that it is necessary to consider is the environment in which nurses work. It is important that this environment evolves and changes so that all patients are adequately supported. For this assessment, you will develop a change strategy to improve the health care environment. These changes can be rooted in a desire to improve clinical outcomes and data related to assessment accuracy, drug administration, or disease recovery rates. A key skill for master’s-level nurses is to be able to evaluate clinical data and create a change plan to help drive improvements in the data to reach set goals.ScenarioConsider a current environment. This could be your current care setting, the care setting presented in the scenario Vila Health: Using Concept Maps for Diagnosis, or a care setting in which you are interested in working. For the setting that you choose you will need to have a data set that depicts sub-optimal outcomes related to a clinical issue. This data could be from existing sources in the course, a relevant data set that already exists (a data set from the case study you used as a basis for your previous Concept Map assessment or from your current place of practice), or an appropriate data set that you have created yourself. (Note:if you choose to create your own data set, check with your instructor first for approval and guidance.)After you have selected an appropriate data set, use your understanding of the data to create at least one realistic goal (though you may create more) that will be driven by a change strategy appropriate for the environment and goal.Potential topics for this assessment could be:· Consider ways to help minimize the rate of secondary infections related to the condition, disease, or disorder that you focused on for your previous Concept Map assessment. As a starting point, you could ask yourself, “What could be changed to facilitate safety and minimize risks of infection?”· Consider how to help a patient experiencing traumatic stress or anxiety over hospitalization. As a starting point, you could ask yourself, “How could the care environment be changed to enhance coping?”Once you determine the change you would like to make, consider the following:· What data will you use to justify the change?· How can the team achieve this change with a reasonable cost?· What are the effects on the workplace?· What other implementation considerations do you need to consider to ensure that the change strategy is successful?· How does your change strategy address all aspects of the Quadruple Aim, especially the well-being of health care professionals?· Once the change strategy is implemented, how would you evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the care system if the desired outcomes are met?InstructionsYour assessment submission should include a data table that illustrates the current and desired states of the clinical issue you are attempting to improve through your application of change strategies. Additionally, you will need to explain the rationale for your decisions around your chosen change strategies, as well as how the change strategies will be successfully implemented. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your change strategy addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Change Strategy and Implementation scoring guide andGuiding Questions: Change Strategy and Implementation [DOCX]Download Guiding Questions: Change Strategy and Implementation [DOCX]to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.· Develop a data table that accurately reflects the current and desired states of one or more clinical outcomes.· Propose change strategies that will help to achieve the desired state of one or more clinical outcomes.· Justify the specific change strategies used to achieve desired outcomes.· Explain how change strategies will lead to quality improvement with regard to safety and equitable care.· Explain how change strategies will utilize interprofessional considerations to ensure successful implementation.· Communicate the change plan in a way that makes the data and rationale easily understood and compelling.· Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.Example assessment:You may use the assessment example,Assessment 2 Example [PDF]Download Assessment 2 Example [PDF], to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.Submission Requirements·Length of submission:3–5 double-spaced, typed pages, not including the title and reference pages. Your plan should be succinct yet substantive.·Number of references:Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that supports your goal setting, proposed change strategies, quality improvement, and interprofessional considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.·APA formatting:TheAPA Template Tutorial [DOCX]can help you in writing and formatting your analysis. No abstract is required.Competencies MeasuredBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:· Competency 1: Design patient-centered, evidence-based, advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality patient outcomes.· Develop a data table that accurately reflects the current and desired states of one or more clinical outcomes.· Competency 2: Develop change strategies for improving the care environment.· Propose change strategies that will help to achieve the desired state of one or more clinical outcomes.· Justify the specific change strategies used to achieve desired outcomes.· Competency 3: Apply quality improvement methods to practice that promote safe, equitable quality of care.· Explain how change strategies will lead to quality improvement with regard to safety and equitable care.· Competency 4: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional care systems in achieving desired health care improvement outcomes.· Explain how change strategies will utilize interprofessional considerations to ensure successful implementation.· Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.· Convey purpose of the assessment narrative in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence, and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.Asses2-resourceslinkedbelowtohelpcompletethisassessment.docxUse the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.Collapse AllAssessment· Bachman, T. E., Iyer, N. P., Newth, C. J. L., Ross, P. A., & Khemani, R. G. (2020).Thresholds for oximetry alarms and target range in the NICU: An observational assessment based on likely oxygen tension and maturity.BMC Pediatrics, 20, 1–8.· Dembek, Z. F., Chekol, T., & Wu, A. (2018).Best practice assessment of disease modelling for infectious disease outbreaks.Epidemiology and Infection, 146(10), 1207–1215.Change· Celebi Cakiroglu, O., Ulutas Hobek, G., & Harmanci Seren, A. K. (2022).Nurses’ views on change management in health care settings: A qualitative study.Journal of Nursing Management, 30(2), 439–446.· Hanrahan, K., Utech, J., Cullen, L., Tucker, S. J., & Gallagher-Ford, L. (2020).EBP 2.0: Implementing and sustaining change: Implementing improved central line flushing practices.The American Journal of Nursing, 120(8), 66–70.· Kourouche, S., Buckley, T., Van, C., Munroe, B., & Curtis, K. (2019).Designing strategies to implement a blunt chest injury care bundle using the behaviour change wheel: A multi-site mixed methods study.BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 461–461.· Rafferty, A. M. (2018).Nurses as change agents for a better future in health care: The politics of drift and dilution.Health Economics, Policy and Law, 13(3–4), 475–491.· Werlau, T., Soares-Sardinha, S., Overman, A. S., Chutz, J., Emory, J., Jones, C. M., Lee, G., & Smith-Miller, C. A. (2020).Creating microclimates of change.JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 50(7/8), 385–394.Evidence and Goal Setting· Crable, J. , Highfield, M. F. & Patmon, F. (2020).Evidence-based practice knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers.Nursing Critical Care, 15(5), 24–32.· DeVries, M. (2021).Beyond bean counting: Gathering and using data to drive improvements.Journal of Infusion Nursing, 44(1), 41–48.· Findlay, M., Rankin, N. M., Shaw, T., White, K., Boyer, M., Milross, C., De Abreu Lourenço, R., Brown, C., Collett, G., Beale, P., & Bauer, J. D. (2020).Best evidence to best practice: Implementing an innovative model of nutrition care for patients with head and neck cancer improves outcomes.Nutrients, 12(5), 1465.· Gannaway, P. (2020).Locating clinical practice guidelines.Nurse Educator, 45(1), 50.· Rohm, C. D., Whiteman, K., Swanson-Biearman, B., & Stephens, K. (2020).Interprofessional collaboration to reduce falls in the acute care setting.Medsurg Nursing,29(5), 303–307.· Stoner, M. S. (2020).Finding evidence-based resources for care.Home Healthcare Now, 38(1), 60.· Vermunt, N. P., Harmsen, M., Elwyn, G., Westert, G. P., Burgers, J. S., Olde Rikkert, M. G., & Faber, M. J. (2018).A three-goal model for patients with multimorbidity: A qualitative approach.Health Expectations, 21(2), 528–538.Pharmacology· Bruneau, J., Ahamad, K., Goyer, M. È., Poulin, G., Selby, P., Fischer, B., Wild, T. C., & Wood, E. (2018).Management of opioid use disorders: a national clinical practice guideline.Canadian Medical Association Journal, 190(9), E247–E257.· Gadbois, C., Chin, E. D., & Dalphonse, L. (2016).Health promotion in an opioid treatment program: An evidence-based nursing quality improvement project.Journal of Addictions Nursing, 27(2),127–142.· Lalau, J., Kajbaf, F., Bennis, Y., Lemaire, A., Belpaire, F., & De Broe, M. (2018).Metformin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease stages 3A, 3B, or 4.Diabetes Care, 31(3), 547–553.· Oster, E. (2018).Diabetes and diet: Purchasing behavior change in response to health information.American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(4), 308–348.Evidence-Based Practice· Asrat, H. D., & Mekonnen, H. B. (2021).Implementation of evidence-based practice: The experience of nurses and midwives.PLoS One, 16(8), 1–12.Biopsychosocial· Da Silva, J. A. P., Geenen, R., & Jacobs, J. W. G. (2018).Chronic widespread pain and increased mortality: Biopsychosocial interconnections.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(6), 790.· Wong, A., Samartzis, D., Cheung, P., & Cheung, J. (2019).How common is back pain and what biopsychosocial factors are associated with back pain in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 477(4), 676–686. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437349/ExampleofAssessment2.pdfThis file is too large to display.View in new windowAsses2.docxAnalyze a professional environment and relevant data, and develop a change strategy (3-5 pages) and discuss how to implement it successfully.Collapse AllIntroductionNote: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, it is recommended that you complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.Knowing the best practice for our patients is very important in providing safe and effective care. Understanding best practices can help nurses identify areas of care that need to be improved. To identify areas of need, nurses must use evidence from various sources, such as the literature, clinical practice guidelines (CPG), professional organization practice alerts or position papers, and protocols. These sources of evidence can also be used to set goals for improvement and best practices with an eye toward improving the care experience or outcomes for patients.The challenge facing many care environments and health care practitioners is how to plan for change and implement changes. For if we cannot effectively implement changes in practice or procedure, then our goals of improving care will likely amount to nothing. This assessment focuses on allowing you to practice locating, assessing, analyzing, and implementing change strategies in order to improve patient outcomes related to one or more clinical goals.This assessment will take the form of a data table to identify areas for improvement and to set one or more outcome goals, as well as a narrative describing a change plan that would help you to achieve the goals you have set.Professional ContextOne area in health care that it is necessary to consider is the environment in which nurses work. It is important that this environment evolves and changes so that all patients are adequately supported. For this assessment, you will develop a change strategy to improve the health care environment. These changes can be rooted in a desire to improve clinical outcomes and data related to assessment accuracy, drug administration, or disease recovery rates. A key skill for master’s-level nurses is to be able to evaluate clinical data and create a change plan to help drive improvements in the data to reach set goals.ScenarioConsider a current environment. This could be your current care setting, the care setting presented in the scenario Vila Health: Using Concept Maps for Diagnosis, or a care setting in which you are interested in working. For the setting that you choose you will need to have a data set that depicts sub-optimal outcomes related to a clinical issue. This data could be from existing sources in the course, a relevant data set that already exists (a data set from the case study you used as a basis for your previous Concept Map assessment or from your current place of practice), or an appropriate data set that you have created yourself. (Note:if you choose to create your own data set, check with your instructor first for approval and guidance.)After you have selected an appropriate data set, use your understanding of the data to create at least one realistic goal (though you may create more) that will be driven by a change strategy appropriate for the environment and goal.Potential topics for this assessment could be:· Consider ways to help minimize the rate of secondary infections related to the condition, disease, or disorder that you focused on for your previous Concept Map assessment. As a starting point, you could ask yourself, “What could be changed to facilitate safety and minimize risks of infection?”· Consider how to help a patient experiencing traumatic stress or anxiety over hospitalization. As a starting point, you could ask yourself, “How could the care environment be changed to enhance coping?”Once you determine the change you would like to make, consider the following:· What data will you use to justify the change?· How can the team achieve this change with a reasonable cost?· What are the effects on the workplace?· What other implementation considerations do you need to consider to ensure that the change strategy is successful?· How does your change strategy address all aspects of the Quadruple Aim, especially the well-being of health care professionals?· Once the change strategy is implemented, how would you evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the care system if the desired outcomes are met?InstructionsYour assessment submission should include a data table that illustrates the current and desired states of the clinical issue you are attempting to improve through your application of change strategies. Additionally, you will need to explain the rationale for your decisions around your chosen change strategies, as well as how the change strategies will be successfully implemented. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your change strategy addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Change Strategy and Implementation scoring guide andGuiding Questions: Change Strategy and Implementation [DOCX]Download Guiding Questions: Change Strategy and Implementation [DOCX]to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.· Develop a data table that accurately reflects the current and desired states of one or more clinical outcomes.· Propose change strategies that will help to achieve the desired state of one or more clinical outcomes.· Justify the specific change strategies used to achieve desired outcomes.· Explain how change strategies will lead to quality improvement with regard to safety and equitable care.· Explain how change strategies will utilize interprofessional considerations to ensure successful implementation.· Communicate the change plan in a way that makes the data and rationale easily understood and compelling.· Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.Example assessment:You may use the assessment example,Assessment 2 Example [PDF]Download Assessment 2 Example [PDF], to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.Submission Requirements·Length of submission:3–5 double-spaced, typed pages, not including the title and reference pages. Your plan should be succinct yet substantive.·Number of references:Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that supports your goal setting, proposed change strategies, quality improvement, and interprofessional considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.·APA formatting:TheAPA Template Tutorial [DOCX]can help you in writing and formatting your analysis. No abstract is required.Competencies MeasuredBy successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:· Competency 1: Design patient-centered, evidence-based, advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality patient outcomes.· Develop a data table that accurately reflects the current and desired states of one or more clinical outcomes.· Competency 2: Develop change strategies for improving the care environment.· Propose change strategies that will help to achieve the desired state of one or more clinical outcomes.· Justify the specific change strategies used to achieve desired outcomes.· Competency 3: Apply quality improvement methods to practice that promote safe, equitable quality of care.· Explain how change strategies will lead to quality improvement with regard to safety and equitable care.· Competency 4: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional care systems in achieving desired health care improvement outcomes.· Explain how change strategies will utilize interprofessional considerations to ensure successful implementation.· Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.· Convey purpose of the assessment narrative in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence, and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly communication standards.Asses2-resourceslinkedbelowtohelpcompletethisassessment.docxUse the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.Collapse AllAssessment· Bachman, T. E., Iyer, N. P., Newth, C. J. L., Ross, P. A., & Khemani, R. G. (2020).Thresholds for oximetry alarms and target range in the NICU: An observational assessment based on likely oxygen tension and maturity.BMC Pediatrics, 20, 1–8.· Dembek, Z. F., Chekol, T., & Wu, A. (2018).Best practice assessment of disease modelling for infectious disease outbreaks.Epidemiology and Infection, 146(10), 1207–1215.Change· Celebi Cakiroglu, O., Ulutas Hobek, G., & Harmanci Seren, A. K. (2022).Nurses’ views on change management in health care settings: A qualitative study.Journal of Nursing Management, 30(2), 439–446.· Hanrahan, K., Utech, J., Cullen, L., Tucker, S. J., & Gallagher-Ford, L. (2020).EBP 2.0: Implementing and sustaining change: Implementing improved central line flushing practices.The American Journal of Nursing, 120(8), 66–70.· Kourouche, S., Buckley, T., Van, C., Munroe, B., & Curtis, K. (2019).Designing strategies to implement a blunt chest injury care bundle using the behaviour change wheel: A multi-site mixed methods study.BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 461–461.· Rafferty, A. M. (2018).Nurses as change agents for a better future in health care: The politics of drift and dilution.Health Economics, Policy and Law, 13(3–4), 475–491.· Werlau, T., Soares-Sardinha, S., Overman, A. S., Chutz, J., Emory, J., Jones, C. M., Lee, G., & Smith-Miller, C. A. (2020).Creating microclimates of change.JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 50(7/8), 385–394.Evidence and Goal Setting· Crable, J. , Highfield, M. F. & Patmon, F. (2020).Evidence-based practice knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers.Nursing Critical Care, 15(5), 24–32.· DeVries, M. (2021).Beyond bean counting: Gathering and using data to drive improvements.Journal of Infusion Nursing, 44(1), 41–48.· Findlay, M., Rankin, N. M., Shaw, T., White, K., Boyer, M., Milross, C., De Abreu Lourenço, R., Brown, C., Collett, G., Beale, P., & Bauer, J. D. (2020).Best evidence to best practice: Implementing an innovative model of nutrition care for patients with head and neck cancer improves outcomes.Nutrients, 12(5), 1465.· Gannaway, P. (2020).Locating clinical practice guidelines.Nurse Educator, 45(1), 50.· Rohm, C. D., Whiteman, K., Swanson-Biearman, B., & Stephens, K. (2020).Interprofessional collaboration to reduce falls in the acute care setting.Medsurg Nursing,29(5), 303–307.· Stoner, M. S. (2020).Finding evidence-based resources for care.Home Healthcare Now, 38(1), 60.· Vermunt, N. P., Harmsen, M., Elwyn, G., Westert, G. P., Burgers, J. S., Olde Rikkert, M. G., & Faber, M. J. (2018).A three-goal model for patients with multimorbidity: A qualitative approach.Health Expectations, 21(2), 528–538.Pharmacology· Bruneau, J., Ahamad, K., Goyer, M. È., Poulin, G., Selby, P., Fischer, B., Wild, T. C., & Wood, E. (2018).Management of opioid use disorders: a national clinical practice guideline.Canadian Medical Association Journal, 190(9), E247–E257.· Gadbois, C., Chin, E. D., & Dalphonse, L. (2016).Health promotion in an opioid treatment program: An evidence-based nursing quality improvement project.Journal of Addictions Nursing, 27(2),127–142.· Lalau, J., Kajbaf, F., Bennis, Y., Lemaire, A., Belpaire, F., & De Broe, M. (2018).Metformin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease stages 3A, 3B, or 4.Diabetes Care, 31(3), 547–553.· Oster, E. (2018).Diabetes and diet: Purchasing behavior change in response to health information.American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(4), 308–348.Evidence-Based Practice· Asrat, H. D., & Mekonnen, H. B. (2021).Implementation of evidence-based practice: The experience of nurses and midwives.PLoS One, 16(8), 1–12.Biopsychosocial· Da Silva, J. A. P., Geenen, R., & Jacobs, J. W. G. (2018).Chronic widespread pain and increased mortality: Biopsychosocial interconnections.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(6), 790.· Wong, A., Samartzis, D., Cheung, P., & Cheung, J. (2019).How common is back pain and what biopsychosocial factors are associated with back pain in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 477(4), 676–686. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437349/ExampleofAssessment2.pdfThis file is too large to display.View in new window123Bids(68)PROVEN STERLINGMiss DeannaDr. Ellen RMEmily ClareMathProgrammingDr. Sarah BlakeMISS HILLARY A+abdul_rehman_Doctor.NamiraYoung NyanyaSTELLAR GEEK A+ProWritingGuruJahky BSheryl HoganDr M. MichelleAshley EllieDr. Sophie MilesWIZARD_KIMDr CloverIsabella HarvardShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Can someone do a Criminal Justice Trends Evaluation(law enforcement)?ACCT 504 Week 4 Midterm Set 3What is a business process? Give three examples. What are the stages in the business process lifecycle?IS PrinciplesWriter Community-Based Prevention choosePSY 390 Week 3 Individual Assignment – Classical Conditioning PaperProgram Planning and Community Needs Assessment to chooseFIN 534 Week 8 Chapter 15 SolutionCIM630Z1: Week One Discussion Question #2Problem Question

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helpResearchprojectplease see all attachment. Part 3 is the assignment.a year ago03.03.202410Report issuefiles (4)Part3DueQualityBenchmarkProjectProposal.docxMisdiagnosisinHealthcareProject-11.docxMisdiagnosisinHealthcareProject-Part21.docxSamplePaperTemplate_APAFormat_7thed5.docxPart3DueQualityBenchmarkProjectProposal.docxAssignment: Part 3 Due, Quality Benchmark Project ProposalContinue to work on the quality benchmark proposal you started in weeks 1 & 2.  When you have completed Part 3 of your assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place and submit a copy to this drop box.Part 3: Part 3 requires minimum of 2 additional pages. Use instructor feedback from Week 5 and improve Part 2, then add 2 more body content pages for a total of 6 pages in Week 9. You WILL have a conclusion for Part 3. All format must be in 7th edition APA.Use the instructor feedback given you in parts 1 & 2 to improve your writingpriorto adding part 3 for the final submission, especially if you have been given APA feedback. Your instructor will be comparing the feedback given in Week 5 to what you submit in Week 9. If your instructor does not see the requested improvements made, you will get a ‘0’ on this assignment. There is an logical expectation to see growth in your writing from week to week.For the continued body of your paper, address the following objectives and separate using distinct paragraph headers:· Explain quality management issues you anticipate within the framework of public policy or regulatory procedures· 3 or more potential barriers you may encounter when addressing your quality issue· Identify positive or negative effects your quality issue has on nursing practiceFor the conclusion:· Sum up the paper without introducing new information in one complete paragraph.· Draw conclusions based on your research and integrate professional opinion.*Important: Use theSample Paperas a template to format your assignment to prevent unnecessary point deduction.MisdiagnosisinHealthcareProject-11.docx1Misdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient Care (Part 1)NameCollege of NursingPolicy, Finance, and Quality in Nursing and HealthcareProfessorDateMisdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient CareMisdiagnosis is one of the prominent problems that has characterized health care over time and, therefore, determining very many elements of the treatment process in a patient’s life. The purpose of this paper is to review peculiar features of misdiagnosis, consequences it delivers and preventive measures practiced in order to avoid such complications. This quality issue in a health care setting can be resolved using the Quality Benchmark Project to improve patient care levels and ensuring low occurrence of diagnostic error. People who read this paper should be informed on what misdiagnosis is and the different effects it has had towards patients’ health as well as solutions that have been adopted over time to solve its problem. One of the most enduring questions in the medical community is this, therefore this research considered crucially important to doctors, legislators and patients.Description of the Quality IssueThe quality problem of misdiagnosis is rather widespread in the field of human’s health care, which may entail unnecessary treatment, slow rehabilitation procedures as well as non-rectifiable harm to health or even lethal outcome. But misdiagnosis is not the result of clinical error alone; this is also about system-wide problems, which are associated with deficient healthcare infrastructure innovation, a lack of appropriate diagnostic equipment and sufficient instruction to medical workers. Nonetheless, the outcomes of diagnostic mistakes are far from being unambiguous and concern patients’ health state, emotional balance as well as financial stability. The immediate effects and consequences of misdiagnosis include the provision of treatment that may not have been required or desired and ultimately subjecting the patient to unnecessary pain. In the end, however, it leads to long-term health complications besides a poor-quality life and escalated medical expenditure.Quality Issue BackgroundIn recent years, misdiagnoses have been identified as a significant issue in the health care industry. Research shown that diagnostic errors are estimated to impact an astounding number of some 12 million adults in the United States annually in the outpatient setting, indicating how widespread this practice is (Newman-Toker et al., 2023). A number of issues underlie diagnostic accuracy in practice, and they include a patient’s complex medical condition, atypical presentations associated with chronic conditions and misunderstandings between the patient-physician interactions. In addition, the fast pace of medical knowledge and technology development that is to benefit in various dimensions also brings challenges regarding updating health care professionals with the current diagnostic criterion and treatment plans.Previous Attempts to Address the Quality IssueThe issue of misdiagnosis is tackled in several ways, such as enhancing diagnostic precision through better communication and training healthcare workers to work on the same. An important strategy that has been used during the reduction of such errors is a tactic with the use of Artificial intelligence and machine learning systems for diagnoses due to its complex decision-making mechanisms (Jimma, 2023). The second is the change in the focus of treatment to patient-centered care because proper communication and participating in diagnostic activities are defined. This does not only the creation of a complete clinical picture, but also to ensure that patient concerns and symptoms are properly intervened (Gusmano et al., 2019).Training of health care professionals has also been reformatted to focus on accuracy in diagnosis and prevention of cognitive biases that result to wrong prognosis. A lot of these programs depend on the use of case studies, simulation-like assignments and online short courses to ensure that healthcare providers do not lose touch with recent methodologies and most efficient treatments methods (Meyer & Singh, 2019).In addition, policy based interventions have been suggested to create an enabling environment for correct diagnosis. This starts with encouraging a culture where diagnostic errors and their consequences may be openly discussed without any bias. There is also an effort to apply better recording systems and data analysis that can be utilized to monitor diagnostic error prevalence, as well as use those elements of the study in terms of what leads them and how they can be mitigated (Al Khafaji et al., 2023).ReferencesAl-Khafaji, J., Lee, M., & Mossburg, S. (2023).Improving diagnostic safety andquality.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/improving-diagnostic-safety-and-qualityGusmano, M. K., Maschke, K. J., & Solomon, M. Z. (2019). Patient-centered care, yes; patients as consumers, no.Health affairs,38(3), 368-373.Jimma, B. L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: A bibliometric analysis.Telematics and Informatics Reports, 100041.Meyer, A. N., & Singh, H. (2019). The path to diagnostic excellence includes feedback to calibrate how clinicians think.Jama,321(8), 737-738.Newman-Toker, D. E., Nassery, N., Schaffer, A. C., Yu-Moe, C. W., Clemens, G. D., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Saber Tehrani, A. S., Fanai, M., Hassoon, A., & Siegal, D. (2023). Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2021-014130. Advance online publication.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014130MisdiagnosisinHealthcareProject-Part21.docx8Misdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient Care (Part2)NameCollege of NursingPolicy, Finance, and Quality in Nursing and HealthcareProfessordateMisdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient CareMisdiagnosis is one of the prominent problems that has characterized health care over time and, therefore, determining very many elements of the treatment process in a patient’s life. The purpose of this paper is to review peculiar features of misdiagnosis, consequences it delivers and preventive measures practiced in order to avoid such complications. This quality issue in a health care setting can be resolved using the Quality Benchmark Project to improve patient care levels and ensuring low occurrence of diagnostic error. People who read this paper should be informed on what misdiagnosis is and the different effects it has had towards patients’ health as well as solutions that have been adopted over time to solve its problem. One of the most enduring questions in the medical community is this, therefore this research considered crucially important to doctors, legislators and patients.Description of the Quality IssueThe quality problem of misdiagnosis is rather widespread in the field of human’s health care, which may entail unnecessary treatment, slow rehabilitation procedures as well as non-rectifiable harm to health or even lethal outcome. But misdiagnosis is not the result of clinical error alone; this is also about system-wide problems, which are associated with deficient healthcare infrastructure innovation, a lack of appropriate diagnostic equipment and sufficient instruction to medical workers. Nonetheless, the outcomes of diagnostic mistakes are far from being unambiguous and concern patients’ health state, emotional balance as well as financial stability. The immediate effects and consequences of misdiagnosis include the provision of treatment that may not have been required or desired and ultimately subjecting the patient to unnecessary pain. In the end, however, it leads to long-term health complications besides a poor-quality life and escalated medical expenditure.Quality Issue BackgroundIn recent years, misdiagnoses have been identified as a significant issue in the health care industry. Research shown that diagnostic errors are estimated to impact an astounding number of some 12 million adults in the United States annually in the outpatient setting, indicating how widespread this practice is (Newman-Toker et al., 2023). A number of issues underlie diagnostic accuracy in practice, and they include a patient’s complex medical condition, atypical presentations associated with chronic conditions and misunderstandings between the patient-physician interactions. In addition, the fast pace of medical knowledge and technology development that is to benefit in various dimensions also brings challenges regarding updating health care professionals with the current diagnostic criterion and treatment plans.Previous Attempts to Address the Quality IssueThe issue of misdiagnosis is tackled in several ways, such as enhancing diagnostic precision through better communication and training healthcare workers to work on the same. An important strategy that has been used during the reduction of such errors is a tactic with the use of Artificial intelligence and machine learning systems for diagnoses due to its complex decision-making mechanisms (Jimma, 2023). The second is the change in the focus of treatment to patient-centered care because proper communication and participating in diagnostic activities are defined. This does not only the creation of a complete clinical picture, but also to ensure that patient concerns and symptoms are properly intervened (Gusmano et al., 2019).Training of health care professionals has also been reformatted to focus on accuracy in diagnosis and prevention of cognitive biases that result to wrong prognosis. A lot of these programs depend on the use of case studies, simulation-like assignments and online short courses to ensure that healthcare providers do not lose touch with recent methodologies and most efficient treatments methods (Meyer & Singh, 2019).In addition, policy based interventions have been suggested to create an enabling environment for correct diagnosis. This starts with encouraging a culture where diagnostic errors and their consequences may be openly discussed without any bias. There is also an effort to apply better recording systems and data analysis that can be utilized to monitor diagnostic error prevalence, as well as use those elements of the study in terms of what leads them and how they can be mitigated (Al Khafaji et al., 2023).Jurisdiction Over Quality IssuesMisdiagnosis as a quality issue in healthcare is regulated on different levels such as governmental health agencies, healthcare institutions, and professional boards. First, regulatory agencies including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its divisions, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), possess considerable power to implement policies and standards aimed at reducing diagnostic mistakes (Shi et al., 2022). These groups can drive health policy by instituting national policies, conducting quality research about healthcare, and requiring reporting and performance standards for healthcare providers.At the organizational level, hospitals and healthcare systems are fully in a position to take control of changes that can reduce misdiagnoses. These should include embracing new technologies, better delivery processes, and ensuring tough rules are in place regarding the conduct of diagnostic tests. Professional bodies and associations, including the AMA and specialty respective organizations, also contribute significantly to clinical guideline development, education, and policy change aimed at reducing misdiagnosis (Shi et al., 2022).Stakeholders and Decision-MakersIn the case of misdiagnosis, relevant stakeholders are patients, healthcare providers (doctors, nurses, diagnostic specialists), healthcare institutions, insurance companies, policymakers and technology developers. Different groups of stakeholders influence, and are influenced by, the quality of diagnostic practices in unique ways.Patients themselves, representing the affected group, are interested in correct diagnoses because this issue influences them as its users through patient advocacy and feedback. Healthcare providers, who are the first to diagnose a patient and provide treatment, influence the issue by their clinical practice and professional progress. As to the management of diagnoses, an indirect organization environment is created by healthcare institutions through the allocation of resources and the establishment of internal policies. With their reimbursement policies, insurance companies can motivate practices to be instituted that will reduce the rate of such diagnostic errors.The legal and regulatory framework that governs the rules concerning the diagnostics standards and patient safety are determined by policymakers, which can include government officials as well as regulatory agencies. By designing and perfecting diagnostic instruments and health information technologies, technology developers offer essential inputs that could improve diagnostic accuracy.Powerbases and Resources Needed for ChangeTo help foster change and improvement, in dealing with misdiagnosis, a multifaceted approach involving different powerbases and resources needs to be utilized. The biggest resource is financial as the implementation of innovative diagnostic technologies, regular professional training and effective health information systems have a great capacity to reduce errors. Legislative and policy-making power is critical in establishing a healthcare setting that focuses on patient safety and quality care, policies and laws that promote reporting diagnostic error as well as transparency as would be the case if this study were implemented (World Health Organization, 2021).Knowledge and information are critical tools in the fight against misdiagnosis. Increased attention and awareness in the health professionals and even patients to errors in diagnosis may bring transformation. This includes publishing research findings, sharing good practices, and creating an environment of openness and learning from misjudgment (Ranji et al., 2022).Moreover, technological tools as artificial intelligence and machine learning, electronic health records and decision support systems assess will be necessary to ensure correctness of the diagnosis (Senbekov et al., 2020). Such tools allow therefore medical practitioners to process great volumes of medical information, recognize the emerging patterns and give better conclusions on diagnosis.Lastly, there are multiple human resources that one can think about in this connection including leadership and an empowered workforce, whose presence serves as sources to lead to enhanced quality. Safety and quality improvement initiatives must be continually promoted in all ranks of leadership. Effective changes come with a highly skilled workforce implementing the latest diagnostic techniques and technologies and practicing patient-focused care (Olson et al., 2019).ReferencesAl-Khafaji, J., Lee, M., & Mossburg, S. (2023).Improving diagnostic safety andquality.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/improving-diagnostic-safety-and-qualityGusmano, M. K., Maschke, K. J., & Solomon, M. Z. (2019). Patient-centered care, yes; patients as consumers, no.Health affairs,38(3), 368-373.Jimma, B. L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: A bibliometric analysis.Telematics and Informatics Reports, 100041.Meyer, A. N., & Singh, H. (2019). The path to diagnostic excellence includes feedback to calibrate how clinicians think.Jama,321(8), 737-738.Newman-Toker, D. E., Nassery, N., Schaffer, A. C., Yu-Moe, C. W., Clemens, G. D., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Saber Tehrani, A. S., Fanai, M., Hassoon, A., & Siegal, D. (2023). Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ Quality & Safety2023; 3382-85. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016496Olson, A., Rencic, J., Cosby, K., Rusz, D., Papa, F., Croskerry, P., … & Graber, M. L. (2019). Competencies for improving diagnosis: an interprofessional framework for education and training in health care. Diagnosis, vol. 6, no. 4, 2019, pp. 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2018-0107Ranji, S. R., & Thomas, E. J. (2022). Research to improve diagnosis: time to study the real world. BMJ Quality & Safety. 13. 2044-5415. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014071Senbekov, M., Saliev, T., Bukeyeva, Z., Almabayeva, A., Zhanaliyeva, M., Aitenova, N., … & Fakhradiyev, I. (2020). The recent progress and applications of digital technologies in healthcare: a review. International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2020. 1687-6415. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8830200Shi, L., & Singh, D. A. (2022). Essentials of the US health care system. Jones & Bartlett Learning.World Health Organization. (2021). Global patient safety action plan 2021-2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. World Health Organization.SamplePaperTemplate_APAFormat_7thed5.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new windowSamplePaperTemplate_APAFormat_7thed5.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new windowPart3DueQualityBenchmarkProjectProposal.docxAssignment: Part 3 Due, Quality Benchmark Project ProposalContinue to work on the quality benchmark proposal you started in weeks 1 & 2.  When you have completed Part 3 of your assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place and submit a copy to this drop box.Part 3: Part 3 requires minimum of 2 additional pages. Use instructor feedback from Week 5 and improve Part 2, then add 2 more body content pages for a total of 6 pages in Week 9. You WILL have a conclusion for Part 3. All format must be in 7th edition APA.Use the instructor feedback given you in parts 1 & 2 to improve your writingpriorto adding part 3 for the final submission, especially if you have been given APA feedback. Your instructor will be comparing the feedback given in Week 5 to what you submit in Week 9. If your instructor does not see the requested improvements made, you will get a ‘0’ on this assignment. There is an logical expectation to see growth in your writing from week to week.For the continued body of your paper, address the following objectives and separate using distinct paragraph headers:· Explain quality management issues you anticipate within the framework of public policy or regulatory procedures· 3 or more potential barriers you may encounter when addressing your quality issue· Identify positive or negative effects your quality issue has on nursing practiceFor the conclusion:· Sum up the paper without introducing new information in one complete paragraph.· Draw conclusions based on your research and integrate professional opinion.*Important: Use theSample Paperas a template to format your assignment to prevent unnecessary point deduction.MisdiagnosisinHealthcareProject-11.docx1Misdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient Care (Part 1)NameCollege of NursingPolicy, Finance, and Quality in Nursing and HealthcareProfessorDateMisdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient CareMisdiagnosis is one of the prominent problems that has characterized health care over time and, therefore, determining very many elements of the treatment process in a patient’s life. The purpose of this paper is to review peculiar features of misdiagnosis, consequences it delivers and preventive measures practiced in order to avoid such complications. This quality issue in a health care setting can be resolved using the Quality Benchmark Project to improve patient care levels and ensuring low occurrence of diagnostic error. People who read this paper should be informed on what misdiagnosis is and the different effects it has had towards patients’ health as well as solutions that have been adopted over time to solve its problem. One of the most enduring questions in the medical community is this, therefore this research considered crucially important to doctors, legislators and patients.Description of the Quality IssueThe quality problem of misdiagnosis is rather widespread in the field of human’s health care, which may entail unnecessary treatment, slow rehabilitation procedures as well as non-rectifiable harm to health or even lethal outcome. But misdiagnosis is not the result of clinical error alone; this is also about system-wide problems, which are associated with deficient healthcare infrastructure innovation, a lack of appropriate diagnostic equipment and sufficient instruction to medical workers. Nonetheless, the outcomes of diagnostic mistakes are far from being unambiguous and concern patients’ health state, emotional balance as well as financial stability. The immediate effects and consequences of misdiagnosis include the provision of treatment that may not have been required or desired and ultimately subjecting the patient to unnecessary pain. In the end, however, it leads to long-term health complications besides a poor-quality life and escalated medical expenditure.Quality Issue BackgroundIn recent years, misdiagnoses have been identified as a significant issue in the health care industry. Research shown that diagnostic errors are estimated to impact an astounding number of some 12 million adults in the United States annually in the outpatient setting, indicating how widespread this practice is (Newman-Toker et al., 2023). A number of issues underlie diagnostic accuracy in practice, and they include a patient’s complex medical condition, atypical presentations associated with chronic conditions and misunderstandings between the patient-physician interactions. In addition, the fast pace of medical knowledge and technology development that is to benefit in various dimensions also brings challenges regarding updating health care professionals with the current diagnostic criterion and treatment plans.Previous Attempts to Address the Quality IssueThe issue of misdiagnosis is tackled in several ways, such as enhancing diagnostic precision through better communication and training healthcare workers to work on the same. An important strategy that has been used during the reduction of such errors is a tactic with the use of Artificial intelligence and machine learning systems for diagnoses due to its complex decision-making mechanisms (Jimma, 2023). The second is the change in the focus of treatment to patient-centered care because proper communication and participating in diagnostic activities are defined. This does not only the creation of a complete clinical picture, but also to ensure that patient concerns and symptoms are properly intervened (Gusmano et al., 2019).Training of health care professionals has also been reformatted to focus on accuracy in diagnosis and prevention of cognitive biases that result to wrong prognosis. A lot of these programs depend on the use of case studies, simulation-like assignments and online short courses to ensure that healthcare providers do not lose touch with recent methodologies and most efficient treatments methods (Meyer & Singh, 2019).In addition, policy based interventions have been suggested to create an enabling environment for correct diagnosis. This starts with encouraging a culture where diagnostic errors and their consequences may be openly discussed without any bias. There is also an effort to apply better recording systems and data analysis that can be utilized to monitor diagnostic error prevalence, as well as use those elements of the study in terms of what leads them and how they can be mitigated (Al Khafaji et al., 2023).ReferencesAl-Khafaji, J., Lee, M., & Mossburg, S. (2023).Improving diagnostic safety andquality.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/improving-diagnostic-safety-and-qualityGusmano, M. K., Maschke, K. J., & Solomon, M. Z. (2019). Patient-centered care, yes; patients as consumers, no.Health affairs,38(3), 368-373.Jimma, B. L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: A bibliometric analysis.Telematics and Informatics Reports, 100041.Meyer, A. N., & Singh, H. (2019). The path to diagnostic excellence includes feedback to calibrate how clinicians think.Jama,321(8), 737-738.Newman-Toker, D. E., Nassery, N., Schaffer, A. C., Yu-Moe, C. W., Clemens, G. D., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Saber Tehrani, A. S., Fanai, M., Hassoon, A., & Siegal, D. (2023). Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2021-014130. Advance online publication.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014130MisdiagnosisinHealthcareProject-Part21.docx8Misdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient Care (Part2)NameCollege of NursingPolicy, Finance, and Quality in Nursing and HealthcareProfessordateMisdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient CareMisdiagnosis is one of the prominent problems that has characterized health care over time and, therefore, determining very many elements of the treatment process in a patient’s life. The purpose of this paper is to review peculiar features of misdiagnosis, consequences it delivers and preventive measures practiced in order to avoid such complications. This quality issue in a health care setting can be resolved using the Quality Benchmark Project to improve patient care levels and ensuring low occurrence of diagnostic error. People who read this paper should be informed on what misdiagnosis is and the different effects it has had towards patients’ health as well as solutions that have been adopted over time to solve its problem. One of the most enduring questions in the medical community is this, therefore this research considered crucially important to doctors, legislators and patients.Description of the Quality IssueThe quality problem of misdiagnosis is rather widespread in the field of human’s health care, which may entail unnecessary treatment, slow rehabilitation procedures as well as non-rectifiable harm to health or even lethal outcome. But misdiagnosis is not the result of clinical error alone; this is also about system-wide problems, which are associated with deficient healthcare infrastructure innovation, a lack of appropriate diagnostic equipment and sufficient instruction to medical workers. Nonetheless, the outcomes of diagnostic mistakes are far from being unambiguous and concern patients’ health state, emotional balance as well as financial stability. The immediate effects and consequences of misdiagnosis include the provision of treatment that may not have been required or desired and ultimately subjecting the patient to unnecessary pain. In the end, however, it leads to long-term health complications besides a poor-quality life and escalated medical expenditure.Quality Issue BackgroundIn recent years, misdiagnoses have been identified as a significant issue in the health care industry. Research shown that diagnostic errors are estimated to impact an astounding number of some 12 million adults in the United States annually in the outpatient setting, indicating how widespread this practice is (Newman-Toker et al., 2023). A number of issues underlie diagnostic accuracy in practice, and they include a patient’s complex medical condition, atypical presentations associated with chronic conditions and misunderstandings between the patient-physician interactions. In addition, the fast pace of medical knowledge and technology development that is to benefit in various dimensions also brings challenges regarding updating health care professionals with the current diagnostic criterion and treatment plans.Previous Attempts to Address the Quality IssueThe issue of misdiagnosis is tackled in several ways, such as enhancing diagnostic precision through better communication and training healthcare workers to work on the same. An important strategy that has been used during the reduction of such errors is a tactic with the use of Artificial intelligence and machine learning systems for diagnoses due to its complex decision-making mechanisms (Jimma, 2023). The second is the change in the focus of treatment to patient-centered care because proper communication and participating in diagnostic activities are defined. This does not only the creation of a complete clinical picture, but also to ensure that patient concerns and symptoms are properly intervened (Gusmano et al., 2019).Training of health care professionals has also been reformatted to focus on accuracy in diagnosis and prevention of cognitive biases that result to wrong prognosis. A lot of these programs depend on the use of case studies, simulation-like assignments and online short courses to ensure that healthcare providers do not lose touch with recent methodologies and most efficient treatments methods (Meyer & Singh, 2019).In addition, policy based interventions have been suggested to create an enabling environment for correct diagnosis. This starts with encouraging a culture where diagnostic errors and their consequences may be openly discussed without any bias. There is also an effort to apply better recording systems and data analysis that can be utilized to monitor diagnostic error prevalence, as well as use those elements of the study in terms of what leads them and how they can be mitigated (Al Khafaji et al., 2023).Jurisdiction Over Quality IssuesMisdiagnosis as a quality issue in healthcare is regulated on different levels such as governmental health agencies, healthcare institutions, and professional boards. First, regulatory agencies including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its divisions, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), possess considerable power to implement policies and standards aimed at reducing diagnostic mistakes (Shi et al., 2022). These groups can drive health policy by instituting national policies, conducting quality research about healthcare, and requiring reporting and performance standards for healthcare providers.At the organizational level, hospitals and healthcare systems are fully in a position to take control of changes that can reduce misdiagnoses. These should include embracing new technologies, better delivery processes, and ensuring tough rules are in place regarding the conduct of diagnostic tests. Professional bodies and associations, including the AMA and specialty respective organizations, also contribute significantly to clinical guideline development, education, and policy change aimed at reducing misdiagnosis (Shi et al., 2022).Stakeholders and Decision-MakersIn the case of misdiagnosis, relevant stakeholders are patients, healthcare providers (doctors, nurses, diagnostic specialists), healthcare institutions, insurance companies, policymakers and technology developers. Different groups of stakeholders influence, and are influenced by, the quality of diagnostic practices in unique ways.Patients themselves, representing the affected group, are interested in correct diagnoses because this issue influences them as its users through patient advocacy and feedback. Healthcare providers, who are the first to diagnose a patient and provide treatment, influence the issue by their clinical practice and professional progress. As to the management of diagnoses, an indirect organization environment is created by healthcare institutions through the allocation of resources and the establishment of internal policies. With their reimbursement policies, insurance companies can motivate practices to be instituted that will reduce the rate of such diagnostic errors.The legal and regulatory framework that governs the rules concerning the diagnostics standards and patient safety are determined by policymakers, which can include government officials as well as regulatory agencies. By designing and perfecting diagnostic instruments and health information technologies, technology developers offer essential inputs that could improve diagnostic accuracy.Powerbases and Resources Needed for ChangeTo help foster change and improvement, in dealing with misdiagnosis, a multifaceted approach involving different powerbases and resources needs to be utilized. The biggest resource is financial as the implementation of innovative diagnostic technologies, regular professional training and effective health information systems have a great capacity to reduce errors. Legislative and policy-making power is critical in establishing a healthcare setting that focuses on patient safety and quality care, policies and laws that promote reporting diagnostic error as well as transparency as would be the case if this study were implemented (World Health Organization, 2021).Knowledge and information are critical tools in the fight against misdiagnosis. Increased attention and awareness in the health professionals and even patients to errors in diagnosis may bring transformation. This includes publishing research findings, sharing good practices, and creating an environment of openness and learning from misjudgment (Ranji et al., 2022).Moreover, technological tools as artificial intelligence and machine learning, electronic health records and decision support systems assess will be necessary to ensure correctness of the diagnosis (Senbekov et al., 2020). Such tools allow therefore medical practitioners to process great volumes of medical information, recognize the emerging patterns and give better conclusions on diagnosis.Lastly, there are multiple human resources that one can think about in this connection including leadership and an empowered workforce, whose presence serves as sources to lead to enhanced quality. Safety and quality improvement initiatives must be continually promoted in all ranks of leadership. Effective changes come with a highly skilled workforce implementing the latest diagnostic techniques and technologies and practicing patient-focused care (Olson et al., 2019).ReferencesAl-Khafaji, J., Lee, M., & Mossburg, S. (2023).Improving diagnostic safety andquality.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/improving-diagnostic-safety-and-qualityGusmano, M. K., Maschke, K. J., & Solomon, M. Z. (2019). Patient-centered care, yes; patients as consumers, no.Health affairs,38(3), 368-373.Jimma, B. L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: A bibliometric analysis.Telematics and Informatics Reports, 100041.Meyer, A. N., & Singh, H. (2019). The path to diagnostic excellence includes feedback to calibrate how clinicians think.Jama,321(8), 737-738.Newman-Toker, D. E., Nassery, N., Schaffer, A. C., Yu-Moe, C. W., Clemens, G. D., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Saber Tehrani, A. S., Fanai, M., Hassoon, A., & Siegal, D. (2023). Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ Quality & Safety2023; 3382-85. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016496Olson, A., Rencic, J., Cosby, K., Rusz, D., Papa, F., Croskerry, P., … & Graber, M. L. (2019). Competencies for improving diagnosis: an interprofessional framework for education and training in health care. Diagnosis, vol. 6, no. 4, 2019, pp. 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2018-0107Ranji, S. R., & Thomas, E. J. (2022). Research to improve diagnosis: time to study the real world. BMJ Quality & Safety. 13. 2044-5415. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014071Senbekov, M., Saliev, T., Bukeyeva, Z., Almabayeva, A., Zhanaliyeva, M., Aitenova, N., … & Fakhradiyev, I. (2020). The recent progress and applications of digital technologies in healthcare: a review. International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2020. 1687-6415. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8830200Shi, L., & Singh, D. A. (2022). Essentials of the US health care system. Jones & Bartlett Learning.World Health Organization. (2021). Global patient safety action plan 2021-2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. World Health Organization.SamplePaperTemplate_APAFormat_7thed5.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new windowPart3DueQualityBenchmarkProjectProposal.docxAssignment: Part 3 Due, Quality Benchmark Project ProposalContinue to work on the quality benchmark proposal you started in weeks 1 & 2.  When you have completed Part 3 of your assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place and submit a copy to this drop box.Part 3: Part 3 requires minimum of 2 additional pages. Use instructor feedback from Week 5 and improve Part 2, then add 2 more body content pages for a total of 6 pages in Week 9. You WILL have a conclusion for Part 3. All format must be in 7th edition APA.Use the instructor feedback given you in parts 1 & 2 to improve your writingpriorto adding part 3 for the final submission, especially if you have been given APA feedback. Your instructor will be comparing the feedback given in Week 5 to what you submit in Week 9. If your instructor does not see the requested improvements made, you will get a ‘0’ on this assignment. There is an logical expectation to see growth in your writing from week to week.For the continued body of your paper, address the following objectives and separate using distinct paragraph headers:· Explain quality management issues you anticipate within the framework of public policy or regulatory procedures· 3 or more potential barriers you may encounter when addressing your quality issue· Identify positive or negative effects your quality issue has on nursing practiceFor the conclusion:· Sum up the paper without introducing new information in one complete paragraph.· Draw conclusions based on your research and integrate professional opinion.*Important: Use theSample Paperas a template to format your assignment to prevent unnecessary point deduction.MisdiagnosisinHealthcareProject-11.docx1Misdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient Care (Part 1)NameCollege of NursingPolicy, Finance, and Quality in Nursing and HealthcareProfessorDateMisdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient CareMisdiagnosis is one of the prominent problems that has characterized health care over time and, therefore, determining very many elements of the treatment process in a patient’s life. The purpose of this paper is to review peculiar features of misdiagnosis, consequences it delivers and preventive measures practiced in order to avoid such complications. This quality issue in a health care setting can be resolved using the Quality Benchmark Project to improve patient care levels and ensuring low occurrence of diagnostic error. People who read this paper should be informed on what misdiagnosis is and the different effects it has had towards patients’ health as well as solutions that have been adopted over time to solve its problem. One of the most enduring questions in the medical community is this, therefore this research considered crucially important to doctors, legislators and patients.Description of the Quality IssueThe quality problem of misdiagnosis is rather widespread in the field of human’s health care, which may entail unnecessary treatment, slow rehabilitation procedures as well as non-rectifiable harm to health or even lethal outcome. But misdiagnosis is not the result of clinical error alone; this is also about system-wide problems, which are associated with deficient healthcare infrastructure innovation, a lack of appropriate diagnostic equipment and sufficient instruction to medical workers. Nonetheless, the outcomes of diagnostic mistakes are far from being unambiguous and concern patients’ health state, emotional balance as well as financial stability. The immediate effects and consequences of misdiagnosis include the provision of treatment that may not have been required or desired and ultimately subjecting the patient to unnecessary pain. In the end, however, it leads to long-term health complications besides a poor-quality life and escalated medical expenditure.Quality Issue BackgroundIn recent years, misdiagnoses have been identified as a significant issue in the health care industry. Research shown that diagnostic errors are estimated to impact an astounding number of some 12 million adults in the United States annually in the outpatient setting, indicating how widespread this practice is (Newman-Toker et al., 2023). A number of issues underlie diagnostic accuracy in practice, and they include a patient’s complex medical condition, atypical presentations associated with chronic conditions and misunderstandings between the patient-physician interactions. In addition, the fast pace of medical knowledge and technology development that is to benefit in various dimensions also brings challenges regarding updating health care professionals with the current diagnostic criterion and treatment plans.Previous Attempts to Address the Quality IssueThe issue of misdiagnosis is tackled in several ways, such as enhancing diagnostic precision through better communication and training healthcare workers to work on the same. An important strategy that has been used during the reduction of such errors is a tactic with the use of Artificial intelligence and machine learning systems for diagnoses due to its complex decision-making mechanisms (Jimma, 2023). The second is the change in the focus of treatment to patient-centered care because proper communication and participating in diagnostic activities are defined. This does not only the creation of a complete clinical picture, but also to ensure that patient concerns and symptoms are properly intervened (Gusmano et al., 2019).Training of health care professionals has also been reformatted to focus on accuracy in diagnosis and prevention of cognitive biases that result to wrong prognosis. A lot of these programs depend on the use of case studies, simulation-like assignments and online short courses to ensure that healthcare providers do not lose touch with recent methodologies and most efficient treatments methods (Meyer & Singh, 2019).In addition, policy based interventions have been suggested to create an enabling environment for correct diagnosis. This starts with encouraging a culture where diagnostic errors and their consequences may be openly discussed without any bias. There is also an effort to apply better recording systems and data analysis that can be utilized to monitor diagnostic error prevalence, as well as use those elements of the study in terms of what leads them and how they can be mitigated (Al Khafaji et al., 2023).ReferencesAl-Khafaji, J., Lee, M., & Mossburg, S. (2023).Improving diagnostic safety andquality.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/improving-diagnostic-safety-and-qualityGusmano, M. K., Maschke, K. J., & Solomon, M. Z. (2019). Patient-centered care, yes; patients as consumers, no.Health affairs,38(3), 368-373.Jimma, B. L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: A bibliometric analysis.Telematics and Informatics Reports, 100041.Meyer, A. N., & Singh, H. (2019). The path to diagnostic excellence includes feedback to calibrate how clinicians think.Jama,321(8), 737-738.Newman-Toker, D. E., Nassery, N., Schaffer, A. C., Yu-Moe, C. W., Clemens, G. D., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Saber Tehrani, A. S., Fanai, M., Hassoon, A., & Siegal, D. (2023). Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ quality & safety, bmjqs-2021-014130. Advance online publication.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014130MisdiagnosisinHealthcareProject-Part21.docx8Misdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient Care (Part2)NameCollege of NursingPolicy, Finance, and Quality in Nursing and HealthcareProfessordateMisdiagnosis in Healthcare: Implications and Challenges for Patient CareMisdiagnosis is one of the prominent problems that has characterized health care over time and, therefore, determining very many elements of the treatment process in a patient’s life. The purpose of this paper is to review peculiar features of misdiagnosis, consequences it delivers and preventive measures practiced in order to avoid such complications. This quality issue in a health care setting can be resolved using the Quality Benchmark Project to improve patient care levels and ensuring low occurrence of diagnostic error. People who read this paper should be informed on what misdiagnosis is and the different effects it has had towards patients’ health as well as solutions that have been adopted over time to solve its problem. One of the most enduring questions in the medical community is this, therefore this research considered crucially important to doctors, legislators and patients.Description of the Quality IssueThe quality problem of misdiagnosis is rather widespread in the field of human’s health care, which may entail unnecessary treatment, slow rehabilitation procedures as well as non-rectifiable harm to health or even lethal outcome. But misdiagnosis is not the result of clinical error alone; this is also about system-wide problems, which are associated with deficient healthcare infrastructure innovation, a lack of appropriate diagnostic equipment and sufficient instruction to medical workers. Nonetheless, the outcomes of diagnostic mistakes are far from being unambiguous and concern patients’ health state, emotional balance as well as financial stability. The immediate effects and consequences of misdiagnosis include the provision of treatment that may not have been required or desired and ultimately subjecting the patient to unnecessary pain. In the end, however, it leads to long-term health complications besides a poor-quality life and escalated medical expenditure.Quality Issue BackgroundIn recent years, misdiagnoses have been identified as a significant issue in the health care industry. Research shown that diagnostic errors are estimated to impact an astounding number of some 12 million adults in the United States annually in the outpatient setting, indicating how widespread this practice is (Newman-Toker et al., 2023). A number of issues underlie diagnostic accuracy in practice, and they include a patient’s complex medical condition, atypical presentations associated with chronic conditions and misunderstandings between the patient-physician interactions. In addition, the fast pace of medical knowledge and technology development that is to benefit in various dimensions also brings challenges regarding updating health care professionals with the current diagnostic criterion and treatment plans.Previous Attempts to Address the Quality IssueThe issue of misdiagnosis is tackled in several ways, such as enhancing diagnostic precision through better communication and training healthcare workers to work on the same. An important strategy that has been used during the reduction of such errors is a tactic with the use of Artificial intelligence and machine learning systems for diagnoses due to its complex decision-making mechanisms (Jimma, 2023). The second is the change in the focus of treatment to patient-centered care because proper communication and participating in diagnostic activities are defined. This does not only the creation of a complete clinical picture, but also to ensure that patient concerns and symptoms are properly intervened (Gusmano et al., 2019).Training of health care professionals has also been reformatted to focus on accuracy in diagnosis and prevention of cognitive biases that result to wrong prognosis. A lot of these programs depend on the use of case studies, simulation-like assignments and online short courses to ensure that healthcare providers do not lose touch with recent methodologies and most efficient treatments methods (Meyer & Singh, 2019).In addition, policy based interventions have been suggested to create an enabling environment for correct diagnosis. This starts with encouraging a culture where diagnostic errors and their consequences may be openly discussed without any bias. There is also an effort to apply better recording systems and data analysis that can be utilized to monitor diagnostic error prevalence, as well as use those elements of the study in terms of what leads them and how they can be mitigated (Al Khafaji et al., 2023).Jurisdiction Over Quality IssuesMisdiagnosis as a quality issue in healthcare is regulated on different levels such as governmental health agencies, healthcare institutions, and professional boards. First, regulatory agencies including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its divisions, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), possess considerable power to implement policies and standards aimed at reducing diagnostic mistakes (Shi et al., 2022). These groups can drive health policy by instituting national policies, conducting quality research about healthcare, and requiring reporting and performance standards for healthcare providers.At the organizational level, hospitals and healthcare systems are fully in a position to take control of changes that can reduce misdiagnoses. These should include embracing new technologies, better delivery processes, and ensuring tough rules are in place regarding the conduct of diagnostic tests. Professional bodies and associations, including the AMA and specialty respective organizations, also contribute significantly to clinical guideline development, education, and policy change aimed at reducing misdiagnosis (Shi et al., 2022).Stakeholders and Decision-MakersIn the case of misdiagnosis, relevant stakeholders are patients, healthcare providers (doctors, nurses, diagnostic specialists), healthcare institutions, insurance companies, policymakers and technology developers. Different groups of stakeholders influence, and are influenced by, the quality of diagnostic practices in unique ways.Patients themselves, representing the affected group, are interested in correct diagnoses because this issue influences them as its users through patient advocacy and feedback. Healthcare providers, who are the first to diagnose a patient and provide treatment, influence the issue by their clinical practice and professional progress. As to the management of diagnoses, an indirect organization environment is created by healthcare institutions through the allocation of resources and the establishment of internal policies. With their reimbursement policies, insurance companies can motivate practices to be instituted that will reduce the rate of such diagnostic errors.The legal and regulatory framework that governs the rules concerning the diagnostics standards and patient safety are determined by policymakers, which can include government officials as well as regulatory agencies. By designing and perfecting diagnostic instruments and health information technologies, technology developers offer essential inputs that could improve diagnostic accuracy.Powerbases and Resources Needed for ChangeTo help foster change and improvement, in dealing with misdiagnosis, a multifaceted approach involving different powerbases and resources needs to be utilized. The biggest resource is financial as the implementation of innovative diagnostic technologies, regular professional training and effective health information systems have a great capacity to reduce errors. Legislative and policy-making power is critical in establishing a healthcare setting that focuses on patient safety and quality care, policies and laws that promote reporting diagnostic error as well as transparency as would be the case if this study were implemented (World Health Organization, 2021).Knowledge and information are critical tools in the fight against misdiagnosis. Increased attention and awareness in the health professionals and even patients to errors in diagnosis may bring transformation. This includes publishing research findings, sharing good practices, and creating an environment of openness and learning from misjudgment (Ranji et al., 2022).Moreover, technological tools as artificial intelligence and machine learning, electronic health records and decision support systems assess will be necessary to ensure correctness of the diagnosis (Senbekov et al., 2020). Such tools allow therefore medical practitioners to process great volumes of medical information, recognize the emerging patterns and give better conclusions on diagnosis.Lastly, there are multiple human resources that one can think about in this connection including leadership and an empowered workforce, whose presence serves as sources to lead to enhanced quality. Safety and quality improvement initiatives must be continually promoted in all ranks of leadership. Effective changes come with a highly skilled workforce implementing the latest diagnostic techniques and technologies and practicing patient-focused care (Olson et al., 2019).ReferencesAl-Khafaji, J., Lee, M., & Mossburg, S. (2023).Improving diagnostic safety andquality.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/improving-diagnostic-safety-and-qualityGusmano, M. K., Maschke, K. J., & Solomon, M. Z. (2019). Patient-centered care, yes; patients as consumers, no.Health affairs,38(3), 368-373.Jimma, B. L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: A bibliometric analysis.Telematics and Informatics Reports, 100041.Meyer, A. N., & Singh, H. (2019). The path to diagnostic excellence includes feedback to calibrate how clinicians think.Jama,321(8), 737-738.Newman-Toker, D. E., Nassery, N., Schaffer, A. C., Yu-Moe, C. W., Clemens, G. D., Wang, Z., Zhu, Y., Saber Tehrani, A. S., Fanai, M., Hassoon, A., & Siegal, D. (2023). Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ Quality & Safety2023; 3382-85. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016496Olson, A., Rencic, J., Cosby, K., Rusz, D., Papa, F., Croskerry, P., … & Graber, M. L. (2019). Competencies for improving diagnosis: an interprofessional framework for education and training in health care. Diagnosis, vol. 6, no. 4, 2019, pp. 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2018-0107Ranji, S. R., & Thomas, E. J. (2022). Research to improve diagnosis: time to study the real world. BMJ Quality & Safety. 13. 2044-5415. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014071Senbekov, M., Saliev, T., Bukeyeva, Z., Almabayeva, A., Zhanaliyeva, M., Aitenova, N., … & Fakhradiyev, I. (2020). The recent progress and applications of digital technologies in healthcare: a review. International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2020. 1687-6415. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8830200Shi, L., & Singh, D. A. (2022). Essentials of the US health care system. Jones & Bartlett Learning.World Health Organization. (2021). Global patient safety action plan 2021-2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care. World Health Organization.SamplePaperTemplate_APAFormat_7thed5.docxThis file is too large to display.View in new window1234Bids(65)MathProgrammingPROF_ALISTERSheryl HoganProf Double RProf. TOPGRADEDr. Sarah BlakeEmily ClareDoctor.NamiraFiona Davasherry proffMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverJudithTutorDiscount AssigngrA+de plusJahky BProWritingGuruColeen AndersonIsabella HarvardBrilliant GeekShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Wendy OnlyFOR PROF TUTOR ONLY!!!! Do not message me if you are not him!!!UNIT VIII ASSESSMENT FOR KATETUTOR ONLYphysicsQFIN 467 -Individual Week 2Math Expert Only –Need in 5 hours- No copied work!!!Stop Cell Phone Robocalls ScholarshipNEED ESSAY DONE BY 3-14 (1500 WORDS)Week 10 Discussion COLLAPSE Overall Rating: 12345Your Rating: 12345 “Hypothesis Test” Please respond to the following: Note: Online students, please select one of the two subjects to discuss. Use the Internet or Strayer Library to research articles onThe case study: “Groupon Inc.: Daily Deal or Lasting 2

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now

Home>Homework Answsers>Nursing homework helppdfa year ago05.03.20244Report issuefiles (1)Casestudycc.docxCasestudycc.docxPurposeTo treat clients with STIs with a nonjudgmental attitude within the scope of practice of the LPN while functioning on a team of professionals.CompetencyIdentify nursing interventions for clients with disorders of the reproductive system.InstructionsRead the case studies below and answer the questions. Make sure you cite any sources using APA format.Scenario # 1You are working in a community health clinic on a team that has an LPN, RN, and nurse practitioner. Your first client of the day is a tearful young woman who states that she has had a painful rash to her genital area for the past couple of days. She came to the clinic today because the rash is getting progressively worse. Her vital signs are: 100.5 (PO), 114, 28, 145/88 Pain: 9 on a 1-10 scale. The client shares with you that her boyfriend has herpes. They never have sex when he is having a flare-up, so she is not sure how she could have gotten it from him.Question # 1: What should be the first priority for this client? Explain your answer. (5-10 sentences)Question # 2: The RN provides teaching to the client, but the client has some follow-up questions. As the LPN you reinforce the teaching about how herpes is spread. What factual information should the nurse provide about the spread of this diseasebetween flare-ups?(2-3 sentences)Scenario # 2You are working in a primary care office with a physician’s assistant (PA) and RN. A client comes in for a follow-up visit. He states that he was called to come in because of an “abnormal lab report.” You print the labs for the PA, and you see that the client had a sore on his penis that was scraped and sent to the lab. The scrapings are positive for syphilis. You also see in the notes that the client had to be called repeatedly to come to the office. At first, he was unwilling to return because he stated he “feels fine.”Question # 3: The client is confused about why he needs to name his sexual partners. What factual information can the nurse give to explain the need for all of his sexual partners to be treated as soon as possible? (5-10 sentences)Question # 4: The PA orders a single dose of Benzathine Penicillin G 2.4 million units IM. The client questions why he just cannot take some pills. What explanation will you provide to the client? (5-10 sentences)Scenario # 3You are working in a primary care office with a physician. You are instructed to collect data on a client, including vital signs and chief complaint. The client states that she is a sex worker and has had chills, fevers, and sore throats on and off for several weeks. The physician orders a rapid HIV test.Question # 5: What in your data collection indicates that the client is at high risk for HIV? (2-3 sentences)Format· Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.)· Logical, original, and insightful· Professional organization, style, and mechanics in APA format· Submit document throughGrammarlyto correct errors before submission.ResourcesAPA Online GuideCasestudycc.docxPurposeTo treat clients with STIs with a nonjudgmental attitude within the scope of practice of the LPN while functioning on a team of professionals.CompetencyIdentify nursing interventions for clients with disorders of the reproductive system.InstructionsRead the case studies below and answer the questions. Make sure you cite any sources using APA format.Scenario # 1You are working in a community health clinic on a team that has an LPN, RN, and nurse practitioner. Your first client of the day is a tearful young woman who states that she has had a painful rash to her genital area for the past couple of days. She came to the clinic today because the rash is getting progressively worse. Her vital signs are: 100.5 (PO), 114, 28, 145/88 Pain: 9 on a 1-10 scale. The client shares with you that her boyfriend has herpes. They never have sex when he is having a flare-up, so she is not sure how she could have gotten it from him.Question # 1: What should be the first priority for this client? Explain your answer. (5-10 sentences)Question # 2: The RN provides teaching to the client, but the client has some follow-up questions. As the LPN you reinforce the teaching about how herpes is spread. What factual information should the nurse provide about the spread of this diseasebetween flare-ups?(2-3 sentences)Scenario # 2You are working in a primary care office with a physician’s assistant (PA) and RN. A client comes in for a follow-up visit. He states that he was called to come in because of an “abnormal lab report.” You print the labs for the PA, and you see that the client had a sore on his penis that was scraped and sent to the lab. The scrapings are positive for syphilis. You also see in the notes that the client had to be called repeatedly to come to the office. At first, he was unwilling to return because he stated he “feels fine.”Question # 3: The client is confused about why he needs to name his sexual partners. What factual information can the nurse give to explain the need for all of his sexual partners to be treated as soon as possible? (5-10 sentences)Question # 4: The PA orders a single dose of Benzathine Penicillin G 2.4 million units IM. The client questions why he just cannot take some pills. What explanation will you provide to the client? (5-10 sentences)Scenario # 3You are working in a primary care office with a physician. You are instructed to collect data on a client, including vital signs and chief complaint. The client states that she is a sex worker and has had chills, fevers, and sore throats on and off for several weeks. The physician orders a rapid HIV test.Question # 5: What in your data collection indicates that the client is at high risk for HIV? (2-3 sentences)Format· Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.)· Logical, original, and insightful· Professional organization, style, and mechanics in APA format· Submit document throughGrammarlyto correct errors before submission.ResourcesAPA Online GuideBids(42)Jahky BPROF_ALISTERMUSYOKIONES A+Dr CloverDiscount AssigngrA+de plusTeacher A+ WorkSheryl HoganFiona DavaAshley EllieProf Double Rpacesetters2121TopanswersColeen AndersonJudithTutorAmanda SmithQuality AssignmentsDr. BeneveMichelle MalkLarry KellyShow All Bidsother Questions(10)Discussion and research paperHelpweek 4 discussionDiscussionsThe Experience Machine10 hours deadline- 600 wordsDatabase – DiscussionsDiagnostics workup case study pptxdifferent sources mined for descriptive analytics data and their respective benefits.Manhood in America

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 3-4 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now