The Assignment:

Examine Case 2: You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this client. Be sure to consider co-morbid physical as well as mental factors that might impact the client’s diagnosis and treatment.

At each Decision Point, stop to complete the following:

• Decision #1: Differential Diagnosis
  • Which Decision did you select?
  • Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
  • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different?
• Decision #2: Treatment Plan for Psychotherapy
  • Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
  • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different?
• Decision #3: Treatment Plan for Psychopharmacology
  • Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
  • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?
• Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients and their families.

Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement.

Rubric:

Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate-level critical and analytic thinking.–

Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.–

Excellent 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Good 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Fair 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Poor 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e., video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.–

Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e., video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.–

Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 

· Define the Quadruple Aim and explain its application to evidence-based practice.

· Your analysis should address how evidence-based practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim,including each of the four measures of:  (   The response accurately and clearly defines the Quadruple Aim in detail.The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how the   Quadruple Aim applies to evidence-based practice. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how evidence-based practice might or might not help reach the Quadruple Aim as it pertains to patient experience.
 1) Patient experience (2–3 paragraphs  (The response includes clear, accurate, and specific examples of how evidence-based practice impacts patient experience. The response synthesizes and integrates at least two outside resources and two competency-specific resources that fully support the responses provided )

2) Population health (2–3 paragraphs) ( The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how evidence-based practice might or might not help reach the Quadruple Aim as it pertains to population health.The response includes clear, accurate, and specific examples of how evidence-based practice impacts population health.The response synthesizes and integrates at least two outside resources and two competency-specific resources that fully support the responses provided. )

3) Costs (2–3 paragraphs)  The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how evidence-based practice might or might not help reach the  Quadruple Aim as it pertains to costs in healthcare. The response includes clear, accurate, and specific examples of how evidence-based practice impacts costs in healthcare.The response synthesizes and integrates at least two outside resources and two competency-specific resources that fully support the responses provided. )

4) Work-life of healthcare providers (2–3 paragraphs)  ( The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how evidence-based practice might or might not help reach the Quadruple Aim as it pertains to work-life of healthcare providers.The response includes clear, accurate, and specific examples of how evidence-based practice impacts work-life of healthcare providers. The response synthesizes and integrates at least two outside resources and two competency-specific resources that fully support the responses provided. )

 Local Practice Problem Exploration

Reflect upon the selected national practice problem in Week 1 to address the following.

·  From a local perspective, how does the practice problem impact nurses, nursing care, healthcare organizations, and the quality of care being provided?

·  Identify the local key stakeholders related to the selected practice problem.

·  Describe one approach used at your unique setting to address this problem. From your perspective, is this intervention effective in addressing the problem? Why or why not? If this practice problem is not addressed at your workplace, propose an intervention that could be implemented on a local scale to address the problem.

APA FORMATE 

I NEED A COMMENT FOR THIS POST WITH AT LEAST TWO PAGE ( 4-6  PARAGRAPH AND  SOURCES NO LATER THAN FIVE YEARS

HA4050D – Healthcare Law

Discussion 02.1: NAUXChange 02

Find an online news story involving the alleged commission of a crime by a provider in a health care setting. Describe the case to your classmates and provide a link.

HA4050D – Healthcare Law

Discussion 02.2: Intentional Torts

  Read the Discussion 02.2 Scenario. Refer to this scenario as you answer the questions below.

1.What INTENTIONAL tort theories (NOT NEGLIGENCE) might apply here? What facts fit the elements of those tort theories?

2.Consider the extent of the hospital’s monetary liability. If you were on the jury in this case, how would you calculate an amount of damages? Did taking the photographs cause any economic damages (cost the plaintiffs money)? Probably not. Did they cause pain and suffering? How do you think a jury might arrive at a dollar figure to award in a case like this?

  DISCUSSION 02.2: INTENTIONAL TORTS

SCENARIO (BASED ON A REAL MAINE CASE)

You are an administrator in a medium-sized hospital. One of the physicians, Dr. McKee, comes to you

to tell you about something disturbing she has just witnessed.

A hospitalized patient suffering from cancer of the larynx was under the care of another physician, Dr.

Smallwood. The patient’s condition was somewhat unusual and of interest to several of the oncologists

who had examined it. The patient had initially permitted Dr. Smallwood to take several photographs that were to be used for the medical record, but he was adamant that they not to be used for

publication.

Later, a few hours before the patient died, Dr. Smallwood and a nurse took more photographs, moving

the patient’s head for the photos, despite the patient’s clear wishes that he did not want any more

photos to be taken. Dr. Smallwood then uploaded the photos to a discussion group to share them with

fellow surgeons.

Soon after the patient died, his wife discovered that additional photos were taken and was outraged.

Dr. McKee just witnessed the patient’s widow have a heated conversation with Dr. Smallwood and then

storm out, threatening to sue the hospital.

You immediately begin drafting an email to inform your supervisor about the situation. You want to

include the following in your memo: