Please answer the following questions regarding cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis, and the perfect health care system.

• Give an original example of a situation in which cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis would give you contrary results. Substantiate your answer.
• Suppose you had the opportunity to organize the perfect healthcare system. Explain how you would organize the financing method, reimbursement method, mode of production, and physician referral procedure.

Must be at least 250 words

Must be supported by at least two references 

Protecting human research participants is of utmost importance. Even though your change project will not be implemented in the field and you will not be engaging with human subjects in this context, it is still critical that all healthcare professionals have a solid foundation in patient rights and protections within the realm of research.

It is essential that all healthcare professionals, whether or not they are currently involved in research studies, remain aware of regulatory policies and updates such as the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, or Common Rule, that will take effect January 2019.

Review the Frequently Asked Questions on Requirements for Education at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) link here:

https://humansubjects.nih.gov/requirement-education

If you would like to review more information, you can go to the following link to view 12 recorded webinars related to Human Research Protection on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r8cpgWs7j4&list=PL5965CB14C2506914

Assignment Instructions:
This week, reflect on what you learned from the NIH materials about protecting the rights of human research participants.

Discuss at least three of the following in your paper:

• Describe the circumstances that influenced the need for a policy to protect human research subjects. Give examples of specific ways human research subjects can be harmed by researchers.
• Identify three vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated with human research among these groups. Evaluate the requirements and restrictions. Do you think they are adequate? Why or why not?
• The Belmont Report summarizes the ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. Three core principles are identified: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Even though these principles are considered equal, prioritize them in order of importance to you. Explain your decisions.
• Although you are not implementing a change project at this time, and you may not be directly involved in research as part of your professional responsibilities, explain the reasons why it is important for you to know about these rights and protections.

Your reflective paper should be two to three pages and written in current APA Style.

Submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board. Discuss one strength and one weakness for each of these six articles on why the article may or may not provide sufficient evidence for your practice change. (you can use these articles previously used on the change project)

Barber, R. D., Coulourides Kogan, A., Riffenburgh, A., & Enguidanos, S. (2015). A role for social workers in improving care setting transitions: a case study. Social work in health care, 54(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2015.1005273

Cote, D. J., Dasenbrock, H. H., Muskens, I. S., Broekman, M. L., Zaidi, H. A., Dunn, I. F., … & Laws Jr, E. R. (2017). Readmission and other adverse events after transsphenoidal surgery: prevalence, timing, and predictive factors. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 224(5), 971-979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.02.015

Härkänen, M., Kervinen, M., Ahonen, J., Voutilainen, A., Turunen, H., & Vehviläinen‐Julkunen, K. (2015). Patient‐specific risk factors of adverse drug events in adult inpatients–evidence detected using the G lobal T rigger T ool method. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(3-4), 582-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12714

Jackson, C., Shahsahebi, M., Wedlake, T., & DuBard, C. A. (2015). Timeliness of outpatient follow-up: an evidence-based approach for planning after hospital discharge. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(2), 115-122.https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1753

Kalisch, B. (2015). The Post-Hospitalization Syndrome: Can Nursing Make the Difference?. Nurse Leader, 13(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2014.10.006

Linkens, A.E.M.J.H., Milosevic, V., van der Kuy, P.H.M., Damen-Hendriks, V.H., Gonzalvo, C.M., & Hurkens, K.P.G.M. (2020). Medication-related hospital admissions and readmissions in older patients: an overview of literature. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 42, 1243–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-020-01040-1

Appendix J – Grief

Ticket to class:

• Place in dropbox prior to the start of class
• No single word responses (at least 100+ words in each response)
• Give examples
• Cite resources
• Give the questions some thought and answer honestly
• Number your answers to correspond with the question
• Worth 12 points / 10%

Watch the following videos:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2BJsOQypuw&feature=emb_logohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFvSgEKJktY&feature=emb_logoThese are short video of less than 3 minutes.Questions:

1. How did each of the videos make you feel? Explain.
2. What thoughts came to mind after viewing each video? Explain.
3. What were some interesting facts that reached out to you while watching each video? Give examples.